compiletest: Require `//~` annotations even if `error-pattern` is specified
This is continuation of #138865 with some help from #139100.
`error-pattern` annotations that duplicate the newly added `//~` annotations are removed, other `error-pattern`s are not touched yet.
In exceptional cases `//@ compile-flags: --error-format=human` can be used to opt out of these checks.
In this PR I only had to use the opt out 3 times:
- `tests/ui/parser/utf16-{be,le}-without-bom.rs` - there are too many errors that are nearly identical (modulo location), because an error is reported on every second symbol
- `tests/ui-fulldeps/missing-rustc-driver-error.rs` - the errors list various rustc crate dependencies and may unexpectedly invalidate on random rustc changes
Experimental feature gate for `super let`
This adds an experimental feature gate, `#![feature(super_let)]`, for the `super let` experiment.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139076
Liaison: ``@nikomatsakis``
## Description
There's a rough (inaccurate) description here: https://blog.m-ou.se/super-let/
In short, `super let` allows you to define something that lives long enough to be borrowed by the tail expression of the block. For example:
```rust
let a = {
super let b = temp();
&b
};
```
Here, `b` is extended to live as long as `a`, similar to how in `let a = &temp();`, the temporary will be extended to live as long as `a`.
## Properties
During the temporary lifetimes work we did last year, we explored the properties of "super let" and concluded that the fundamental property should be that these two are always equivalent in any context:
1. `& $expr`
2. `{ super let a = & $expr; a }`
And, additionally, that these are equivalent in any context when `$expr` is a temporary (aka rvalue):
1. `& $expr`
2. `{ super let a = $expr; & a }`
This makes it possible to give a name to a temporary without affecting how temporary lifetimes work, such that a macro can transparently use a block in its expansion, without that having any effect on the outside.
## Implementing pin!() correctly
With `super let`, we can properly implement the `pin!()` macro without hacks: ✨
```rust
pub macro pin($value:expr $(,)?) {
{
super let mut pinned = $value;
unsafe { $crate::pin::Pin::new_unchecked(&mut pinned) }
}
}
```
This is important, as there is currently no way to express it without hacks in Rust 2021 and before (see [hacky definition](2a06022951/library/core/src/pin.rs (L1947))), and no way to express it at all in Rust 2024 (see [issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138718)).
## Fixing format_args!()
This will also allow us to express `format_args!()` in a way where one can assign the result to a variable, fixing a [long standing issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698):
```rust
let f = format_args!("Hello {name}!"); // error today, but accepted in the future! (after separate FCP)
```
## Experiment
The precise definition of `super let`, what happens for `super let x;` (without initializer), and whether to accept `super let _ = _ else { .. }` are still open questions, to be answered by the experiment.
Furthermore, once we have a more complete understanding of the feature, we might be able to come up with a better syntax. (Which could be just a different keywords, or an entirely different way of naming temporaries that doesn't involve a block and a (super) let statement.)
remove `feature(inline_const_pat)`
Summarizing https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/144729-t-types/topic/remove.20feature.28inline_const_pat.29.20and.20shared.20borrowck.
With https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/129 we will start to borrowck items together with their typeck parent. This is necessary to correctly support opaque types, blocking the new solver and TAIT/ATPIT stabilization with the old one. This means that we cannot really support `inline_const_pat` as they are implemented right now:
- we want to typeck inline consts together with their parent body to allow inference to flow both ways and to allow the const to refer to local regions of its parent.This means we also need to borrowck the inline const together with its parent as that's necessary to properly support opaque types
- we want the inline const pattern to participate in exhaustiveness checking
- to participate in exhaustiveness checking we need to evaluate it, which requires borrowck, which now relies on borrowck of the typeck root, which ends up checking exhaustiveness again. **This is a query cycle**.
There are 4 possible ways to handle this:
- stop typechecking inline const patterns together with their parent
- causes inline const patterns to be different than inline const exprs
- prevents bidirectional inference, we need to either fail to compile `if let const { 1 } = 1u32` or `if let const { 1u32 } = 1`
- region inference for inline consts will be harder, it feels non-trivial to support inline consts referencing local regions from the parent fn
- inline consts no longer participate in exhaustiveness checking. Treat them like `pat if pat == const { .. }` instead. We then only evaluate them after borrowck
- difference between `const { 1 }` and `const FOO: usize = 1; match x { FOO => () }`. This is confusing
- do they carry their weight if they are now just equivalent to using an if-guard
- delay exhaustiveness checking until after borrowck
- should be possible in theory, but is a quite involved change and may have some unexpected challenges
- remove this feature for now
I believe we should either delay exhaustiveness checking or remove the feature entirely. As moving exhaustiveness checking to after borrow checking is quite complex I think the right course of action is to fully remove the feature for now and to add it again once/if we've got that implementation figured out.
`const { .. }`-expressions remain stable. These seem to have been the main motivation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2920.
r? types
cc `@rust-lang/types` `@rust-lang/lang` #76001
Revert "Rollup merge of #136127 - WaffleLapkin:dyn_ptr_unwrap_cast, r=compiler-errors"
...not permanently tho. Just until we can land something like #138542, which will fix the underlying perf issues (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136127#issuecomment-2743891744). I just don't want this to land on beta and have people rely on this behavior if it'll need some reworking for it to be implemented performantly.
r? `@WaffleLapkin` or reassign -- sorry for reverting ur pr! i'm working on getting it re-landed soon :>
hygiene: Rewrite `apply_mark_internal` to be more understandable
The previous implementation allocated new `SyntaxContext`s in the inverted order, and it was generally very hard to understand why its result matches what the `opaque` and `opaque_and_semitransparent` field docs promise.
```rust
/// This context, but with all transparent and semi-transparent expansions filtered away.
opaque: SyntaxContext,
/// This context, but with all transparent expansions filtered away.
opaque_and_semitransparent: SyntaxContext,
```
It also couldn't be easily reused for the case where the context id is pre-reserved like in #129827.
The new implementation tries to follow the docs in a more straightforward way.
I did the transformation in small steps, so it indeed matches the old implementation, not just the docs.
So I suggest reading only the new version.
Simplify expansion for format_args!().
Instead of calling `Placeholder::new()`, we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
```rust
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
```
After:
```rust
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
```
(I originally avoided the struct expression, because `Placeholder` had a lot of fields. But now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136974 is merged, it only has four fields left.)
This will make the `fmt` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` a candidate for const promotion, which is important if we ever hope to tackle https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698 (It doesn't change anything yet though, because the `args` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` is not const-promotable.)
[AIX] Ignore linting on repr(C) structs with repr(packed) or repr(align(n))
This PR updates the lint added in 9b40bd7 to ignore repr(C) structs that also have repr(packed) or repr(align(n)).
As these representations can be modifiers on repr(C), it is assumed that users that add these should know what they are doing, and thus the the lint should not warn on the respective structs. For example, for the time being, using repr(packed) and manually padding a repr(C) struct can be done to correctly align struct members on AIX.
Set `target_vendor = "openwrt"` on `mips64-openwrt-linux-musl`
OpenWRT is a Linux distribution for embedded network devices. The target name contains `openwrt`, so we should set `cfg(target_vendor = "openwrt")`.
This is similar to what other Linux distributions do (the only one in-tree is `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl`, but that sets `target_vendor = "unikraft"`).
Motivation: To make correctly [parsing target names](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/1413) simpler.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131165.
CC target maintainer `@Itus-Shield`
compiletest: Support matching diagnostics on lines below
Using `//~vvv ERROR`.
This is not needed often, but it's easy to support, and it allows to eliminate a class of `error-pattern`s that cannot be eliminated in any other way.
See the diff for the examples of such patterns coming from parser.
Some of them can be matched by `//~ ERROR` or `//~^ ERROR` as well (when the final newline is allowed), but it changes the shape of reported spans, so I chose to keep the spans by using `//~v ERROR`.
Start using `with_native_path` in `std::sys::fs`
Ideally, each platform should use their own native path type internally. This will, for example, allow passing a `CStr` directly to `std::fs::File::open` and therefore avoid the need for allocating a new null-terminated C string.
However, doing that for every function and platform all at once makes for a large PR that is way too prone to breaking. So this PR does some minimal refactoring which should help progress towards that goal. The changes are Unix-only and even then I avoided functions that require more changes so that this PR is just moving things around.
r? joboet
Fix `uclibc` LLVM target triples
`uclibc` is not an environment understood by LLVM, it is only a concept in Clang that can be selected with `-muclibc` (it affects which dynamic linker is passed to the static linker's `-dynamic-linker` flag).
In fact, using `uclibcgnueabi`/`uclibc` is actively harmful, as it prevents LLVM from seeing that the target is gnu-like; we should use `gnueabi`/`gnu` directly instead.
Motivation: To make it easier to verify that [`cc-rs`' conversion from `rustc` to Clang/LLVM triples](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1431) is correct.
**There are no target maintainers for these targets.** So I'll CC ``@lancethepants`` and ``@skrap`` who maintain the related `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi` and `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf` (both of which already pass `-gnu` instead of `-uclibc`) in case they have any insights.
r? jieyouxu
stabilize const_cell
``@rust-lang/libs-api`` ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`` I see no reason to wait any longer, so I propose we stabilize the use of `Cell` in `const fn` -- specifically the APIs listed here:
```rust
// core::cell
impl<T> Cell<T> {
pub const fn replace(&self, val: T) -> T;
}
impl<T: Copy> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get(&self) -> T;
}
impl<T: ?Sized> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T;
pub const fn from_mut(t: &mut T) -> &Cell<T>;
}
impl<T> Cell<[T]> {
pub const fn as_slice_of_cells(&self) -> &[Cell<T>];
}
```
Unfortunately, `set` cannot be made `const fn` yet as it drops the old contents.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131283
Avoid wrapping constant allocations in packed structs when not necessary
This way LLVM will set the string merging flag if the alloc is a nul terminated string, reducing binary sizes.
try-job: armhf-gnu
rustdoc: Rearrange `Item`/`ItemInner`.
The `Item` struct is 48 bytes and contains a `Box<ItemInner>`;
`ItemInner` is 104 bytes. This is an odd arrangement. Normally you'd
have one of the following.
- A single large struct, which avoids the allocation for the `Box`, but
can result in lots of wasted space in unused parts of a container like
`Vec<Item>`, `HashSet<Item>`, etc.
- Or, something like `struct Item(Box<ItemInner>)`, which requires the
`Box` allocation but gives a very small Item size, which is good for
containers like `Vec<Item>`.
`Item`/`ItemInner` currently gets the worst of both worlds: it always
requires a `Box`, but `Item` is also pretty big and so wastes space in
containers. It would make sense to push it in one direction or the
other. #138916 showed that the first option is a regression for rustdoc,
so this commit does the second option, which improves speed and reduces
memory usage.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
bors
Vadim Petrochenkov
Matthias Krüger
León Orell Valerian Liehr
Tshepang Mbambo
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
Jieyou Xu
clubby789
Boxy
Samuel Tardieu
Guillaume Gomez
Santiago Pastorino
mejrs