first round of link fixes

src/SUMMARY.md

@@ -22,34 +22,34 @@
 - [The HIR (High-level IR)](./hir.md)
 - [The `ty` module: representing types](./ty.md)
 - [Type inference](./type-inference.md)
-- [Trait solving (old-style)](./trait-resolution.md)
-    - [Higher-ranked trait bounds](./trait-hrtb.md)
-    - [Caching subtleties](./trait-caching.md)
-    - [Specialization](./trait-specialization.md)
+- [Trait solving (old-style)](./traits/resolution.md)
+    - [Higher-ranked trait bounds](./traits/hrtb.md)
+    - [Caching subtleties](./traits/caching.md)
+    - [Specialization](./traits/specialization.md)
 - [Trait solving (new-style)](./traits.md)
-    - [Lowering to logic](./traits-lowering-to-logic.md)
-      - [Goals and clauses](./traits-goals-and-clauses.md)
-      - [Equality and associated types](./traits-associated-types.md)
-      - [Implied bounds](./traits-implied-bounds.md)
-      - [Region constraints](./traits-regions.md)
-    - [Canonical queries](./traits-canonical-queries.md)
-      - [Canonicalization](./traits-canonicalization.md)
-    - [Lowering rules](./traits-lowering-rules.md)
-      - [The lowering module in rustc](./traits-lowering-module.md)
-    - [Well-formedness checking](./traits-wf.md)
-    - [The SLG solver](./traits-slg.md)
+    - [Lowering to logic](./traits/lowering-to-logic.md)
+      - [Goals and clauses](./traits/goals-and-clauses.md)
+      - [Equality and associated types](./traits/associated-types.md)
+      - [Implied bounds](./traits/implied-bounds.md)
+      - [Region constraints](./traits/regions.md)
+    - [Canonical queries](./traits/canonical-queries.md)
+      - [Canonicalization](./traits/canonicalization.md)
+    - [Lowering rules](./traits/lowering-rules.md)
+      - [The lowering module in rustc](./traits/lowering-module.md)
+    - [Well-formedness checking](./traits/wf.md)
+    - [The SLG solver](./traits/slg.md)
     - [An Overview of Chalk](./chalk-overview.md)
-    - [Bibliography](./traits-bibliography.md)
+    - [Bibliography](./traits/bibliography.md)
 - [Type checking](./type-checking.md)
     - [Method Lookup](./method-lookup.md)
     - [Variance](./variance.md)
 - [The MIR (Mid-level IR)](./mir.md)
-    - [MIR construction](./mir-construction.md)
-    - [MIR visitor and traversal](./mir-visitor.md)
-    - [MIR passes: getting the MIR for a function](./mir-passes.md)
-    - [MIR borrowck](./mir-borrowck.md)
-      - [MIR-based region checking (NLL)](./mir-regionck.md)
-    - [MIR optimizations](./mir-optimizations.md)
+    - [MIR construction](./mir/construction.md)
+    - [MIR visitor and traversal](./mir/visitor.md)
+    - [MIR passes: getting the MIR for a function](./mir/passes.md)
+    - [MIR borrowck](./mir/borrowck.md)
+      - [MIR-based region checking (NLL)](./mir/regionck.md)
+    - [MIR optimizations](./mir/optimizations.md)
 - [Constant evaluation](./const-eval.md)
     - [miri const evaluator](./miri.md)
 - [Parameter Environments](./param_env.md)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 
 ---
 
-- [Appendix A: Stupid Stats](./appendix-stupid-stats.md)
-- [Appendix B: Background material](./appendix-background.md)
-- [Appendix C: Glossary](./appendix-glossary.md)
-- [Appendix D: Code Index](./appendix-code-index.md)
+- [Appendix A: Stupid Stats](./appendix/stupid-stats.md)
+- [Appendix B: Background material](./appendix/background.md)
+- [Appendix C: Glossary](./appendix/glossary.md)
+- [Appendix D: Code Index](./appendix/code-index.md)

src/rustc-driver.md

@@ -73,4 +73,4 @@ thread-locals, although you should rarely need to touch it.
 [`TyCtxt`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc/ty/struct.TyCtxt.html
 [`CodeMap`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/syntax/codemap/struct.CodeMap.html
 [stupid-stats]: https://github.com/nrc/stupid-stats
-[Appendix A]: appendix-stupid-stats.html
+[Appendix A]: appendix/stupid-stats.html

src/traits/caching.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On the other hand, if there is no hit, we need to go through the [selection
 process] from scratch. Suppose, we come to the conclusion that the only
 possible impl is this one, with def-id 22:
 
-[selection process]: ./trait-resolution.html#selection
+[selection process]: ./traits/resolution.html#selection
 
 ```rust,ignore
 impl Foo<isize> for usize { ... } // Impl #22
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ We would then record in the cache `usize : Foo<$0> => ImplCandidate(22)`. Next
 we would [confirm] `ImplCandidate(22)`, which would (as a side-effect) unify
 `$t` with `isize`.
 
-[confirm]: ./trait-resolution.html#confirmation
+[confirm]: ./traits/resolution.html#confirmation
 
 Now, at some later time, we might come along and see a `usize :
 Foo<$u>`. When skolemized, this would yield `usize : Foo<$0>`, just as

src/traits/canonical-queries.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ would like to know the answer to -- and in the
 checker or other parts of the system, may in the course of doing their
 thing want to know whether some trait is implemented for some type
 (e.g., is `u32: Debug` true?). Or they may want to
-[normalize some associated type](./traits-associated-types.html).
+[normalize some associated type](./traits/associated-types.html).
 
 This section covers queries at a fairly high level of abstraction. The
 subsections look a bit more closely at how these ideas are implemented
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ value for a type variable, that means that this is the **only possible
 instantiation** that you could use, given the current set of impls and
 where-clauses, that would be provable. (Internally within the solver,
 though, they can potentially enumerate all possible answers. See
-[the description of the SLG solver](./traits-slg.html) for details.)
+[the description of the SLG solver](./traits/slg.html) for details.)
 
 The response to a trait query in rustc is typically a
 `Result<QueryResult<T>, NoSolution>` (where the `T` will vary a bit
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ we did find. It consists of four parts:
 - **Region constraints:** these are relations that must hold between
   the lifetimes that you supplied as inputs. We'll ignore these here,
   but see the
-  [section on handling regions in traits](./traits-regions.html) for
+  [section on handling regions in traits](./traits/regions.html) for
   more details.
 - **Value:** The query result also comes with a value of type `T`. For
   some specialized queries -- like normalizing associated types --

src/traits/canonicalization.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ starting from zero and numbered in a fixed order (left to right, for
 the most part, but really it doesn't matter as long as it is
 consistent).
 
-[cq]: ./traits-canonical-queries.html
+[cq]: ./traits/canonical-queries.html
 
 So, for example, if we have the type `X = (?T, ?U)`, where `?T` and
 `?U` are distinct, unbound inference variables, then the canonical
@@ -98,12 +98,12 @@ Remember that substitution S though! We're going to need it later.
 
 OK, now that we have a fresh inference context and an instantiated
 query, we can go ahead and try to solve it. The trait solver itself is
-explained in more detail in [another section](./traits-slg.html), but
+explained in more detail in [another section](./traits/slg.html), but
 suffice to say that it will compute a [certainty value][cqqr] (`Proven` or
 `Ambiguous`) and have side-effects on the inference variables we've
 created. For example, if there were only one impl of `Foo`, like so:
 
-[cqqr]: ./traits-canonical-queries.html#query-response
+[cqqr]: ./traits/canonical-queries.html#query-response
 
 ```rust,ignore
 impl<'a, X> Foo<'a, X> for Vec<X>

src/traits/goals-and-clauses.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 In logic programming terms, a **goal** is something that you must
 prove and a **clause** is something that you know is true. As
-described in the [lowering to logic](./traits-lowering-to-logic.html)
+described in the [lowering to logic](./traits/lowering-to-logic.html)
 chapter, Rust's trait solver is based on an extension of hereditary
 harrop (HH) clauses, which extend traditional Prolog Horn clauses with
 a few new superpowers.
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ paper
 ["A Proof Procedure for the Logic of Hereditary Harrop Formulas"][pphhf]
 gives the details.
 
-[pphhf]: ./traits-bibliography.html#pphhf
+[pphhf]: ./traits/bibliography.html#pphhf
 
 <a name="domain-goals"></a>
 
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ e.g. `ProjectionEq<T as Iterator>::Item = u8`
 
 The given associated type `Projection` is equal to `Type`; this can be proved
 with either normalization or using skolemized types. See [the section
-on associated types](./traits-associated-types.html).
+on associated types](./traits/associated-types.html).
 
 #### Normalize(Projection -> Type)
 e.g. `ProjectionEq<T as Iterator>::Item -> u8`
@@ -102,11 +102,12 @@ e.g. `ProjectionEq<T as Iterator>::Item -> u8`
 The given associated type `Projection` can be [normalized][n] to `Type`.
 
 As discussed in [the section on associated
-types](./traits-associated-types.html), `Normalize` implies `ProjectionEq`,
+types](./traits/associated-types.html), `Normalize` implies `ProjectionEq`,
 but not vice versa. In general, proving `Normalize(<T as Trait>::Item -> U)`
 also requires proving `Implemented(T: Trait)`.
 
-[n]: ./traits-associated-types.html#normalize
+[n]: ./traits/associated-types.html#normalize
+[at]: ./traits/associated-types.html
 
 #### FromEnv(TraitRef), FromEnv(Projection = Type)
 e.g. `FromEnv(Self: Add<i32>)`
@@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ In addition to auto traits, `WellFormed` predicates are co-inductive.
 These are used to achieve a similar "enumerate all the cases" pattern,
 as described in the section on [implied bounds].
 
-[implied bounds]: ./traits-lowering-rules.html#implied-bounds
+[implied bounds]: ./traits/lowering-rules.html#implied-bounds
 
 ## Incomplete chapter
 

src/traits/index.md

@@ -13,20 +13,20 @@ instructions for getting involved in the
 
 Trait solving is based around a few key ideas:
 
-- [Lowering to logic](./traits-lowering-to-logic.html), which expresses
+- [Lowering to logic](./traits/lowering-to-logic.html), which expresses
   Rust traits in terms of standard logical terms.
-  - The [goals and clauses](./traits-goals-and-clauses.html) chapter
+  - The [goals and clauses](./traits/goals-and-clauses.html) chapter
     describes the precise form of rules we use, and
-    [lowering rules](./traits-lowering-rules.html) gives the complete set of
+    [lowering rules](./traits/lowering-rules.html) gives the complete set of
     lowering rules in a more reference-like form.
-- [Canonical queries](./traits-canonical-queries.html), which allow us
+- [Canonical queries](./traits/canonical-queries.html), which allow us
   to solve trait problems (like "is `Foo` implemented for the type
   `Bar`?") once, and then apply that same result independently in many
   different inference contexts.
-- [Lazy normalization](./traits-associated-types.html), which is the
+- [Lazy normalization](./traits/associated-types.html), which is the
   technique we use to accommodate associated types when figuring out
   whether types are equal.
-- [Region constraints](./traits-regions.html), which are accumulated
+- [Region constraints](./traits/regions.html), which are accumulated
   during trait solving but mostly ignored. This means that trait
   solving effectively ignores the precise regions involved, always --
   but we still remember the constraints on them so that those

src/traits/lowering-module.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # The lowering module in rustc
 
 The program clauses described in the
-[lowering rules](./traits-lowering-rules.html) section are actually
+[lowering rules](./traits/lowering-rules.html) section are actually
 created in the [`rustc_traits::lowering`][lowering] module.
 
 [lowering]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_traits/lowering/

src/traits/lowering-rules.md

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ This section gives the complete lowering rules for Rust traits into
 [program clauses][pc]. It is a kind of reference. These rules
 reference the [domain goals][dg] defined in an earlier section.
 
-[pc]: ./traits-goals-and-clauses.html
-[dg]: ./traits-goals-and-clauses.html#domain-goals
+[pc]: ./traits/goals-and-clauses.html
+[dg]: ./traits/goals-and-clauses.html#domain-goals
 
 ## Notation
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The nonterminal `Ai` is used to mean some generic *argument*, which
 might be a lifetime like `'a` or a type like `Vec<A>`.
 
 When defining the lowering rules, we will give goals and clauses in
-the [notation given in this section](./traits-goals-and-clauses.html).
+the [notation given in this section](./traits/goals-and-clauses.html).
 We sometimes insert "macros" like `LowerWhereClause!` into these
 definitions; these macros reference other sections within this chapter.
 
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ This `WellFormed` rule states that `T: Trait` is well-formed if (a)
 `T: Trait` is implemented and (b) all the where-clauses declared on
 `Trait` are well-formed (and hence they are implemented). Remember
 that the `WellFormed` predicate is
-[coinductive](./traits-goals-and-clauses.html#coinductive); in this
+[coinductive](./traits/goals-and-clauses.html#coinductive); in this
 case, it is serving as a kind of "carrier" that allows us to enumerate
 all the where clauses that are transitively implied by `T: Trait`.
 
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ where WC
 
 We will produce a number of program clauses. The first two define
 the rules by which `ProjectionEq` can succeed; these two clauses are discussed
-in detail in the [section on associated types](./traits-associated-types.html),
+in detail in the [section on associated types](./traits/associated-types.html),
 but reproduced here for reference:
 
 ```text

src/traits/lowering-to-logic.md

@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ example Gopalan Nadathur's excellent
 ["A Proof Procedure for the Logic of Hereditary Harrop Formulas"][pphhf]
 in [the bibliography].
 
-[the bibliography]: ./traits-bibliography.html
-[pphhf]: ./traits-bibliography.html#pphhf
+[the bibliography]: ./traits/bibliography.html
+[pphhf]: ./traits/bibliography.html#pphhf
 
 It turns out that supporting FOHH is not really all that hard. And
 once we are able to do that, we can easily describe the type-checking

src/traits/resolution.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ some non-obvious things.
 **Note:** This chapter (and its subchapters) describe how the trait
 solver **currently** works. However, we are in the process of
 designing a new trait solver. If you'd prefer to read about *that*,
-see [*this* traits chapter](./traits.html).
+see [*this* traits chapter](./traits/index.html).
 
 ## Major concepts
 

src/type-inference.md

@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ actual return type is not `()`, but rather `InferOk<()>`. The
 to ensure that these are fulfilled (typically by enrolling them in a
 fulfillment context). See the [trait chapter] for more background on that.
 
-[trait chapter]: trait-resolution.html
+[trait chapter]: traits/resolution.html
 
 You can similarly enforce subtyping through `infcx.at(..).sub(..)`. The same
 basic concepts as above apply.