Minor fix in borrow_check

Fixes as follows:

- fixes spelling
- removes unnecessary white spaces and blank lines
This commit is contained in:
Yuki Okushi 2019-07-12 11:02:45 +09:00 committed by Who? Me?!
parent a8b434de11
commit 842cfe96f4
5 changed files with 6 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ fn foo() {
let b = a.0; // moves a.0
// a.0 is not initializd, but a.1 still is
// a.0 is not initialized, but a.1 still is
let c = a.0; // ERROR
let d = a.1; // OK
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ initialized (which lowers overhead).
## Looking up a move-path
If you have a [`Place`] and you would like to convert it to a [`MovePathIndex`], you
If you have a [`Place`] and you would like to convert it to a [`MovePathIndex`], you
can do that using the [`MovePathLookup`] structure found in the [`rev_lookup`] field
of [`MoveData`]. There are two different methods:
@ -124,4 +124,3 @@ given move-path (e.g., `a.b`) or any child of that move-path (e.g.,
[`Place`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc/mir/enum.Place.html
[`has_any_child_of`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_mir/dataflow/at_location/struct.FlowAtLocation.html#method.has_any_child_of

View File

@ -236,4 +236,3 @@ tests and universal regions, as discussed above.
[`propagate_constraints`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_mir/borrow_check/nll/region_infer/struct.RegionInferenceContext.html#method.propagate_constraints
[`check_type_tests`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_mir/borrow_check/nll/region_infer/struct.RegionInferenceContext.html#method.check_type_tests
[`check_universal_regions`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_mir/borrow_check/nll/region_infer/struct.RegionInferenceContext.html#method.check_universal_regions

View File

@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ by invoking `constraint_sccs.scc(r)`.
Working in terms of SCCs allows us to be more efficient: if we have a
set of regions `'a...'d` that are part of a single SCC, we don't have
to compute/store their values separarely. We can just store one value
to compute/store their values separately. We can just store one value
**for the SCC**, since they must all be equal.
If you look over the region inference code, you will see that a number
@ -220,5 +220,3 @@ taking into account all of the liveness and outlives
constraints. However, in order to complete the process, we must also
consider [member constraints][m_c], which are described in [a later
section][m_c].

View File

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ based on their index:
In fact, the universal regions can be further subdivided based on
where they were brought into scope (see the [`RegionClassification`]
type). These subdivions are not important for the topics discussed
type). These subdivisions are not important for the topics discussed
here, but become important when we consider [closure constraint
propagation](./closure_constraints.html), so we discuss them there.

View File

@ -176,11 +176,11 @@ region being inferred. However, it is somewhat arbitrary.
In practice, computing upper bounds is a bit inconvenient, because our
data structures are setup for the opposite. What we do is to compute
the **reverse SCC graph** (we do this lazilly and cache the result) --
the **reverse SCC graph** (we do this lazily and cache the result) --
that is, a graph where `'a: 'b` induces an edge `SCC('b) ->
SCC('a)`. Like the normal SCC graph, this is a DAG. We can then do a
depth-first search starting from `SCC('0)` in this graph. This will
take us to all the SCCs that must outlive `'0`.
take us to all the SCCs that must outlive `'0`.
One wrinkle is that, as we walk the "upper bound" SCCs, their values
will not yet have been fully computed. However, we **have** already
@ -190,4 +190,3 @@ parameters, their value will contain themselves (i.e., the initial
value for `'a` includes `'a` and the value for `'b` contains `'b`). So
we can collect all of the lifetime parameters that are reachable,
which is precisely what we are interested in.