Removes two variables:
- days which is unused, and similar usage provided by longDayNames
- months in favour of using longMonthNames
Fixes#36359
Change-Id: I51b6b7408db9359c658462ba73e59ed432f655a6
GitHub-Last-Rev: 778d3ea157
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#36372
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213177
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#36987
Change-Id: I91ea1a42f75302de5256a22d382ab7f1b307a498
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217360
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Since Durations only span 290 years, they are not good for
manipulating very remote times. I bounced off this problem recently
while doing some astronomical calculations and it took me a while to
realize I could get a 64-bit seconds value from time.Time.Unix and
subtract two of them to evaluate the interval.
I thought it worth adding a sentence to make this clear. It didn't
occur to me for quite a while that "Unix time" spans a huge range in
the Go library.
Change-Id: I76c75dc951dfd6bcf86e8b0be3cfec518a3ecdee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213977
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
In the tzdata database CEST is not recognized as a timezone name.
It is used as the abbreviated name for daylight saving time in
Central Europe. Avoid using CEST in documentation as it suggests
that programs can parse dates that use CEST, which will typically
fail on Unix systems.
Updates #34913
Change-Id: I4b22f7d06607eb5b066812a48af58edd95498286
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201197
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
This reverts commit CL 131196 because there is a bug
in the calculation of nanoseconds.
Fixes#33677
Change-Id: Ic8e94c547ee29b8aeda1b9a5cb9764dbf47b14b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190497
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
This is primarily achieved by checking for arithmetic overflow
instead of using Add and Equal.
It's a decent performance improvement even though
the function still isn't inlined.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Sub-6 242ns ± 0% 122ns ± 0% -49.59% (p=0.002 n=8+10)
Updates #17858.
Change-Id: I1469b618183c83ea8ea54d5ce277eb15f2ec0f11
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/131196
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The return values are integers, as opposed to floats, since the fractionals can be derived from multiplying t.Seconds().
Fixes#28564
Change-Id: I3796227e1f64ead39ff0aacfbdce912d952f2994
GitHub-Last-Rev: b843ab740b
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#30819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167387
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
time.now is somewhat expensive (much more expensive than nanotime),
in the common case when Time has monotonic time we don't actually
need to call time.now in Since/Until as we can do calculation
based purely on monotonic times.
name old time/op new time/op delta
TCP4OneShotTimeout-6 17.0µs ± 0% 17.1µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5)
SetReadDeadline-6 261ns ± 0% 234ns ± 1% -10.35% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Benchmark that only calls Until:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkUntil 54.0 29.5 -45.37%
Update #25729
Change-Id: I5ac5af3eb1fe9f583cf79299f10b84501b1a0d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146341
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Move startNano from runtime to time package.
In preparation for a subsequent change that speeds up Since and Until.
This also makes code simpler as we have less assembly as the result,
monotonic time handling is better localized in time package.
This changes values returned from nanotime on windows
(it does not account for startNano anymore), current comments state
that it's important, but it's unclear how it can be important
since no other OS does this.
Update #25729
Change-Id: I2275d57b7b5ed8fd0d53eb0f19d55a86136cc555
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146340
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
As found by unparam. Picked the low-hanging fruit, consisting only of
errors that were always nil and results that were never used. Left out
those that were useful for consistency with other func signatures.
Change-Id: I06b52bbd3541f8a5d66659c909bd93cb3e172018
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102418
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Introduce the presence of the monotonic time reading first,
before the paragraph about comparison that mentions it multiple times.
Change-Id: I91e31e118be013eee6c258163a1bb2cb42501527
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76010
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Saying that they return t unchanged is misleading, because they return
a modified t, stripped of any monotonic clock reading, as of Go 1.9.
Fixes#21485.
Change-Id: Icddf8813aed3d687fcefcd2fe542829438be6a0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/56690
Reviewed-by: Avelino <t@avelino.xxx>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
t.Sub(u) would be -20 milliseconds.
The right computation is u.Sub(t), but rewrite to be even clearer.
Thanks to Karsten Weiss for catching this.
Change-Id: I6e274d69b0301840d57c5c65bf4114da0d33bf10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46971
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Done with grep & interactive search & replace, to double-check
replacements. Not many remained after CL 20022.
Fixes#18572
Change-Id: Idbe90ba3b584f9b9661d2bbd141607daaadfa41a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45270
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Round uses r+r < d to decide whether the remainder is
above or below half of d (to decide whether to round up or down).
This is wrong when r+r wraps negative, because it looks < d
but is really > d.
No one will ever care about rounding to a multiple of
d > 2⁶² (about 146 years), but might as well get it right.
Fixes#19807.
Change-Id: I1b55a742dc36e02a7465bc778bf5dd74fe71f7c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39151
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The original analysis of the Go corpus assumed that these
stripped monotonic time. During the design discussion we
decided to try not stripping monotonic time here, but existing
code works better if we do.
See the discussion on golang.org/issue/18991 for more details.
For #18991.
Change-Id: I04d355ffe56ca0317acdd2ca76cb3033c277f6d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37542
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fetch both monotonic and wall time together when possible.
Avoids skew and is cheaper.
Also shave a few ns off in conversion in package time.
Compared to current implementation (after monotonic changes):
name old time/op new time/op delta
Now 19.6ns ± 1% 9.7ns ± 1% -50.63% (p=0.000 n=41+49) darwin/amd64
Now 23.5ns ± 4% 10.6ns ± 5% -54.61% (p=0.000 n=30+28) windows/amd64
Now 54.5ns ± 5% 29.8ns ± 9% -45.40% (p=0.000 n=27+29) windows/386
More importantly, compared to Go 1.8:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Now 9.5ns ± 1% 9.7ns ± 1% +1.94% (p=0.000 n=41+49) darwin/amd64
Now 12.9ns ± 5% 10.6ns ± 5% -17.73% (p=0.000 n=30+28) windows/amd64
Now 15.3ns ± 5% 29.8ns ± 9% +94.36% (p=0.000 n=30+29) windows/386
This brings time.Now back in line with Go 1.8 on darwin/amd64 and windows/amd64.
It's not obvious why windows/386 is still noticeably worse than Go 1.8,
but it's better than before this CL. The windows/386 speed is not too
important; the changes just keep the two architectures similar.
Change-Id: If69b94970c8a1a57910a371ee91e0d4e82e46c5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36428
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
1e-9 has a 1 in the last place, causing some Duration calculations to
have unnecessary rounding errors. 1e9 does not, so use that instead.
Change-Id: I96334a2c47e7a014b532eb4b8a3ef9550e7ed057
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33116
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The docs used to imply that using == would compare Locations, but of
course it just compares Location pointers, which will have unpredictable
results depending on how the pointers are loaded.
Change-Id: I783c1309e476a9616a1c1c290eac713aba3b0b57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32332
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In the zero Time, the (not user visible) nil *Location indicates UTC.
In the result of t.UTC() and other ways to create times in specific
zones, UTC is indicated by a non-nil *Location, specifically &utcLoc.
This creates a representation ambiguity exposed by comparison with ==
or reflect.DeepEqual or the like.
Change time.Time representation to use only nil, never &utcLoc,
to represent UTC. This eliminates the ambiguity.
Fixes#15716.
Change-Id: I7dcc2c20ce6b073e1daae323d3e49d17d1d52802
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31144
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
1. Define behavior for Unmarshal of JSON null into Unmarshaler and
TextUnmarshaler. Specifically, an Unmarshaler will be given the
literal null and can decide what to do (because otherwise
json.RawMessage is impossible to implement), and a TextUnmarshaler
will be skipped over (because there is no text to unmarshal), like
most other inappropriate types. Document this in Unmarshal, with a
reminder in UnmarshalJSON about handling null.
2. Test all this.
3. Fix the TextUnmarshaler case, which was returning an unmarshalling
error, to match the definition.
4. Fix the error that had been used for the TextUnmarshaler, since it
was claiming that there was a JSON string when in fact the problem was
NOT having a string.
5. Adjust time.Time and big.Int's UnmarshalJSON to ignore null, as is
conventional.
Fixes#9037.
Change-Id: If78350414eb8dda712867dc8f4ca35a9db041b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30944
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
AddDate now retrieves location from t.Location() to ensure that
it never calls Date with a nil location.
Added test for this bug on all Time's methods
Fixes#15852
Change-Id: Id2a222af56993f741ad0b802a2c3b89e8e463926
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23561
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
It is unlikely that the value of UnixNano overflow in most
use cases. However, the max date of 2262 is also within the range
where it may be of concern to some users. Rather than have each
person recompute when this overflows to validate if its okay for
their use case, we just document it as within the years 1678 and
2262, for user's convenience.
Fixes#16977
Change-Id: I4988738c147f4a6d30f8b8735c3941b75113bb16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28478
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Truncate and Round operate on absolute time, which means that
Truncate(Hour) may return a time with non-zero Minute(). Document that
more clearly, and remove the misleading example which suggests it is
safe.
Updates #16647
Change-Id: I930584ca030dd12849195d45e49ed2fb74e0c9ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28730
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Adds an Until() function that returns the duration until the given time.
This compliments the existing Since() function and makes writing
expressions that have expiration times more readable; for example:
<-After(time.Until(connExpires)):
Fixes#14595
Change-Id: I87998a924b11d4dad5512e010b29d2da6b123456
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20118
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
It was out of date; in 1.7 the format changes to 0s.
Change-Id: I2013a1b0951afc5607828f313641b51c74433257
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24421
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
There should be a unit, and s is the SI unit name, so use that.
The other obvious possibility is ns (nanosecond), but the fact
that durations are measured in nanoseconds is an internal detail.
Fixes#14058.
Change-Id: Id1f8f3c77088224d9f7cd643778713d5cc3be5d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22357
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
PetarDambovaliev
Paschalis Tsilias
Shuo
Rob Pike
Ian Lance Taylor
Joe Tsai
Nikita Kryuchkov
Michael Darakananda
Derek Phan
Agniva De Sarker
Dmitry Vyukov
Kazuhiro Sera
Brad Fitzpatrick
fraenkel
Daniel Martí
Kunpei Sakai
Ross Chater
Russ Cox
Dmitri Shuralyov
Alberto Donizetti
Nicholas Maniscalco
Caleb Spare
Martin Möhrmann
Simon Rawet
Joe Tsai
Quentin Smith
Sam Whited