Auto merge of #138865 - petrochenkov:errwhere, r=jieyouxu

compiletest: Support matching on diagnostics without a span

Using `//~? ERROR my message` on any line of the test.

The new checks are exhaustive, like all other `//~` checks, and unlike the `error-pattern` directive that is sometimes used now to check for span-less diagnostics.

This will allow to eliminate most on `error-pattern` directives in compile-fail tests (except those that are intentionally imprecise due to platform-specific diagnostics).
I didn't migrate any of `error-pattern`s in this PR though, except those where the migration was necessary for the tests to pass.

src/tests/ui.md

@@ -202,6 +202,9 @@ several ways to match the message with the line (see the examples below):
 * `~|`: Associates the error level and message with the *same* line as the
   *previous comment*. This is more convenient than using multiple carets when
   there are multiple messages associated with the same line.
+* `~?`: Used to match error levels and messages with errors not having line
+  information. These can be placed on any line in the test file, but are
+  conventionally placed at the end.
 
 Example:
 
@@ -270,10 +273,23 @@ fn main() {
 //~| ERROR this pattern has 1 field, but the corresponding tuple struct has 3 fields [E0023]
 ```
 
+#### Error without line information
+
+Use `//~?` to match an error without line information.
+`//~?` is precise and will not match errors if their line information is available.
+It should be preferred to using `error-pattern`, which is imprecise and non-exhaustive.
+
+```rust,ignore
+//@ compile-flags: --print yyyy
+
+//~? ERROR unknown print request: `yyyy`
+```
+
 ### `error-pattern`
 
-The `error-pattern` [directive](directives.md) can be used for messages that don't
-have a specific span.
+The `error-pattern` [directive](directives.md) can be used for runtime messages, which don't
+have a specific span, or for compile time messages if imprecise matching is required due to
+multi-line platform specific diagnostics.
 
 Let's think about this test:
 
@@ -300,7 +316,9 @@ fn main() {
 }
 ```
 
-But for strict testing, try to use the `ERROR` annotation as much as possible.
+But for strict testing, try to use the `ERROR` annotation as much as possible,
+including `//~?` annotations for diagnostics without span.
+For compile time diagnostics `error-pattern` should very rarely be necessary.
 
 ### Error levels
 
@@ -353,7 +371,7 @@ would be a `.mir.stderr` and `.thir.stderr` file with the different outputs of
 the different revisions.
 
 > Note: cfg revisions also work inside the source code with `#[cfg]` attributes.
-> 
+>
 > By convention, the `FALSE` cfg is used to have an always-false config.
 
 ## Controlling pass/fail expectations