This change replaces various uses of FileSet with either
nothing (when the parameter wasn't really needed) or token.File.
Notably, astutil.Imports was being used to extract the imports
of a file (available at ast.File.Imports), forcing a number
of wrappers to have a FileSet parameter.
Also, simplify various expressions file.Position().Line to file.Line().
Change-Id: I19fe86a18aba50352275f77ed737513744d3930c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/410366
Run-TryBot: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This change makes it so that the stub methods analysis can recognize
errors happening to method and function call expressions that are being
passed a concrete type to an interface parameter. This way, a method stub CodeAction will appear at the call site.
Updates golang/go#37537
Change-Id: I886d53f06a85b9e5160d882aa742bb2b7fcea139
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/404655
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
This CL adds a new analyzer for //go:embed directive, which
checks for the "embed" import.
Along with it, it improves doc for analysistest.Run for
comments of the the form "//...// want..." or
"//...// want..."
Updates #50262
Change-Id: I60ef0ab740feadd4fff3a4d758123b27ceda0bc6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/400854
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Nooras Saba <saba@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Provide a default value for unsafe.Pointer in fillstruct.
Fixesgolang/go#52640
Change-Id: I10a1878fbf53b082f83f44e0ba2788ead14439d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/403535
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Change-Id: I13cf73d7e043dda1a06c28bb09e413a76a68df1f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/391934
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
This CL adds support for generating method stubs for named types
that have type parameters and want to implement an interface.
See internal/lsp/testdata/stub/stub_generic_receiver.go for an example.
Note, this CL does not yet support type params on interface declarations.
Updates golang/go#37537
Change-Id: I2a2a18d364b2b489e2fbd8a74dfed88ae32d83b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/389654
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
This CL adds a quickfix CodeAction that detects "missing method"
compiler errors and suggests adding method stubs to the concrete
type that would implement the interface. There are many ways that
a user might indicate a concrete type is meant to be used as an interface.
This PR detects two types of those errors: variable declaration and function returns.
For variable declarations, things like the following should be detected:
1. var _ SomeInterface = SomeType{}
2. var _ = SomeInterface(SomeType{})
3. var _ SomeInterface = (*SomeType)(nil)
For function returns, the following example is the primary detection:
func newIface() SomeInterface {
return &SomeType{}
}
More detections can be added in the future of course.
Fixesgolang/go#37537
Change-Id: Ibb7784622184c9885eff2ccc786767682876b4d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/274372
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reading the code and running the tests, it appears we only support quick
fixes for undeclared name errors inside function bodies. Don't offer
them in other places.
The specific situation raised was type constraints, so that's what I
tested even though the problem was much broader. Also add actual error
messages where we had empty strings.
Fixesgolang/go#50935.
Change-Id: I8dadcb6e4301bf22cbe7fe5d66064aafeef02690
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/384117
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The IndexExprData type of internal/typeparams was redundant now
that the typeparams.IndexListExpr type has been introduced. Remove it,
and change GetIndexExprData to an UnpackIndexExpr method, symmetric with
PackIndexExpr. With the IndexListExpr type, both UnpackIndexExpr and
PackIndexExpr can be moved to common.go.
Change-Id: I6c31f52ab594175decfbd1a4cd94b60a23a1e629
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/377235
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 379116 changes the format of the error this checker is looking for.
Update it to handle both the old and new form.
Change-Id: I91668e4fcbe203a9028d07b780fd17e9758fc838
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/379174
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The error messages produced by go/types related to an incorrect number
of return values have changed, and have been repositioned. Update the
fillreturns analyzer to handle the Go 1.18 form of these errors.
Ideally we'd use error codes here, but can't because they are not
forwarded by go/packages. Added a TODO to revisit when error codes are
exposed.
Change-Id: I4c594fd2fd1cb7423f37ff9c6a57e9490dcbc2a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/367714
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Skip tests so we can get CL 367196 submitted. After that
reenable tests (and adjust as needed).
Change-Id: Id0a6d6b873a0760ae438f6f0cb147c20d00b1ca6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/367574
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
When infertypeargs suggested an edit that kept at least one argument the
diagnostic sent to the editor included comma and whitespace(s).
In editors/IDEs that highlight the range it looked a bit odd. This
change reduce the diagnostic range to start at the first unnecessary
argument.
Change-Id: Ib091f8ff150c66d1d8ee4f82bda8b1b37202eeba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/356989
Trust: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Do not suggest fixes for types that require type params
or that have fields that require type parameters.
Change-Id: I68059956a7d38be0ffa3f79230615437ccc5788f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/353109
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Also, change the way we test fillreturns to match the other analyzers.
Change-Id: If2124775c583524ff61017452bf065965a6cc97e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/353171
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Add a new "usesgenerics" analyzer to report uses of features related to
generic programming.
This analyzer may be used to temporarily guard other analyzers until
they may be updated to support generic features.
Along the way, update the typeparams API to return the Info.Instances
map, rather than provide indirect access, so that it can be iterated.
Fixesgolang/go#48790
Change-Id: Ia3555524beff6e19f0b9101582205e26e757c8da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/355009
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
using the typeparams convention.
Change-Id: I42094b75bd43937bdae099473d6241de887456b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/353289
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Add a test for a parameterized slice to make sure that the simplify
slice analysis still finds the simplification.
Change-Id: I20d5f064bcae60c752f0dee53472dd5db0b18a89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/352089
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This CL adds a new infertypeargs analyzer, which finds call exprs where
type arguments could be inferred, and suggests a quick fix to simplify
them.
Along the way, may two changes to the supporting frameworks:
- Initialized types.Info.Instances in go/packages
- Fail analysis tests run with suggested fixes if formatting the
resulting source fails.
Change-Id: Ib15e5bd7c26aa293c5fc18a4cff6bc047e9e31d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/351552
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Type parameters don't have default values, so for now, we just skip them
in fillreturns. I think we should still be able to handle functions
whose return values are all concrete types though.
Change-Id: I1fe4c0d46cd564ff71647294d6cc935762bbd9d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/352910
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
I missed the TODO in undeclaredname to add support for functions, so
really this belongs in that analyzer. This removes a fair bit of code.
However, the type error analyzers don't really work with the go/analysis
testing framework because the suggested fixes are split from the
diagnostics, so I moved the tests into the gopls tests.
Change-Id: I861a7ad531d2732fe698ee0ac46f23ad53b16812
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/351333
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Anonymous struct quick fixes should provide more information on
which struct they will fill. This adds the first fields of an
anonymous struct to the fill title.
Updates golang/go#48563
Change-Id: I42cee2e8b1b9405ac2e2e8cfb8deb2c7710c3056
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/351591
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Add an analyzer that checks for empty interfaces in constraint position,
that could instead use the new predeclared "any" type.
Change-Id: I6c11f74c479c2cba64b3b12e61d70d157f94393b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/351549
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This adds an analyzer that provides suggested fixes for undeclared name
errors on function calls, implementing a stub of the fuction (with an
empty body). As of now this doesn't try to guess returned types but
only parameters.
Generated functions are appended at the end of the file where these type
errors occur.
Updates golang/go#47558
Change-Id: Iaef45ada6b7b73de1fbe42e5f7e334512b65e6c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/348829
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
If there is a return statement that is guaranteed to execute in
the selection to extract to function, then the result of calling
the extracted function can be directly returned.
Updates golang/go#37170
Change-Id: I6454e4107d670e4a1bc9048b2e1073fc80fc78ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/312469
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This updates fillstruct to work even when the struct is partially
filled. User supplied fields are preserved but comments are blown away.
Preserving comments appears to be very hard with the current ast
library. One possible option is to do manual string shenanigans, but
after exploring that path it seems like A Bad Idea.
Fixesgolang/go#39804
Change-Id: Iec0bb93db05d4d726dfa6c77a8139f53b14bcc77
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/262018
Run-TryBot: Jean de Klerk <deklerk@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Jean de Klerk <deklerk@google.com>
Do a pass of unused code cleanup and other staticcheck errors.
Change-Id: Iaf5d27c4f5405d4cce3e48fa06a5d46ec757de40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/257965
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Update the title of the diagnostic to account for the fact that
fillreturns can also use in-scope variables to fill in values.
Change-Id: Ib506af76a4187ef611e96b2602f301432fcbccf0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/253278
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Avoid logging to stderr as it will interfere with LSP communication.
Change-Id: Ic9ff4f3555eabb8b0b6503650df7de5ddb76ef98
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/249997
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
In the previous implementation, we always created a default
value for each type in the struct or return statement in fillstruct
and fillreturns, respectively. Now, we try to find a variable in scope
that matches the expected type. If we find multiple matches, we choose
the variable that is named most similarly to the type. If we do not
find a variable that matches, we maintain the previous functionality.
Change-Id: I3acb7e27476afaa71aaff9ffb69445913575e2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245130
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, we kept the first variable in the
return statement that matched the each given return type. Now, we
keep searching for a non-"zero" value, even if we have already found
a "zero" value.
Change-Id: Icf0987bab90239781452319979e7a30502807e36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246917
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, fillreturns only altered return
statements that contained too few values. Now, fillreturns also examines
return statements with too many return values. In these situations,
we remove any value that is a "zero value" and does not match a type
in the return signature.
Change-Id: I7548307234ff4b16534b72a8aead95a322eb535a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246520
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Code actions that apply convenience fixes were filtered by the start
line so it wasn't possible to narrow the scope to a specific range.
This change allows clients to send a specific range (or cursor position)
to filter all fixes where the range doesn't intersect with the provided
range. It also widens the diagnostic returned by fillstruct analysis.
The idea is to provide a way to narrow the scope without breaking
clients that do want to ask for code actions using the entire line.
Updates golang/go#40438
Change-Id: Ifd984a092a4a3bf0b3a2a5426d3e65023ba4eebc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244519
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The logic for extracting a function is quite signficant, and the code
is expensive enough that we should only call it when requested by the
user. This means that we should support extracting through a command
rather than text edits in the code action.
To that end, we create a new struct for commands. Features like extract
variable and extract function can supply functions to determine if they
are relevant to the given range, and if so, to generate their text
edits. source.Analyzers now point to Commands, rather than
SuggestedFixFuncs. The "canExtractVariable" and "canExtractFunction"
functions still need improvements, but I think that can be done in a
follow-up.
Change-Id: I9ec894c5abdbb28505a0f84ad7c76aa50977827a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244598
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This CL is a follow-up from CL 241983. I didn't realize that the
undeclaredname analysis was also using the go/printer.Fprint trick,
which we decided was both incorrect and inefficient. This CL does
approximately the same things as CL 241983, with a few changes to make
the approach more general.
source.Analyzer now has a field to indicate if its suggested fix needs
to be computed separately, and that is used to determine which
code actions get commands. We also make helper functions to map
analyses to their commands.
I figured out a neater way to test suggested fixes in this CL, so I
reversed the move to source_test back to lsp_test (which was the right
place all along).
Change-Id: I505bf4790481d887edda8b82897e541ec73fb427
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/242366
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This change moves the suggested fixes logic for fillstruct out of the
analysis and into internal/lsp/source. This logic is then used as part
of a new fillstruct command. This command is returned along with the
code action results, to be executed only when the user accepts the code
action.
This led to a number of changes to testing. The suggested fix tests in
internal/lsp doesn't support executing commands, so we skip them. The
suggested fix tests in internal/lsp/source are changed to call
fillstruct directly. A new regtest is added to check the command
execution, which led to a few regtest changes.
Also, remove the `go mod tidy` code action, as it's made redundant by
the existence of the suggested fixes coming from internal/lsp/mod.
Change-Id: I35ca0aff1ace8f0097fe7cb57232997facb516a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/241983
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
I add a code action that triggers upon request of the user. A variable
name is generated manually for the extracted code because the LSP does
not support a user's ability to provide a name.
Change-Id: Id1ec19b49562b7cfbc2cd416378bec9bd021d82f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/240182
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The previous implementation did not support filling anonymous structs.
This is distinct from filling a struct that has an anonymous
struct as a field. That field will still not be filled.
golang/go#39929 has been opened to address this limitation.
Fixes: golang/go#39803
Change-Id: Ia7ba9fda2bdee092d182e0a23829b9a6d9a4b986
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/240463
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Getting the right indentation for the text in the AST proves to be a
little complicated. The most reasonable approach seems to be writing
out the AST, getting the lines with the struct definition on it,
and trimming whitespace to get the current indent. Then, we add this
indent to the struct fields in the new text.
Change-Id: I1cc3421d95edae61cfb662254ff3fb759b5c487f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/239199
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The current implementation writes strings to the diagnostic instead
of creating new AST nodes.
Change-Id: Ibb37a93a3c43fb74ec5dc687091601e055c6e1b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/238198
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now that fillstruct is an analyzer, we can simplify the code that calls
it in code_action.go. We introduce a new class of analyzer --
convenience analyzers, which are closer to commands. These represent
suggestions that won't necessarily improve the quality or correctness of
your code, but they offer small helper functions for the user.
This CL also combines the refactor rewrite tests with the suggested fix
tests, since they are effectively the same.
For now, we only support convenience analyzers when a code action was
requested on the same line as the fix. I'm not sure how to otherwise
handle this without bothering the user with unnecessary diagnostics.
Change-Id: I7f0aa198b5ee9964a907d709bae6380093d4ef21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/237687
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The current implementation of the fill struct tool is not a part of
the analysis framework. This commit moves the functionality from the
source directory to the analysis directory.
Change-Id: Ibe37b57f3e6680c8729932dbbe010a4642600e4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/237258
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The existing implementation looks for matching types in the declaration
and the leftmost value in the return statement. Instead, the analyzer
now searches across all the values in the return statement to find one
that matches the type in the declaration. Additionally, if a value in
the return statement does not match any type in the declaration, it is
not overriden.
Change-Id: I4d4aed0ef67e59bfd886b44055d523a8c478255c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/236962
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The existing implementation contains strict equality rules for
comparing the return type in the function declaration against
the return types in the function body. This causes the code in the
return statement to be incorrectly overriden with its corresponding
zero value type by the fillreturns analyzer.
Fixesgolang/go#38707
Change-Id: I07522aaf85f2a5f811a86cbc0951ae61035ff55e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/236617
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>