Composite literals using the &T{} form were incorrectly
exported, leading to weird errors at import time.
Fixes#4879.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7395054
A new comment directive //go:noescape instructs the compiler
that the following external (no body) func declaration should be
treated as if none of its arguments escape to the heap.
Fixes#4099.
R=golang-dev, dave, minux.ma, daniel.morsing, remyoudompheng, adg, agl, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7289048
Was not re-walking the new AND node, so that its ullman
count was wrong, so that the code generator attempted to
store values in registers across the call.
Fixes#4752.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7288054
For consistency with conversions that look like function calls,
conversions that don't look like function calls now allow an
optional trailing comma.
That is, int(x,) has always been syntactically valid.
Now []int(x,) is valid too.
Fixes#4162.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7288045
Expressions involving nil, even if they can be evaluated
at compile time, do not count as Go constants and cannot
be used in const initializers.
Fixes#4673.
Fixes#4680.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7278043
The test case of issue 4585 was not passing due to
miscalculation of memequal args, and the previous fix
does not handle padding at the end of a struct.
Handling of padding at end of structs also fixes the case
of [n]T where T is such a padded struct.
Fixes#4585.
(again)
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7133059
The linker split PKGDEF into (prefix, name, def) pairs,
and defines def to begin after a space following the identifier.
This is totally wrong for the following export data:
func "".FunctionName()
var SomethingCompletelyUnrelated int
The linker would parse
name=`"".FunctionName()\n\tvar`
def=`SomethingCompletelyUnrelated int`
since there is no space after FunctionName.
R=minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7068051
A constant node of type uintptr with a nil literal could
happen in two cases: []int(nil)[1:] and
uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(nil)).
Fixes#4614.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7059043
Unnamed types like structs with embedded fields can have methods.
These methods are generated on-the-fly by the compiler and
it may happen for identical types in different packages.
The linker must accept these multiple definitions.
Fixes#4590.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/7030051
Before this CL, defining the variable worked fine, but then when
the implicit package-level init func was created, that caused a
name collision and a confusing error about the redeclaration.
Also add a test for issue 3705 (func init() needs body).
Fixes#4517.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7008045
Ordinary variable load was assumed to be not worth saving,
but not if one of the function calls later might change
its value.
Fixes#4313.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6997047
The patch makes the compile user an ordinary package-local
symbol for the name of embedded fields of builtin type.
This is incompatible with the fix delivered for issue 2687
(revision 3c060add43fb) but fixes it in a different way, because
the explicit symbol on the field makes the typechecker able to
find it in lookdot.
Fixes#3552.
R=lvd, rsc, daniel.morsing
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6866047
The typechecking code was doing an extra, unnecessary
indirection.
Fixes#4458.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6998051
A fatal error used to happen when escassign-ing a multiple
function return to a single node. However, the situation
naturally appears when using "go f(g())" or "defer f(g())",
because g() is escassign-ed to sink.
Fixes#4529.
R=golang-dev, lvd, minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6920060
I just committed a patch to gccgo that notices that float was
never defined, causing an additional unmatched error message.
Rename the type to avoid that message.
R=golang-dev, minux.ma
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6947049
This check for BADWIDTH might happen while in defercheckwidth, making it raise errors for non-erroneous situations.
Fixes#4495.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6927043
Used to say:
issue4251.go:12: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:12: constant -1 overflows uint64
issue4251.go:16: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:16: constant -1 overflows uint64
issue4251.go:20: inverted slice range
issue4251.go:20: constant -1 overflows uint64
With this patch, only gives the "inverted slice range" errors.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6871058
Fixes#4396.
For fixed arrays larger than the unmapped page, agenr would general a nil check by loading the first word of the array. However there is no requirement for the first element of a byte array to be word aligned, so this check causes a trap on ARMv5 hardware (ARMv6 since relaxed that restriction, but it probably still comes at a cost).
Switching the check to MOVB ensures alignment is not an issue. This check is only invoked in a few places in the code where large fixed arrays are embedded into structs, compress/lzw is the biggest offender, and switching to MOVB has no observable performance penalty.
Thanks to Rémy and Daniel Morsing for helping me debug this on IRC last night.
R=remyoudompheng, minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6854063
The current spec says that when calling make, if both len and
cap are constant, it is an error if len > cap. The gc
compiler does not yet implement that, but when it does this
will need to change. Changing it now for the benefit of
gccgo.
R=gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6867064
The compiler was confused when inlining a T.Method(f()) call
where f returns multiple values: support for this was marked
as TODO.
Variadic calls are not supported but are not inlined either.
Add a test preventively for that case.
Fixes#4167.
R=golang-dev, rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6871043
Bools from comparisons can be assigned to all bool types, but this idealness would propagate through logical operators when the result should have been lowered to a non-ideal form.
Fixes#3924.
R=golang-dev, remyoudompheng, r, rsc, mtj
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6855061
The stack overflow checker in the linker uses the spadj field
to determine whether stack space will be large enough or not.
When spadj=0, the checker treats the function as a nosplit
and emits an error although the program is correct.
Also enable the stack checker in 8l.
Fixes#4316.
R=rsc, golang-dev
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6855088
When exporting a body containing
x, ok := v.(Type)
the definition for Type was not being included, so when the body
was actually used, it would cause an "unknown type" compiler error.
Fixes#4370.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6827064
The old code worked with gc, I assume because the linker
unified identical strings, but it failed with gccgo.
R=rsc
CC=gobot, golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6826063
Avoids problems with local declarations shadowing other names.
We write a more explicit form than the incoming program, so there
may be additional type annotations. For example:
int := "hello"
j := 2
would normally turn into
var int string = "hello"
var j int = 2
but the int variable shadows the int type in the second line.
This CL marks all local variables with a per-function sequence number,
so that this would instead be:
var int·1 string = "hello"
var j·2 int = 2
Fixes#4326.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6816100
When local declarations needed unexported types, these could
be missing in the export data.
Fixes build with -gcflags -lll, except for exp/gotype.
R=golang-dev, rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6813067
I fixed a bug in gccgo that was causing it to only give an
error for the first package that was imported and not used.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6813058
Someone new to the language may not know the connection between ints and arrays, which was the only thing that the previous error told you anything about.
Fixes#4256.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6739048
Since this patch changes the way complex literals are written
in export data, there are a few other glitches.
Fixes#4159.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/6674047
The other tests either need a complex procedure
or are architecture- or OS-dependent.
Update #4139.
R=golang-dev, daniel.morsing, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6618062
Also mention that ignoring second blank identifier of range is required by the spec in the code.
Fixes#4173.
R=daniel.morsing, remyoudompheng, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6594043
const1.go:31:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:31:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:33:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:33:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:34:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:36:19: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:37:15: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:38:12: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:41:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:41:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:42:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:42:20: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:44:28: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:44:28: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:45:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:49:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:50:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:51:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:54:23: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:56:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:57:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:57:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:58:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:58:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:59:22: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:59:22: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:61:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:62:20: error: division by zero
const1.go:65:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:65:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:66:28: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:66:28: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:67:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:67:19: error: floating point constant overflow
const1.go:68:19: error: division by zero
const1.go:33:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:35:19: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:42:22: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:53:17: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:55:14: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:59:24: error: integer constant overflow
const1.go:69:20: error: expected integer type
const1.go:75:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type int8 as type int)
const1.go:76:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type int8 as type int)
const1.go:77:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type uint8 as type int)
const1.go:79:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type float32 as type int)
const1.go:80:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type float64 as type int)
const1.go:81:4: error: floating point constant truncated to integer
const1.go:83:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type float64 as type int)
const1.go:84:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type string as type int)
const1.go:85:4: error: argument 1 has incompatible type (cannot use type bool as type int)
const1.go:88:7: error: const initializer cannot be nil
const2.go:14:8: error: expected ‘=’
const5.go:27:7: error: expression is not constant
const5.go:28:7: error: expression is not constant
const5.go:30:7: error: expression is not constant
const5.go:31:7: error: expression is not constant
ddd1.go:57:23: error: invalid use of ‘...’ in type conversion
ddd1.go:59:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ in type conversion
ddd1.go:60:12: error: use of ‘[...]’ outside of array literal
ddd1.go:21:15: error: argument 1 has incompatible type
ddd1.go:22:10: error: argument 1 has incompatible type
ddd1.go:30:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ with non-slice
ddd1.go:30:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ with non-slice
ddd1.go:46:2: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:47:2: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:49:2: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:50:6: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:51:6: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:53:6: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:58:13: error: invalid use of %<...%> with builtin function
ddd1.go:20:10: error: floating point constant truncated to integer
ddd1.go:32:6: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
declbad.go:20:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:38:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:44:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:51:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:57:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:63:3: error: variables redeclared but no variable is new
declbad.go:26:3: error: incompatible types in assignment (cannot use type float32 as type int)
declbad.go:32:3: error: incompatible types in assignment (cannot use type int as type float32)
declbad.go:44:3: error: incompatible types in assignment (different number of results)
fixedbugs/bug223.go:21:5: error: initialization expression for ‘m’ depends upon itself
fixedbugs/bug412.go:10:2: error: duplicate field name ‘x’
fixedbugs/bug413.go:11:5: error: initialization expression for ‘i’ depends upon itself
fixedbugs/bug416.go:13:1: error: method ‘X’ redeclares struct field name
fixedbugs/bug435.go:15:49: error: missing ‘)’
fixedbugs/bug435.go:15:2: error: reference to undefined name ‘bar’
fixedbugs/bug451.go:9:9: error: expected package
typeswitch3.go:39:9: error: no new variables on left side of ‘:=’
typeswitch3.go:24:2: error: impossible type switch case (type has no methods)
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6560063
Today, if run.go doesn't understand a test header line it just ignores
the test, making it too easy to write or edit tests that are not actually
being run.
- expand errorcheck to accept flags, so that bounds.go and escape*.go can run.
- create a whitelist of skippable tests in run.go; skipping others is an error.
- mark all skipped tests at top of file.
Update #4139.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6549054
Revision 63f7abcae015 introduced a bug caused by
code assuming registers started at X5, not X0.
Fixes#4138.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/6558043
Broke tests on 386.
««« original CL description
6l/8l: emit correct opcodes to F(SUB|DIV)R?D.
When the destination was not F0, 6l and 8l swapped FSUBD/FSUBRD and
FDIVD/FDIVRD.
R=golang-dev, dave, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6498092
»»»
R=golang-dev
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6492100
Rémy Oudompheng
Russ Cox
Daniel Morsing
Ian Lance Taylor
Shenghou Ma
Dave Cheney
Robert Griesemer
David Symonds
Adam Langley