Add "else with" action will reduce the template complexity in some use cases(#57646).
This action will be added:
{{with pipeline}} T1 {{else with pipeline}} T0 {{end}}.
Fixes#57646
Change-Id: I90ed546ab671805f753343b00bd3c9d1a1d5581d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545376
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #60088
Change-Id: Ibc3983ca5cfe396087ddfa96c43cfe32ca47129a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/514640
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
I unintentionally flipped them in CL 446795.
For #56490Fixes#60801
Change-Id: I57586bec052e1b2cc61513870ce24dd6ce17e56b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/503575
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Update unicode/tables.go to reflect changes in the Unicode Standard up to
Unicode 15.0.0, released 13 Sept 2022.
In order to accommodate this update, strconv/isPrint has been updated to
reflect changes in printable characters.
Also changed is template/exec_test.go for both text and html packages- in
the test "TestJSEscaping", rune U+FDFF was used as a placeholder for an
unprintable character. This codepoint was assigned and made printable in
Unicode 14.0.0, breaking this test. It has been replaced with the assigned
and never-printable U+FFFE to fix the test and provide resiliency in the
future.
This upgrade bypasses Unicode 14.0.0, but is compatible.
Updates https://github.com/golang/go/issues/48621
Fixes https://github.com/golang/go/issues/55079
Change-Id: I40efd097eb746db0727ebf7437280916d1242e47
GitHub-Last-Rev: c8885cab7a
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#57265
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/456837
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
We were mishandling {{range $i = .}}, treating it as though it were
{{range $i := .}}. That happened to work if $i were the most recently
declared variable, but not otherwise.
Fixes#56490
Change-Id: I222a009d671d86c06a980a54388e05f12101c00b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/446795
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: I559986b5408d3967c58c9abc6e8f4b04b25496a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428280
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The existing code errors out immediately if the argument is not
"comparable", making it impossible to test a slice, map, and so
on from being compared to nil.
Fix by delaying the "comparable" error check until we encounter
an actual check between two non-comparable, non-nil values.
Note for the future: reflect makes it unnecessarily clumsy
to deal with nil values in cases like this. For instance, it
should be possible to check if a value is nil without stepping
around a panic. See the new functions isNil and canCompare
for my (too expensive) workaround.
Fixes#51642
Change-Id: Ic4072698c4910130ea7e3d76e7a148d8a8b88162
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/392274
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
And then revert the bootstrap cmd directories and certain testdata.
And adjust tests as needed.
Not reverting the changes in std that are bootstrapped,
because some of those changes would appear in API docs,
and we want to use any consistently.
Instead, rewrite 'any' to 'interface{}' in cmd/dist for those directories
when preparing the bootstrap copy.
A few files changed as a result of running gofmt -w
not because of interface{} -> any but because they
hadn't been updated for the new //go:build lines.
Fixes#49884.
Change-Id: Ie8045cba995f65bd79c694ec77a1b3d1fe01bb09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/368254
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
to avoid a crash on a nil pointer as an embedded field.
Fixes#48215
Change-Id: I214faa6e3cf08cdec1c01035e4bbca0900c6a408
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/357963
Trust: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
In the last CL I missed the fact that except for the final value the
code already unwraps the argument.
For #31103
Change-Id: Ic9099aeb50c6b3322fc14a90ac8026c1d8cb1698
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/354091
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
For #31103
Change-Id: I9c0aa64f95f564de31a4c178e3930584d41316bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/353610
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
There was a bug in the short-circuit code for and/or added in CL 321490:
it ignored the value passed in by an earlier pipeline.
For #31103
Change-Id: Ic31f4d7cedfe563ef968cbb712ecfb2413c42eb5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/353130
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Break and continue for range loops was accepted as a proposal in June 2017.
It was implemented in CL 66410 (Oct 2017)
but then rolled back in CL 92155 (Feb 2018)
because html/template changes had not been implemented.
This CL reimplements break and continue in text/template
and then adds support for them in html/template as well.
Fixes#20531.
Change-Id: I05330482a976f1c078b4b49c2287bd9031bb7616
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/321491
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Making the builtin and and or functions use short-circuit
evaluation was accepted as a proposal in April 2019,
but we never got around to implementing it. Do that.
Fixes#31103.
Change-Id: Ia43d4a9a6b0ab814f2dd3471ebaca3e7bb1505cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/321490
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
{{eq .x 0}} where .x is a nil interface{} should be false, not a type error.
Similarly, {{eq .x .x}} should succeed, not panic in reflect.
Fixes#45982.
Change-Id: I90aba82bb2f1a9e162bde1290c94f5028f56f412
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/317470
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This adds a new lock protecting "tmpl".
This is a copy of https://golang.org/cl/257817 by Andreas Fleig,
updated for current tip, and updated to start running the
html/template TestEscapeRace test.
Thanks to @bep for providing the test case.
Fixes#39807
Change-Id: Ic8874484290283a49116812eeaffb8608346dc70
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/316669
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
template range require channel contains RecvDir
if recv on send only channel will raise an panic.
Fixes#43065
Change-Id: Ie0ea70ce60e074bf8c9f2378e07ef1d4c41dc38f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/276532
Trust: Meng Zhuo <mzh@golangcn.org>
Run-TryBot: Meng Zhuo <mzh@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
The old ioutil references are still valid, but update our code
to reflect best practices and get used to the new locations.
Code compiled with the bootstrap toolchain
(cmd/asm, cmd/dist, cmd/compile, debug/elf)
must remain Go 1.4-compatible and is excluded.
Also excluded vendored code.
For #41190.
Change-Id: I6d86f2bf7bc37a9d904b6cee3fe0c7af6d94d5b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263142
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
This allows multiline constructs like:
{{"hello" |
printf}}
Now that unclosed actions can span multiple lines,
track and report the start of the action when reporting errors.
Also clean up a few "unexpected <error message>" to be just "<error message>".
Fixes#29770.
Change-Id: I54c6c016029a8328b7902a4b6d85eab713ec3285
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/254257
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The existing implementation is not compatible with JSON
escape as it uses hex escaping.
Unicode escape, instead, is valid for both JSON and JS.
This fix avoids creating a separate escaping context for
scripts of type "application/ld+json" and it is more
future-proof in case more JSON+JS contexts get added
to the platform (e.g. import maps).
Fixes#33671Fixes#37634
Change-Id: Id6f6524b4abc52e81d9d744d46bbe5bf2e081543
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/226097
Reviewed-by: Carl Johnson <me@carlmjohnson.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The recently added slice function used indirectInterface, but then
forgot to actually call reflect.Value.Slice on its result. Calling the
Slice method on the original Value without indirectInterface would
result in a panic, if our slice was indeed behind an interface.
Fix that, and add test cases for all three built-in functions that work
with slices.
Fixes#36199.
Change-Id: I9a18f4f604a3b29967eefeb573f8960000936b88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/211877
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Ampersand and equal are not dangerous in a JS/JSString context
but they might cause issues if interpolated in HTML attributes.
This change makes it harder to introduce XSS by misusing
escaping.
Thanks to t1ddl3r <t1ddl3r@gmail.com> for reporting this common
misuse scenario.
Fixes#35665
Change-Id: Ice6416477bba4cb2ba2fe2cfdc20e027957255c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207637
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Samuel <mikesamuel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
An error check was missing: If the first argument of a pipeline is
parenthesized, and the pipeline has further arguments, then
syntactically the pipeline is a function invocation and there must
be a "call". Tricky rare corner case, but easily caught.
Add the error check and some tests to verify behavior.
Fixes#31810.
Change-Id: Ica80b7c11284e4ea9e8cc94a01dbbc9a67e42079
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206124
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When using a '.' constant literal as a reflect.Value variadic argument,
idealConstant would incorrectly result in a float64. This is because
rune literals can be represented as a float64, and contain a period,
which tricked the logic into thinking the literal must have been a
floating point number.
This also happened with other characters that can be part of a floating
point number, such as 'e' or 'P'.
To fix these edge cases, exit the case sooner if the literal was a rune,
since that should always go to the int case instead.
Finally, add test cases that verify that they behave properly. These
would error before, since eq would receive a mix of int and float64,
which aren't comparable.
Fixes#34483.
Change-Id: Icfcb7803bfa0cf317a1d1adacacad3d69a57eb42
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196808
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Payne <tom@airmap.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Extends the built-in eq function to support all Go
comparable types.
Fixes#33740
Change-Id: I522310e313e251c4dc6a013d33d7c2034fe2ec8e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/193837
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The new slice function returns the result of slicing its first argument by
the following arguments. Thus {{slice x 1 3}} is, in Go syntax, x[1:3].
Each sliced item must be a string, slice, or array.
Closed#30153
RELNOTE=yes
Change-Id: I63188c422848cee3d383a64dc4d046e3a1767c63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/161762
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Shorten some of the longest tests that run during all.bash.
Removes 7r 50u 21s from all.bash.
After this change, all.bash is under 5 minutes again on my laptop.
For #26473.
Change-Id: Ie0460aa935808d65460408feaed210fbaa1d5d79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/177559
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Before this commit, the two logically equivalent conditionals below would
produce different output:
{{ if not .NonEmptyInterfaceTypedNil }}OK{{ else }}{{ end }}
{{ if .NonEmptyInterfaceTypedNil }}{{ else }}OK{{ end }}
The functions `not`, `or`, and `and` all use the same `truth` function, which
unwraps any concrete interface value before passing it to `isTrue`.
`if` and `with` also use `isTrue` to establish truth, but was missing the
interface indirect call.
Fixes#30501
Change-Id: I9c49eed41e737d8f162e39bef1c3b82fd5518fed
GitHub-Last-Rev: 95fc2c82f2
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#30534
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/164958
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Trying to call a method on a nil interface is a panic in Go. For
example:
var stringer fmt.Stringer
println(stringer.String()) // nil pointer dereference
In https://golang.org/cl/143097 we started recovering panics encountered
during function and method calls. However, we didn't handle this case,
as text/template panics before evalCall is ever run.
In particular, reflect's MethodByName will panic if the receiver is of
interface kind and nil:
panic: reflect: Method on nil interface value
Simply add a check for that edge case, and have Template.Execute return
a helpful error. Note that Execute shouldn't just error if the interface
contains a typed nil, since we're able to find a method to call in that
case.
Finally, add regression tests for both the nil and typed nil interface
cases.
Fixes#30143.
Change-Id: Iffb21b40e14ba5fea0fcdd179cd80d1f23cabbab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/161761
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
If we're accessing a field on a nil struct pointer, and that field is
present in the type, we should print a "nil pointer evaluating X.Y" error
instead of the broader "can't evaluate field Y in X". The latter error
should still be used for the cases where the field is simply missing.
While at it, remove the isNil checks in the struct and map cases. The
indirect func will only return a true isNil when returning a pointer or
interface reflect.Value, so it's impossible for either of these checks
to be useful.
Finally, extend the test suite to test a handful of these edge cases,
including the one shown in the original issue.
Fixes#29137.
Change-Id: I53408ced8a7b53807a0a8461b6baef1cd01d25ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153341
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This CL updates text/template's scanner to accept the
new number syntaxes:
- Hexadecimal floating-point values.
- Digit-separating underscores.
- Leading 0b and 0o prefixes.
See golang.org/design/19308-number-literals for background.
For #12711.
For #19308.
For #28493.
For #29008.
Change-Id: I68c16ea35c3f506701063781388de72bafee6b8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160248
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
There's precedent in handling panics that happen in functions called
from the standard library. For example, if a fmt.Formatter
implementation fails, fmt will absorb the panic into the output text.
Recovering panics is useful, because otherwise one would have to wrap
some Template.Execute calls with a recover. For example, if there's a
chance that the callbacks may panic, or if part of the input data is nil
when it shouldn't be.
In particular, it's a common confusion amongst new Go developers that
one can call a method on a nil receiver. Expecting text/template to
error on such a call, they encounter a long and confusing panic if the
method expects the receiver to be non-nil.
To achieve this, introduce safeCall, which takes care of handling error
returns as well as recovering panics. Handling panics in the "call"
function isn't strictly necessary, as that func itself is run via
evalCall. However, this makes the code more consistent, and can allow
for better context in panics via the "call" function.
Finally, add some test cases with a mix of funcs, methods, and func
fields that panic.
Fixes#28242.
Change-Id: Id67be22cc9ebaedeb4b17fa84e677b4b6e09ec67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143097
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This turns
panic: function name is not a valid identifier
into
panic: function name "" is not a valid identifier
and also makes it consistent with the func signature check.
This CL also makes the testBadFuncName func a test helper.
Change-Id: Id967cb61ac28228de81e1cd76a39f5195a5ebd11
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130998
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 95215 changed text/template so that untyped nil arguments were no
longer ignored, but were instead passed to functions as expected.
This had an unexpected effect on html/template, where all data is
implicitly passed to functions: originally untyped nil arguments were
not passed and were thus effectively ignored, but after CL 95215 they
were passed and were printed, typically as an escaped version of "<nil>".
This CL restores some of the behavior of html/template by ignoring
untyped nil arguments passed implicitly to escaper functions.
While eliminating one change to html/template relative to earlier
releases, this unfortunately introduces a different one: originally
values of interface type with the value nil were printed as an escaped
version of "<nil>". With this CL they are ignored as though they were
untyped nil values. My judgement is that this is a less common case.
We'll see.
This CL adds some tests of typed and untyped nil values to
html/template and text/template to capture the current behavior.
Updates #18716Fixes#25875
Change-Id: I5912983ca32b31ece29e929e72d503b54d7b0cac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121815
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Variables can be declared and shadowing is supported, but modifying
existing variables via assignments was not available.
This meant that modifying a variable from a nested block was not
possible:
{{ $v := "init" }}
{{ if true }}
{{ $v := "changed" }}
{{ end }}
v: {{ $v }} {{/* "init" */}}
Introduce the "=" assignment token, such that one can now do:
{{ $v := "init" }}
{{ if true }}
{{ $v = "changed" }}
{{ end }}
v: {{ $v }} {{/* "changed" */}}
To avoid confusion, rename PipeNode.Decl to PipeNode.Vars, as the
variables may not always be declared after this change. Also change a
few other names to better reflect the added ambiguity of variables in
pipelines.
Modifying the text/template/parse package in a backwards incompatible
manner is acceptable, given that the package godoc clearly states that
it isn't intended for general use. It's the equivalent of an internal
package, back when internal packages didn't exist yet.
To make the changes to the parse package sit well with the cmd/api test,
update except.txt with the changes that we aren't worried about.
Fixes#10608.
Change-Id: I1f83a4297ee093fd45f9993cebb78fc9a9e81295
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84480
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
reflect.Value is a struct and does not have a kind nor any flag for
untyped nils. As a result, it is tricky to differentiate when we're
missing a value, from when we have one but it is untyped nil.
We could start using *reflect.Value instead, to add one level of
indirection, using nil for missing values and new(reflect.Value) for
untyped nils. However, that is a fairly invasive change, and would also
mean unnecessary allocations.
Instead, use a special reflect.Value that depicts when a value is
missing. This is the case for the "final" reflect.Value in multiple
scenarios, such as the start of a pipeline. Give it a specific,
unexported type too, to make sure it cannot be mistaken for any other
valid value.
Finally, replace "final.IsValid()" with "final != missingVal", since
final.IsValid() will be false when final is an untyped nil.
Also add a few test cases, all different variants of the untyped nil
versus missing value scenario.
Fixes#18716.
Change-Id: Ia9257a84660ead5a7007fd1cced7782760b62d9d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/95215
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
It makes no sense to try to get the zero value of a nil type, hence the
panic. When we have a nil type, use reflect.ValueOf(nil) instead.
This was showing itself if one used a missing field on the data between
parentheses, when the data was a nil interface:
t := template.Must(template.New("test").Parse(`{{ (.).foo }}`))
var v interface{}
t.Execute(os.Stdout, v)
Resulting in:
panic: reflect: Zero(nil) [recovered]
panic: reflect: Zero(nil)
Fixes#21171.
Change-Id: Ifcc4a0c67e6df425b65bc9f82fde6fcf03828579
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84482
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The new break and continue actions do not work in html/template, and
fixing them requires thinking about security issues that seem too
tricky at this stage of the release. We will try again for 1.11.
Original CL description:
text/template: add break, continue actions in ranges
Adds the two range control actions "break" and "continue". They act the
same as the Go keywords break and continue, but are simplified in that
only the innermost range statement can be broken out of or continued.
Fixes#20531
Updates #20531
Updates #23683
Change-Id: Ia7fd3c409163e3bcb5dc42947ae90b15bdf89853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92155
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Adds the two range control actions "break" and "continue". They act the
same as the Go keywords break and continue, but are simplified in that
only the innermost range statement can be broken out of or continued.
Fixes#20531
Change-Id: I4412b3bbfd4dadb0ab74ae718e308c1ac7a0a1e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66410
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The existing implementation of text/template handles the option
"missingkey=error" in an inconsitent manner: If the provided data is
a nil-interface, no error is returned (despite the fact that no key
can be found in it).
This patch makes text/template return an error if "missingkey=error"
is set and the provided data is a not a valid reflect.Value.
Fixes#15356
Change-Id: Ia0a83da48652ecfaf31f18bdbd78cb21dbca1164
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31638
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Instead of scanning the text to count newlines, which is n², keep track as we go
and store the line number in the token.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkParseLarge-4 1589721293 38783310 -97.56%
Fixes#17851
Change-Id: I231225c61e667535e2ce55cd2facea6d279cc59d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33234
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This reverts commit 794fb71d9c.
Reason for revert: submitted without TryBots and it broke all three race builders.
Change-Id: I80a1e566616f0ee8fa3529d4eeee04268f8a713b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33232
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Instead of scanning the text to count newlines, which is n², keep track as we go
and store the line number in the token.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkParseLarge-4 1589721293 38783310 -97.56%
Fixes#17851
Change-Id: Ieaf89a35e371b405ad92e38baa1e3fa98d18cfb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32923
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
CL 31462 made it possible to operate directly on reflect.Values
instead of always forcing a round trip to interface{} and back.
The round trip was losing addressability, which hurt users.
The round trip was also losing "interface-ness", which helped users.
That is, using reflect.ValueOf(v.Interface()) instead of v was doing
an implicit indirect any time v was itself an interface{} value: the result
was the reflect.Value for the underlying concrete value contained in the
interface, not the interface itself.
CL 31462 eliminated some "unnecessary" reflect.Value round trips
in order to preserve addressability, but in doing so it lost this implicit
indirection. This CL adds the indirection back.
It may help to compare the changes in this CL against funcs.go from CL 31462:
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/31462/4/src/text/template/funcs.go
Everywhere CL 31462 changed 'v := reflect.ValueOf(x)' to 'v := x',
this CL changes 'v := x' to 'v := indirectInterface(x)'.
Fixes#17714.
Change-Id: I67cec4eb41fed1d56e1c19f12b0abbd0e59d35a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33139
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The report in #17414 points out that if you have many many templates,
then this is an overwhelming list and just hurts the signal-to-noise ratio of the error.
Even the test of the old behavior also supports the idea that this is noise:
template: empty: "empty" is an incomplete or empty template; defined templates are: "secondary"
The chance that someone mistyped "secondary" as "empty" is slim at best.
Similarly, the compiler does not augment an error like 'unknown variable x'
by dumping the full list of all the known variables.
For all these reasons, drop the list.
Fixes#17414.
Change-Id: I78f92d2c591df7218385fe723a4abc497913acf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32116
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Add support for passing reflect.Values to and returning reflect.Values from
any registered functions in the FuncMap, much as if they were
interface{} values. Keeping the reflect.Value instead of round-tripping
to interface{} preserves addressability of the value, which is important
for method lookup.
Change index and a few other built-in functions to use reflect.Values,
making a loop using explicit indexing now match the semantics that
range has always had.
Fixes#14916.
Change-Id: Iae1a2fd9bb426886a7fcd9204f30a2d6ad4646ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31462
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
rogeryk
Ian Lance Taylor
weebney
cuiweixie
Rob Pike
Russ Cox
Adrien Delorme
Meng Zhuo
empijei
Daniel Martí
Ariel Mashraki
Bjørn Erik Pedersen
Michal Bohuslávek
Tim Cooper
Emmanuel Odeke
Özgür Kesim
Brad Fitzpatrick
Josh Bleecher Snyder