LeSeulArtichaut wording/typo fixes
Co-authored-by: LeSeulArtichaut <leseulartichaut@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4056d0820
commit
d94394322b
|
|
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ feel comfortable jumping straight into the large `rust-lang/rust` codebase.
|
|||
The following tasks are doable without much background knowledge but are
|
||||
incredibly helpful:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ICE-breakers Cleanup crew][iceb]: find minimal reproductions of ICEs, bisect
|
||||
- [Cleanup crew][iceb]: find minimal reproductions of ICEs, bisect
|
||||
regressions, etc. This is a way of helping that saves a ton of time for
|
||||
others to fix an error later.
|
||||
- Writing documentation: if you are feeling a bit more intrepid, you could try
|
||||
|
|
@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ below][break]) for some PRs.
|
|||
[break]: #breaking-changes
|
||||
|
||||
When the PR is ready to be merged, the reviewer will issue a command to
|
||||
`@bors`, the CI bot. Usually, this is `@bors r+` or `@bors r=@user` to approve
|
||||
`@bors`, the CI bot. Usually, this is `@bors r+` or `@bors r=user` to approve
|
||||
a PR (there are few other commands, but they are less relevant here). This puts
|
||||
the PR in [bors's queue][bors] to be tested and merged. Be patient; this can take a
|
||||
while and the queue can sometimes be long. PRs are never merged by hand.
|
||||
|
|
@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ approval of the relevant teams.
|
|||
|
||||
After that, the feature gate can be removed and the feature turned on for all users.
|
||||
|
||||
[For more details on this process, see this chapter.](./implementing_new_features.md)
|
||||
[For more details on this process, see this chapter on implementing new features.](./implementing_new_features.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### Breaking Changes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ discuss the issue and either accept, reject, or request changes on the PR.
|
|||
|
||||
If the scale of breakage is large, a deprecation warning may be needed. This is
|
||||
a warning that the compiler will display to users whose code will break in the
|
||||
future. After some time, an FCP can be used to move forward with the actual
|
||||
future. After some time, an FCP can be used to move forward with the actual
|
||||
breakage.
|
||||
|
||||
If the scale of breakage is unknown, a team member or contributor may request a
|
||||
|
|
@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ compiler (as opposed to a full RFC or a design meeting with the team).
|
|||
Example of things that might require MCPs include major refactorings, changes
|
||||
to important types, or important changes to how the compiler does something.
|
||||
|
||||
**When in doubt, ask on [zulip][z]. We would hate for you to put a lot of work
|
||||
**When in doubt, ask on [zulip][z]. It would be a shame to put a lot of work
|
||||
into a PR that ends up not getting merged!**
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue