TestRace runs a collection of tests, some of which are expected
to fail with data races. Make TestRace more robust at detecting
when the test run is cut short, such as when a test causes
an unhandled panic.
Skip TestRaceRangeFuncIterator, which contains an unhandled panic.
This test was causing all subsequent tests to not run.
Skip TestNoRaceRangeFuncIterator, which contains an unexpected data race.
This test was not running due to the above failure.
For #72925
Change-Id: Id662375cc498ea25ae308619709768588bf6a2f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658875
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
CL 651755 introduced registration of root regions when allocating
memory. We also need to unregister that memory to avoid the leak
sanitizer accessing unmapped memory.
Issue #67833
Change-Id: I5d403d66e65a8a003492f4d79dad22d416fd8574
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/659135
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Don't include a monotonic time in time.Times created inside
a bubble, to avoid the confusion of different Times using
different monotonic clock epochs.
For #67434
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: time
cpu: Apple M1 Pro
│ /tmp/bench.0 │ /tmp/bench.1 │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
Since-10 18.42n ± 2% 18.68n ± 1% ~ (p=0.101 n=10)
Until-10 18.28n ± 2% 18.46n ± 2% +0.98% (p=0.009 n=10)
geomean 18.35n 18.57n +1.20%
Change-Id: Iaf1b80d0a4df52139c5b80d4bde4410ef8a49f2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/657415
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
This ensures that runtime's signal handlers pass through the TSAN and
MSAN libc interceptors and subsequent calls to the intercepted
sigaction function from C will correctly see them.
Change-Id: I243a70d9dcb6d95a65c8494d5f9f9f09a316c693
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/654995
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: abner chenc <chenguoqi@loongson.cn>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
CL 658035 added TestCgoCallbackPprof, which is consistently failing on
solaris. runtime/pprof maintains a list of platforms where CPU profiling
does not work properly. Since this test requires CPU profiling, skip the
this test on those platforms.
For #72870.
Fixes#72876.
Change-Id: I6a6a636cbf6b16abcbba8771178fe1d001be9d9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658415
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
For #70602
Change-Id: I3f723ebc17ef690d5be7f4f948c9dd1f890196fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658095
Auto-Submit: Rhys Hiltner <rhys.hiltner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
mp.isExtraInC is intended to indicate that this M has no Go frames at
all; it is entirely executing in C.
If there was a cgocallback to Go and then a cgocall to C, such that the
leaf frames are C, that is fine. e.g., traceback can handle this fine
with SetCgoTraceback (or by simply skipping the C frames).
However, we currently mismanage isExtraInC, unconditionally setting it
on return from cgocallback. This means that if there are two levels of
cgocallback, we end up running Go code with isExtraInC set.
1. C-created thread calls into Go function 1 (via cgocallback).
2. Go function 1 calls into C function 1 (via cgocall).
3. C function 1 calls into Go function 2 (via cgocallback).
4. Go function 2 returns back to C function 1 (returning via the remainder of cgocallback).
5. C function 1 returns back to Go function 1 (returning via the remainder of cgocall).
6. Go function 1 is now running with mp.isExtraInC == true.
The fix is simple; only set isExtraInC on return from cgocallback if
there are no more Go frames. There can't be more Go frames unless there
is an active cgocall out of the Go frames.
Fixes#72870.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: I6a6a636c4e7ba75a29639d7036c5af3738033467
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658035
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Plan 9 can use floating point now.
Change-Id: If721b243daa31853609cb3d2c535d86c106a1ee1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655879
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Bump the required version of GDB up to 10 from 7.7 in the runtime GDB
tests, so as to ensure that we have something that can handle DWARF 5
when running tests. In theory there is some DWARF 5 support on the
version 9 release branch, but we get "Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_addrx"
errors for some archs on builders where GDB 9.2 is installed.
Updates #26379.
Change-Id: I1b7b45f8e4dd1fafccf22f2dda0124458ecf7cba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/656836
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: Id5258a72b0727bf7c66d558e30486eac2c6c8c36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655875
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
We've been slowly moving packages from runtime/internal to
internal/runtime. For now, runtime/internal only has test packages.
It's a good chance to clean up the references to runtime/internal
in the toolchain.
For #65355.
Change-Id: Ie6f9091a44511d0db9946ea6de7a78d3afe9f063
GitHub-Last-Rev: fad32e2e81
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#72137
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655515
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
We previously disallowed all non-regular files being embedded. This CL
relaxes the restriction a little: if the GODEBUG embedfollowsymlinks=1
is set, we allow the leaf files being embedded (not the directories
containing them) to be symlinks. The files pointed to by the symlinks
must still be regular files.
This will be used when a Bazel build action executing the Go command is
running in a symlink-based sandbox. It's not something we want to enable
in general for now, so it's behind a GODEBUG.
Fixes#59924
Change-Id: I895be14c12de55b7d1b663d81bdda1df37d54804
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/643215
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This adds a new godebug to control whether the runtime applies the
anonymous memory mapping annotations added in https://go.dev/cl/646095.
It is enabled by default.
This has several effects:
* The feature is only enabled by default when the main go.mod has go >=
1.25.
* This feature can be disabled with GODEBUG=decoratemappings=0, or the
equivalents in go.mod or package main. See https://go.dev/doc/godebug.
* As an opaque setting, this option will not appear in runtime/metrics.
* This setting is non-atomic, so it cannot be changed after startup.
I am not 100% sure about my decision for the last two points.
I've made this an opaque setting because it affects every memory mapping
the runtime performs. Thus every mapping would report "non-default
behavior", which doesn't seem useful.
This setting could trivially be atomic and allow changes at run time,
but those changes would only affect future mappings. That seems
confusing and not helpful. On the other hand, going back to annotate or
unannotate every previous mapping when the setting changes is
unwarranted complexity.
For #71546.
Change-Id: I6a6a636c5ad551d76691cba2a6f668d5cff0e352
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655895
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
this does result in a little bit more inlining,
cmd/compile text is 0.5% larger,
bent-benchmark text geomeans grow by only 0.02%.
some of our tests make assumptions about inlining.
Change-Id: I999d1798aca5dc64a1928bd434258a61e702951a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655157
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
For #71591
Relevant CL 560155
Change-Id: Iebc497d56b36d50c13a6dd88e7bca4578a03cf63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/654916
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
This enables the ASAN default behavior of reporting C memory leaks.
It can be disabled with ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0.
Fixes#67833
Change-Id: I420da1b5d79cf70d8cf134eaf97bf0a22f61ffd0
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-asan-clang15,gotip-linux-arm64-asan-clang15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651755
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
CL 652276 reduced the m struct by 8 bytes, which has changed the
allocation class on 64 bit OpenBSD platforms. This results in build
failures due to:
M structure uses sizeclass 1792/0x700 bytes; incompatible with mutex flag mask 0x3ff
Add 128 bytes of padding when spinbitmutex is enabled on 64 bit
architectures, moving the size to the half point between the
1792 and 2048 allocation size.
Change-Id: I71623a1f75714543c302217e619d20cf0e717aeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/653335
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This change tries increasing the timeout in
TestSpuriousWakeupsNeverHangSemasleep. I'm not entirely sure of the
mechanism, but GODEBUG=gcstoptheworld=2 and GODEBUG=gccheckmark=1 can
cause this test to fail at it's regular timeout. It does not seem to
indicate a deadlock, because bumping the timeout 10x make the problem
go away. I suspect the problem is due to the long STW times these two
modes can induce, plus the fact this test runs in parallel with others.
Let's just bump the timeout. The test is fundamentally sound, and it's
unclear to me how else to test for a deadlock here.
Fixes#71691.
Fixes#71548.
Change-Id: I649531eeec8a8408ba90823ce5223f3a17863124
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652756
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie38583d667d579751d643b2da2aa56390b69904c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652255
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: sophie zhao <zhaoxiaolin@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Meidan Li <limeidan@loongson.cn>
In the runtime.exitThread function, a storeRelease barrier
is required instead of a full barrier.
Change-Id: I2815ddb03e4984c891d71811ccf650a82325e10d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/631915
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Meidan Li <limeidan@loongson.cn>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: sophie zhao <zhaoxiaolin@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
It's not used for anything.
Change-Id: I031b3cdfe52b6b1cff4b3cb6713ffe588084542f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652276
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
CL 652181 accidentally missed this iPhone only code.
For #71961
Change-Id: I567f8bb38958907442e69494da330d5199d11f54
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/653135
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
It's used by the SWIG CI build, at least, and it's an easy fix.
Fixes#71961
Change-Id: Id21071a5aef216b35ecf0e9cd3e05d08972d92fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652181
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
The existing description of the function lacks usage examples, which makes it difficult to understand, so I added one.
There is no open issue about this, since the implementation seems trivial.
Change-Id: I96b29f0b21d1c7fda04128239633c8a2fc36fef2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/649995
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This avoids problems when the C linker doesn't want to see the Go relocation.
Fixes#71954
Change-Id: I7cf884c4059d596cad6074ade02020d5a724f20e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652180
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
CL 527935 optimized []byte(string1 + string2) to use runtime.concatbytes
to prevent concatenating of strings before converting to slices.
However, the optimization is implemented without allowing temporary
buffer for slice on stack, causing un-necessary allocations.
To fix this, optimize concatbytes to use temporary buffer if the result
string length fit to the buffer size.
Fixes#71943
Change-Id: I1d3c374cd46aad8f83a271b8a5ca79094f9fd8db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652395
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Change-Id: I84ec73d3ddef913a87cb9b48147c44ac3e7c8a8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651957
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
_beginthread is intended to be used together with the C runtime.
The cgo runtime doesn't use it, so better use CreateThread directly,
which is the Windows API for creating threads.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-windows-amd64-longtest,gotip-windows-arm64
Change-Id: Ic6cf75f69f62a3babf5e74155da1aac70961886c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651995
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
If the -test.run value is not surrounded by ^$ then any test that
matches the -test.run value will be run. This is normally not the
desired behavior, as it can lead to unexpected tests being run.
Change-Id: I3447aaebad5156bbef7f263cdb9f6b8c32331324
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651956
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
this removes the old conditional-on-register-value
handshake from the deferproc/deferprocstack logic.
The "line" for the recovery-exit frame itself (not the defers
that it runs) is the closing brace of the function.
Reduces code size slightly (e.g. go command is 0.2% smaller)
Sample output showing effect of this change, also what sort of
code it requires to observe the effect:
```
package main
import "os"
func main() {
g(len(os.Args) - 1) // stack[0]
}
var gi int
var pi *int = &gi
//go:noinline
func g(i int) {
switch i {
case 0:
defer func() {
println("g0", i)
q() // stack[2] if i == 0
}()
for j := *pi; j < 1; j++ {
defer func() {
println("recover0", recover().(string))
}()
}
default:
for j := *pi; j < 1; j++ {
defer func() {
println("g1", i)
q() // stack[2] if i == 1
}()
}
defer func() {
println("recover1", recover().(string))
}()
}
p()
} // stack[1] (deferreturn)
//go:noinline
func p() {
panic("p()")
}
//go:noinline
func q() {
panic("q()") // stack[3]
}
/* Sample output for "./foo foo":
recover1 p()
g1 1
panic: q()
goroutine 1 [running]:
main.q()
.../main.go:46 +0x2c
main.g.func3()
.../main.go:29 +0x48
main.g(0x1?)
.../main.go:37 +0x68
main.main()
.../main.go:6 +0x28
*/
```
Change-Id: Ie39ea62ecc244213500380ea06d44024cadc2317
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/650795
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
No point in using string comparison when we can use integer comparison instead.
Unify the constants in cmd/internal/sys and internal/goarch while
we are at it.
Change-Id: I5681a601030307b7b286f958a8965559cb43506d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652175
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
In test files, using testenv.Executable is more reliable than
os.Executable or os.Args[0].
Change-Id: I88e577efeabc20d02ada27bf706ae4523129128e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651955
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The overhead for allocation is not significant but it should be excluded
from the memmove/memclr benchmarking anyway.
Change-Id: I7ea86d1b85b13352ccbff16f7510caa250654dab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/645576
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Change-Id: I8d7bbeebbf4a46f2fd8d630b1edbaf79b8ffccc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/420114
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
TryBot-Bypass: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
This change moves finBlockSize into mfinal.go and renames finblock to
finBlock.
Change-Id: I20a0bc3907e7b028a2caa5d2fe8cf3f76332c871
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/650695
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Currently Make panics when passed a linker-allocated object. This is
inconsistent with both runtime.AddCleanup and runtime.SetFinalizer. Not
panicking in this case is important so that all pointers can be treated
equally by these APIs. Libraries should not have to worry where a
pointer came from to still make weak pointers.
Supporting this behavior is a bit complex for weak pointers versus
finalizers and cleanups. For the latter two, it means a function is
never called, so we can just drop everything on the floor. For weak
pointers, we still need to produce pointers that compare as per the API.
To do this, copy the tiny lock-free trace map implementation and use it
to store weak handles for "immortal" objects. These paths in the
runtime should be rare, so it's OK if it's not incredibly fast, but we
should keep the memory footprint relatively low (at least not have it be
any worse than specials), so this change tweaks the map implementation a
little bit to ensure that's the case.
Fixes#71726.
Change-Id: I0c87c9d90656d81659ac8d70f511773d0093ce27
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/649460
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The existing code for recover from deferrangefunc was broken in
several ways.
1. the code following a deferrangefunc call did not check the return
value for an out-of-band value indicating "return now" (i.e., recover
was called)
2. the returned value was delivered using a bespoke ABI that happened
to match on register-ABI platforms, but not on older stack-based
ABI.
3. the returned value was the wrong width (1 word versus 2) and
type/value(integer 1, not a pointer to anything) for deferrangefunc's
any-typed return value (in practice, the OOB value check could catch
this, but still, it's sketchy).
This -- using the deferreturn lookup method already in place for
open-coded defers -- turned out to be a much-less-ugly way of
obtaining the desired transfer of control for recover().
TODO: we also could do this for regular defer, and delete some code.
Fixes#71675
Change-Id: If7d7ea789ad4320821aab3b443759a7d71647ff0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/650476
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Add some linknames back, therefore sonic (github.com/bytedance/sonic) can work correctly.
Fixes#71672
Change-Id: Iae86c837d8a714855106a26766aa08b128e17e58
GitHub-Last-Rev: 4de0a48717
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#71673
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/648537
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Provides, on one line, an approximation of P scheduling throughput: how
many times execute() was called for a given P. Said another way: how
many RUNNABLE to RUNNING transitions have happened for this P.
This allows discerning whether a P actually did anything, and how it
compares to other periods of a processes operation.
This should be useful to analyze (kernel) scheduler hiccups.
Investigators will want to subtract the tick values from subsequent
schedtrace lines to get a rate of schedulings. I've opted to add a space
around the first and last element as well to make it more uniform to do
the proposed subtracting with tools like AWK.
Change-Id: I69d6dae1509ad285d43799f38bcaa3aa0fb2352e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/635636
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Nicolas Hillegeer <aktau@google.com>
Check presence of LSE support on ARM64 chip if we targeted it at compile
time.
Related to #69124
Updates #60905Fixes#71411
Change-Id: I65e899a28ff64a390182572c0c353aa5931fc85d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/645795
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Use return with register for async preemption resumption on arm64.
This has the same behaviour as the current use of JMP, however
is permitted when Branch Target Identification is being enforced,
while a JMP with register is considered an indirect call and
requires a `BTI J` marker at the resumption address.
Updates #66054
Change-Id: I135ac577073467bedd9efd8df15b76c97dc08767
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/646782
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
The timespec argument takes the remainder in nanoseconds, not
microseconds. Convert the remaining time to nsec.
Fixes#71714
Change-Id: I36cbbe3a088830c5e3afcc9516ef42e96ee21268
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/648915
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Axel Busch <axel.busch@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishwanatha HD <vishwanatha.hd@ibm.com>
Fixes#66465
Change-Id: I60c017ddba29fa5b452b665d8521cd6c8e20438c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/597979
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorropo <jorropo.pgm@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: qiu laidongfeng2 <2645477756@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>