allow deref patterns to participate in exhaustiveness analysis
Per [this proposal](https://hackmd.io/4qDDMcvyQ-GDB089IPcHGg#Exhaustiveness), this PR allows deref patterns to participate in exhaustiveness analysis. Currently all deref patterns enforce `DerefPure` bounds on their scrutinees, so this assumes all patterns it's analyzing are well-behaved. This also doesn't support [mixed exhaustiveness](https://hackmd.io/4qDDMcvyQ-GDB089IPcHGg#Mixed-exhaustiveness), and instead emits an error if deref patterns are used together with normal constructors. I think mixed exhaustiveness would be nice to have (especially if we eventually want to support arbitrary `Deref` impls[^1]), but it'd require more work to get reasonable diagnostics[^2].
Tracking issue for deref patterns: #87121
r? `@Nadrieril`
[^1]: Regardless of whether we support limited exhaustiveness checking for untrusted `Deref` or always require other arms to be exhaustive, I think it'd be useful to allow mixed matching for user-defined smart pointers. And it'd be strange if it worked there but not for `Cow`.
[^2]: I think listing out witnesses of non-exhaustiveness can be confusing when they're not necessarily disjoint, and when you only need to cover some of them, so we'd probably want special formatting and/or explanatory subdiagnostics. And if it's implemented similarly to unions, we'd probably also want some way of merging witnesses; the way witnesses for unions can appear duplicated is pretty unfortunate. I'm not sure yet how the diagnostics should look, especially for deeply nested patterns.
run-make-support: set rustc dylib path for cargo wrapper
Some run-make tests invoke Cargo via run_make_support::cargo(), but fail to execute correctly when rustc is built without rpath. In these setups, runtime loading of rustc’s shared libraries fails unless the appropriate dynamic library path is set manually.
This commit updates the cargo() wrapper to call set_host_compiler_dylib_path(), aligning its behavior with the existing rustc() wrapper: f76c7367c6/src/tools/run-make-support/src/external_deps/rustc.rs (L39-L43)
This ensures that Cargo invocations during tests inherit the necessary dylib paths, avoiding errors related to missing shared libraries in rpath-less builds.
Fixes part of #140738
add armv5te-unknown-linux-gnueabi target maintainer
My employer is interested in having this target maintained and we already have some tests in our CI running for it.
armv5te-unknown-linux-gnueabi can be ticket off in #113739.
Fix regression from #140393 for espidf / horizon / nuttx / vita
#140393 introduced changes to the layout of the `std::sys::process` code.
As a result, the Tier 3 ESP-IDF (and I suspect Horizon, Nuttx and Vita targets as well) no longer build.
A `pub use unsupported::output` is all that was missing - for the above OSes specifically. This explicit `pub use` is now necessary, because #140393 moved the `output` function to module-level, where it was previously part of `Command` and was thus re-exported automatically, as part of the `imp::Command` re-export further down the file containing the one-liner fix.
Note that - with the change introduced by #140393 - we **can't** anymore just do an unconditional `pub use imp::output` as this function simply does not exist anymore anywhere else but in the `unsupported` module.
r? `@joboet`
[rustdoc] Ensure that temporary doctest folder is correctly removed even if doctests failed
Fixes#139899.
The bug was due to the fact that if any doctest fails for any reason, we call `exit` (or it's called inside `libtest` if not edition 2024), meaning that `TempDir`'s destructor isn't called, and therefore the temporary folder isn't cleaned up.
Took me a while to figure out how to reproduce but finally I was able to reproduce the bug with:
`````rust
#![doc(test(attr(deny(warnings))))]
//! ```
//! let a = 12;
//! ```
`````
And then I ensured that panicking doctests were cleaned up as well:
`````rust
//! ```
//! panic!();
//! ```
`````
And finally I checked if it was fixed for merged doctests too (`--edition 2024`).
To make this work, I needed to add a new public function in `libtest` too which would call a function once all tests have been run.
So only issue is: I have absolutely no idea how we can add a regression test for this fix. If anyone has an idea...
r? `@notriddle`
Don't crash on error codes passed to `--explain` which exceed our internal limit of 9999
removed panic in case where we do `--explain > 9999` and added check for it
now error looks like this instead of ICE
```
$ rustc.exe --explain E10000
error: E10000 is not a valid error code
```
fixes#140647
r? `@fmease`
Parser: Recover error from named params while parse_path
Fixes#140169
I added test to the first commit and the second added the code and changes to test.
r? `@petrochenkov`
The rustc-dev-guide Cronjob Bot
Tshepang Mbambo
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
Stan Manilov
Yuki Okushi
Zalathar
Boxy
bors
Guillaume Gomez