Since Durations only span 290 years, they are not good for
manipulating very remote times. I bounced off this problem recently
while doing some astronomical calculations and it took me a while to
realize I could get a 64-bit seconds value from time.Time.Unix and
subtract two of them to evaluate the interval.
I thought it worth adding a sentence to make this clear. It didn't
occur to me for quite a while that "Unix time" spans a huge range in
the Go library.
Change-Id: I76c75dc951dfd6bcf86e8b0be3cfec518a3ecdee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213977
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Found by running the go vet pass 'testinggoroutine' that
I started in CL 212920.
Change-Id: Ic9462fac85dbafc437fe4a323b886755a67a1efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213097
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The commit de36d1 (CL 4635083) changed the test time
from 2009 to 2010 but forgot to update the comment.
Change-Id: Ia2928773dd184f168fddde126d0bb936de8cfc29
GitHub-Last-Rev: bf8eb57140
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#35930
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209517
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The darwin-arm64-correlium builder was failing the test consistently
at the old values. Give the ticks more time to let the test pass.
Updates #35692
Change-Id: Ibc636cd4db2595c82f4e8c6c822c3df4c2b7e0a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207839
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Take the opportunity of deflaking to make it take less time to run.
Updates #35537
Change-Id: I91ca8094fbe18fbfcd34dfda98da1592c9c82943
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207403
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The test is inherently slightly flaky, so repeat to reduce flakiness.
Fixes#35537
Change-Id: Id918d48d33c7d5e19c4f24df104adc7fbf3720f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207457
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The variable now implies that the next tick always
returns the current time which is not always the case.
Change it to next to clarify that it returns
the time of the next tick which is more appropriate.
Fixes#30271
Change-Id: Ie7719cb8c7180bc6345b436f9b3e950ee349d6e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206123
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
User's program was mutating time.Local variable and crashing
itself as a consequence. Instead of documenting that time.Local
variable should not be mutated, recommended way of setting the
system's time zone has been documented.
Fixes#34814
Change-Id: I7781189855c3bf2ea979dfa07f86c283eed27091
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200457
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Add new fields to runtime.timer, and adjust the various timer
functions in preparation for adding timers to P's. This continues to
use the old timer code.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707
Change-Id: I9adb3814f657e083ec5e22736c4b5b52b77b6a3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171829
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
As a small step toward speeding up timers, restrict modification
of the timer.when field to the timer code itself. Other code that
wants to change the when field of an existing timer must now call
resettimer rather than changing the when field and calling addtimer.
The new resettimer function also works for a new timer.
This is just a refactoring in preparation for later code.
Updates #27707
Change-Id: Iccd5dcad415ffbeac4c2a3cf015e91f82692acf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171825
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
It seems that windowsZones.xml file has moved to Github. I opened
http://unicode.org/cldr/data/common/supplemental/windowsZones.xml
in my browser, and it redirected me to
https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/blob/master/common/supplemental/windowsZones.xml
Very nice of them.
And we could see windowsZones.xml change history now. We could even
probably file issues against this file, if we find problems.
Anyway, this CL adjusts genzabbrs.go to use new GitHub location.
I also run 'go generate' command with updated genzabbrs.go to update
zoneinfo_abbrs_windows.go.
Fixes#34917
Change-Id: I69b71a4e02edd999435738ecb225a6f9793a66d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201378
Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
In the tzdata database CEST is not recognized as a timezone name.
It is used as the abbreviated name for daylight saving time in
Central Europe. Avoid using CEST in documentation as it suggests
that programs can parse dates that use CEST, which will typically
fail on Unix systems.
Updates #34913
Change-Id: I4b22f7d06607eb5b066812a48af58edd95498286
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201197
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
You were a useful port and you've served your purpose.
Thanks for all the play.
A subsequent CL will remove amd64p32 (including assembly files and
toolchain bits) and remaining bits. The amd64p32 removal will be
separated into its own CL in case we want to support the Linux x32 ABI
in the future and want our old amd64p32 support as a starting point.
Updates #30439
Change-Id: Ia3a0c7d49804adc87bf52a4dea7e3d3007f2b1cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/199499
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change adds testable examples for the new Microseconds and Milliseconds methods that were introduced in Go 1.13.
Fixes#34354
Change-Id: Ibdbfd770ca2192f9086f756918325f7327ce0482
GitHub-Last-Rev: 4575f48f5f
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#34355
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195979
Reviewed-by: Alexander Rakoczy <alex@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Alexander Rakoczy <alex@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 131196 optimized Time.Sub, but was reverted because
it incorrectly computed the nanoseconds in some edge cases.
This CL adds a test case to enforce the correct behavior
so that a future optimization does not break this again.
Updates #17858
Updates #33677
Change-Id: I596d8302ca6bf721cf7ca11cc6f939639fcbdd43
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190524
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts commit CL 131196 because there is a bug
in the calculation of nanoseconds.
Fixes#33677
Change-Id: Ic8e94c547ee29b8aeda1b9a5cb9764dbf47b14b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190497
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
The zoneinfo.zip file will be in the $GOROOT in self-hsoted builds
on iOS.
Updates #31722
Change-Id: I991fae92e3dc50581b099a2d8901aed36ecc7cef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174310
Run-TryBot: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When the leading zero format is used, we currently don't handle the
month and year properly.
For the month, we were reporting an out of range error when getnum
returns zero of its own, as it also returns the month 0. That's
confusing, so only check the range when getnum returns a nil error.
For the year, we don't restore the value when parsing error occurs. For
example, with the incorrect input "111-01", "01" will be used to report
an error. So restore the value when an error occurs fix the problem.
Fixes#29918Fixes#29916
Change-Id: I3145f8c46813a0457766b7c302482e6b56f94ed6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/160338
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This is primarily achieved by checking for arithmetic overflow
instead of using Add and Equal.
It's a decent performance improvement even though
the function still isn't inlined.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Sub-6 242ns ± 0% 122ns ± 0% -49.59% (p=0.002 n=8+10)
Updates #17858.
Change-Id: I1469b618183c83ea8ea54d5ce277eb15f2ec0f11
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/131196
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The return values are integers, as opposed to floats, since the fractionals can be derived from multiplying t.Seconds().
Fixes#28564
Change-Id: I3796227e1f64ead39ff0aacfbdce912d952f2994
GitHub-Last-Rev: b843ab740b
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#30819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167387
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Day of year is 002 or __2, in contrast to day-in-month 2 or 02 or _2.
This means there is no way to print a variable-width day-of-year,
but that's probably OK.
Fixes#25689.
Change-Id: I1425d412cb7d2d360e9b3bf74e89566714e2477a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/122876
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Fix the punctuation and use the proper units for microseconds,
while explaining the incorrect but common variant 'us'.
Change-Id: I9e96694ef27ab4761efccd8616ac7b6700f60d39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163917
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also store 64-bit data in lib/time/zoneinfo.zip.
The comments argue that we don't need the 64-bit data until 2037 or
2106, but that turns out not to be the case. We also need them for
dates before December 13, 1901, which is time.Unix(-0x80000000, 0).
Fixes#30099
Change-Id: Ib8c9efb29b7b3c08531ae69912c588209d6320e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/161202
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The example for Nanoseconds() currently reads:
ns, _ := time.ParseDuration("1000ns")
fmt.Printf("one microsecond has %d nanoseconds.", ns.Nanoseconds())
which is not terribly interesting: it seems obvious that parsing
"1000ns" and then calling Nanoseconds() will print 1000. The mention
of microseconds in the text suggests that the author's intention was,
instead, to write something like this:
u, _ := time.ParseDuration("1us")
i.e. build a time value by parsing 1 microsecond, and then print the
value in nanoseconds. Change the example to do this.
Change-Id: I4ddb123f0935a12cda3b5d6f1ca919bfcd6383d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163622
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Updates #20969
Change-Id: Ibcf0bf932d5b1de67c22c63dd8514ed7a5d198fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/155538
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This commit fixes tests which fail on some versions of AIX 7.2 due
to internal bugs.
getsockname isn't working properly with unix networks.
Timezone files aren't returning a correct output.
Change-Id: I4ff15683912be62ab86dfbeeb63b73513404d086
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146940
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
time.now is somewhat expensive (much more expensive than nanotime),
in the common case when Time has monotonic time we don't actually
need to call time.now in Since/Until as we can do calculation
based purely on monotonic times.
name old time/op new time/op delta
TCP4OneShotTimeout-6 17.0µs ± 0% 17.1µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5)
SetReadDeadline-6 261ns ± 0% 234ns ± 1% -10.35% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Benchmark that only calls Until:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkUntil 54.0 29.5 -45.37%
Update #25729
Change-Id: I5ac5af3eb1fe9f583cf79299f10b84501b1a0d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146341
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Move startNano from runtime to time package.
In preparation for a subsequent change that speeds up Since and Until.
This also makes code simpler as we have less assembly as the result,
monotonic time handling is better localized in time package.
This changes values returned from nanotime on windows
(it does not account for startNano anymore), current comments state
that it's important, but it's unclear how it can be important
since no other OS does this.
Update #25729
Change-Id: I2275d57b7b5ed8fd0d53eb0f19d55a86136cc555
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146340
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We have fixed the playground to display results of
the program when it was timed out.
This CL fixes how soon results will be displayed to the user.
Change-Id: Ifb75828e0de12c726c8ca6e2d04947e01913dc73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146237
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This commit adds AIX operating system to time package for ppc64
architecture.
Updates: #25893
Change-Id: I4fb6fb47eae7671bf4e22729d6d160f557083c44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/138721
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Unsuccessful calls to LoadLocation previously returned the first
error encountered while traversing the default list of sources, but
ignored errors from sources specified by ZONEINFO. Whether errors
indicating missing zones or sources were ignored in this process
differed between kinds of sources.
With this change, unsuccessful calls to LoadLocation always return
the first error, not counting errors indicating missing zones or
sources.
Change-Id: Ief2c088f1df53d974b837e6565e784c2b9928ef4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/81595
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This makes Android consistent with the change in CL 121877.
Updates #20969
Change-Id: I1f114556fd1d4654c8e4e6a59513bddd5dc3d1a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/135416
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
Currently, when a tz file was being checked inside a zoneInfo dir,
a syscall.ENOENT error was being returned, which caused it to look
in the zoneinfo.zip file and return an error for that case.
We return a syscall.ENOENT error for the zip file case too, so that
it falls through to the end of the loop and returns an uniform error
for both cases.
Fixes#20969
Change-Id: If1de068022ac7693caabb5cffd1c929878460140
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121877
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
A timezone with a zero offset from UTC and without a three-letter
abbreviation will have a numeric name in timestamps: "+00".
There are currently two of them:
$ zdump Atlantic/Azores America/Scoresbysund
Atlantic/Azores Wed Aug 22 09:01:05 2018 +00
America/Scoresbysund Wed Aug 22 09:01:05 2018 +00
These two timestamp are rejected by Parse, since it doesn't allow for
zero offsets:
parsing time "Wed Aug 22 09:01:05 2018 +00": extra text: +00
This change modifies Parse to accept a +00 offset in numeric timezone
names.
As side effect of this change, Parse also now accepts "GMT+00". It was
explicitely disallowed (with a unit test ensuring it got rejected),
but the restriction seems incorrect.
DATE(1), for example, allows it:
$ date --debug --date="2009-01-02 03:04:05 GMT+00"
date: parsed date part: (Y-M-D) 2009-01-02
date: parsed time part: 03:04:05
date: parsed zone part: UTC+00
date: input timezone: parsed date/time string (+00)
date: using specified time as starting value: '03:04:05'
date: starting date/time: '(Y-M-D) 2009-01-02 03:04:05 TZ=+00'
date: '(Y-M-D) 2009-01-02 03:04:05 TZ=+00' = 1230865445 epoch-seconds
date: timezone: system default
date: final: 1230865445.000000000 (epoch-seconds)
date: final: (Y-M-D) 2009-01-02 03:04:05 (UTC)
date: final: (Y-M-D) 2009-01-02 04:04:05 (UTC+01)
Fri 2 Jan 04:04:05 CET 2009
This fixes 2 of 17 time.Parse() failures listed in Issue #26032.
Updates #26032
Change-Id: I01cd067044371322b7bb1dae452fb3c758ed3cc2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130696
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>