Change-Id: Ia8e666b128622391d72e42449c01c4e10f3c9e1e
GitHub-Last-Rev: c74cf13b70
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#65938
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/566855
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Fixes#65718
Change-Id: I0b3edf9085f2d71f915bdf8ff9d312509b438c5f
GitHub-Last-Rev: 9fb1ca1a63
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#65750
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/564795
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
valueInterface not copy result in the follow incorrect behavior
w1. x := ValueOf(&v).Elem()
r1. iface := Value.Interface()
w2. x.Set() or x.SetT()
The write operation of W2 will be observed by the read operation of r1,
but the existing behavior is not.
The valueInterface in deepValueEqual can, in theory, pass safe==true to not copy the object,
but there is no benchmark to indicate that the memory allocation has changed,
maybe we don't actually need safe==true here.
Change-Id: I55c423fd50adac8822a7fdbfe67af89ee223eace
GitHub-Last-Rev: 4a63867098
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64618
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/548436
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For 'case Array' in IsZero, check 'v.flag&flagIndir == 0' in the
first place, rename 'array' to 'typ' for consistency, and remove
stale comment.
Add line breaks for long sentence in isZero.
Change-Id: Id06d01fd61eefd205bf4626e6b920ae82b459455
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7225ca3f7b
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64270
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/543656
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Jes Cok <xigua67damn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
For some types where the zero value is a value where all bits of this type are 0 optimize it.
goos: windows
goarch: amd64
pkg: reflect
cpu: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics
│ old.txt │ new.txt │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
IsZero/StructInt_512-16 109.75n ± 0% 72.61n ± 1% -33.84% (p=0.000 n=12)
Change-Id: I56de8b95f4d4482068960d6f38938763fa1caa90
GitHub-Last-Rev: c143f0cd76
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64220
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/543355
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Before Go 1.21, ValueOf always escapes and a Value's content is
always heap allocated. In Go 1.21, we made it no longer always
escape, guarded by go121noForceValueEscape. This behavior has
been released for some time and there is no issue so far. We can
remove the guard now.
Change-Id: I81f5366412390f6c63b642f4c7c016da534da76a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/542795
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Currently bulkBarrierPreWrite follows a fairly slow path wherein it
calls typePointersOf, which ends up calling into fastForward. This does
some fairly heavy computation to move the iterator forward without any
assumptions about where it lands at all. It needs to be completely
general to support splitting at arbitrary boundaries, for example for
scanning oblets.
This means that copying objects during the GC mark phase is fairly
expensive, and is a regression from before allocheaders.
However, in almost all cases bulkBarrierPreWrite and
bulkBarrierPreWriteSrcOnly have perfect type information. We can do a
lot better in these cases because we're starting on a type-size
boundary, which is exactly what the iterator is built around.
This change adds the typePointersOfType method which produces a
typePointers iterator from a pointer and a type. This change
significantly improves the performance of these bulk write barriers,
eliminating some performance regressions that were noticed on the perf
dashboard.
There are still just a couple cases where we have to use the more
general typePointersOf calls, but they're fairly rare; most bulk
barriers have perfect type information.
This change is tested by the GCInfo tests in the runtime and the GCBits
tests in the reflect package via an additional check in getgcmask.
Results for tile38 before and after allocheaders. There was previous a
regression in the p90, now it's gone. Also, the overall win has been
boosted slightly.
tile38 $ benchstat noallocheaders.results allocheaders.results
name old time/op new time/op delta
Tile38QueryLoad 481µs ± 1% 468µs ± 1% -2.71% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old average-RSS-bytes new average-RSS-bytes delta
Tile38QueryLoad 6.32GB ± 1% 6.23GB ± 0% -1.38% (p=0.000 n=9+8)
name old peak-RSS-bytes new peak-RSS-bytes delta
Tile38QueryLoad 6.49GB ± 1% 6.40GB ± 1% -1.38% (p=0.002 n=10+10)
name old peak-VM-bytes new peak-VM-bytes delta
Tile38QueryLoad 7.72GB ± 1% 7.64GB ± 1% -1.07% (p=0.007 n=10+10)
name old p50-latency-ns new p50-latency-ns delta
Tile38QueryLoad 212k ± 1% 205k ± 0% -3.02% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
name old p90-latency-ns new p90-latency-ns delta
Tile38QueryLoad 622k ± 1% 616k ± 1% -1.03% (p=0.005 n=10+10)
name old p99-latency-ns new p99-latency-ns delta
Tile38QueryLoad 4.55M ± 2% 4.39M ± 2% -3.51% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old ops/s new ops/s delta
Tile38QueryLoad 12.5k ± 1% 12.8k ± 1% +2.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I0a48f848eae8777d0fd6769c3a1fe449f8d9d0a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/542219
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The upcoming built-in zero value provides an idiomatic way
to test for zero by comparing to the zero literal: v == zero.
The reflect package is meant to provide a programmatic way to perform
operations that the Go language itself provides.
Thus, it seems prudent that reflect.ValueOf(&v).Elem().IsZero() is
identical to v == zero.
This change alters the behavior of Value.IsZero in two concrete ways:
* negative zero is identical to zero
* blank fields in a struct are ignored
Prior to this change, we were already in an inconsistent state
due to a regression introduced by CL 411478.
The new behavior was already the case for comparable composite types.
This change makes it consistent for all other types
(in particular incomparable composite types and standalone numbers).
Updates #61372Fixes#61827
Change-Id: Id23fb97eb3b8921417cc75a1d3ead963e22dc3d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/517777
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This makes it easier to click around in documentation on pkg.go.dev.
Change-Id: Idc67c312bc72c612e660607e5400b43ecc110bc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/514895
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
It is possible to call reflect.ValueOf(ch).Close() on a recv-only channel,
while close(ch) is a compile-time error. Following the same reflect
semantics as send and recv this should result in a panic.
Fixes#61445
Change-Id: I2a9ee8f45963593a37bd6df4643dd64fb322f9f9
GitHub-Last-Rev: fe2d5e09f5
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#61453
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/511295
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
With CL 408826 reflect.Value not always escape. IsZero still
escapes the Value because in some cases it passes the Value
pointer to the equal function, which is function pointer. Equal
functions are compiler generated and never escapes, but the escape
analysis doesn't know. Add noescape to help.
Change-Id: Ica397c2be77cac9e8a46d03d70bac385b0aa9e82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/441937
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Types are either static (for compiler-created types) or heap
allocated and always reachable (for reflection-created types, held
in the central map). So there is no need to escape types.
With CL 408826 reflect.Value does not always escape. Some functions
that escapes Value.typ would make the Value escape without this CL.
Had to add a special case for the inliner to keep (*Value).Type
still inlineable.
Change-Id: I7c14d35fd26328347b509a06eb5bd1534d40775f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/413474
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently, reflect.ValueOf forces the referenced object to be heap
allocated. This CL makes it possible to be stack allocated. We
need to be careful to make sure the compiler's escape analysis can
do the right thing, e.g. channel send, map assignment, unsafe
pointer conversions.
Tests will be added in a later CL.
CL 408827 might help ensure the correctness.
Change-Id: I8663651370c7c8108584902235062dd2b3f65954
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/408826
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This reverts CL 487558, which is causing test failures in Google. See
b/282133554.
Change-Id: Icafa4ffc6aaa24a363abb90b8ae0b0183aca2b89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/494410
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The abi.Type field was changed to *abi.Type, thus the
bitwise representation is the same, many casts are now
avoided and replace by either rtype{afoo} or rfoo.Type.
Change-Id: Ie7643edc714a0e56027c2875498a4dfe989cf7dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/487558
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This refactoring is more problematic because the client
package wrap abi.Type, thus the self-referential fields
within ArrayType need to be downcast to the client wrappers
in several places. It's not clear to me this is worthwhile;
this CL is for additional comment, before I attempt similar
changes for other self-referential types.
Change-Id: I41e517e6d851b32560c41676b91b76d7eb17c951
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/466236
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
was two commits, the first contained a lot of intermediate work,
better this way.
Change-Id: I7c5b79ef78b21a85828c8aaf9baeae86bb144db7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/463118
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This touches a lot of files, which is bad, but it is also good,
since there's N copies of this information commoned into 1.
The new files in internal/abi are copied from the end of the stack;
ultimately this will all end up being used.
Change-Id: Ia252c0055aaa72ca569411ef9f9e96e3d610889e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/462995
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
It appears to have been unused since https://go.dev/cl/298670
in April 2021, as that change removed its only use.
It is always in the git history if it is needed again.
Change-Id: Ie55d059c102dfaa75bd253e09d48a4b30f45e941
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/483136
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Fixes the misuse of "a" vs "an", according to English grammatical
expectations and using https://www.a-or-an.com/
Change-Id: I53ac724070e3ff3d33c304483fe72c023c7cda47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/480536
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
These are replaced by unsafe.String etc, which were added in Go 1.20.
Per https://go.dev/wiki/Deprecated, we must wait until Go 1.21
to mark them deprecated.
Fixes#56906.
Change-Id: I4198c3f3456e9e2031f6c7232842e187e6448892
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/452762
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Change-Id: I75aef6bf957939fae8b680214f5923dc2713a5cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/452935
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
There has been no proposal discussion about adding these notices.
Also, even if we did decide to add them, then since their replacements
are only appearing in Go 1.20, go.dev/wiki/Deprecation says that we
should wait until Go 1.22 to add the deprecation notice.
Filed #56906 for the proposal discussion.
Fixes#56905.
Change-Id: If86cce65aa00b4b62b2b18e82503431dcbdbcfed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/452761
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
For #46746
Change-Id: I75ddb9ce24cd3394186562dae156fef9fe2d55d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/447798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Change-Id: I871a747b4b47bccc889f2fdc93a2bcebb041b719
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/447895
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Assuming the two values are valid and non-comparable, Equal should panic.
x := reflect.ValueOf([]int{1, 2, 3})
x.Equal(x) // can not report false, should panic
Assuming one of them is non-comparable and the other is invalid, it should
always report false.
x := reflect.ValueOf([]int{1, 2, 3})
y := reflect.ValueOf(nil)
x.Equal(y) // should report false
For #46746.
Change-Id: Ifecd77ca0b3de3019fae2be39048f9277831676c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440037
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The Grow method is like the proposed slices.Grow function
in that it ensures that the slice has enough capacity to append
n elements without allocating.
The implementation of Grow is a thin wrapper over runtime.growslice.
This also changes Append and AppendSlice to use growslice under the hood.
Fixes#48000
Change-Id: I992a58584a2ff1448c1c2bc0877fe76073609111
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/389635
Run-TryBot: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #46746
Change-Id: Ic7a31ddf7cd6bf6dd0db6b9eb3fee68fc180f72e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/435277
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
using Type.Comparable to simplify the Value.Comparable,
and return true directly when exit the for loop of kind == array and elements type is interface or array or struct.
Change-Id: Ib0b06a70642ba24c9215c69e7d619960fbeeed90
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/426457
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
After we deprecated reflect.{SliceHeader, StringHeader}, it is recommended
to use unsafe.{Slice, String} to replace its work. However, the compiler
and linker cannot be migrated for the time being.
As a temporary strategy, using the "internal/unsafeheader" package like
other code is the most suitable choice at present.
For #53003.
Change-Id: I69d0ef72e2d95caabd0706bbb247a719d225c758
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/429755
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: hopehook <hopehook@golangcn.org>
As discussed in CL 401434 there are substantial misuses of these in the
wild, and they are a potential source of unsafety even for code that
does not use them directly.
Since proposal #53003 has already been implemented, now is the right
time to deprecate reflect.{SliceHeader, StringHeader}.
For #53003.
Change-Id: I724cf46d4b22d2ed3cbf2b948e6aac5ee4bf0f6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428757
Run-TryBot: hopehook <hopehook@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The lowests fives bits are the kind, and the next five bits are attributes,
not the other way around.
Change-Id: I5e1d13b195b766e99f66bb1227cc7f84e85dc49d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/425185
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
v.SetIterXXX(i) is semantically identical to v.Set(i.XXX()).
If the latter panics for unexported values, so should the former.
This change may breaking some programs, but the change is justified
under the "Go 1 and the Future of Go Programs" document because
the "library has a bug that violates the specification".
In this case, the "reflect" package does not accurately match
the behavior of the Go language specification.
Also, this API was recently released, so the number of users
who could be depending on this behavior is hopefully lower.
Fixes#54628
Change-Id: If86ede51f286e38093f6697944c089f616525115
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/425184
Auto-Submit: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
go:notinheap will be replaced by runtime/internal/sys.NotInHeap, and for
longer term, we want to restrict all of its usages inside the runtime
package only.
Updates #46731
Change-Id: I267adc2a19f0dc8a1ed29b5b4aeec1a7dc7318d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/421880
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The current implementation always returns false for non-comparable
values, update the doc to reflect that.
Change-Id: I87f2da408874b0a209c8f51949e3310da15c5904
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/426195
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: hopehook <hopehook@golangcn.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
If array element is not interface, array or struct, we just need to
check whether the array element type is comparable.
Change-Id: I1ab94cfa17ae86feb6cd3fbdf878af5a776e7bec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/426194
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
For #46746
Change-Id: I879124974cdb55932cd9d07d3b384d49d5059857
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/423794
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Pouriya
guoguangwu
Jes Cok
Keith Randall
qiulaidongfeng
Cherry Mui
Michael Anthony Knyszek
Joe Tsai
Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo
Austin Clements
David Chase
Daniel Martí
cui fliter
Russ Cox
Cuong Manh Le
Ian Lance Taylor
hopehook
cuiweixie