Make explicit that Compact does HTML escaping.
Fixes#30357.
Change-Id: I4648f8f3e907d659db977d07253f716df6e07d7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173417
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In the common case, structs have a handful of fields and most inputs
match struct field names exactly.
The previous code would do a linear search over the fields, stopping at
the first exact match, and otherwise using the first case insensitive
match.
This is unfortunate, because it means that for the common case, we'd do
a linear search with bytes.Equal. Even for structs with only two or
three fields, that is pretty wasteful.
Worse even, up until the exact match was found via the linear search,
all previous fields would run their equalFold functions, which aren't
cheap even in the simple case.
Instead, cache a map along with the field list that indexes the fields
by their name. This way, a case sensitive field search doesn't involve a
linear search, nor does it involve any equalFold func calls.
This patch should also slightly speed up cases where there's a case
insensitive match but not a case sensitive one, as then we'd avoid
calling bytes.Equal on all the fields. Though that's not a common case,
and there are no benchmarks for it.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 11.0ms ± 0% 10.6ms ± 1% -4.42% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 176MB/s ± 0% 184MB/s ± 1% +4.62% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.28MB ± 0% 2.28MB ± 0% ~ (p=0.725 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 76.9k ± 0% 76.9k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I9929c1f06c76505e5b96914199315dbdaae5dc76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172918
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We can work out how many bytes can be unquoted trivially in
rescanLiteral, which already iterates over a string's bytes.
Removing the extra loop in unquoteBytes simplifies the function and
speeds it up, especially when decoding simple strings, which are common.
While at it, we can remove unnecessary checks like len(s)<2 and
s[0]=='"'. Add a comment explaining why.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 11.2ms ± 0% 11.1ms ± 1% -1.63% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 173MB/s ± 0% 175MB/s ± 1% +1.66% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I2436a3a7f8148a2f7a6a4cdbd7dec6b32ef5e20c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/151157
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
readValue is a hot function, clocking in at ~13% flat CPU use in
CodeDecoder. In particular, looping over the bytes is slow. That's
partially because the code contains a bounds check at the start of the
loop.
The source of the problem is that scanp is a signed integer, and comes
from a field, so the compiler doesn't know that it's non-negative. Help
it with a simple and comparatively cheap hint.
While at it, use scanp as the index variable directly, removing the need
for a duplicate index variable which is later added back into scanp.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 11.3ms ± 1% 11.2ms ± 1% -0.98% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 172MB/s ± 1% 174MB/s ± 1% +0.99% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I138f83babdf316fc97697cc18f595c3403c1ddb7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170939
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This was the only benchmark missing the SetBytes call, as spotted
earlier by Bryan.
It's not required to make the benchmark useful, but it can still be a
good way to see how its speed is affected by the reduced allocations:
name time/op
CodeUnmarshal-8 12.1ms ± 1%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 11.4ms ± 1%
name speed
CodeUnmarshal-8 161MB/s ± 1%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 171MB/s ± 1%
name alloc/op
CodeUnmarshal-8 3.28MB ± 0%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 1.94MB ± 0%
name allocs/op
CodeUnmarshal-8 92.7k ± 0%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 77.6k ± 0%
While at it, remove some unnecessary empty lines.
Change-Id: Ib2bd92d5b3237b8f3092e8c6f863dab548fee2f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170938
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Decoder.Decode and Unmarshal actually scan the input bytes twice - the
first time to check for syntax errors and the length of the value, and
the second to perform the decoding.
It's in the second scan that we actually tokenize the bytes. Since
syntax errors aren't a possibility, we can take shortcuts.
In particular, literals such as quoted strings are very common in JSON,
so we can avoid a lot of work by special casing them.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 10.3ms ± 1% 9.1ms ± 0% -11.89% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
UnicodeDecoder-8 342ns ± 0% 283ns ± 0% -17.25% (p=0.000 n=6+5)
DecoderStream-8 239ns ± 0% 230ns ± 0% -3.90% (p=0.000 n=6+5)
CodeUnmarshal-8 11.0ms ± 0% 9.8ms ± 0% -11.45% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 10.3ms ± 0% 9.0ms ± 0% -12.72% (p=0.004 n=5+6)
UnmarshalString-8 104ns ± 0% 92ns ± 0% -11.35% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
UnmarshalFloat64-8 93.2ns ± 0% 87.6ns ± 0% -6.01% (p=0.010 n=6+4)
UnmarshalInt64-8 74.5ns ± 0% 71.5ns ± 0% -3.91% (p=0.000 n=5+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 189MB/s ± 1% 214MB/s ± 0% +13.50% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
UnicodeDecoder-8 40.9MB/s ± 0% 49.5MB/s ± 0% +20.96% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
CodeUnmarshal-8 176MB/s ± 0% 199MB/s ± 0% +12.93% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I7a5e2aef51bd4ddf2004aad24210f6f50e01eaeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/151042
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In golang.org/cl/145218, a feature was added where the JSON decoder
would keep track of the entire path to a field when reporting an
UnmarshalTypeError.
However, we all failed to check if this affected the benchmarks - myself
included, as a reviewer. Below are the numbers comparing the CL's parent
with itself, once it was merged:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 12.9ms ± 1% 28.2ms ± 2% +119.33% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 151MB/s ± 1% 69MB/s ± 3% -54.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.74MB ± 0% 109.39MB ± 0% +3891.83% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 77.5k ± 0% 168.5k ± 0% +117.30% (p=0.004 n=6+5)
The reason why the decoder got twice as slow is because it now allocated
~40x as many objects, which puts a lot of pressure on the garbage
collector.
The reason is that the CL concatenated strings every time a nested field
was decoded. In other words, practically every field generated garbage
when decoded. This is hugely wasteful, especially considering that the
vast majority of JSON decoding inputs won't return UnmarshalTypeError.
Instead, use a stack of fields, and make sure to always use the same
backing array, to ensure we only need to grow the slice to the maximum
depth once.
The original CL also introduced a bug. The field stack string wasn't
reset to its original state when reaching "d.opcode == scanEndObject",
so the last field in a decoded struct could leak. For example, an added
test decodes a list of structs, and encoding/json before this CL would
fail:
got: cannot unmarshal string into Go struct field T.Ts.Y.Y.Y of type int
want: cannot unmarshal string into Go struct field T.Ts.Y of type int
To fix that, simply reset the stack after decoding every field, even if
it's the last.
Below is the original performance versus this CL. There's a tiny
performance hit, probably due to the append for every decoded field, but
at least we're back to the usual ~150MB/s.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 12.9ms ± 1% 13.0ms ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.009 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 151MB/s ± 1% 149MB/s ± 1% -1.24% (p=0.009 n=6+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.74MB ± 0% 2.74MB ± 0% +0.00% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 77.5k ± 0% 77.5k ± 0% +0.00% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Finally, make all of these benchmarks report allocs by default. The
decoder ones are pretty sensitive to generated garbage, so ReportAllocs
would have made the performance regression more obvious.
Change-Id: I67b50f86b2e72f55539429450c67bfb1a9464b67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167978
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If a for loop has a simple condition and begins with a simple
"if x { break; }"; we can simply add "!x" to the loop's condition.
While at it, simplify a few assignments to use the common pattern
"x := staticDefault; if cond { x = otherValue(); }".
Finally, simplify a couple of var declarations.
Change-Id: I413982c6abd32905adc85a9a666cb3819139c19f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/165342
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
I had been finding these over a year or so, but none were big enough
changes to warrant CLs. They're a handful now, so clean them all up in a
single commit.
The smaller bodies get a bit simpler, but most importantly, the larger
bodies get unindented.
Change-Id: I5707a6fee27d4c9ff9efd3d363af575d7a4bf2aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/165340
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When parsing nested object, UnmarshalTypeError does not contain actual
path to nested field in original JSON.
This commit change Field to contain the full path to that field. One
can get the Field name by stripping all the leading path elements.
Fixes#22369
Change-Id: I6969cc08abe8387a351e3fb2944adfaa0dccad2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/145218
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Comparing errors using DeepEqual breaks if frame information
is added as proposed in Issue #29934.
Updates #29934.
Change-Id: Ib430c9ddbe588dd1dd51314c408c74c07285e1ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/162179
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Both the encoding/xml and encoding/json packages support custom
marshalers for JSON and XML, as well as the basic encoding.TextMarshaler
and encoding.TextUnmarshaler interfaces, but the docs and examples for
these are missing.
There are docs for how to use encoding.TextMarshaler and
encoding.TextUnmarshaler in encoding/json, but not encoding/xml. There
are no examples for how to use them with either json or xml. This commit
includes docs for encoding/xml and examples for both encoding/json and
encoding/xml.
There is an example using custom marshalers MarshalJSON and
UnmarshalJSON in encoding/json, but not MarshalXML and UnmarshalXML in
encoding/json. These docs are more so necessary for encoding/xml because
the complexities of XML documents is significantly greater than JSON
documents which more often leads to the need for custom marshaling. The
encoding/json package includes an example of how to write a custom
marshaler, and this commit includes the same example for the xml
package.
All examples are mirrored off the existing custom marshaler example in
encoding/json.
Fixes#6859
Change-Id: Ic93abc27c0b4d5e48dea6ede4e20b1bedca4ab39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/76350
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Calling .Interface on a struct field's reflect.Value isn't always safe.
For example, if that field is an unexported anonymous struct.
We only descended into this branch if the struct type had any methods,
so this bug had gone unnoticed for a few release cycles.
Add the check, and add a simple test case.
Fixes#28145.
Change-Id: I02f7e0ab9a4a0c18a5e2164211922fe9c3d30f64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141537
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Given a program as follows:
data := []byte(`{"F": {
"a": 2,
"3": 4
}}`)
json.Unmarshal(data, &map[string]map[int]int{})
The JSON package should error, as "a" is not a valid integer. However,
we'd encounter a panic:
panic: JSON decoder out of sync - data changing underfoot?
The reason was that decodeState.object would return a nil error on
encountering the invalid map key string, while saving the key type error
for later. This broke if we were inside another object, as we would
abruptly end parsing the nested object, leaving the decoder in an
unexpected state.
To fix this, simply avoid storing the map element and continue decoding
the object, to leave the decoder state exactly as if we hadn't seen an
invalid key type.
This affected both signed and unsigned integer keys, so fix both and add
two test cases.
Updates #28189.
Change-Id: I8a6204cc3ff9fb04ed769df7a20a824c8b94faff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142518
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This change makes stateEndTop use isSpace instead of specifically
recreating the same functionality.
Change-Id: I81f8f51682e46e7f8e2b9fed423a968457200625
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/121797
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Having these panic-like errors used to be ok, since they were used in
the internal decoder state instead of passed around via return
parameters.
Recently, the decoder was rewritten to use explicit error returns
instead. This error is a terrible fit for error returns; a handful of
functions must return an error because of it, and their callers must
check for an error that should never happen.
This is precisely what panics are for, so use them. The test coverage of
the package goes up from 91.3% to 91.6%, and performance is unaffected.
We can also get rid of some unnecessary verbosity in the code.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-4 27.5ms ± 1% 27.5ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.937 n=6+6)
Change-Id: I01033b3f5b7c0cf0985082fa272754f96bf6353c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/134835
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The overall coverage of the json package goes up from 90.8% to 91.3%.
While at it, apply two minor code simplifications found while inspecting
the HTML coverage report.
Change-Id: I0fba968afeedc813b1385e4bde72d93b878854d7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/134735
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Given the following types:
type S2 struct{ Field string }
type S struct{ *S2 }
Marshalling a value of type T1 should result in "{}", as there's no way
to access any value of T2.Field. This is how Go 1.10 and earlier
versions behave.
However, in the recent refactor golang.org/cl/125417 I broke this logic.
When the encoder found an anonymous struct pointer field that was nil,
it no longer skipped the embedded fields underneath it. This can be seen
in the added test:
--- FAIL: TestAnonymousFields/EmbeddedFieldBehindNilPointer (0.00s)
encode_test.go:430: Marshal() = "{\"Field\":\"\\u003c*json.S2 Value\\u003e\"}", want "{}"
The human error was a misplaced label, meaning we weren't actually
skipping the right loop iteration. Fix that.
Change-Id: Iba8a4a77d358dac73dcba4018498fe4f81afa263
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131376
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TestRawMessage now passes without the need for the RawMessage field to
be a pointer. The TODO dates all the way back to 2010, so I presume the
issue has since been fixed.
TestNullRawMessage tested the decoding of a JSON null into a
*RawMessage. The existing behavior was correct, but for the sake of
completeness a non-pointer RawMessage field has been added too. The
non-pointer field behaves differently, as one can read in the docs:
To unmarshal JSON into a value implementing the Unmarshaler
interface, Unmarshal calls that value's UnmarshalJSON method,
including when the input is a JSON null.
Change-Id: Iabaed75d4ed10ea427d135ee1b80c6e6b83b2e6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131377
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Encoders like map and array can use the much cheaper "i > 0" check to
see if we're not writing the first element. However, since struct fields
support omitempty, we need to keep track of that separately.
This is much more expensive - after calling the field encoder itself,
and retrieving the field via reflection, this branch was the third most
expensive piece of this field loop.
Instead, hoist the branch logic outside of the loop. The code doesn't
get much more complex, since we just delay the writing of each byte
until the next iteration. Yet the performance improvement is noticeable,
even when the struct types in CodeEncoder only have 2 and 7 fields,
respectively.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 5.39ms ± 0% 5.31ms ± 0% -1.37% (p=0.010 n=4+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 360MB/s ± 0% 365MB/s ± 0% +1.39% (p=0.010 n=4+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I2662cf459e0dfd68e56fa52bc898a417e84266c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131401
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
A few encoder struct types, such as map and slice, only encapsulate
other prepared encoder funcs. Using pointer receivers has no advantage,
and makes calling these methods slightly more expensive.
Not a huge performance win, but certainly an easy one. The struct types
used in the benchmark below contain one slice field and one pointer
field.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 5.48ms ± 0% 5.39ms ± 0% -1.66% (p=0.010 n=6+4)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 354MB/s ± 0% 360MB/s ± 0% +1.69% (p=0.010 n=6+4)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I9f78dbe07fcc6fbf19a6d96c22f5d6970db9eca4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131400
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Some WriteByte('\\') calls can be deduplicated.
fillField is used in two occasions, but it is unnecessary when adding
fields to the "next" stack, as those aren't used for the final encoding.
Inline the func with its only remaining call.
Finally, unindent a default-if block.
The performance of the encoder is unaffected:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 6.65ms ± 1% 6.65ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.662 n=6+5)
Change-Id: Ie55baeab89abad9b9f13e9f6ca886a670c30dba9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122461
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This function was only used in a single place - in the field encoding
loop within the struct encoder.
Inlining the function call manually lets us get rid of the call
overhead. But most importantly, it lets us simplify the logic afterward.
We no longer need to use reflect.Value{} and !fv.IsValid(), as we can
skip the field immediately.
The two factors combined (mostly just the latter) give a moderate speed
improvement to this hot loop.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 6.01ms ± 1% 5.91ms ± 1% -1.66% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 323MB/s ± 1% 328MB/s ± 1% +1.69% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I12757c325a68abb2856026cf719c122612a1f38e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125417
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
structEncoder had two slices - the list of fields, and a list containing
the encoder for each field. structEncoder.encode then looped over the
fields, and indexed into the second slice to grab the field encoder.
However, this makes it very hard for the compiler to be able to prove
that the two slices always have the same length, and that the index
expression doesn't need a bounds check.
Merge the two slices into one to completely remove the need for bounds
checks in the hot loop.
While at it, don't copy the field elements when ranging, which greatly
speeds up the hot loop in structEncoder.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 6.18ms ± 0% 5.56ms ± 0% -10.08% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 314MB/s ± 0% 349MB/s ± 0% +11.21% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 93.2kB ± 0% 62.1kB ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I0dd47783530f439b125e084aede09dda172eb1e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125416
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reuse v.Type() and cachedTypeFields(t) when decoding maps and structs.
Always use the same data slices when in hot loops, to ensure that the
compiler generates good code. "for i < len(data) { use(d.data[i]) }"
makes it harder for the compiler.
Finally, do other minor clean-ups, such as deduplicating switch cases,
and using a switch instead of three chained ifs.
The decoder sees a noticeable speed-up, in particular when decoding
structs.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-4 29.8ms ± 1% 27.5ms ± 0% -7.83% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-4 65.0MB/s ± 1% 70.6MB/s ± 0% +8.49% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I9d751e22502221962da696e48996ffdeb777277d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122468
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Calling Name on a reflect.Type is somewhat expensive, as it involves a
number of nested calls and string handling.
This cost was showing up when decoding structs, as we were calling it to
set up an error context.
We can avoid the extra work unless we do encounter an error, which makes
decoding via struct types faster.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-4 31.0ms ± 1% 29.9ms ± 1% -3.69% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-4 62.6MB/s ± 1% 65.0MB/s ± 1% +3.83% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I48a3a85ef0ba96f524b7c3e9096cb2c4589e077a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122467
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If the encoded bytes fit in the bootstrap array encodeState.scratch, use
that instead of allocating a new byte slice.
Also tweaked the Encoding vs Encoder heuristic to use the length of the
encoded bytes, not the length of the input bytes. Encoding is used for
allocations of up to 1024 bytes, as we measured 2048 to be the point
where it no longer provides a noticeable advantage.
Also added some benchmarks. Only the first case changes in behavior.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MarshalBytes/32-4 420ns ± 1% 383ns ± 1% -8.69% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
MarshalBytes/256-4 913ns ± 1% 915ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.580 n=5+6)
MarshalBytes/4096-4 7.72µs ± 0% 7.74µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.340 n=5+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
MarshalBytes/32-4 112B ± 0% 64B ± 0% -42.86% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
MarshalBytes/256-4 736B ± 0% 736B ± 0% ~ (all equal)
MarshalBytes/4096-4 7.30kB ± 0% 7.30kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
MarshalBytes/32-4 2.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% -50.00% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
MarshalBytes/256-4 2.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
MarshalBytes/4096-4 2.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I5fa55c27bd7728338d770ae7c0756885ba9a5724
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122462
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Struct field names are static, so we can run HTMLEscape on them when
building each struct type encoder. Then, when running the struct
encoder, we can select either the original or the escaped field name to
write directly.
When the encoder is not escaping HTML, using the original string works
because neither Go struct field names nor JSON tags allow any characters
that would need to be escaped, like '"', '\\', or '\n'.
When the encoder is escaping HTML, the only difference is that '<', '>',
and '&' are allowed via JSON struct field tags, hence why we use
HTMLEscape to properly escape them.
All of the above lets us encode field names with a simple if/else and
WriteString calls, which are considerably simpler and faster than
encoding an arbitrary string.
While at it, also include the quotes and colon in these strings, to
avoid three WriteByte calls in the loop hot path.
Also added a few tests, to ensure that the behavior in these edge cases
is not broken. The output of the tests is the same if this optimization
is reverted.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 7.12ms ± 0% 6.14ms ± 0% -13.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 272MB/s ± 0% 316MB/s ± 0% +16.08% (p=0.004 n=6+5)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 91.9kB ± 0% 93.2kB ± 0% +1.43% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I6f6a340d0de4670799ce38cf95b2092822d2e3ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122460
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing Decoder.tokenError implementation creates its error messages by
concatenating "invalid character " + quoteChar(c) + " " + context. All context
values however already start with a space leading to error messages containing
two spaces.
This change removes " " from the concatenation expression.
Fixes#26587
Change-Id: I93d14319396636b2a40d55053bda88c98e94a81a
GitHub-Last-Rev: 6db7e1991b
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#26588
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125775
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#18037
Change-Id: I20e27bcc013b00b726eb348daf5ca86b138ddcc2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107598
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes golint warning about "if block ends with a return statement, so drop this else and outdent its block".
Change-Id: Id17ad0bf37ba939386b177b709e9e3c067d8ba21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105736
Run-TryBot: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The go/printer (and thus gofmt) uses a heuristic to determine
whether to break alignment between elements of an expression
list which is spread across multiple lines. The heuristic only
kicked in if the entry sizes (character length) was above a
certain threshold (20) and the ratio between the previous and
current entry size was above a certain value (4).
This heuristic worked reasonably most of the time, but also
led to unfortunate breaks in many cases where a single entry
was suddenly much smaller (or larger) then the previous one.
The behavior of gofmt was sufficiently mysterious in some of
these situations that many issues were filed against it.
The simplest solution to address this problem is to remove
the heuristic altogether and have a programmer introduce
empty lines to force different alignments if it improves
readability. The problem with that approach is that the
places where it really matters, very long tables with many
(hundreds, or more) entries, may be machine-generated and
not "post-processed" by a human (e.g., unicode/utf8/tables.go).
If a single one of those entries is overlong, the result
would be that the alignment would force all comments or
values in key:value pairs to be adjusted to that overlong
value, making the table hard to read (e.g., that entry may
not even be visible on screen and all other entries seem
spaced out too wide).
Instead, we opted for a slightly improved heuristic that
behaves much better for "normal", human-written code.
1) The threshold is increased from 20 to 40. This disables
the heuristic for many common cases yet even if the alignment
is not "ideal", 40 is not that many characters per line with
todays screens, making it very likely that the entire line
remains "visible" in an editor.
2) Changed the heuristic to not simply look at the size ratio
between current and previous line, but instead considering the
geometric mean of the sizes of the previous (aligned) lines.
This emphasizes the "overall picture" of the previous lines,
rather than a single one (which might be an outlier).
3) Changed the ratio from 4 to 2.5. Now that we ignore sizes
below 40, a ratio of 4 would mean that a new entry would have
to be 4 times bigger (160) or smaller (10) before alignment
would be broken. A ratio of 2.5 seems more sensible.
Applied updated gofmt to all of src and misc. Also tested
against several former issues that complained about this
and verified that the output for the given examples is
satisfactory (added respective test cases).
Some of the files changed because they were not gofmt-ed
in the first place.
For #644.
For #7335.
For #10392.
(and probably more related issues)
Fixes#22852.
Change-Id: I5e48b3d3b157a5cf2d649833b7297b33f43a6f6e
The previous type cache is quadratic in time in the situation where
new types are continually encountered. Now that it is possible to dynamically
create new types with the reflect package, this can cause json to
perform very poorly.
Switch to sync.Map which does well when the cache has hit steady state,
but also handles occasional updates in better than quadratic time.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/MissTypes1-8 14817 16202 +9.35%
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/MissTypes10-8 70926 69144 -2.51%
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/MissTypes100-8 976467 208973 -78.60%
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/MissTypes1000-8 79520162 1750371 -97.80%
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/MissTypes10000-8 6873625837 16847806 -99.75%
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/HitTypes1000-8 7.51 8.80 +17.18%
BenchmarkTypeFieldsCache/HitTypes10000-8 7.58 8.68 +14.51%
The old implementation takes 12 minutes just to build a cache of size 1e5
due to the quadratic behavior. I did not bother benchmark sizes above that.
Change-Id: I5e6facc1eb8e1b80e5ca285e4dd2cc8815618dad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76850
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Consider the following:
type child struct{ Field string }
type parent struct{ child }
p := new(parent)
v := reflect.ValueOf(p).Elem().Field(0)
v.Field(0).SetString("hello") // v.Field = "hello"
v = v.Addr().Elem() // v = *(&v)
v.Field(0).SetString("goodbye") // v.Field = "goodbye"
It would appear that v.Addr().Elem() should have the same value, and
that it would be safe to set "goodbye".
However, after CL 66331, any interspersed calls between Field calls
causes the RO flag to be set.
Thus, setting to "goodbye" actually causes a panic.
That CL affects decodeState.indirect which assumes that back-to-back
Value.Addr().Elem() is side-effect free. We fix that logic to keep
track of the Addr() and Elem() calls and set v back to the original
after a full round-trip has occured.
Fixes#24152
Updates #24153
Change-Id: Ie50f8fe963f00cef8515d89d1d5cbc43b76d9f9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97796
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Rather than only ignoring runtime.Error panics, which are a very
narrow set of possible panic values, switch it such that the json
package only captures panic values that have been properly wrapped
in a jsonError struct. This ensures that only intentional panics
originating from the json package are captured.
Fixes#23012
Change-Id: I5e85200259edd2abb1b0512ce6cc288849151a6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94019
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This CL reverts CL 76851 and takes a different approach to #21357.
The changes in encode.go and encode_test.go are reverts that
rolls back the changed behavior in CL 76851 where
embedded pointers to unexported struct types were
unilaterally ignored in both marshal and unmarshal.
Instead, these fields are handled as before with the exception that
it returns an error when Unmarshal is unable to set an unexported field.
The behavior of Marshal is now unchanged with regards to #21357.
This policy maintains the greatest degree of backwards compatibility
and avoids silently discarding data the user may have expected to be present.
Fixes#21357
Change-Id: I7dc753280c99f786ac51acf7e6c0246618c8b2b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82135
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
It was added in CL 79995. It is unnecessarily confusing.
Change-Id: Ib8ff35b9f71b54ff99d2d6e0534c7128e1f4345a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80035
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
CL 60410 fixes a bug in reflect that allows assignments to an embedded
field of a pointer to an unexported struct type.
This breaks the json package because unmarshal is now unable to assign
a newly allocated struct to such fields.
In order to be consistent in the behavior for marshal and unmarshal,
this CL changes both marshal and unmarshal to always ignore
embedded pointers to unexported structs.
Fixes#21357
Change-Id: If62ea11155555e61115ebb9cfa5305caf101bde5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76851
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The go repository contains a mix of github.com/golang/go/issues/xxxxx
and golang.org/issues/xxxxx URLs for references to issues in the issue
tracker. We should use one for consistency, and golang.org is preferred
in case the project moves the issue tracker in the future.
This reasoning is taken from a comment Sam Whited left on a CL I
recently opened: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/73890.
In that CL I referenced an issue using its github.com URL, because other
tests in the file I was changing contained references to issues using
their github.com URL. Sam Whited left a comment on the CL stating I
should change it to the golang.org URL.
If new code is intended to reference issues via golang.org and not
github.com, existing code should be updated so that precedence exists
for contributors who are looking at the existing code as a guide for the
code they should write.
Change-Id: I3b9053fe38a1c56fc101a8b7fd7b8f310ba29724
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75673
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When a SyntaxError occurs, report the current offset within the stream.
The code already accounted for the offset within the current buffer
being scanned. By including how much data was already scanned, the
current offset can be computed.
Fixes#22478
Change-Id: I91ecd4cad0b85a5c1556bc597f3ee914e769af01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74251
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Add a DisallowUnknownFields flag to Decoder.
DisallowUnknownFields causes the Decoder to return an error when
the the decoding destination is a struct and the input contains
object keys which do not match any non-ignored, public field the
destination, including keys whose value is set to null.
Note: this fix has already been worked on in 27231, which seems
to be abandoned. This version is a slightly simpler implementation
and is up to date with the master branch.
Fixes#15314
Change-Id: I987a5857c52018df334f4d1a2360649c44a7175d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74830
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In #10909, it was decided that "Deprecated:" is a magic string for
tools (e.g., #17056 for godoc) to detect deprecated identifiers.
Use those convention instead of custom written prose.
Change-Id: Ia514fc3c88fc502e86c6e3de361c435f4cb80b22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70110
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Remove an old comment introduced in golang.org/cl/9073.
Change-Id: I14be27ddfac987f44d839920bc4d02361a576f06
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66371
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
bytes.IndexByte can be used wherever the second argument to
strings.Index is exactly one byte long, so we do that with this change.
This avoids generating unnecessary string symbols/converison and saves
a few calls to bytes.Index.
Change-Id: If31c775790e01edfece1169e398ad6a754fb4428
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66373
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
strings.IndexByte was introduced in go1.2 and it can be used
effectively wherever the second argument to strings.Index is
exactly one byte long.
This avoids generating unnecessary string symbols and saves
a few calls to strings.Index.
Change-Id: I1ab5edb7c4ee9058084cfa57cbcc267c2597e793
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65930
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 60410 fixes the compiler such that reflect.StructField.PkgPath
is non-empty if and only if the field is unexported.
Given that property, we can cleanup the logic in the json encoder
to avoid parsing the field name to detect export properties.
Updates #21122
Change-Id: Ic01b9c4ca76386774846b742b0c1b9b948f53e7c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65550
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Make arguments semantics clear without the need to look for
json.Indent documentation.
Change-Id: If9adfe9f477a30d426ae83790b0f2578c0a809b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61670
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Most of these are return values that were part of a receiving parameter,
so they're still accessible.
A few others are not, but those have never had a use.
Found with github.com/mvdan/unparam, after Kevin Burke's suggestion that
the tool should also warn about unused result parameters.
Change-Id: Id8b5ed89912a99db22027703a88bd94d0b292b8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55910
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Went mainly for the ones that make no sense, such as the ones
mid-sentence or after commas.
Change-Id: Ie245d2c19cc7428a06295635cf6a9482ade25ff0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/57293
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change fixes the remaining examples where the raw strings had
suboptimal indentation (one level too many) when viewed in godoc.
Follows CL 48910.
Fixes#21026.
Change-Id: Ifc0dae3fa899a9fff8b1ff958414e2fe6852321d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50990
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <shurcool@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
https://golang.org/cl/33773 fixes the JSON marshaler to avoid serializing
embedded fields on unexported types of non-struct types. However, Go allows
embedding pointer to types, so the check for whether the field is a non-struct
type must first dereference the pointer to get at the underlying type.
Furthermore, due to a edge-case in the behavior of StructField.PkgPath not
being a reliable indicator of whether the field is unexported (see #21122),
we use our own logic to determine whether the field is exported or not.
The logic in this CL may be simplified depending on what happens in #21122.
Fixes#21121
Updates #21122
Change-Id: I8dfd1cdfac8a87950df294a566fb96dfd04fd749
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50711
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The existing example for Decoder.Decode (Stream) had excessive
indentation in the godoc interface for the const jsonStream,
making it hard to read. This fixes the indentation in the
example_test.go to improve the readability in godoc.
Helps #21026.
Change-Id: I16f56b82182da1dcc73cca44e535a7f5695e975d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48910
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <shurcool@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Marshal must process unexported embedded fields of struct type,
looking for exported fields in those structs. However, it must
not process unexported embedded fields of non-struct type.
For example, consider:
type t1 struct {
X int
}
type t2 int
type T struct {
t1
t2
}
When considering T, Marshal must process t1 to find t1.X.
Marshal must not process t2, but it was. Fix that.
Fixes#18009
Change-Id: I62ba0b65ba30fd927990e101a26405a9998787a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33773
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
JSON decoding performs poorly for unmapped and ignored fields. We noticed better
performance when unmarshalling unused fields. The loss comes mostly from calls
to scanner.error as described at #17914.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkIssue10335-8 431 408 -5.34%
BenchmarkUnmapped-8 1744 1314 -24.66%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkIssue10335-8 4 3 -25.00%
BenchmarkUnmapped-8 18 4 -77.78%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkIssue10335-8 320 312 -2.50%
BenchmarkUnmapped-8 568 344 -39.44%
Fixes#17914, improves #10335
Change-Id: I7d4258a94eb287c0fe49e7334795209b90434cd0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33276
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The tree is inconsistent about single l vs double l in those
words in documentation, test messages, and one error value text.
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshall(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
42
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshal(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
1694
Make it consistently a single l, per earlier decisions. This means
contributors won't be confused by misleading precedence, and it helps
consistency.
Change the spelling in one error value text in newRawAttributes of
crypto/x509 package to be consistent.
This change was generated with:
perl -i -npe 's,([Mm]arshal)l(|s|er|ers|ed|ing),$1$2,' $(git grep -l -E '[Mm]arshall' | grep -v AUTHORS | grep -v CONTRIBUTORS)
Updates #12431.
Follows https://golang.org/cl/14150.
Change-Id: I85d28a2d7692862ccb02d6a09f5d18538b6049a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33017
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
I used the slowtests.go tool as described in
https://golang.org/cl/32684 on packages that stood out.
go test -short std drops from ~56 to ~52 seconds.
This isn't a huge win, but it was mostly an exercise.
Updates #17751
Change-Id: I9f3402e36a038d71e662d06ce2c1d52f6c4b674d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32751
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This CL expands upon a change made in (http://golang.org/cl/21811)
to ensure that a nil RawMessage gets serialized as "null" instead of
being a nil slice.
The added check only triggers when the RawMessage is nil. We do not
handle the case when the RawMessage is non-nil, but empty.
Fixes#17704
Updates #14493
Change-Id: I0fbebcdd81f7466c5b78c94953afc897f162ceb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32472
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
1. Define behavior for Unmarshal of JSON null into Unmarshaler and
TextUnmarshaler. Specifically, an Unmarshaler will be given the
literal null and can decide what to do (because otherwise
json.RawMessage is impossible to implement), and a TextUnmarshaler
will be skipped over (because there is no text to unmarshal), like
most other inappropriate types. Document this in Unmarshal, with a
reminder in UnmarshalJSON about handling null.
2. Test all this.
3. Fix the TextUnmarshaler case, which was returning an unmarshalling
error, to match the definition.
4. Fix the error that had been used for the TextUnmarshaler, since it
was claiming that there was a JSON string when in fact the problem was
NOT having a string.
5. Adjust time.Time and big.Int's UnmarshalJSON to ignore null, as is
conventional.
Fixes#9037.
Change-Id: If78350414eb8dda712867dc8f4ca35a9db041b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30944
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Struct fields can be suppressed in JSON serialization by "-" tags, but
that doesn't preclude generation of "-" object keys.
Document and verify the mechanism for doing so.
Change-Id: I7f60e1759cfee15cb7b2447cd35fab91c5b004e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21204
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The UnmarshalTypeError has two new fields Struct and Field,
used when constructing the error message.
Fixes#6716.
Change-Id: I67da171480a9491960b3ae81893770644180f848
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18692
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Change float32/float64 formatting to use non-exponential form
for a slightly wider range, to more closely match ES6 JSON.stringify
and other JSON generators.
Most notably:
1e20 now formats as 100000000000000000000 (previously 1e+20)
1e-6 now formats as 0.000001 (previously 1e-06)
1e-7 now formats as 1e-7 (previously 1e-07)
This also brings the int64 and float64 formatting in line with each other,
for all shared representable values. For example both int64(1234567)
and float64(1234567) now format as "1234567", where before the
float64 formatted as "1.234567e+06".
The only variation now compared to ES6 JSON.stringify is that
Go continues to encode negative zero as "-0", not "0", so that
the value continues to be preserved during JSON round trips.
Fixes#6384.
Fixes#14135.
Change-Id: Ib0e0e009cd9181d75edc0424a28fe776bcc5bbf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30371
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
I avoided anywhere in the compiler or things which might be used by
the compiler in the future, since they need to build with Go 1.4.
I also avoided anywhere where there was no benefit to changing it.
I probably missed some.
Updates #16721
Change-Id: Ib3c895ff475c6dec2d4322393faaf8cb6a6d4956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30250
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Documentation made reference to an unknown entity "DisableHTMLEscaping,"
but I think it actually meant the method "Encoder.SetEscapeHTML."
Fixes#17255
Change-Id: I18fda76f8066110caef85fd33698de83d632e646
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29931
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The previous check for characters inside of a JSON string that needed
to be escaped performed seven different boolean comparisons before
determining that a ASCII character did not need to be escaped. Most
characters do not need to be escaped, so this check can be done in a
more performant way.
Use the same strategy as the unicode package for precomputing a range
of characters that need to be escaped, then do a single lookup into a
character array to determine whether the character needs escaping.
On an AWS c4.large node:
$ benchstat benchmarks/master-bench benchmarks/json-table-bench
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-2 19.0ms ± 0% 15.5ms ± 1% -18.16% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
CodeMarshal-2 20.1ms ± 1% 16.8ms ± 2% -16.35% (p=0.000 n=20+21)
CodeDecoder-2 49.3ms ± 1% 49.5ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.498 n=16+20)
DecoderStream-2 416ns ± 0% 416ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.978 n=19+19)
CodeUnmarshal-2 51.0ms ± 1% 50.9ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.490 n=19+17)
CodeUnmarshalReuse-2 48.5ms ± 2% 48.5ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.989 n=20+19)
UnmarshalString-2 541ns ± 1% 532ns ± 1% -1.75% (p=0.000 n=20+21)
UnmarshalFloat64-2 485ns ± 1% 481ns ± 1% -0.92% (p=0.000 n=20+21)
UnmarshalInt64-2 429ns ± 1% 427ns ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
Issue10335-2 631ns ± 1% 619ns ± 1% -1.84% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
NumberIsValid-2 19.1ns ± 0% 19.1ns ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
NumberIsValidRegexp-2 689ns ± 1% 690ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.150 n=20+20)
SkipValue-2 14.0ms ± 0% 14.0ms ± 0% -0.05% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
EncoderEncode-2 525ns ± 2% 512ns ± 1% -2.33% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-2 102MB/s ± 0% 125MB/s ± 1% +22.20% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
CodeMarshal-2 96.6MB/s ± 1% 115.6MB/s ± 2% +19.56% (p=0.000 n=20+21)
CodeDecoder-2 39.3MB/s ± 1% 39.2MB/s ± 2% ~ (p=0.464 n=16+20)
CodeUnmarshal-2 38.1MB/s ± 1% 38.1MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.525 n=19+17)
SkipValue-2 143MB/s ± 0% 143MB/s ± 0% +0.05% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
I also took the data set reported in #5683 (browser
telemetry data from Mozilla), added named structs for
the data set, and turned it into a proper benchmark:
https://github.com/kevinburke/jsonbench/blob/master/go/bench_test.go
The results from that test are similarly encouraging. On a 64-bit
Mac:
$ benchstat benchmarks/master-benchmark benchmarks/json-table-benchmark
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeMarshal-4 1.19ms ± 2% 1.08ms ± 2% -9.33% (p=0.000 n=21+17)
Unmarshal-4 3.09ms ± 3% 3.06ms ± 1% -0.83% (p=0.027 n=22+17)
UnmarshalReuse-4 3.04ms ± 1% 3.04ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.169 n=20+15)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeMarshal-4 80.3MB/s ± 1% 88.5MB/s ± 1% +10.29% (p=0.000 n=21+17)
Unmarshal-4 31.0MB/s ± 2% 31.2MB/s ± 1% +0.83% (p=0.025 n=22+17)
On the c4.large:
$ benchstat benchmarks/master-bench benchmarks/json-table-bench
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeMarshal-2 1.10ms ± 1% 0.98ms ± 1% -10.12% (p=0.000 n=20+54)
Unmarshal-2 2.82ms ± 1% 2.79ms ± 0% -1.09% (p=0.000 n=20+51)
UnmarshalReuse-2 2.80ms ± 0% 2.77ms ± 0% -1.03% (p=0.000 n=20+52)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeMarshal-2 87.3MB/s ± 1% 97.1MB/s ± 1% +11.27% (p=0.000 n=20+54)
Unmarshal-2 33.9MB/s ± 1% 34.2MB/s ± 0% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=20+51)
For what it's worth, I tried other heuristics - short circuiting the
conditional for common ASCII characters, for example:
if (b >= 63 && b != 92) || (b >= 39 && b <= 59) || (rest of the conditional)
This offered a speedup around 7-9%, not as large as the submitted
change.
Change-Id: Idcf88f7b93bfcd1164cdd6a585160b7e407a0d9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24466
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Swtich from a sync.RWMutex to atomic.Value for cacheTypeFields.
On GOARCH=386, this recovers most of the remaining performance
difference from the 1.6 release. Compared with tip on linux/386:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-40 92.8ms ± 1% 87.7ms ± 1% -5.50% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-40 20.9MB/s ± 1% 22.1MB/s ± 1% +5.83% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
With more time and care, I believe more of the JSON decoder's work
could be shifted so it is done before decoding, and independent of
the number of bytes processed. Maybe someone could explore that for
Go 1.8.
For #16117.
Change-Id: I049655b2e5b76384a0d5f4b90e3ec7cc8d8c4340
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24472
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This has been inaccurate since https://golang.org/cl/6048047.
Fixes#15317.
Change-Id: If93d2161f51ccb91912cb94a35318cf33f4d526a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23691
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Decoding a JSON message does not touch unspecified or null fields;
always use a new underlying struct to prevent old field values from
sticking around.
Fixes: #14640
Change-Id: Ica78c208ce104e2cdee1d4e92bf58596ea5587c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23483
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
CL 21057 added this method during the Go 1.7 cycle
(so it is not yet released and still possible to revise).
This makes it clearer that the method is not doing something
(like func Indent does), but just changing a setting about doing
something later.
Also document that this is in some sense irreversible.
I think that's probably a mistake but the original CL discussion
claimed it as a feature, so I'll leave it alone.
For #6492.
Change-Id: If4415c869a9196501056c143811a308822d5a420
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23295
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
DisableHTMLEscaping is now SetEscapeHTML, allowing the escaping
to be toggled, not just disabled. This API is new for Go 1.7,
so there are no compatibility concerns (quite the opposite,
the point is to fix the API before we commit to it in Go 1.7).
Change-Id: I96b9f8f169a9c44995b8a157a626eb62d0b6dea7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23293
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
CL 19725 changed the encoding of []typedByte to look for
typedByte.MarshalJSON and typedByte.MarshalText.
Previously it was handled like []byte, producing a base64 encoding of the underlying byte data.
CL 19725 forgot to look for (*typedByte).MarshalJSON and (*typedByte).MarshalText,
as the marshaling of other slices would. Add test and fix for those.
This CL also adds tests that the decoder can handle both the old and new encodings.
(This was true even in Go 1.6, which is the only reason we can consider this
not an incompatible change.)
For #13783.
Change-Id: I7cab8b6c0154a7f2d09335b7fa23173bcf856c37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23294
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
This change makes encoding and decoding support integer types in map
keys, converting to/from JSON string keys.
JSON object keys are still sorted lexically, even though the keys may be
integer strings.
For backwards-compatibility, the existing Text(Un)Marshaler support for
map keys (added in CL 20356) does not take precedence over the default
encoding for string types. There is no such concern for integer types,
so integer map key encoding is only used as a fallback if the map key
type is not a Text(Un)Marshaler.
Fixes#12529.
Change-Id: I7e68c34f9cd19704b1d233a9862da15fabf0908a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22060
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Russ Cox
Daniel Martí
LE Manh Cuong
Marcel van Lohuizen
Ketan Parmar
GuilhermeCaruso
Leigh McCulloch
hearot
Gabriel Aszalos
Ian Davis
Taesu Pyo
Tim Cooper
Philip Børgesen
tengufromsky
Michael Fraenkel
Jeremy Jackins
bontequero
Robert Griesemer
Pascal S. de Kloe
Joe Tsai
rajender
Michael Schurter
Ian Lance Taylor
Ivan Bertona
Marvin Stenger
tbunyk
Dmitri Shuralyov
Iccha Sethi
Brad Fitzpatrick
thoeni
Alberto Donizetti
Bryan C. Mills
Tuo Shan
Matt Layher
Emmanuel Odeke
Richard Gibson
Jirka Daněk
mike andrews
Kevin Burke
Carlos C
David Crawshaw
David Glasser
Quentin Smith
Scott Bell
Caleb Spare