CL 414836 limited the check for implicit dot for method call enabled by
a type bound. However, the checking condition for ODOTMETH only is not
right. For example, for promoted method, we have a OXDOT node instead,
and we still have to check for implicit dot in this case.
However, if the base type and embedded types have the same method name,
e.g in issue #53419, typecheck.AddImplicitDots will be confused and
result in an ambigus selector.
To fix this, we ensure methods for the base type are computed, then only
do the implicit dot check if we can find a matched method.
Fixes#54348
Change-Id: Iefe84ff330830afe35c5daffd499824db108da23
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422274
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For selector expression "x.M" where "M" is a promoted method, irgen is using
the type of receiver "x" for determining the typeparams for instantiation.
However, because M is a promoted method, so its associated receiver is
not "x", but "x.T" where "T" is the embedded field of "x". That casues a
mismatch when converting non-shape types arguments.
Fixing it by using the actual receiver which has the method, instead of
using the base receiver.
Fixes#53982
Change-Id: I1836fc422d734df14e9e6664d4bd014503960bfc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/419294
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Fixes#54135
Change-Id: I2b27af8124014b2699ea44bdc765e1fb8f6c8028
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/420394
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For type assertions, if src type is empty interface, we should
use normal type assertions rather than dynamic type assertions.
Fixes#53762
Change-Id: I596b2e4ad647fe5e42ad884f7273c78f8f50dac2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/416736
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
If value is a non-empty interface and has shape, we still need to
convert it to an interface{} first.
Fixes#53477
Change-Id: I516063ba4429a6cc24c483758387ec13815fc63e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414834
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
For unsafe.{Alignof,Offsetof,Sizeof}, subster will transform them them
to OLITERAL nodes, and discard their arguments. However, any closure in
their children nodes were already processed and added to declaration
queue. Thus, we lack of information for generating instantiation for
the closure.
To fix it, just skip substituting the closures if we are going to edit
the children nodes of unsafe builtins.
Fixes#53390
Change-Id: Ia815cd05af9dc0491f10faac4399f378ac53dec6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/412794
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For type assertions, if either src or dst type has shape, we must
convert them to dynamic type assertions.
Fixes#53309
Change-Id: Ia3362fa67c011febcbdb5b26f856d081b5c366de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/411617
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Rename DynamicType's "X" field to "RType".
Split DynamicTypeAssertExpr's "T" field into "RType" and "ITab", the
same as DynamicType, updating all uses accordingly.
Change-Id: I8cec8171349c93234a10ac50708f800dee6fb1d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/405334
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Type arguments are always type expressions, which are semantically
represented by Ntype.
In fact, the slice should probably just be []*types.Type instead, and
that would remove a lot of ir.TypeNode wrapping/unwrapping. But this
lead to issues within the stenciling code, and I can't immediately
make sense why.
Change-Id: Ib944db30e4d21284bc2d8d954b68ecb70b4205a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/403843
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
As with ir.CompLitExpr.Ntype, there's no need for
ir.TypeAssertExpr.Ntype in a pure-types2 world.
Change-Id: Iff48c98330f072fd6b26099e13a19c56adecdc42
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/403842
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
When we convert a type to a shaped interface type, we are not able
to recognize the itab. So passing the itab by dictionary as the
workaround.
Fixes#52026.
Change-Id: I75c23c7dd215daf9761dc24116a8af2c28c6d948
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/401034
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL:
1. extracts typecheck.LookupNum into a method on *types.Pkg, so that
it can be used with any package, not just types.LocalPkg,
2. adds a new helper function closureSym to generate symbols in the
appropriate package as needed within stencil.go, and
3. updates the existing typecheck.LookupNum+Name.SetSym code to call
closureSym instead.
No functional change (so no need to backport to Go 1.18), but a little
cleaner, and avoids polluting types.LocalPkg.Syms with symbols that we
won't end up using.
Updates #52117.
Change-Id: Ifc8a3b76a37c830125e9d494530d1f5b2e3e3e2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/403197
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Endlineno is lost when we call "genericSubst" to create the new
instantiation of the generic function. This will cause "readFuncLines"
to fail to read the target function.
To fix this issue, as @mdempsky pointed out, add the line in
cmd/compile/internal/noder/stencil.go:
newf.Endlineno = gf.Endlineno
Fixes#51988
Change-Id: Ib408e4ed0ceb68df8dedda4fb551309e8385aada
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399057
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
This reverts commit e550c30545.
Reason for revert: Method bound calls are no longer implemented using interface calls, so it is no longer necessary. Leaving the test, though.
Change-Id: I80f1e4cd921063cd27ca8f07998316ca282e075b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/395594
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
When we have x.M(args) where x is a value of type parameter type, we
currently cast x to the bound of that type parameter (which is an interface)
and then invoke the method on that interface. That's pretty inefficient
because:
1) We need to convert x to an interface, which often requires allocation.
With CL 378178 it is at least stack allocation, but allocation nontheless.
2) We need to call through wrapper functions to unpack the interface
into the right argument locations for the callee.
Instead, let's just call the target directly. The previous CL to this one
added method expression closures to the dictionary, which is a simple
captureless closure that implements T.M for type parameter T and method M.
So to implement x.M(args) for x of type T, we use methodexpr(T,M)(x, args).
We just need to move x from the receiver slot to the first argument, and
use the dictionary entry to implement the polymorphism. This works because
we stencil by shape, so we know how to marshal x for the call even though
we don't know its exact type.
We should be able to revert CL 378178 after this one, as that optimization
will no longer be necssary as we're not converting values to interfaces
to implement this language construct anymore.
Update #50182
Change-Id: I813de4510e41ab63626e58bd1167f9ae93016202
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/385274
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently we do quite a dance for method expressions on generic
types. We write a new closure, and in that closure convert the
receiver to an interface with the required method, then call the
target using an interface call.
Instead in this CL, we just allocate a (captureless) closure in the
dictionary which implements that method expression.
This CL makes method expressions faster and simpler. But the real win
is some followon CLs, where we can use the same closure to implement
bound method calls using the same closure, instead of converting to
interface and having wrappers convert back. Much faster and simpler.
Still thinking about how to do method values. The receiver still
needs to be captured, so there must be some closure involved, I think.
Update #50182
Change-Id: I1fbd57e7105663f8b049955b8f4111649a5f4aa8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/385254
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
First law of cmd/compile frontend development: thou shalt not rely on
types.Sym.
This CL replaces Type.OrigSym with Type.OrigType, which semantically
matches what all of the uses within the frontend actually care about,
and avoids using types.Sym, which invariably leads to mistakes because
symbol scoping in the frontend doesn't work how anyone intuitively
expects it to.
Fixes#51765.
Change-Id: I4affe6ee0718103ce5006ab68aa7e1bb0cac6881
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/394274
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
CL 338129 added getDictionaryType to get the dictionary type from the
specified dict param, but still using the one in info.dictParam, which
is wrong.
Fixes#51413
Change-Id: Ie13460c1e5751c4c5fc44479a44f6eed8b3b06e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/391994
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Both the thing we're switching on, as well as the cases we're switching for.
Convert anything containing a type parameter to interface{} before the
comparison happens.
Fixes#51522
Change-Id: I97ba9429ed332cb7d4240cb60f46d42226dcfa5f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/391594
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
In getInstantiation, we were not computing tparams correctly for the
case where the receiver of a method was a fully-instantiated type. This
wasn't affecting later parts of the function, since method
instantiations of fully-instantiated types were already being calculated
in an earlier path. But it did give us a non-typeparam when trying to
see if a shape was associated with a type param with a structural type.
The fix is just to get the typeparams associated with the base generic
type. Then we can eliminate a conditional check later in the code.
The tparam parameter of Shapify should always be non-nil
Fixes#51367
Change-Id: I6f95fe603886148b2dad0c581416c51373c85009
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/388116
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The problem in 51355 is that escape analysis decided that the
dictionary variable was captured by reference instead of by value. We
want dictionaries to always be captured by value.
Escape analysis was confused because it saw what it thought was a
reassignment of the dictionary variable. In fact, it was the only
assignment, it just wasn't marked as the defining assignment. Fix
that.
Add an assert to make sure this stays true.
Fixes#51355
Change-Id: Ifd9342455fa107b113f5ff521a94cdbf1b8a7733
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/388115
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
We changed to delaying all transforms of generic functions, since there
are so many complicated situations where type params can be used. We
missed changing so that all Call expressions(not just some) are delayed
if in a generic function. This changes to delaying all transforms on
calls in generic functions. Had to convert Call() to g.callExpr() (so we
can access g.delayTransform()). By always delaying transforms on calls
in generic functions, we actually simplify the code a bit both in
g.CallExpr() and stencil.go.
Fixes#51236
Change-Id: I0342c7995254082c4baf709b0b92a06ec14425e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/386220
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Given we have support for field access to type params with a single
structural type, we need to distinguish between methods calls and field
access when we have an OXDOT node on an expression which is a typeparam
(or correspondingly a shape). We were missing checks in getInstInfo,
which figures out the dictionary format, which then caused problems when
we generate the dictionaries. We don't need/want dictionary entries for
field access, only for bound method calls. Added a new function
isBoundMethod() to distinguish OXDOT nodes which are bound calls vs.
field accesses on a shape.
Removed isShapeDeref() - we can't have field access or method call on a
pointer to variable of type param type.
Fixes#50690
Change-Id: Id692f65e6f427f28cd2cfe474dd30e53c71877a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379674
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In the compiler, we need to distinguish field and method access on a
type param. For field access, we avoid the dictionary access (to create
an interface bound) and just do the normal transformDot() (which will
create the field access on the shape type).
This field access works fine for non-pointer types, since the shape type
preserves the underlying type of all types in the shape. But we
generally merge all pointer types into a single shape, which means the
field will not be accessible via the shape type. So, we need to change
Shapify() so that a type which is a pointer type is mapped to its
underlying type, rather than being merged with other pointers.
Because we don't want to change the export format at this point in the
release, we need to compute StructuralType() directly in types1, rather
than relying on types2. That implementation is in types/type.go, along
with the helper specificTypes().
I enabled the compiler-related tests in issue50417.go, added an extra
test for unnamed pointer types, and added a bunch more tests for
interesting cases involving StructuralType(). I added a test
issue50417b.go similar to the original example, but also tests access to
an embedded field.
I also added a unit test in
cmd/compile/internal/types/structuraltype_test.go that tests a bunch of
unusual cases directly (some of which have no structural type).
Updates #50417
Change-Id: I77c55cbad98a2b95efbd4a02a026c07dfbb46caa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/376194
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Let T be a type parameter, and say we instantiate it with S, a type
that isn't pointer-like (e.g. a pair of ints, or as in 50182, a
slice). Then to call a method m on a variable of type T, the compiler
does essentially:
var v T = ...
i := (interface{m()})(v)
i.m()
The conversion at that second line allocates, as we need to make the
data word for an interface. And in the general case, that interface
may live an arbitrarily long time. But in this case, we know it
doesn't.
The data word of i has type *S. When we call i.m, we can't call S.m
directly. It is expecting an S, not a *S. We call through a wrapper
defined on *S, which looks like:
func (p *S) m() {
var s S = *p
s.m()
}
The value passed in for p is exactly the data word mentioned above. It
never escapes anywhere - the wrapper copies a type S variable out of
*p and p is dead after that. That means that in the situation where we
build an interface for the explicit purpose of calling a method on it,
and use that built interface nowhere else, the allocation of the data
word for that interface is known to die before the call returns and
thus can be stack allocated.
One tricky case is that although the allocation of the backing store
of the interface conversion doesn't escape, pointers we store *inside*
that allocation might escape (in fact they definitely will, unless we
can devirtualize the receiver).
Fixes#50182
Change-Id: I40e893955c2e6871c54ccecf1b9f0cae17871b0d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/378178
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Finally figured out how to deal with the interaction between generics
and inlining. The problem has been: what to do if you inline a function
that uses a new instantiated type that hasn't been seen in the current
package? This might mean that you need to do another round of
function/method instantiatiations after inlining, which might lead to
more inlining, etc. (which is what we currently do, but it's not clear
when you can stop the inlining/instantiation loop).
We had thought that one solution was to export instantiated types (even
if not marked as exportable) if they are referenced in exported
inlineable functions. But that was quite complex and required changing
the export format. But I realized that we really only need to make sure
the relevant dictionaries and shape instantiations for the instantiated
types are exported, not the instantiated type itself and its wrappers.
The instantiated type is naturally created as needed, and the wrappers
are generated automatically while writing out run-time type (making use
of the exported dictionaries and shape instantiations).
So, we just have to make sure that those dictionaries and shape
instantiations are exported, and then they will be available without any
extra round of instantiations after inlining. We now do this in
crawler.go. This is especially needed when the instantiated type is only
put in an interface, so relevant dictionaries/shape instantiations are
not directly referenced and therefore exported, but are still needed for
the itab.
This fix avoids the phase ordering problem where we might have to keep
creating new type instantiations and instantiated methods after each
round of inlining we do.
Removed the extra round of instantiation/inlining that were added in the
previous fix. The existing tests
test/typeparam{geninline.go,structinit.go} already test this situation
of inlining a function referencing a new instantiated type.
Added the original example from issue 50121 as test (has 5 packages),
since it found a problem with this code that the current simpler test
for 50121 did not find.
Change-Id: Iac5d0dddf4be19376f6de36ee20a83f0d8f213b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/375494
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
In the dict info, we need to save the SelectorExpr of a generic method
call when making its sub-dictionary entry. The generic method call will
eventually be transformed into a function call on the method shape
instantiation, so we may not always have the selector info available
when we need it to create a dictionary. We use this SelectorExpr as
needed if the relevant call node has already been transformed.
Similarly, we save the InstExpr of generic function calls, since the
InstExpr will be dropped when the function call is transformed to a call
to a shape instantiation. We use this InstExpr if the relevant function
call has already been transformed.
Added an extra generic function Some2 and a call to it from Some that
exercises the generic function case. The existing test already tests the
method call case.
Fixes#50264
Change-Id: I2c7c7d79a8e33ca36a5e88e64e913c57500c97f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/373754
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
We can import an shape-instantiated function/method for inlining
purposes. If we are instantiating the methods of a instantiated type
that we have seen, and it happens to need a shape instantiation that we
have imported, then don't re-create the instantiation, since we will end
up with conflicting/duplicate definitions for the instantiation symbol.
Instead, we can just use the existing imported instantation, and enter
it in the instInfoMap[].
Fixes#50121
Change-Id: I6eeb8786faad71106e261e113048b579afad04fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/371414
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
It causes a crash because of the unexpected XDOT operation. It's not
needed, since we will run ComputeAddrTaken() on function instantiations
after stenciling. And it's not always correct, since we may not be able
to distinguish between a array and a slice, if a type is dependent on a
type param.
However, we do need to call ComputeAddrTaken on instantiations created
during inlining, since that is after the main ComputeAddrTaken pass.
Fixes#49659
Change-Id: I0bb610cf11f14e4aa9068f6ca2a012337b069c79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/365214
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The main fix is that we should call ir.SetPos() at the beginning of
(*subster).node.edit function, since that is analogous to the
ir.SetPos() at the beginning of typecheck.typecheck(). It ensures that
transform functions can use base.Pos() with appropriate results, just
like their corresponding tc*() functions do.
A small fix is to make sure that the new nodes creates for dictionary
references have the correct position based on the location of the
function call.
Another small fix is to the use of base.Pos when creating a new selector
expression (including implicit XDOTs) for a method expression in
buildClosure().
Also, I converted the final use of base.Pos in stencil.go to src.NoXPos,
since the nodes created by AddImplicitDots will be checked for their
type, but won't actually be used.
I also needed to add an ir.SetPos() at the beginning of transformCall(),
since transformCall() is called in the modify and dict passes, when we
base.Pos is not being set for each node.
This change fixes all the line numbering problems printed out from
Alessandro's program, except for auto-generated functions (which I think
are fine).
Fixes#49523
Change-Id: I9836a497b7beba25ecafdde653a6c2036a3020d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363835
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Like OFUNCINST, in case of OXDOT call expression, the arguments need
to be transformed earlier, so any needed CONVIFACE nodes are exposed.
Fixes#49538
Change-Id: I275ddf6f53a9cadc8708e805941cdf7bdffabba9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363554
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Our compiler gets confused between functions that were declared
with no body, and those which have a body but it is empty.
Ensure that when stenciling, we generate a nonempty body.
The particular test that causes this problem is in
cmd/compile/internal/gc/main.go:enqueueFunc. It thinks that if
a function has no body, then we need to generate ABI wrappers for
it, but not compile it.
Fixes#49524
Change-Id: Id962666a2098f60a2421484b6a776eafdc4f4a63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363395
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
When building a call expression for function instantiation closure, if
it's a variadic function, the CallExpr.IsDDD must be set for typecheck
to work properly. Otherwise, there will be a mismatch between the
arguments type and the function signature.
Fixes#49516
Change-Id: I0af90ee3fcc3e6c8bba8b20e331e044cbce17985
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363314
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In stencil.go, change doubleCheck to false, which will turn off some
double-checking code which isn't needed generally, now that we have lots
of tests of end-to-end runs.
Also, removed checkDictionary() which is unused and is unlikely to be
useful in the future.
Change-Id: I4e5acceab80f4904b174422bae21ca82cf04f943
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/361923
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
When bulding formal arguments of newly created closure, irgen forgets to
set "..." field attribute, causing type mismatched between the closure
function and the ONAME node represents that closure function.
Fixes#49432
Change-Id: Ieddaa64980cdd3d8cea236a5a9de0204ee21ee39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/361961
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
In case of reference to method call of an imported fully-instantiated
type, nameNode.Func will be nil causes checkFetchBody panic. To fix
this, make sure checkFetchBody is only called when Func is not nil.
Fixes#49246
Change-Id: I32e9208385a86d4600d8ebf6f5efd8fca571ea16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/360056
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
There were two main outer switch statements in node() that can just be
combined. Also, for simplicity, changed an IsCmp() conditional into just
another case in the switch statement.
Also, the inner OCALL switch statement had a bunch of fairly duplicate
cases. Combined the cases that all had no special semantics, into a
single default case calling transformCall().
In the OCALL case in dictPass(), got rid of a check for OFUNCINST (which
will always have been removed by this point). Also, eliminated an assert
that could cause unneded failures. transformCall() should always be
called if the node op is still OCALL, so no need to assert on the ops of
call.X.
Added an extra test in issue47078.go, to explicitly check for case where
the X argument of a call is a DOTTYPE.
Change-Id: Ifb3f812ce12820a4ce08afe2887f00f7fc00cd2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/358596
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The method of using references to dictionaries to hold methods
live during linker deadcode elimination wasn't working very well.
I implemented a new scheme in the CL below this, so this CL strips
out the old method.
The new method has the added benefit of having 0 runtime overhead
(unlike the stuff we're ripping out here, which does have a small overhead).
Update #48047
Change-Id: I68ac57119792d53c58f1480f407de6ab2bb53211
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/357836
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
We don't need it any more, after CL 357835.
Change-Id: I1ff5f24b5540c3e80c4b35be8215a1c378952274
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/357894
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
In preparation for capturing the implicit interface bit in export data,
thread through the IsImplicit property from types2 into typecheck.
Change-Id: I9b46fe73de102935a127e6ececaacd76738b557e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/357109
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Simple cleanup: convert a bunch of if's to a switch statement in
getInstInfo. Also, use a few extra variables to avoid repeated node
conversions (such as n.(*ir.CallExpr))
Change-Id: I7a2a4efb569415256a8bc9350fb100bd2d8cfb39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/356311
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
SetImplicit() has an explicit meaning and really shouldn't be used in
this way - its use is left over from early prototype of the dictionary
code. Convert from using SetImplicit to just using a map during
traversal.
Change-Id: I3d257c101a859f000e159d7ced307d1b7cf990d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/356310
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Modify the phase for creating needed function/method instantiations and
modifying functions to use those instantiations, so that the phase is
self-contained and can be called again after inlining. This is to deal
with the issue that inlining may reveal new fully-instantiated types
whose methods must be instantiated.
With this change, we have an extra phase for instantiation after
inlining, to take care of the new fully-instantiated types that have
shown up during inlining. We call inline.InlineCalls() for any new
instantiated functions that are created.
Change-Id: I4ddf0b1907e5f1f7d45891db7876455a99381133
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/352870
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Alexander Rakoczy <alex@golang.org>
Cuong Manh Le
Wayne Zuo
jacobishao
Keith Randall
Matthew Dempsky
hopehook
Dan Scales
Robert Findley