This test expects to be able to drain a Pool using only Get. This isn't
actually possible in the general case, since a pooled value could get
stuck in some P's private slot. However, if GOMAXPROCS=1, there's only 1
P we could be running on, so getting stuck becomes impossible.
This test isn't checking any concurrent properties of Pool, so this is
fine. Just set GOMAXPROCS=1 for this one particular test.
Fixes#73728.
Change-Id: I9053e28118060650f2cd7d0d58f5a86d630b36f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/673375
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
testPool currently does the old-style busy loop to wait until cleanups
have executed. Clean this up by using the linkname'd
blockUntilCleanupQueueEmpty.
For #73642.
Change-Id: Ie0c2614db858a984f25b33a805dc52948069eb52
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/671675
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This change splits the finalizer and cleanup queues and implements a new
lock-free blocking queue for cleanups. The basic design is as follows:
The cleanup queue is organized in fixed-sized blocks. Individual cleanup
functions are queued, but only whole blocks are dequeued.
Enqueuing cleanups places them in P-local cleanup blocks. These are
flushed to the full list as they get full. Cleanups can only be enqueued
by an active sweeper.
Dequeuing cleanups always dequeues entire blocks from the full list.
Cleanup blocks can be dequeued and executed at any time.
The very last active sweeper in the sweep phase is responsible for
flushing all local cleanup blocks to the full list. It can do this
without any synchronization because the next GC can't start yet, so we
can be very certain that nobody else will be accessing the local blocks.
Cleanup blocks are stored off-heap because the need to be allocated by
the sweeper, which is called from heap allocation paths. As a result,
the GC treats cleanup blocks as roots, just like finalizer blocks.
Flushes to the full list signal to the scheduler that cleanup goroutines
should be awoken. Every time the scheduler goes to wake up a cleanup
goroutine and there were more signals than goroutines to wake, it then
forwards this signal to runtime.AddCleanup, so that it creates another
goroutine the next time it is called, up to gomaxprocs goroutines.
The signals here are a little convoluted, but exist because the sweeper
and the scheduler cannot safely create new goroutines.
For #71772.
For #71825.
Change-Id: Ie839fde2b67e1b79ac1426be0ea29a8d923a62cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/650697
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
This reframes the WaitGroup documentation with Go at its center and
Add/Done as more "advanced" features.
Updates #63796
Change-Id: I8101972626fdb00c6f7fb185b685227823d10db1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/662975
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Updated the use of atomic.Uint32 to atomic.Bool for sync package.
Change-Id: Ib8da66fea86ef06e1427ac5118016b96fbcda6b1
GitHub-Last-Rev: d36e0f431f
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#73447
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/666895
Reviewed-by: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jorropo <jorropo.pgm@gmail.com>
This moves the f = nil assignment to the defer statement,
so that in case the functions panics, the f func is not
referenced anymore.
Change-Id: I3e53b90a10f21741e26602270822c8a75679f163
GitHub-Last-Rev: bda01100c6
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#68636
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/601240
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The lifetime of the variables are identical; capture
them in a single struct to avoid individual allocations.
The inner closure can also avoid allocation by using the
capture of the outer closure.
Escape analysis for OnceValues:
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:74:29: moved to heap: sync.f
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:76:3: moved to heap: sync.once
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:77:3: moved to heap: sync.valid
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:78:3: moved to heap: sync.p
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:79:3: moved to heap: sync.r1
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:80:3: moved to heap: sync.r2
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:82:7: func literal escapes to heap
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:83:9: func literal does not escape
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:93:9: func literal escapes to heap
After provided changes:
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:86:2: moved to heap: sync.d
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:96:9: func literal escapes to heap
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go:99:13: func literal does not escape
/go/src/sync/oncefunc.go💯10: func literal does not escape
Change-Id: Ib06e650fd427b57e0bdbdf1fe759fe436104ff79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/601596
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
In test files, using testenv.Executable is more reliable than
os.Executable or os.Args[0].
Change-Id: I88e577efeabc20d02ada27bf706ae4523129128e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651955
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This changes the use of finalizers to the cleanup implementation in
tests.
Updates #70907
Change-Id: I7d7289999a83fa53f538698f34294f7d9651c921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/640735
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Fixes#38859
Change-Id: I9f4f6fa4cb529aaadfb3812e3a5c0da982a95f68
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/633415
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Add an internal (for now) implementation of testing/synctest.
The synctest.Run function executes a tree of goroutines in an
isolated environment using a fake clock. The synctest.Wait function
allows a test to wait for all other goroutines within the test
to reach a blocking point.
For #67434
For #69687
Change-Id: Icb39e54c54cece96517e58ef9cfb18bf68506cfc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/591997
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This change adds a GOEXPERIMENT, synchashtriemap, which replaces the
internals of a sync.Map with internal/sync.HashTrieMap[any, any]. The
main purpose behind this change is improved performance. Across almost
every benchmark, HashTrieMap[any, any] performs better than Map.
Also, relax TestMapClearNoAllocations to allow for one allocation.
Currently, the HashTrieMap allocates a new empty root node and stores
it: that's the whole clear operation. At the cost of some complexity, we
could allow Clear to have zero allocations by clearing the root node.
The complexity comes down to allowing threads to race to install a new
root node *or* creating a top-level mutex for installing a root node.
But I'm not sure this is worth it. Whether Clear or some other operation
takes the hit for allocating a single node almost certainly doesn't
matter. And Clear is still much, much faster in the new implementation
than the old, so I don't consider this a regression.
Change-Id: I939aa70a0edf2e850cedbea239aaf29a11a77b79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/608335
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Also, rename Map benchmarks to make them easier to single out via
regexp.
Change-Id: I4dcb066745aba1c340f56050d08539ae2976274d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/606461
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
This CL refactors sync.Mutex such that its implementation lives in the
new internal/sync package. The purpose of this change is to eventually
reverse the dependency edge between internal/concurrent and sync, such
that sync can depend on internal/concurrent (or really, its contents,
which will likely end up in internal/sync).
The only change made to the sync.Mutex code is the frame skip count for
mutex profiling, so that the internal/sync frames are omitted in the
profile.
Change-Id: Ib3603d30e8e71508c4ea883a584ae2e51ce40c3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/594056
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Following CLs will refactor Mutex and change the internals of Map. This
ends up breaking tests in x/tools for the copylock vet check, because
the error message changes. Let's insulate ourselves from such things
permanently by adding an explicit noCopy field. We'll update the vet
check to accept that as the problem, rather than depend on less explicit
internals.
We capture Once here too to clean up the error message as well.
Change-Id: Iead985fc8ec9ef3ea5ff615f26dde17bb03aeadb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/627777
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
Fixes#16241
I made 64 bits op on 32 bits arches still leak since it was kinda promised.
The promised leaks were wider than this but I don't belive it's effect can
be observed in an breaking maner without using unsafe the way it's currently
setup.
Change-Id: I66d8df47bfe49bce3efa64ac668a2a55f70733a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/462298
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Change-Id: I011f66854a9af5f3baa20abebd4b315c15db571f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/596715
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The methods being implemented are part of the Locker interface,
not the RWMutex struct.
Fixes#68250.
Change-Id: I609c4d5c44e90a12914a8678971ba295519cc265
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/595875
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
A few of the new Or methods of the atomic types use "new" as the name
for the result value, but it actually returns the old value. Fix this
by renaming the result values to "old".
Updates #61395.
Change-Id: Ib08db9964f5dfe91929f216d50ff0c9cc891ee49
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/593855
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
The lack of links to https://go.dev/ref/mem in the sync package
documentation makes it difficult to read for people who have no previous
knowledge of that page. This PR includes the links where needed.
Fixes#67891
Change-Id: I0e1344cc6d7b702f4cb2e55fe0fcee3eb089391a
GitHub-Last-Rev: 427cf58aae
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#67892
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/591395
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Doing this because the slices functions are slightly faster and
slightly easier to use. It also removes one dependency layer.
This CL does not change packages that are used during bootstrap,
as the bootstrap compiler does not have the required slices functions.
It does not change the go/scanner package because the ErrorList
Len, Swap, and Less methods are part of the Go 1 API.
Change-Id: If52899be791c829198e11d2408727720b91ebe8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/587655
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
This CL implements the new sync/atomic AND and OR apis as well as their race
counterparts.
Fixes#61395
Change-Id: I294eefe4b3ac27bc4ed237edcbfa88a8c646d86f
GitHub-Last-Rev: f174297007
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64331
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544455
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
CL 585358 adds restrictions to disallow pull-only linknames
(currently off by default). Currently, there are quite some pull-
only linknames in user code in the wild. In order not to break
those, we add push linknames to allow them to be pulled. This CL
includes linknames found in a large code corpus (thanks Matthew
Dempsky and Michael Pratt for the analysis!), that are not
currently linknamed.
Updates #67401.
Change-Id: I32f5fc0c7a6abbd7a11359a025cfa2bf458fe767
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586137
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The godoc for sync.Map.CompareAndSwap does not document the meaning
of its return value. Document it by giving it a name.
Change-Id: I50ad9c078a7885f5ce83489d66d138d491c35861
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/572657
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
I ran go fmt to fix format on the entire repository.
Change-Id: I2f09166b6b8ba0ffb0ba27f6500efb0ea4cf21ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/566835
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change-Id: I9bc5fd29b0eec8ceadcfee2116de5e7524ef92c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539617
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: I79797be6b385c9927d68350334d7f7387007085f
GitHub-Last-Rev: 3daa3b144f
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#65937
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/566815
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The function passed to OnceFunc/OnceValue/OnceValues may transitively
keep more allocations alive. As the passed function is guaranteed to be
called at most once, it is safe to drop it after the first call is
complete. This avoids keeping the passed function (and anything it
transitively references) alive until the returned function is GCed.
Change-Id: I2faf397b481d2f693ab3aea8e2981b02adbc7a21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481515
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Slightly simplifies the code and avoids human error.
Change-Id: Ib76575e8bc5b3a699ba6cc3870d63cd7a55e6416
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/541476
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Change-Id: If9089f8afd78de3e62cd575f642ff96ab69e2099
GitHub-Last-Rev: 14165018d6
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63386
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/532895
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorropo <jorropo.pgm@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
After the change from CL 426074 the Range method on Map always
escape the read variable, leading to an allocation.
Since the compiler doesn't do live-range splitting for local variables we
need to use some hints to only escape in that particular branch.
Fixes#62404
Change-Id: I938a5e593647455fa827e3dd3ed8ea22c7365df1
GitHub-Last-Rev: fcbedb467c
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#62408
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/524976
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#61651
Change-Id: I27d581719e6bf38910f9d47dcf023bbff74ddf72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/514037
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Fix comments, including duplicate is, wrong phrases and articles, misspellings, etc.
Change-Id: I8bfea53b9b275e649757cc4bee6a8a026ed9c7a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/493035
Reviewed-by: Benny Siegert <bsiegert@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This adds the three functions from #56102 to the sync package. These
provide a convenient API for the most common uses of sync.Once.
The performance of these is comparable to direct use of sync.Once:
$ go test -run ^$ -bench OnceFunc\|OnceVal -count 20 | benchstat -row .name -col /v
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: sync
cpu: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1185G7 @ 3.00GHz
│ Once │ Global │ Local │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │ sec/op vs base │
OnceFunc 1.3500n ± 6% 2.7030n ± 1% +100.22% (p=0.000 n=20) 0.3935n ± 0% -70.86% (p=0.000 n=20)
OnceValue 1.3155n ± 0% 2.7460n ± 1% +108.74% (p=0.000 n=20) 0.5478n ± 1% -58.35% (p=0.000 n=20)
The "Once" column represents the baseline of how code would typically
express these patterns using sync.Once. "Global" binds the closure
returned by OnceFunc/OnceValue to global, which is how I expect these
to be used most of the time. Currently, this defeats some inlining
opportunities, which roughly doubles the cost over sync.Once; however,
it's still *extremely* fast. Finally, "Local" binds the returned
closure to a local variable. This unlocks several levels of inlining
and represents pretty much the best possible case for these APIs, but
is also unlikely to happen in practice. In principle the compiler
could recognize that the global in the "Global" case is initialized in
place and never mutated and do the same optimizations it does in the
"Local" case, but it currently does not.
Fixes#56102
Change-Id: If7355eccd7c8de7288d89a4282ff15ab1469e420
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/451356
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Spare <cespare@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>