Dim performance has regressed by 14% vs 1.9 on amd64.
Current pure go version of Dim is faster and,
what is even more important for performance, is inlinable, so
instead of tweaking asm implementation, just remove it.
I had to update BenchmarkDim, because it was simply reloading
constant(answer) in a loop.
Perf data below:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Dim-6 6.79ns ± 0% 1.60ns ± 1% -76.39% (p=0.000 n=7+10)
If I modify benchmark to be the same as in this CL results are even better:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Dim-6 10.2ns ± 0% 1.6ns ± 1% -84.27% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Updates #21913
Change-Id: I00e23c8affc293531e1d9f0e0e49f3a525634f53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80695
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This is a subset of https://golang.org/cl/20022 with only the copyright
header lines, so the next CL will be smaller and more reviewable.
Go policy has been single space after periods in comments for some time.
The copyright header template at:
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#copyright
also uses a single space.
Make them all consistent.
Change-Id: Icc26c6b8495c3820da6b171ca96a74701b4a01b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20111
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Ilya Tocar
Brad Fitzpatrick
Russ Cox