Fix typo (#1697)
* Fix typo * Fix typo in typo fix * add missing word --------- Co-authored-by: Tshepang Mbambo <tshepang@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
11bc8caeb7
commit
4b15de4985
|
|
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ In this second selection, we do not consider any where-clauses to be in scope
|
|||
because we know that each resolution will resolve to a particular impl.
|
||||
|
||||
One interesting twist has to do with nested obligations. In general, in codegen,
|
||||
we only to figure out which candidate applies, we do not care about nested obligations,
|
||||
we only need to figure out which candidate applies, and we do not care about nested obligations,
|
||||
as these are already assumed to be true. Nonetheless, we *do* currently fulfill all of them.
|
||||
That is because it can sometimes inform the results of type inference.
|
||||
That is, we do not have the full substitutions in terms of the type variables
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue