Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957#issuecomment-2539270352 reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1689 (Previous PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [#32410](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [#93153](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127853 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128651 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128004 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? ``@Amanieu`` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github/workflows | ||
| ci | ||
| examples | ||
| josh-sync | ||
| src | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .mailmap | ||
| CITATION.cff | ||
| CNAME | ||
| CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | ||
| LICENSE-APACHE | ||
| LICENSE-MIT | ||
| README.md | ||
| book.toml | ||
| mermaid-init.js | ||
| mermaid.min.js | ||
| rust-version | ||
| rustfmt.toml | ||
| triagebot.toml | ||
README.md
This is a collaborative effort to build a guide that explains how rustc works. The aim of the guide is to help new contributors get oriented to rustc, as well as to help more experienced folks in figuring out some new part of the compiler that they haven't worked on before.
You can read the latest version of the guide here.
You may also find the rustdocs for the compiler itself useful. Note that these are not intended as a guide; it's recommended that you search for the docs you're looking for instead of reading them top to bottom.
For documentation on developing the standard library, see
std-dev-guide.
Contributing to the guide
The guide is useful today, but it has a lot of work still to go.
If you'd like to help improve the guide, we'd love to have you! You can find plenty of issues on the issue tracker. Just post a comment on the issue you would like to work on to make sure that we don't accidentally duplicate work. If you think something is missing, please open an issue about it!
In general, if you don't know how the compiler works, that is not a problem! In that case, what we will do is to schedule a bit of time for you to talk with someone who does know the code, or who wants to pair with you and figure it out. Then you can work on writing up what you learned.
In general, when writing about a particular part of the compiler's code, we recommend that you link to the relevant parts of the rustc rustdocs.
Build Instructions
To build a local static HTML site, install mdbook with:
cargo install mdbook mdbook-linkcheck2 mdbook-toc mdbook-mermaid
and execute the following command in the root of the repository:
mdbook build --open
The build files are found in the book/html directory.
Link Validations
We use mdbook-linkcheck2 to validate URLs included in our documentation. Link
checking is not run by default locally, though it is in CI. To enable it
locally, set the environment variable ENABLE_LINKCHECK=1 like in the
following example.
ENABLE_LINKCHECK=1 mdbook serve
Table of Contents
We use mdbook-toc to auto-generate TOCs for long sections. You can invoke the preprocessor by
including the <!-- toc --> marker at the place where you want the TOC.
Synchronizing josh subtree with rustc
This repository is linked to rust-lang/rust as a josh subtree. You can use the following commands to synchronize the subtree in both directions.
You'll need to install josh-proxy locally via
cargo +stable install josh-proxy --git https://github.com/josh-project/josh --tag r24.10.04
Older versions of josh-proxy may not round trip commits losslessly so it is important to install this exact version.
Pull changes from rust-lang/rust into this repository
- Checkout a new branch that will be used to create a PR into
rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide - Run the pull command
cargo run --manifest-path josh-sync/Cargo.toml rustc-pull - Push the branch to your fork and create a PR into
rustc-dev-guide
Push changes from this repository into rust-lang/rust
- Run the push command to create a branch named
<branch-name>in arustcfork under the<gh-username>accountcargo run --manifest-path josh-sync/Cargo.toml rustc-push <branch-name> <gh-username> - Create a PR from
<branch-name>intorust-lang/rust
Minimal git config
For simplicity (ease of implementation purposes), the josh-sync script simply calls out to system git. This means that the git invocation may be influenced by global (or local) git configuration.
You may observe "Nothing to pull" even if you know rustc-pull has something to pull if your global git config sets fetch.prunetags = true (and possibly other configurations may cause unexpected outcomes).
To minimize the likelihood of this happening, you may wish to keep a separate minimal git config that only has [user] entries from global git config, then repoint system git to use the minimal git config instead. E.g.
GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL=/path/to/minimal/gitconfig GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM='' cargo +stable run --manifest-path josh-sync/Cargo.toml -- rustc-pull