If the test has already completed when a go routine with a panic
handler reports an error the location of the error call is lost.
Added logDepth to be able to log location of failure at different
depths down the stack.
Fixes#26720
Change-Id: I8b7789ddae757ef6f4bd315cb20356709f4fadec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/127596
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
I omitted vendor directories and anything necessary for bootstrapping.
(Tested by bootstrapping with Go 1.4)
Updates #27864
Change-Id: I7d9b68d0372d3a34dee22966cca323513ece7e8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/137856
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The previous CL (https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/96756)
added comments that didn't really say much, but there is something
so say: what the units are and that they are indexed starting at 1.
Add a more helpful comment on the type, and also follow proper
style by using initial capitals and a period.
Change-Id: Id19cd5f392faf7c7bac034073f276cc770589075
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121875
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fill in the missing descriptions for the CoverBlock struct fields
Change-Id: I9257881a19b01e5cfe61cf19a91375b6d7cc68ef
GitHub-Last-Rev: f5b9e1d49d
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#24079
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/96756
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts golang.org/cl/110775
Reason for revert: this is causing huge slow-dows on every run after
the 1st, on various benchmarks, on multiple architectures (see Issue
25622 for details). It's just a nice-to-have little optimization, and
we're near the 1st go1.11 beta release, so I'm reverting it.
Fixes#25622
Change-Id: I758ade4af4abf764abd8336d404396992d11a0c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115535
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Since subtests and subbenchmarks run in a separate goroutine, and thus
a separate stack, this entails capturing the stack trace at the point
tb.Run is called. The work of getting the file and line information from
this stack is only done when needed, however.
Continuing the search into the parent test also requires temporarily
holding its mutex. Since Run does not hold it while waiting for the
subtest to complete, there should be no risk of a deadlock due to this.
Fixes#24128
Change-Id: If0bb169f3ac96bd48794624e619ade7edb599f83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108658
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
When running a benchmark multiple times, instead of re-computing the
value of b.N each time, use the value found by the first run.
For
go test -bench=. -benchtime 3s -count 2 p_test.go
on the benchmark in the linked issue; before:
BenchmarkBenchmark-4 500 10180593 ns/op
--- BENCH: BenchmarkBenchmark-4
p_test.go:13: single call took 10.111079ms
p_test.go:13: single call took 1.017298685s
p_test.go:13: single call took 5.090096124s
BenchmarkBenchmark-4 500 10182164 ns/op
--- BENCH: BenchmarkBenchmark-4
p_test.go:13: single call took 10.098169ms
p_test.go:13: single call took 1.017712905s
p_test.go:13: single call took 5.090898517s
PASS
ok command-line-arguments 12.244s
and after:
BenchmarkBenchmark-4 500 10177076 ns/op
--- BENCH: BenchmarkBenchmark-4
p_test.go:13: single call took 10.091301ms
p_test.go:13: single call took 1.016943125s
p_test.go:13: single call took 5.088376028s
BenchmarkBenchmark-4 500 10171497 ns/op
--- BENCH: BenchmarkBenchmark-4
p_test.go:13: single call took 10.140245ms
p_test.go:13: single call took 5.085605921s
PASS
ok command-line-arguments 11.218s
Fixes#23423
Change-Id: Ie66a8c5ac43881eb8741e14105db28745b4d56d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110775
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We need to grab the mutex before we can access it.
Fixes#24438
Change-Id: Idd6130036691acec5bc5f8b40d6884f8db1d9d3c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/101283
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The Go's heap profile contains four kinds of samples
(inuse_space, inuse_objects, alloc_space, and alloc_objects).
The pprof tool by default chooses the inuse_space (the bytes
of live, in-use objects). When analyzing the current memory
usage the choice of inuse_space as the default may be useful,
but in some cases, users are more interested in analyzing the
total allocation statistics throughout the program execution.
For example, when we analyze the memory profile from benchmark
or program test run, we are more likely interested in the whole
allocation history than the live heap snapshot at the end of
the test or benchmark.
The pprof tool provides flags to control which sample type
to be used for analysis. However, it is one of the less-known
features of pprof and we believe it's better to choose the
right type of samples as the default when producing the profile.
This CL introduces a new type of profile, "allocs", which is
the same as the "heap" profile but marks the alloc_space
as the default type unlike heap profiles that use inuse_space
as the default type.
'go test -memprofile=...' command is changed to use the new
"allocs" profile type instead of the traditional "heap" profile.
Fixes#24443
Change-Id: I012dd4b6dcacd45644d7345509936b8380b6fbd9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102696
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
When a test calls t.Fatal()/t.Fatalf(), only deferred code will execute.
Increment the failure count as part of a deferred call.
Fixes#24412
Change-Id: Ibb154015fcd3d0fb7739718fdda8c9ad22f9e896
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/101035
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Fixed a broken link to a section in the documentation for the
test flags for the go command.
Change-Id: Ic4bdd4965aac7856dd13a2adda9d774b9bae4113
GitHub-Last-Rev: 15bda34067
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#24613
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/103835
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-race sets a hard cap of 8,192, which is easily hit while testing.
Fixes#23611
Change-Id: I0f720ec39c82c2194a485d437d6373f4bdc8a9c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/103160
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
I grepped for "bytes.Buffer" and "buf.String" and mostly ignored test
files. I skipped a few on purpose and probably missed a few others,
but otherwise I think this should be most of them.
Updates #18990
Change-Id: I5a6ae4296b87b416d8da02d7bfaf981d8cc14774
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102479
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Don’t panic if a subtest inadvertently calls FailNow
on a parent’s T. Instead, report the offending subtest
while still reporting the error with the ancestor test and
keep exiting goroutines.
Note that this implementation has a race if parallel
subtests are failing the parent concurrently.
This is fine:
Calling FailNow on a parent is considered an error
in principle, at the moment, and is reported if it is
detected. Having the race allows the race detector
to detect the error as well.
Fixes#22882
Change-Id: Ifa6d5e55bb88f6bcbb562fc8c99f1f77e320015a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97635
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Kunpei Sakai <namusyaka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In func TestXxxx(*testing.T) the Xxxx can be anything that can appear
in an identifier, but can't start with a lowercase letter. Clarify the docs.
Fixes#23322
Change-Id: I5c297916981f7e3890ee955d12bc7422a75488e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/86001
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Tests exist that call m.Run in a loop‽
Now we have one too.
Fixes#23129.
Change-Id: I8cbecb724f239ae14ad45d75e67d12c80e41c994
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83956
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
t.Run(f) does not wait for f after f calls t.Parallel.
Otherwise it would be impossible to create new
parallel sibling subtests for f.
Fixes#22993.
Change-Id: I27e1555ab1ff608eb8155db261d5e7ee8f486aef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83880
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When we write a cached test result, we now also write a log of the
environment variables and files inspected by the test run,
along with a hash of their content. Before reusing a cached test result,
we recompute the hash of the content specified by the log, and only
use the result if that content has not changed.
This makes test caching behave correctly for tests that consult
environment variables or stat or read files or directories.
Fixes#22593.
Change-Id: I8608798e73c90e0c1911a38bf7e03e1232d784dc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81895
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The test binaries accept -timeout=0 to mean no timeout,
but then the backup timer in cmd/go kills the test after 1 minute.
Make cmd/go understand this special case and change
behavior accordingly.
Fixes#14780.
Change-Id: I66bf517173a4ad21d53a5ee88d163f04b8929fb6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81499
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It's not safe (it crashes), and it's also useless: if you run
multiple benchmarks in parallel you will not get reliable
timing results from any of them.
Fixes#18603.
Change-Id: I00e5a72f7c98151543cf7d5573c38383276e391a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80841
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When -test.failfast flag is provided to go test,
no new tests get started after the first failure.
Fixes#21700
Change-Id: I0092e72f25847af05e7c8e1b811dcbb65a00cbe7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74450
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This should make parallel execution a bit clearer.
With -p=1 it should make the execution completely unambiguous.
Fixes#19280.
Change-Id: Ib48cdfe96896d01b0d8f98ccb2fab614407a7d92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49430
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
strings.LastIndexByte was introduced in go1.5 and it can be used
effectively wherever the second argument to strings.LastIndex is
exactly one byte long.
This avoids generating unnecessary string symbols and saves
a few calls to strings.LastIndex.
Change-Id: I7b5679d616197b055cffe6882a8675d24a98b574
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66372
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Most of these are return values that were part of a receiving parameter,
so they're still accessible.
A few others are not, but those have never had a use.
Found with github.com/mvdan/unparam, after Kevin Burke's suggestion that
the tool should also warn about unused result parameters.
Change-Id: Id8b5ed89912a99db22027703a88bd94d0b292b8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55910
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Otherwise, if there are any parallel tests, it will hang and panic with
"all goroutines are asleep - deadlock!".
Do not use flag.Uint to handle the error for us because we also want to
error on N==0, and because it would make setting the default to
GOMAXPROCS(0) more difficult, since it's an int.
Check for it right after flag.Parse, and mimic flag errors by printing
the usage and returning exit code 2.
Fixes#20542.
Change-Id: I0c9d4587f83d406a8f5e42ed74e40be46d639ffb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/54150
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This addresses the case of a -timeout panic, but not the more
general case of a signal arriving. See CL 48370 and CL 44352
for recent difficulties in that area.
"-timeout" here means flag usage to distinguish from the
default timeout termination which uses signals.
Fixes#19394
Change-Id: I5452d5422c0c080e940cbcc8c6606049975268c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48491
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently all package tests are executed once
with Parallel tests executed in parallel.
Then this process is repeated count*cpu times.
Tests are not parallelized over count*cpu.
Parallelizing over cpu is not possible as
GOMAXPROCS is a global setting. But it is
possible for count.
Parallelize over count.
Brings down testing of my package with -count=100
form 10s to 0.3s.
Change-Id: I76d8322adeb8c5c6e70b99af690291fd69d6402a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44830
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The code was adding race.Errors to t.raceErrors before checking
Failed, but Failed was using t.raceErrors+race.Errors. We don't want
to change Failed, since that would affect tests themselves, so modify
the harness to not unnecessarily change t.raceErrors.
Updates #19851Fixes#21338
Change-Id: I7bfdf281f90e045146c92444f1370d55c45221d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/54050
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
SkipNow and FailNow must be called from the goroutine running the
test. This is already documented, but it's easy to call them by
mistake when writing subtests. In the following:
func TestPanic(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("", func(t2 *testing.T) {
t.FailNow() // BAD: should be t2.FailNow()
})
}
the FailNow call on the outer t *testing.T correctly triggers a panic
panic: test executed panic(nil) or runtime.Goexit
The error message confuses users (see issues #17421, #21175) because
there is no way to trace back the relevant part of the message ("test
executed ... runtime.Goexit") to a bad FailNow call without checking
the testing package source code and finding out that FailNow calls
runtime.Goexit.
To help users debug the panic message, mention in the SkipNow and
FailNow documentation that they stop execution by calling
runtime.Goexit.
Fixes#21175
Change-Id: I0a3e5f768e72b464474380cfffbf2b67396ac1b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/52770
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#21205
Change-Id: I81b001eb42cbf2a5d5b7b82eb63548b22f501be5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/52110
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 44352 changed the behavior of SIGINT, which can break tests that
themselves use SIGINT. I think we can only implement this if the
testing package has a way to know whether the code under test is using
SIGINT, but os/signal does not provide an API for that. Roll back for
1.9 and think about this again for 1.10.
Updates #19397
Change-Id: I021c314db2b9d0a80d0088b120a6ade685459990
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48370
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Now that ReadMemStats is fast (CL 34937), CL 36791 is not so
necessary, and causes confusion. See #20863
This was already partially reverted in CL 46612 but missed two of the
spots.
Fixes#20863
Change-Id: I1307a0f7b1f9e86e8b6ceaa6a677f24f13431110
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47350
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Apparently, "all such calls must happen" means that the t.Run call
must *return* before the outer test function returns, or the calls
will cause a data race on t.ran.
Clarify the docs.
Fixes#20339
Change-Id: I191a9af2a9095be1e0aaf10b79c30e00a9c495cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47150
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If the only way the user indicates they want alloc stats shown
is via ReportAllocs, we don't know that until benchFunc is run.
Therefore, StopTimer's ReadMemStats will return incorrect data
for single cycle runs since there's no counterpart ReadMemStats from
StartTimer that initializes alloc stats.
It appears that this bug was introduced by CL 46612,
"testing: only call ReadMemStats if necessary when benchmarking"
Fixes#20590
Change-Id: I3b5ef91677823f4b98011880a3be15423baf7e33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46612
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also reword the testing/quick.Config field docs to conform to the
normal subject-first style. Without that style, godoc links
/pkg/testing/quick/#Config.Rand to the wrong line, since it doesn't
recognize the preceding comment as necessarily being attached.
Fixes#20809
Change-Id: I9aebbf763eed9b1ab1a153fa11850d88a65571c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46910
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If you have BenchmarkX1 with sub-benchmark Y
and you have BenchmarkX2 with no sub-benchmarks,
then
go test -bench=X/Y
runs BenchmarkX1 once with b.N=1 (to find out about Y)
and then not again, because it has sub-benchmarks,
but arguably also because we're interested in Y.
In contrast, it runs BenchmarkX2 in full, even though clearly
that is not relevant to the match X/Y. We do have to run X2
once with b.N=1 to probe for having X2/Y, but we should not
run it with larger b.N.
Fixes#20589.
Change-Id: Ib86907e844f34dcaac6cd05757f57db1019201d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46031
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Because of parallel tests, which have stalled executions, the RUN
output of a test can be much earlier than its completion output resulting
in hard-to-read verbose output.
The tests are displayed in the order in which the output shows
that they began, to make it easy to line up with the "RUN" output.
Similarly, the definitions of when tests begin and complete is
determined by when RUN and FAIL/SKIP/PASS are output since the
focus of this code is on enhancing readability.
Fixes#19397
Change-Id: I4d0ca3fd268b620484e7a190117f79a33b3dc461
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44352
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Some large testing/build systems require some form of test discovery before
running tests. This usually allows for analytics, history, and stats on a per
tests basis. Typically these systems are meant used in multi-language
environments and the original source code is not known or available.
This adds a -test.list option which takes a regular expression as an
argument. Any tests, benchmarks, or examples that match that regular
expression will be printed, one per line, to stdout and then the program
will exit.
Since subtests are named/discovered at run time this will only show
top-level tests names and is a known limitation.
Fixes#17209
Change-Id: I7e607f5f4f084d623a1cae88a1f70e7d92b7f13e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41195
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, helpers were identified by entry PC, but this breaks if the
helper is inlined (as in notHelperCallingHelper). Instead, identify
helpers by function name (with package path). Now TestTBHelper and
TestTBHelperParallel pass with -l=4.
To keep the code unified, this change makes it so that the runner
is also identified by function name instead of entry PC.
Change-Id: I1b1987fc49d114e69d075fab56aeeacd5294982b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41257
Run-TryBot: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This CL implements the proposal at
https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/4899-testing-helper.md.
It's based on Josh's CL 79890043 from a few years ago:
https://codereview.appspot.com/79890043 but makes several changes,
most notably by using the new CallersFrames API so that it works with
mid-stack inlining.
Another detail came up while I was working on this: I didn't want the
user to be able to call t.Helper from inside their TestXxx function
directly (which would mean we'd print a file:line from inside the
testing package itself), so I explicitly prevented this from working.
Fixes#4899.
Change-Id: I37493edcfb63307f950442bbaf993d1589515310
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38796
Run-TryBot: Caleb Spare <cespare@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When generating a random int8, uint8, int16, uint16, int32, uint32,
quick.Value chooses among all possible values.
But when generating a random int64 or uint64, it only chooses
values in the range [-2⁶², 2⁶²) (even for uint64).
It should, like for all the other integers, use the full range.
If it had, this would have caught #19807 earlier.
Instead it let us discover the presence of #19809.
While we are here, also make the default source of
randomness not completely deterministic.
Fixes#19808.
Change-Id: I070f852531c92b3670bd76523326c9132bfc9416
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39152
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The run1 call removed in golang.org/cl/36990 was necessary to
initialize the duration of the benchmark. With it gone, the math in
launch() starts from 100. This doesn't work out well for second-long
benchmark methods. Put it back.
Updates #18815
Change-Id: I461f3466c805d0c61124a2974662f7ad45335794
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37530
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
When running benchmarks with -cpuprofile,
the entire process gets profiled,
and ReadMemStats is surprisingly expensive.
Running the sort benchmarks right now with
-cpuprofile shows almost half of all execution
time in ReadMemStats.
Since ReadMemStats is not required if the benchmark
does not need allocation stats, simply skip it.
This will make cpu profiles nicer to read
and significantly speed up the process of running benchmarks.
It might also make sense to toggle cpu profiling
on/off as we begin/end individual benchmarks,
but that wouldn't get us the time savings of
skipping ReadMemStats, so this CL is useful in itself.
Change-Id: I425197b1ee11be4bc91d22b929e2caf648ebd7c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36791
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When running benchmarks, print "goos", "goarch", and "pkg"
labels. This makes it easier to refer to benchmark logs and understand
how they were generated. "pkg" is printed only for benchmarks located
in GOPATH.
Change-Id: I397cbdd57b9fe8cbabbb354ec7bfba59f5625c42
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36356
Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This reverts commit ed8c62b7fb.
Turns out it was needed in later commits.
Change-Id: I07a7bc2429976d8a5a89f915a11625c118b85500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36113
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Prior to this change it was possible to see interleaved messages:
<<<
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName48
=== RUN Test/LongLon=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName50
gLongLongName49
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName51
>>>
This change fixes it such that you see:
<<<
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName48
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName49
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName50
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName51
>>>
Fixes#18741
Change-Id: I2529d724065dc65b3e9eb3d7cbeeda82a2d0cfd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35556
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I429637ca91f7db4144f17621de851a548dc1ce76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34923
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
No test because in practice these errors never occur.
Change-Id: I11c77893ae931fc621c98920cba656790d18ed93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34811
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The TestMain docs explain that flag.Parse() should be called if TestMain
itself depends on command-line flags.
The issue here is that the example implementation does not use any
flags, and thus the flag.Parse call is unnecessary. This leads to people
who use this example as a starting point for their own implementations
to forget that the call is not necessary in most cases.
Comment it out instead of removing the line to keep it as a reminder, as
suggested by Minux Ma.
Change-Id: I6ffc5413e7036366ae3cf0f069b7065e832a3b45
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33273
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
From the doc comment:
Context returns the context for the current test or benchmark.
The context is cancelled when the test or benchmark finishes.
A goroutine started during a test or benchmark can wait for the
context's Done channel to become readable as a signal that the
test or benchmark is over, so that the goroutine can exit.
Fixes#16221.
Fixes#17552.
Change-Id: I657df946be2c90048cc74615436c77c7d9d1226c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31724
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Currently, we don't have package testing to import package regexp directly,
because then regexp can't have internal tests (or at least they become more
difficult to write), for fear of an import cycle. The solution we've been using
is for the generated test main package (pseudo-import path "testmain", package main)
to import regexp and pass in a matchString function for use by testing when
implementing the -run flags. This lets testing use regexp but without depending
on regexp and creating unnecessary cycles.
We want to add a few dependencies to runtime/pprof, notably regexp
but also compress/gzip, without causing those packages to have to work
hard to write internal tests.
Restructure the (dare I say it) dependency injection of regexp.MatchString
to be more general, and use it for the runtime/pprof functionality in addition
to the regexp functionality. The new package testing/internal/testdeps is
the root for the testing dependencies handled this way.
Code using testing.MainStart will have to change from passing in a matchString
implementation to passing in testdeps.TestDeps{}. Users of 'go test' don't do this,
but other build systems that have recreated 'go test' (for example, Blaze/Bazel)
may need to be updated. The new testdeps setup should make future updates
unnecessary, but even so we keep the comment about MainStart not being
subject to Go 1 compatibility.
Change-Id: Iec821d2afde10c79f95f3b23de5e71b219f47b92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32455
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This makes it possible to avoid tests where coverage affects the test
results by skipping them (or otherwise adjusting them) when coverage
is enabled.
Update #17699
Change-Id: Ifcc36cfcd88ebd677890e82ba80ee3d696ed3d7c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32483
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In a previous change, cmd/go was taught to show a "no tests ran" warning
if test did nothing. But it missed a case - if no tests nor examples ran
but any benchmarks were meant to be run, it would still produce the
warning. This meant that running only benchmarks, which is common, would
be confusing:
$ go test -run='^$' -bench=.
testing: warning: no tests to run
BenchmarkFoo-4 300000 5056 ns/op
[...]
I believe this was because of a copy-paste error in the tests. This was
being tested, but on the wrong file which does contain a test that was
being run. Fix the path and fix the now failing test by never showing
the warning if -bench was given a non-empty string.
The rationale is that if -bench was given but there was no output, it's
obvious that nothing happened as benchmarks always produce output even
without -v. So showing a warning in those cases is redundant.
To make future typos less likely, make sure that no tests are being run
in the cases where we only want to run benchmarks.
Fixes#17603.
Change-Id: I4c626caf39f72260c6a9761c06446663f465f947
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32157
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
runtime.SetMutexProfileFraction(n int) will capture 1/n-th of stack
traces of goroutines holding contended mutexes if n > 0. From runtime/pprof,
pprot.Lookup("mutex").WriteTo writes the accumulated
stack traces to w (in essentially the same format that blocking
profiling uses).
Change-Id: Ie0b54fa4226853d99aa42c14cb529ae586a8335a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29650
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
For example, testing the current directory:
$ go test -run XXX
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok testing 0.013s
$
And in a summary:
$ go test -run XXX testing
ok testing 0.013s [no tests to run]
$
These make it easy to spot when the -run regexp hasn't matched anything
or there are no tests. Previously the message was printed in the "current directory"
case when there were no tests at all, but not for no matches, and either way
was not surfaced in the directory list summary form.
Fixes#15211.
Change-Id: I1c82a423d6bd429fb991c9ca964c9d26c96fd3c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22341
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
It's not intuitive, especially in the presence of subtests, so improve the
explanation and extend and explain the examples.
Change-Id: I6c4d3f8944b60b12311d0c0f0a8e952e7c35a9ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28995
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
When ns/op dropped below 1, the old code
ignored benchtime and reverted to 1s.
Change-Id: I59752cef88d8d73bfd5b085f5400ae657f78504e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/26664
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Since at least 1.0.3, the testing package has said that logs are dumped
to standard error, but has in fact dumped the logs to standard output.
We could change to dump to standard error, but after doing it this way
for so long I think it's better to change the docs.
Fixes#16138.
Change-Id: If39c7ce91f51c7113f33ebabfb8f84fd4611b9e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24311
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Allows passing regexps per subtest to --test.run and --test.bench
Note that the documentation explicitly states that the split regular
expressions match the correpsonding parts (path components) of
the bench/test identifier. This is intended and slightly different
from the i'th RE matching the subtest/subbench at the respective
level. Picking this semantics allows guaranteeing that a test or
benchmark identifier as printed by go test can be passed verbatim
(possibly quoted) to, respectively, -run or -bench: subtests and
subbenches might have a '/' in their name, causing a misaligment if
their ID is passed to -run or -bench as is.
This semantics has other benefits, but this is the main motivation.
Fixes golang.go#15126
Change-Id: If72e6d3f54db1df6bc2729ac6edc7ab3c740e7c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19122
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The synchronization in this test is a bit complicated and likely
incorrect, judging from the sporadically hanging trybots.
Most of what this is supposed to test is already tested in
TestTestContext, so I'll just remove it.
Fixes#15170
Change-Id: If54db977503caa109cec4516974eda9191051888
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22080
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This introduces a few changes
- Skipped benchmarks now print a SKIP line, also if there was
no output
- The benchmark name is only printed if there the benchmark
was not skipped or did not fail in the probe phase.
It also fixes a bug of doubling a skip message in chatty mode in
absense of a failure.
The chatty flag is now passed in the common struct to allow
for testing of the printed messages.
Fixes#14799
Change-Id: Ia8eb140c2e5bb467e66b8ef20a2f98f5d95415d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21504
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
by only testing the lower bound of memalloc
Fixes#15063
Change-Id: Iab2fdd75e9ce98c641bfbce57f142fa47176772d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21507
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Change control flow to probe with N=1. This calls benchFunc
the same number of times as the old implementation in the
absence of subbenchmarks.
To be compatible with existing tools, benchmarking only
prints a line for "leaf" benchmarks. This means, though, that
the name of a benchmark can only be printed after the first
iteration.
Issue #14863
Change-Id: Ic7b9b89b058f8ebb5287755f24f9e47df8c9537c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21043
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The matcher is responsible for sanitizing and uniquing the
test and benchmark names and thus needs to be included before the
API can be exposed.
Matching currently uses the regexp to only match the top-level
tests/benchmarks.
Support for subtest matching is for another CL.
Change-Id: I7c8464068faef7ebc179b03a7fe3d01122cc4f0b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18897
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Wil Selwood
Brad Fitzpatrick
Ian Lance Taylor
Rob Pike
Stephen L
Alberto Donizetti
Yury Smolsky
Diogo Pinela
Anmol Sethi
Zhou Peng
Hana (Hyang-Ah) Kim
fraenkel
ajnirp
Eric Lagergren
Marcel van Lohuizen
Russ Cox
Inanc Gumus
Artyom Pervukhin
Marvin Stenger
Daniel Martí
Meir Fischer
Dmitry Vyukov
Agniva De Sarker
Seiji Takahashi
Kale Blankenship
Brandon Bennett
David Lazar
Caleb Spare
Alexander Döring
Heschi Kreinick
Josh Bleecher Snyder
Quentin Smith
Kyrylo Silin
Joe Tsai
shawnps
Joe Tsai
Peter Weinberger
Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho
Andrew Gerrand
Aliaksandr Valialkin