12f5d8d84f
have checkboxes only point to date-check lines in files ( #1603 )
...
They currently also point to filenames, which is redundant.
current
- [ ] thir.md
- [ ] line 7: 2022-04
- [ ] line 60: 2022-08
- [ ] traits/chalk.md
- [ ] line 4: 2022-05
proposed
- thir.md
- [ ] line 7: 2022-04
- [ ] line 60: 2022-08
- traits/chalk.md
- [ ] line 4: 2022-05
2023-02-16 20:38:25 -08:00
dc6fcaeae8
address review comment
...
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1428#discussion_r948143840
2022-08-25 19:56:58 -07:00
23ae7bb49f
make date-check more easy to use
...
One could not run it like the following, for the would be a panic:
cargo run --manifest-path ci/date-check/Cargo.toml .
Also, remove the need to specify argument, in which case, current_dir
is assumed.
2022-08-25 19:56:58 -07:00
81334fcda4
update date-check format on github issue ( #1416 )
...
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
2022-08-09 14:49:43 -07:00
7910832e02
date-check: be more strict
2022-08-02 17:22:34 -04:00
8194045511
make date-check more lightweight ( #1394 )
...
* make date-check lightweight
This avoids having to write the date twice when updating date-check.
Before "As of <-- 2022-07 --> July 2022"
After "As of July 2022"
* please clippy
* update date-check docs
* accept review suggestion
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#pullrequestreview-1042163557
* accept review suggestion
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#pullrequestreview-1042167261
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#issuecomment-1189105017
* this breaks markdown
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018268
This led to a more robust regex, though making the tool more picky.
It also found a wrong date format that was missed.
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018419
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018816
* accept review suggestion
This was reverted by mistake
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934019395
* use a more simple fn
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018981
Much more clean
* nit
* accept review suggestion
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* avoid a failed regex
Also, test new shape
* adjust to new regex (which uses named groups)
New regex was introduced by 456008cc35
2022-08-02 13:50:32 -07:00
123efb6fc2
Bump regex from 1.4.3 to 1.5.5 in /ci/date-check ( #1364 )
...
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-06-07 08:40:42 +09:00
4c4d9b5357
Update author field
2021-10-21 15:13:09 -05:00
9334db680b
Switch date-check to Rust 2021
...
No migrations were necessary.
2021-10-21 15:13:09 -05:00
52a33e718d
date-check: Recognize capitalized 'Date' as well
...
Now, if people use 'Date' instead of 'date', it won't be ignored.
2021-08-26 18:53:17 -05:00
fe8a704c7e
Implement date-checker
...
This tool looks for HTML comments like `<!-- date: 2021-01 -->` in each
Markdown source file and compiles a list of dates that are older than
six months. It then opens an issue with that list, with checkboxes for
each file and date. Note that it will only open an issue if there was at
least one date older than six months; it does nothing if the list is
empty.
This tool is automatically run monthly in a GitHub Actions workflow.
I have tested the tool on a private repo and confirmed that it works.
2021-02-03 19:29:07 -05:00
Tshepang Mbambo
dependabot[bot]
Noah Lev