Add `From<{integer}>` for `f16`/`f128` impls
This PR adds `impl From<{bool,i8,u8}> for f16` and `impl From<{bool,i8,u8,i16,u16,i32,u32}> for f128`.
The `From<{i64,u64}> for f128` impls are left commented out as adding them would allow using `f128` on stable before it is stabilised like in the following example:
```rust
fn f<T: From<u64>>(x: T) -> T { x }
fn main() {
let x = f(1.0); // the type of the literal is inferred to be `f128`
}
```
None of the impls added in this PR have this issue as they are all, at minimum, also implemented by `f64`.
This PR will need a crater run for the `From<{i32,u32}>` impls, as `f64` is no longer the only float type to implement them (similar to the cause of #125198).
cc `@bjoernager`
r? `@tgross35`
Tracking issue: #116909
added some new test to check for result and options opt
Apologies for the delay. Finally have some time to get back into contributing.
## Context
- Added some tests to show optimization on result and options for 64 and 128 bits
- Relevant issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101210
## Some newb questions from me
- [x] My local llvm IR has `nuw` in `result_nop_match_128` etc whereas [godbolt version](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Td9zoT5zn) doesn't have. So I put optional there, but not sure if it's desirable (maybe I'm not using the compiled llvm in the repo). I ran the test with
```bash
./x test tests/codegen/try_question_mark_nop.rs
```
- [x] Unless I'm reading it wrongly, but `option_nop_match_128` and `option_nop_traits_128` look to be **not** optimized away?
Update:
Here's the test for future reference
```rust
// CHECK-LABEL: `@option_nop_match_128`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn option_nop_match_128(x: Option<i128>) -> Option<i128> {
// CHECK: start:
// CHECK-NEXT: %trunc = trunc nuw i128 %0 to i1
// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %trunc, label %bb3, label %bb4
// CHECK: bb3:
// CHECK-NEXT: %2 = getelementptr inbounds {{(nuw )?}}i8, ptr %_0, i64 16
// CHECK-NEXT: store i128 %1, ptr %2, align 16
// CHECK: bb4:
// CHECK-NEXT: %storemerge = phi i128 [ 1, %bb3 ], [ 0, %start ]
// CHECK-NEXT: store i128 %storemerge, ptr %_0, align 16
// CHECK-NEXT: ret void
match x {
Some(x) => Some(x),
None => None,
}
}
```
r? `@scottmcm`
Update sccache to 0.10.0
This time, does it also for Windows and macOS. This unifies the sccache version across all OSes that we use.
r? `@ghost`
try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-x86_64-apple
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc-alt
try-job: dist-i686-msvc
try-job: dist-aarch64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: dist-x86_64-netbsd
Do not suggest using `-Zmacro-backtrace` for builtin macros
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, or that are annotated with `rustc_diagnostic_item`, which have arbitrary implementations from the point of view of the user and might as well be intrinsics, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros like `panic!` and `format!`.
This PR adds a field to every `Span`'s `ExpnData` stating whether it comes from a builtin macro. This is determined by the macro being annotated with either `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` or `#[rustc_diagnostic_item]`. An alternative to using these attributes that already exist for other uses would be to introduce another attribute like `#[rustc_no_backtrace]` to have finer control on which macros are affected (for example, an error within `vec![]` now doesn't mention the backtrace, but one could make the case that it should). Ideally, instead of carrying this information in the `ExpnData` we'd instead try to query the `DefId` of the macro (that is already stored) to see if it is annotated in some way, but we do not have access to the `TyCtxt` from `rustc_errors`.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Pass `CI_JOB_DOC_URL` to Docker
Fix-up for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136911. I always forget to pass new environment variables to Docker images.. 🤦♂️
r? `@marcoieni`
try-job: x86_64-fuchsia
remove must_use from <*const T>::expose_provenance
`<*mut T>::expose_provenance` does not have this attribute, and in fact the function is documented to have a side-effect, so there are perfectly legitimate use-cases where the return value would be ignored.
uefi: helpers: Add DevicePathNode abstractions
- UEFI device path is a series of nodes layed out in a contiguous memory region. So it makes sense to use Iterator abstraction for modeling DevicePaths
- This PR has been split off from #135368 for easier review. The allow dead_code will be removed in #135368
cc `@nicholasbishop`
Don't `alloca` just to look at a discriminant
Today we're making LLVM do a bunch of extra work when you match on trivial stuff like `Option<bool>` or `ControlFlow<u8>`.
This PR changes that so that simple types like `Option<u32>` or `Result<(), Box<Error>>` can stay as `OperandValue::ScalarPair` and we can still read the discriminant from them, rather than needing to write them into memory to have a `PlaceValue` just to get the discriminant out.
Fixes#137503
Add a .bss-like scheme for encoded const allocs
This check if all bytes are zero feel like it should be too slow, and instead we should have a flag that we track, but that seems hard. Let's see how this perfs first.
Also we can probably stash the "it's all zero actually" flag inside one of the other struct members that's already not using an entire byte. This optimization doesn't fire all that often, so it's possible that by sticking it in the varint length field, this PR actually makes rmeta size worse.
Do not register `Self: AutoTrait` when confirming auto trait (in old solver)
Every built-in auto impl for a trait goal like `Ty: Auto` immediately registers another obligation of `Ty: Auto` as one of its nested obligations, leading to us stressing the cycle detection machinery a lot more than we need to. This is because all traits have a `Self: Trait` predicate.
To fix this, remove the call to `impl_or_trait_obligations` in `vtable_auto_impl`, since auto traits do not have where clauses.
r? lcnr
Calculate predecessor count directly
Avoid allocating a vector of small vectors merely to determine how many
predecessors each basic block has.
Additionally use u8 and saturating operations. The pass only needs to
distinguish between [0..1] and [2..].
Use sa_sigaction instead of sa_union.__su_sigaction for AIX
Revert test cases to use `sa_sigaction` instead of `sa_union.__su_sigaction`, now that the `libc` crate implementation for AIX defines `sa_sigaction` as a direct member of `struct sigaction`, aligning it with implementations on other similar platforms. ([[AIX] Use sa_sigaction instead of the union](https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/4250)).
Rustdoc: remove a bunch of @ts-expect-error from main.js
r? ```````@notriddle```````
Most remaining instances of ````````@ts-expect-error```````` in `search.js` and `main.js` are some sort of unchecked assertion, most of them involving nullibility, and we have yet to decide on how to handle these.
Disentangle `ForwardGenericParamBan` and `ConstParamTy` ribs
In #137617, the `ConstParamTy` rib was adjusted to act kinda like the `ForwardGenericParamBan`. However, this means that it no longer served its purpose banning generics from *parent items*. Although we still are checking for param type validity using the `ConstParamTy_` trait, which means that we weren't accepting code we shouldn't, I think it's a bit strange for us not to be rejecting code like this during *resolution* and instead letting these malformed const generics leak into the type system:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
fn bar<const N: T>() {}
}
```
This PR does a few things:
1. Introduce a `ForwardGenericParamBanReason` enum, and start using the `ForwardGenericParamBan` rib to ban forward-declared params in const tys when `generic_const_parameter_types` is enabled.
2. Start using the `ConstParamTy` rib to ban *all* generics when `generic_const_parameter_types` is disabled.
3. Improve the diagnostics for both of the cases above, and for forward-declared params in parameter defaults too :3
r? `@BoxyUwU` or reassign
Support rmeta inputs for --crate-type=bin --emit=obj
This already works for --emit=metadata, but is possible anytime we're not linking.
Tests:
- `rmeta_bin` checks we're not changing --emit=link (already passes)
- `rmeta_bin-pass` tests the new behavior for --emit=obj (would fail today) and also --emit=metadata which isn't changing
Update bootstrap to edition 2024
The stage0 compiler now supports edition 2024, so we can update bootstrap to it. I manually reviewed all the changes from `cargo fix --edition` and reverted most of them (`if let` -> `matches` changes and two unneeded usages of `use <>`).
r? `@onur-ozkan`
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
strip `-Wlinker-messages` wrappers from `rust-lld` rmake test
The `tests/run-make/rust-lld` rmake test is failing locally on my M1, due to linker messages being in a different shape than the test expects: it asserts that the LLD version is the first linker message, which is seemingly not always the case on osx I guess.
```console
thread 'main' panicked at /Users/lqd/rust/lqd-rust/tests/run-make/rust-lld/rmake.rs:24:5:
the LLD version string should be present in the output logs:
warning: linker stderr: rust-lld: directory not found for option -L/usr/local/lib
LLD 20.1.0 (https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project.git 1c3bb96fdb6db7b8e8f24edb016099c223fdd27e)
Library search paths:
/Users/lqd/rust/lqd-rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/test/run-make/rust-lld/rmake_out
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/lib
Framework search paths:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks
```
This PR normalizes away the `-Wlinker-messages` wrappers around the linker output, to remove the requirement that the linker version is the first linker message / is prefixed with the warning wrapper in the regex.
(also another strange thing to explain the pre-existing regex: it seems the LLD version is sometimes output on stderr sometimes on stdout cool stuff)
We could do this for the other lld rmake tests, but they're only enabled on x64 linux so less likely to have random linker messages appearing without anyone noticing.
Allow bounds checks when enumerating `IndexSlice` to be elided
Without this hint, each loop iteration has to separately bounds check the index. See https://godbolt.org/z/zrfPY4Ten for an example.
This is technically a behaviour change, but only in cases where the compiler is going to crash anyways.
Continuing the work from #137350.
Removes the unused methods: `expect_variant`, `expect_field`,
`expect_foreign_item`.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix.
bors
Tshepang Mbambo
León Orell Valerian Liehr
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
Jakub Beránek
KonaeAkira
Josh Stone
Manish Goregaokar
Nicholas Nethercote