Phrases like "returns whether or not the image is opaque" could be
describing what the function does (it always returns, regardless of
the opacity) or what it returns (a boolean indicating the opacity).
Even when the "or not" is missing, the phrasing is bizarre.
Go with "reports whether", which is still clunky but at least makes
it clear we're talking about the return value.
These were edited by hand. A few were cleaned up in other ways.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11699043
I want to think more carefully about this.
We put this in because Marshal encoded named []byte but Unmarshal rejected them.
And we noticed that Marshal's behavior was undocumented so we documented it.
But I am starting to think the docs and Unmarshal were correct and Marshal's
behavior was the problem.
Rolling back to give us more time to think.
««« original CL description
json: unmarshal types that are byte slices.
The json package cheerfully would marshal
type S struct {
IP net.IP
}
but would give an error when unmarshalling. This change allows any
type whose concrete type is a byte slice to be unmarshalled from a
string.
Fixes#5086.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11161044
»»»
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11042046
In practice, rejecting an entire structure due to a single invalid byte
in a string is just too picky, and too hard to track down.
Be consistent with the bulk of the standard library by converting
invalid UTF-8 into UTF-8 with replacement runes.
R=golang-dev, crawshaw
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11211045
The json package cheerfully would marshal
type S struct {
IP net.IP
}
but would give an error when unmarshalling. This change allows any
type whose concrete type is a byte slice to be unmarshalled from a
string.
Fixes#5086.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11161044
The *Encoder is almost always garbage. It doesn't need an
encodeState inside of it (and its bytes.Buffer), since it's
only needed locally inside of Encode.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkEncoderEncode 2562 2553 -0.35%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkEncoderEncode 283 102 -63.96%
R=r
CC=gobot, golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/9365044
If there are no tags, the rules are the same as before.
If there is a tagged field, choose it if there is exactly one
at the top level of all fields.
More tests. The old tests were clearly inadequate, since
they all pass as is. The new tests only work with the new code.
R=golang-dev, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/8617044
The old code was incorrect and also broken. It passed the tests by accident.
The new algorithm is:
1) Sort the fields in order of names.
2) For all fields with the same name, sort in increasing depth.
3) Choose the single field with shortest depth.
If any of the fields of a given name has a tag, do the above using
tagged fields of that name only.
Fixes#5245.
R=iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/8583044
If a fixed size array is passed in as the decode target and the JSON
to decode has extra array elements that are objects, then previously
the decoder would return a "data changing underfoot" error.
Fixes#3717.
R=golang-dev, adg, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7490046
The second attempt at the Unmarshal optimization allowed
panics to get out of the json package. Add test for that bug
and remove the optimization.
Let's stop trying to optimize Unmarshal.
Fixes#4784.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7300108
The JSON unmarshaller failed to allocate an array when there
are no values for the input causing the `[]` unmarshalled
to []interface{} to generate []interface{}(nil) rather than
[]interface{}{}. This wasn't caught in the tests because Decode()
works correctly and because jsonBig never generated zero-sized
arrays. The modification to scanner_test.go quickly triggers
the error:
without the change to decoder.go, but with the change to scanner_test.go:
$ go test
--- FAIL: TestUnmarshalMarshal (0.10 seconds)
decode_test.go:446: Marshal jsonBig
scanner_test.go:206: diverge at 70: «03c1OL6$":null},{"[=» vs «03c1OL6$":[]},{"[=^\»
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL encoding/json 0.266s
Also added a simple regression to decode_test.go.
R=adg, dave, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7196050
Roll back CL making primitive type unmarshal faster,
because it broke the Unmarshal of malformed data.
Add benchmarks for unmarshal of primitive types.
Update #3949.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7228061
Otherwise it's impossible to know how much data from the
json.Decoder's underlying Reader was actually consumed.
The old fix from golang.org/issue/1955 just added docs. This
provides an actual mechanism.
Update #1955
R=golang-dev, adg, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7181053
Go 1.0 behavior was to create an UnmarshalFieldError when a json value name matched an unexported field name. This error will no longer be created and the field will be skipped instead.
Fixes#4660.
R=adg, rsc, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7139049
bytes.Equal is simpler to read and should also be faster because
of short-circuiting and assembly implementations.
Change generated automatically using:
gofmt -r 'bytes.Compare(a, b) == 0 -> bytes.Equal(a, b)'
gofmt -r 'bytes.Compare(a, b) != 0 -> !bytes.Equal(a, b)'
R=golang-dev, dave, adg, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7038051
Add a check for this case and don't try to follow the anonymous
type's non-existent fields.
Fixes#4474.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6945065
Allows encoding and decoding of maps with key of string kind, not just string type.
Fixes#3519.
R=rsc, dave
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6943047
As discussed in issue 2540, nulls are allowed for any type in JSON so they should not result in an error during Unmarshal.
Fixes#2540.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6759043
Number represents the actual JSON text,
preserving the precision and
formatting of the original input.
R=rsc, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6202068
Removes an incorrect code comment and some superfluous variables.
The comment I removed says that struct fields which implement
Unmarshaler must be pointers, even if they're in an addressable
struct. That's not the case, and there's already a test in decode_test.go
that demonstrates as much.
Encoding/json has quite a few assignments of reflect.Values to extra
variables – things like "iv := v" when there's no need to make a copy. I
think these are left over from a previous version of the reflect API. If they
aren't wanted, I wouldn't mind going through the package and getting
rid of the rest of them.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6318047
Rob Pike
Russ Cox
David Symonds
Paul Borman
Oliver Hookins
Brad Fitzpatrick
Shenghou Ma
Rick Arnold
Andrey Mirtchovski
Rémy Oudompheng
Matthew Dempsky
Caleb Spare
Thomas Kappler
Ryan Slade
Stéphane Travostino
Robert Griesemer
Roger Peppe
Jonathan Gold
Micah Stetson
David G. Andersen
Michael Chaten
Bobby Powers
Francisco Souza