Correct rust code block in *Dataflow Analysis*
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8fae75c0c
commit
91f2d11e9c
|
|
@ -127,16 +127,18 @@ value will be `true`, since our analysis is done as soon as we determine that
|
|||
`transmute` has been called. Our join operator will just be the boolean OR (`||`)
|
||||
operator. We use OR and not AND because of this case:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
let x = if some_cond {
|
||||
std::mem::transmute<i32, u32>(0_i32); // transmute was called!
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
1_u32; // transmute was not called
|
||||
};
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
# unsafe fn example(some_cond: bool) {
|
||||
let x = if some_cond {
|
||||
std::mem::transmute::<i32, u32>(0_i32) // transmute was called!
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
1_u32 // transmute was not called
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Has transmute been called by this point? We conservatively approximate that
|
||||
// as yes, and that is why we use the OR operator.
|
||||
println!("x: {}", x);
|
||||
// Has transmute been called by this point? We conservatively approximate that
|
||||
// as yes, and that is why we use the OR operator.
|
||||
println!("x: {}", x);
|
||||
# }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Inspecting the Results of a Dataflow Analysis
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue