In the common case (<1KB types), no allocation is required
by reflect.Zero.
Also use memclr instead of memmove in Set when the source
is known to be zero.
Fixes#33136
Change-Id: Ic66871930fbb53328032e587153ebd12995ccf55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192331
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Right now we generate hash functions for all types, just in case they
are used as map keys. That's a lot of wasted effort and binary size
for types which will never be used as a map key. Instead, generate
hash functions only for types that we know are map keys.
Just doing that is a bit too simple, since maps with an interface type
as a key might have to hash any concrete key type that implements that
interface. So for that case, implement hashing of such types at
runtime (instead of with generated code). It will be slower, but only
for maps with interface types as keys, and maybe only a bit slower as
the aeshash time probably dominates the dispatch time.
Reorg where we keep the equals and hash functions. Move the hash function
from the key type to the map type, saving a field in every non-map type.
That leaves only one function in the alg structure, so get rid of that and
just keep the equal function in the type descriptor itself.
cmd/go now has 10 generated hash functions, instead of 504. Makes
cmd/go 1.0% smaller. Update #6853.
Speed on non-interface keys is unchanged. Speed on interface keys
is ~20% slower:
name old time/op new time/op delta
MapInterfaceString-8 23.0ns ±21% 27.6ns ±14% +20.01% (p=0.002 n=10+10)
MapInterfacePtr-8 19.4ns ±16% 23.7ns ± 7% +22.48% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Change-Id: I7c2e42292a46b5d4e288aaec4029bdbb01089263
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191198
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
The spec carefully and consistently uses "key" and "element"
as map terminology. The implementation, not so much.
This change attempts to make the implementation consistently
hew to the spec's terminology. Beyond consistency, this has
the advantage of avoid some confusion and naming collisions,
since v and value are very generic and commonly used terms.
I believe that I found all everything, but there are a lot of
non-obvious places for these to hide, and grepping for them is hard.
Hopefully this change changes enough of them that we will start using
elem going forward. Any remaining hidden cases can be removed ad hoc
as they are discovered.
The only externally-facing part of this change is in package reflect,
where there is a minor doc change and a function parameter name change.
Updates #27167
Change-Id: I2f2d78f16c360dc39007b9966d5c2046a29d3701
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174523
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently the shift amount is only masked on x86. Change it so it
is masked on all architectures. In the worst case we generate a
couple of extra instructions to perform the masking and in the best
case we can elide overflow checks.
This particular shift could also be replaced with a rotate
instruction during optimization which would remove both the masking
instructions and overflow checks on all architectures.
Fixes#31165.
Change-Id: I16b7a8800b4ba8813dc83735dfc59564e661d3b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170122
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Now the net package is back to no longer depending on unicode. And lock that in
with a test.
Fixes#30440
Change-Id: I18b89b02f7d96488783adc07308da990f505affd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169137
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We already have the ptrdata field in a type, which encodes exactly
the same information that kindNoPointers does.
My problem with kindNoPointers is that it often leads to
double-negative code like:
t.kind & kindNoPointers != 0
Much clearer is:
t.ptrdata == 0
Update #27167
Change-Id: I92307d7f018a6bbe3daca4a4abb4225e359349b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169157
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reorg map flags a bit so we don't need any extra space for the extra flag.
Fixes#23734
Change-Id: I436812156240ae90de53d0943fe1aabf3ea37417
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/155918
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When we delete an element, and it was the last element in the bucket,
update the slots between the new last element and the old last element
with the marker that says "no more elements beyond here".
Change-Id: I8efeeddf4c9b9fc491c678f84220a5a5094c9c76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142438
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This improves performance for maps with a bucket size
(key+value*8 bytes) larger than 32 bytes and removes loading
a value from the maxElems array for smaller bucket sizes.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MakeMap/[Byte]Byte 93.5ns ± 1% 91.8ns ± 1% -1.83% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MakeMap/[Int]Int 134ns ± 1% 127ns ± 2% -5.61% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Updates #21588
Change-Id: I53f77186769c4bd0f2b90f3c6c17df643b060e39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143797
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If two goroutines are racing on a map, one of them will exit
cleanly, clearing the hashWriting bit, and the other will
likely notice and panic. If we use XOR instead of OR to
set the bit in the first place, even numbers of racers will
hopefully all see the bit cleared and panic simultaneously,
giving the full set of available stacks. If a third racer
sneaks in, we are no worse than the current code, and
the generated code should be no more expensive.
In practice, this catches most racing goroutines even in
very tight races. See the demonstration program posted
on https://github.com/golang/go/issues/26703 for an example.
Fixes#26703
Change-Id: Idad17841a3127c24bd0a659b754734f70e307434
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/126936
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Example of use:
iter := reflect.ValueOf(m).MapRange()
for iter.Next() {
k := iter.Key()
v := iter.Value()
...
}
See issue golang/go#11104
Q. Are there any benchmarks that would exercise the new calls to
copyval in existing code?
Change-Id: Ic469fcab5f1d9d853e76225f89bde01ee1d36e7a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33572
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
replace map clears of the form:
for k := range m {
delete(m, k)
}
(where m is map with key type that is reflexive for ==)
with a new runtime function that clears the maps backing
array with a memclr and reinitializes the hmap struct.
Map key types that for example contain floats are not
replaced by this optimization since NaN keys cannot
be deleted from maps using delete.
name old time/op new time/op delta
GoMapClear/Reflexive/1 92.2ns ± 1% 47.1ns ± 2% -48.89% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
GoMapClear/Reflexive/10 108ns ± 1% 48ns ± 2% -55.68% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
GoMapClear/Reflexive/100 303ns ± 2% 110ns ± 3% -63.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
GoMapClear/Reflexive/1000 3.58µs ± 3% 1.23µs ± 2% -65.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
GoMapClear/Reflexive/10000 28.2µs ± 3% 10.3µs ± 2% -63.55% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
GoMapClear/NonReflexive/1 121ns ± 2% 124ns ± 7% ~ (p=0.097 n=10+10)
GoMapClear/NonReflexive/10 137ns ± 2% 139ns ± 3% +1.53% (p=0.033 n=10+10)
GoMapClear/NonReflexive/100 331ns ± 3% 334ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.342 n=10+10)
GoMapClear/NonReflexive/1000 3.64µs ± 3% 3.64µs ± 2% ~ (p=0.887 n=9+10)
GoMapClear/NonReflexive/10000 28.1µs ± 2% 28.4µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.247 n=10+10)
Fixes#20138
Change-Id: I181332a8ef434a4f0d89659f492d8711db3f3213
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110055
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The hmap field in the maptype is only used by the runtime to check the sizes of
the hmap structure created by the compiler and runtime agree.
Comments are already present about the hmap structure definitions in the
compiler and runtime needing to be in sync.
Add a test that checks the runtimes hmap size is as expected to detect
when the compilers and runtimes hmap sizes diverge instead of checking
this at runtime when a map is created.
Change-Id: I974945ebfdb66883a896386a17bbcae62a18cf2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/91796
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Some of the comments relative paths do not exist and
reflect does not define its own hmap structure.
Correct paths and consistently reference paths starting from the
go src directory.
Change-Id: I5204a3a98f77d65f17dcde98b847378cea05ad8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/94758
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Rename all map implementation and test files to use "map"
as a file name prefix instead of "hashmap" for the implementation
and "map" for the test file names.
Change-Id: I7b317c1f7a660b95c6d1f1a185866f2839e69446
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/90336
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>