When text/template is evaluating a pipeline command and encounters an
`interface{}`, it "digs down one level to the thing inside". Currently it
does this with `value = reflect.ValueOf(value.Interface())`, which is
unnecessary since it could just use `value = value.Elem()`. This commit
changes it to use the latter.
Why it was written that way is mysterious because the proposed change
appears to be strictly better, but given the blame date (13 years ago)
it may have been written while reflect was still in development before
`Elem()` was added.
Change-Id: I6c4f6283e78de07732c4120ce11f26f113fa46e4
GitHub-Last-Rev: bdfc6973ab
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#66373
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/572355
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Change-Id: Idbc110cfc4fd6bbbc8b79807ac14abf7b30e0e65
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539855
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
For #60088
Change-Id: Ibc3983ca5cfe396087ddfa96c43cfe32ca47129a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/514640
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
I unintentionally flipped them in CL 446795.
For #56490Fixes#60801
Change-Id: I57586bec052e1b2cc61513870ce24dd6ce17e56b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/503575
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
We were mishandling {{range $i = .}}, treating it as though it were
{{range $i := .}}. That happened to work if $i were the most recently
declared variable, but not otherwise.
Fixes#56490
Change-Id: I222a009d671d86c06a980a54388e05f12101c00b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/446795
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To avoid false positives from the reflectvaluecompare checker #43993
Use v.IsValid() instead of
var zero reflect.Value
v != zero
Also avoid comparing directly with the singleton reflect.Value
representing a missing value. Detect the missing value by type instead.
Change-Id: I3a00d63cf61c077e7c7ae816474aa1f032be325b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/308769
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
And then revert the bootstrap cmd directories and certain testdata.
And adjust tests as needed.
Not reverting the changes in std that are bootstrapped,
because some of those changes would appear in API docs,
and we want to use any consistently.
Instead, rewrite 'any' to 'interface{}' in cmd/dist for those directories
when preparing the bootstrap copy.
A few files changed as a result of running gofmt -w
not because of interface{} -> any but because they
hadn't been updated for the new //go:build lines.
Fixes#49884.
Change-Id: Ie8045cba995f65bd79c694ec77a1b3d1fe01bb09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/368254
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
to avoid a crash on a nil pointer as an embedded field.
Fixes#48215
Change-Id: I214faa6e3cf08cdec1c01035e4bbca0900c6a408
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/357963
Trust: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
In the last CL I missed the fact that except for the final value the
code already unwraps the argument.
For #31103
Change-Id: Ic9099aeb50c6b3322fc14a90ac8026c1d8cb1698
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/354091
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
For #31103
Change-Id: I9c0aa64f95f564de31a4c178e3930584d41316bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/353610
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
There was a bug in the short-circuit code for and/or added in CL 321490:
it ignored the value passed in by an earlier pipeline.
For #31103
Change-Id: Ic31f4d7cedfe563ef968cbb712ecfb2413c42eb5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/353130
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Break and continue for range loops was accepted as a proposal in June 2017.
It was implemented in CL 66410 (Oct 2017)
but then rolled back in CL 92155 (Feb 2018)
because html/template changes had not been implemented.
This CL reimplements break and continue in text/template
and then adds support for them in html/template as well.
Fixes#20531.
Change-Id: I05330482a976f1c078b4b49c2287bd9031bb7616
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/321491
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Making the builtin and and or functions use short-circuit
evaluation was accepted as a proposal in April 2019,
but we never got around to implementing it. Do that.
Fixes#31103.
Change-Id: Ia43d4a9a6b0ab814f2dd3471ebaca3e7bb1505cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/321490
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This adds a new lock protecting "tmpl".
This is a copy of https://golang.org/cl/257817 by Andreas Fleig,
updated for current tip, and updated to start running the
html/template TestEscapeRace test.
Thanks to @bep for providing the test case.
Fixes#39807
Change-Id: Ic8874484290283a49116812eeaffb8608346dc70
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/316669
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
The IsExported method is a more intuitive helper for checking whether
the method or field is exported than checking whether PkgPath is empty.
In the same CL, modify the standard library to make use of this helper.
Fixes#41563
Change-Id: Iaacfb3b74449501f98e2707aa32095a32bd3c3c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266197
Trust: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
template range require channel contains RecvDir
if recv on send only channel will raise an panic.
Fixes#43065
Change-Id: Ie0ea70ce60e074bf8c9f2378e07ef1d4c41dc38f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/276532
Trust: Meng Zhuo <mzh@golangcn.org>
Run-TryBot: Meng Zhuo <mzh@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
An error check was missing: If the first argument of a pipeline is
parenthesized, and the pipeline has further arguments, then
syntactically the pipeline is a function invocation and there must
be a "call". Tricky rare corner case, but easily caught.
Add the error check and some tests to verify behavior.
Fixes#31810.
Change-Id: Ica80b7c11284e4ea9e8cc94a01dbbc9a67e42079
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206124
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When using a '.' constant literal as a reflect.Value variadic argument,
idealConstant would incorrectly result in a float64. This is because
rune literals can be represented as a float64, and contain a period,
which tricked the logic into thinking the literal must have been a
floating point number.
This also happened with other characters that can be part of a floating
point number, such as 'e' or 'P'.
To fix these edge cases, exit the case sooner if the literal was a rune,
since that should always go to the int case instead.
Finally, add test cases that verify that they behave properly. These
would error before, since eq would receive a mix of int and float64,
which aren't comparable.
Fixes#34483.
Change-Id: Icfcb7803bfa0cf317a1d1adacacad3d69a57eb42
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196808
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Payne <tom@airmap.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
After Go.1.10+ strings.Builder is known as more efficient in
concatenating and building strings than bytes.Buffer.
In this CL,
there is a minor logic fix for getting advantage of strings.builder.
name old time/op new time/op delta
DefinedTemplate-8 543ns ± 3% 512ns ± 2% -5.73% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
DefinedTemplate-8 192B ± 0% 160B ± 0% -16.67% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
DefinedTemplate-8 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Change-Id: Icda0054d146e6c5e32ed8a4d13221bb6850d31b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/175261
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Before this commit, the two logically equivalent conditionals below would
produce different output:
{{ if not .NonEmptyInterfaceTypedNil }}OK{{ else }}{{ end }}
{{ if .NonEmptyInterfaceTypedNil }}{{ else }}OK{{ end }}
The functions `not`, `or`, and `and` all use the same `truth` function, which
unwraps any concrete interface value before passing it to `isTrue`.
`if` and `with` also use `isTrue` to establish truth, but was missing the
interface indirect call.
Fixes#30501
Change-Id: I9c49eed41e737d8f162e39bef1c3b82fd5518fed
GitHub-Last-Rev: 95fc2c82f2
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#30534
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/164958
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Add Unwrap methods to types which wrap an underlying error:
"encodinc/csv".ParseError
"encoding/json".MarshalerError
"net/http".transportReadFromServerError
"net".OpError
"net".DNSConfigError
"net/url".Error
"os/exec".Error
"signal/internal/pty".PtyError
"text/template".ExecError
Add os.ErrTemporary. A case could be made for putting this error
value in package net, since no exported error types in package os
include a Temporary method. However, syscall errors returned from
the os package do include this method.
Add Is methods to error types with a Timeout or Temporary method,
making errors.Is(err, os.Err{Timeout,Temporary}) equivalent to
testing the corresponding method:
"context".DeadlineExceeded
"internal/poll".TimeoutError
"net".adrinfoErrno
"net".OpError
"net".DNSError
"net/http".httpError
"net/http".tlsHandshakeTimeoutError
"net/pipe".timeoutError
"net/url".Error
Updates #30322
Updates #29934
Change-Id: I409fb20c072ea39116ebfb8c7534d493483870dc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170037
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Trying to call a method on a nil interface is a panic in Go. For
example:
var stringer fmt.Stringer
println(stringer.String()) // nil pointer dereference
In https://golang.org/cl/143097 we started recovering panics encountered
during function and method calls. However, we didn't handle this case,
as text/template panics before evalCall is ever run.
In particular, reflect's MethodByName will panic if the receiver is of
interface kind and nil:
panic: reflect: Method on nil interface value
Simply add a check for that edge case, and have Template.Execute return
a helpful error. Note that Execute shouldn't just error if the interface
contains a typed nil, since we're able to find a method to call in that
case.
Finally, add regression tests for both the nil and typed nil interface
cases.
Fixes#30143.
Change-Id: Iffb21b40e14ba5fea0fcdd179cd80d1f23cabbab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/161761
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
If we're accessing a field on a nil struct pointer, and that field is
present in the type, we should print a "nil pointer evaluating X.Y" error
instead of the broader "can't evaluate field Y in X". The latter error
should still be used for the cases where the field is simply missing.
While at it, remove the isNil checks in the struct and map cases. The
indirect func will only return a true isNil when returning a pointer or
interface reflect.Value, so it's impossible for either of these checks
to be useful.
Finally, extend the test suite to test a handful of these edge cases,
including the one shown in the original issue.
Fixes#29137.
Change-Id: I53408ced8a7b53807a0a8461b6baef1cd01d25ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153341
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This CL updates text/template's scanner to accept the
new number syntaxes:
- Hexadecimal floating-point values.
- Digit-separating underscores.
- Leading 0b and 0o prefixes.
See golang.org/design/19308-number-literals for background.
For #12711.
For #19308.
For #28493.
For #29008.
Change-Id: I68c16ea35c3f506701063781388de72bafee6b8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160248
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
There's precedent in handling panics that happen in functions called
from the standard library. For example, if a fmt.Formatter
implementation fails, fmt will absorb the panic into the output text.
Recovering panics is useful, because otherwise one would have to wrap
some Template.Execute calls with a recover. For example, if there's a
chance that the callbacks may panic, or if part of the input data is nil
when it shouldn't be.
In particular, it's a common confusion amongst new Go developers that
one can call a method on a nil receiver. Expecting text/template to
error on such a call, they encounter a long and confusing panic if the
method expects the receiver to be non-nil.
To achieve this, introduce safeCall, which takes care of handling error
returns as well as recovering panics. Handling panics in the "call"
function isn't strictly necessary, as that func itself is run via
evalCall. However, this makes the code more consistent, and can allow
for better context in panics via the "call" function.
Finally, add some test cases with a mix of funcs, methods, and func
fields that panic.
Fixes#28242.
Change-Id: Id67be22cc9ebaedeb4b17fa84e677b4b6e09ec67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143097
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Recent change golang.org/cl/142737 drops the only call site for the
sortKeys function. If it's not in use, it should probably not be there in
the code, lurking and preparing to bite us when someone calls that instead
of the new key sorter in fmtsort, resulting in strange inconsistencies.
Since the function isn't called, this should have no impact.
Related to, but does not fix, #21095.
Change-Id: I4695503ef4d5ce90d989ec952f01ea00cc15c79d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143178
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For easier testing, change the way maps are printed so they
appear in a consistent order between runs. Do this by printing
them in key-sorted order.
To do this, we add a package at the root, internal/fmtsort,
that implements a general mechanism for sorting map keys
regardless of their type. This is a little messy and probably
slow, but formatted printing of maps has never been fast and
is already always reflection-driven.
The rules are:
The ordering rules are more general than with Go's < operator:
- when applicable, nil compares low
- ints, floats, and strings order by <
- NaN compares less than non-NaN floats
- bool compares false before true
- complex compares real, then imag
- pointers compare by machine address
- channel values compare by machine address
- structs compare each field in turn
- arrays compare each element in turn.
- interface values compare first by reflect.Type describing the concrete type
and then by concrete value as described in the previous rules.
The new package is internal because we really do not want
everyone using this to sort things. It is slow, not general, and
only suitable for the subset of types that can be map keys.
Also use the package in text/template, which already had a
weaker version of this mechanism.
This change requires adding a dependency on sort to the fmt
package, but that isn't disruptive to the dependency tree.
Fixes#21095
Change-Id: Ia602115c7de5d95993dbd609611d8bd96e054157
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142737
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
I omitted vendor directories and anything necessary for bootstrapping.
(Tested by bootstrapping with Go 1.4)
Updates #27864
Change-Id: I7d9b68d0372d3a34dee22966cca323513ece7e8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/137856
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
golang.org/cl/84480 altered the API for the parse package for
clarity and consistency. However, the changes also broke the
API for consumers of the package. This CL reverts the API
to the previous spelling, adding only a single new exported
symbol.
Fixes#25968
Change-Id: Ieb81054b61eeac7df3bc3864ef446df43c26b80f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/120355
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The general policy for the current state of js/wasm is that it only
has to support tests that are also supported by nacl.
The test nilptr3.go makes assumptions about which nil checks can be
removed. Since WebAssembly does not signal on reading a null pointer,
all nil checks have to be explicit.
Updates #18892
Change-Id: I06a687860b8d22ae26b1c391499c0f5183e4c485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110096
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Variables can be declared and shadowing is supported, but modifying
existing variables via assignments was not available.
This meant that modifying a variable from a nested block was not
possible:
{{ $v := "init" }}
{{ if true }}
{{ $v := "changed" }}
{{ end }}
v: {{ $v }} {{/* "init" */}}
Introduce the "=" assignment token, such that one can now do:
{{ $v := "init" }}
{{ if true }}
{{ $v = "changed" }}
{{ end }}
v: {{ $v }} {{/* "changed" */}}
To avoid confusion, rename PipeNode.Decl to PipeNode.Vars, as the
variables may not always be declared after this change. Also change a
few other names to better reflect the added ambiguity of variables in
pipelines.
Modifying the text/template/parse package in a backwards incompatible
manner is acceptable, given that the package godoc clearly states that
it isn't intended for general use. It's the equivalent of an internal
package, back when internal packages didn't exist yet.
To make the changes to the parse package sit well with the cmd/api test,
update except.txt with the changes that we aren't worried about.
Fixes#10608.
Change-Id: I1f83a4297ee093fd45f9993cebb78fc9a9e81295
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84480
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
reflect.Value is a struct and does not have a kind nor any flag for
untyped nils. As a result, it is tricky to differentiate when we're
missing a value, from when we have one but it is untyped nil.
We could start using *reflect.Value instead, to add one level of
indirection, using nil for missing values and new(reflect.Value) for
untyped nils. However, that is a fairly invasive change, and would also
mean unnecessary allocations.
Instead, use a special reflect.Value that depicts when a value is
missing. This is the case for the "final" reflect.Value in multiple
scenarios, such as the start of a pipeline. Give it a specific,
unexported type too, to make sure it cannot be mistaken for any other
valid value.
Finally, replace "final.IsValid()" with "final != missingVal", since
final.IsValid() will be false when final is an untyped nil.
Also add a few test cases, all different variants of the untyped nil
versus missing value scenario.
Fixes#18716.
Change-Id: Ia9257a84660ead5a7007fd1cced7782760b62d9d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/95215
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
It makes no sense to try to get the zero value of a nil type, hence the
panic. When we have a nil type, use reflect.ValueOf(nil) instead.
This was showing itself if one used a missing field on the data between
parentheses, when the data was a nil interface:
t := template.Must(template.New("test").Parse(`{{ (.).foo }}`))
var v interface{}
t.Execute(os.Stdout, v)
Resulting in:
panic: reflect: Zero(nil) [recovered]
panic: reflect: Zero(nil)
Fixes#21171.
Change-Id: Ifcc4a0c67e6df425b65bc9f82fde6fcf03828579
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84482
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The new break and continue actions do not work in html/template, and
fixing them requires thinking about security issues that seem too
tricky at this stage of the release. We will try again for 1.11.
Original CL description:
text/template: add break, continue actions in ranges
Adds the two range control actions "break" and "continue". They act the
same as the Go keywords break and continue, but are simplified in that
only the innermost range statement can be broken out of or continued.
Fixes#20531
Updates #20531
Updates #23683
Change-Id: Ia7fd3c409163e3bcb5dc42947ae90b15bdf89853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92155
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Adds the two range control actions "break" and "continue". They act the
same as the Go keywords break and continue, but are simplified in that
only the innermost range statement can be broken out of or continued.
Fixes#20531
Change-Id: I4412b3bbfd4dadb0ab74ae718e308c1ac7a0a1e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66410
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Do the low-hanging fruit - tiny Less functions that are used exactly
once. This reduces the amount of code and puts the logic in a single
place.
Change-Id: I9d4544cd68de5a95e55019bdad1fca0a1dbfae9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/63171
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
It doesn't change the outcome. It might have been useful at some point
to avoid Replace from doing work or allocating. However, nowadays the
func returns early without doing any work if Count returns 0.
Change-Id: Id69dc74042a6e39672b405016484db8b50f43d58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/62991
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Execute incurs separate writes for each "step", e.g. each
variable that needs to be printed, and the final newline.
While it is correct to state that templates can be executed
concurrently, there is a more subtle nuance that is easily missed:
when writing to the same writer, the writes from concurrent execute
calls can be interleaved, leading to unexpected output.
Change-Id: I0abbd7960d8a8d15e109a8a3eeff3b43b852bbbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37444
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
It looks like this conditional may have been refactored at some point,
but the logic was still very confusing. The outer conditional checks if
the function is variadic, so there's no need to verify that in the
result. Additionally, since the function isn't variadic, there is no
reason to permit the function call if the number of input arguments is
less than the function signature requires.
Change-Id: Ia957cf83d1c900c08dd66384efcb74f0c368422e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35491
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing implementation of text/template handles the option
"missingkey=error" in an inconsitent manner: If the provided data is
a nil-interface, no error is returned (despite the fact that no key
can be found in it).
This patch makes text/template return an error if "missingkey=error"
is set and the provided data is a not a valid reflect.Value.
Fixes#15356
Change-Id: Ia0a83da48652ecfaf31f18bdbd78cb21dbca1164
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31638
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 31462 made it possible to operate directly on reflect.Values
instead of always forcing a round trip to interface{} and back.
The round trip was losing addressability, which hurt users.
The round trip was also losing "interface-ness", which helped users.
That is, using reflect.ValueOf(v.Interface()) instead of v was doing
an implicit indirect any time v was itself an interface{} value: the result
was the reflect.Value for the underlying concrete value contained in the
interface, not the interface itself.
CL 31462 eliminated some "unnecessary" reflect.Value round trips
in order to preserve addressability, but in doing so it lost this implicit
indirection. This CL adds the indirection back.
It may help to compare the changes in this CL against funcs.go from CL 31462:
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/31462/4/src/text/template/funcs.go
Everywhere CL 31462 changed 'v := reflect.ValueOf(x)' to 'v := x',
this CL changes 'v := x' to 'v := indirectInterface(x)'.
Fixes#17714.
Change-Id: I67cec4eb41fed1d56e1c19f12b0abbd0e59d35a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33139
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The report in #17414 points out that if you have many many templates,
then this is an overwhelming list and just hurts the signal-to-noise ratio of the error.
Even the test of the old behavior also supports the idea that this is noise:
template: empty: "empty" is an incomplete or empty template; defined templates are: "secondary"
The chance that someone mistyped "secondary" as "empty" is slim at best.
Similarly, the compiler does not augment an error like 'unknown variable x'
by dumping the full list of all the known variables.
For all these reasons, drop the list.
Fixes#17414.
Change-Id: I78f92d2c591df7218385fe723a4abc497913acf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32116
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Add support for passing reflect.Values to and returning reflect.Values from
any registered functions in the FuncMap, much as if they were
interface{} values. Keeping the reflect.Value instead of round-tripping
to interface{} preserves addressability of the value, which is important
for method lookup.
Change index and a few other built-in functions to use reflect.Values,
making a loop using explicit indexing now match the semantics that
range has always had.
Fixes#14916.
Change-Id: Iae1a2fd9bb426886a7fcd9204f30a2d6ad4646ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31462
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Return an error message instead of eating memory and eventually
triggering a stack overflow.
Fixes#15618
Change-Id: I3dcf1d669104690a17847a20fbfeb6d7e39e8751
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23091
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
When evaluating "{{.MissingField}}" on a nil *T, Exec returns
"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *T" instead of
"nil pointer evaluating *T.MissingField".
Fixesgolang/go#15125
Change-Id: I6e73f61b8a72c694179c1f8cdc808766c90b6f57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21705
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.
This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:
$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.) +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.) +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update
Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>