From 9c4b43357581b1f1af6f0d48ef0db70d10363349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Martin Ombura Jr." <8682597+martinomburajr@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 04:01:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] adds 'with' to help clarify how to build a new compiler

---
 src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md                   | 2 +-
 src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md b/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md
index f72918c8..bb7dd8dd 100644
--- a/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md
+++ b/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ of the same compiler.
 This raises a chicken-and-egg paradox: where did the first compiler come from?
 It must have been written in a different language. In Rust's case it was
 [written in OCaml][ocaml-compiler]. However it was abandoned long ago and the
-only way to build a modern version of rustc is a slightly less modern
+only way to build a modern version of rustc is with a slightly less modern
 version.
 
 This is exactly how `x.py` works: it downloads the current beta release of
diff --git a/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md b/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md
index ffcfe259..ac1fa51e 100644
--- a/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md
+++ b/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ the same compiler.
 This raises a chicken-and-egg paradox: where did the first compiler come from?
 It must have been written in a different language. In Rust's case it was
 [written in OCaml][ocaml-compiler]. However it was abandoned long ago and the
-only way to build a modern version of `rustc` is a slightly less modern version.
+only way to build a modern version of `rustc` is with a slightly less modern version.
 
 This is exactly how [`./x.py`] works: it downloads the current beta release of
 `rustc`, then uses it to compile the new compiler.

From 7f939765c4c46d7cef71b051e9aa0683a91e519d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Martin Ombura Jr." <8682597+martinomburajr@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 04:07:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] adds commas

---
 src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md                   | 2 +-
 src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md b/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md
index bb7dd8dd..7f530978 100644
--- a/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md
+++ b/src/building/bootstrapping/intro.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ of the same compiler.
 
 This raises a chicken-and-egg paradox: where did the first compiler come from?
 It must have been written in a different language. In Rust's case it was
-[written in OCaml][ocaml-compiler]. However it was abandoned long ago and the
+[written in OCaml][ocaml-compiler]. However, it was abandoned long ago, and the
 only way to build a modern version of rustc is with a slightly less modern
 version.
 
diff --git a/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md b/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md
index ac1fa51e..a2930b3e 100644
--- a/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md
+++ b/src/building/bootstrapping/what-bootstrapping-does.md
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ the same compiler.
 
 This raises a chicken-and-egg paradox: where did the first compiler come from?
 It must have been written in a different language. In Rust's case it was
-[written in OCaml][ocaml-compiler]. However it was abandoned long ago and the
+[written in OCaml][ocaml-compiler]. However, it was abandoned long ago, and the
 only way to build a modern version of `rustc` is with a slightly less modern version.
 
 This is exactly how [`./x.py`] works: it downloads the current beta release of