Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Heschi Kreinick aeb8e36929 internal/lsp: remove multi-module support in tests
Mostly a rollback of CL 217541. No changes in the actual tests.

Change-Id: I910551d4750822bd2d8c5039d1cf194e42d01500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/256363
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
2020-09-22 16:28:30 +00:00
Rohan Challa 2529d2857a internal/lsp/tests: standardize testdata folder format
This change standardizes the folder structure for testdata that are used for testing the lsp. In particular, it uses the following format:
- dir
  - primarymod
    - .go files
    - packages
    - go.mod (optional)
  - modules
    - repoa
      - mod1
        - .go files
        -  packages
        - go.mod (optional)

As we can see, any folder inside of testdata should be of this format, where the primary test files with the markers are all located inside the primarymod folder. The modules folder is used to hold any potential dependencies that are used for testing.

A consequence of this change is that we can have one directory separated by folders, where each folder is it's own module, this allows us to use internal/lsp/tests with go.mod files. Now, tests.Load() will return an array of Data objects, where each object corresponds to one of the directories structured above.

Updates golang/go#36091

Change-Id: I437cc2a2a9fc1bac93779845737aa74383fbf9c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217541
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
2020-02-06 14:14:23 +00:00
Muir Manders dd0d5d4851 internal/lsp: filter keyword completions in tests
Filter keywords out of completion results in tests similar to
builtins. You don't care about keyword completions unless you are
explicitly testing keyword completion.

Change-Id: I0caaaef8b0f5b08c4b15ba3ada1a963f35a14028
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217499
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
2020-02-06 05:08:30 +00:00
Muir Manders 5a76f03bc7 internal/lsp: fix variadic interface completion ranking
In cases like:

var foo []io.Writer
var buf *bytes.Buffer
foo = append(foo, <>)

we weren't giving "buf" a good score. When comparing the candidate
type *bytes.Buffer to the (variadic) expected type []io.Writer we were
turning the candidate type into []*bytes.Buffer. However, of course,
[]*bytes.Buffer is not assignable to []io.Writer, so the types didn't
match. Now we instead turn the expected type []io.Writer into
io.Writer and compare to *bytes.Buffer.

I fixed the @rank test note to check that the candidates' scores are
strictly decreasing. Previously it would allow candidates with the
same score if they happened to be in the right order. This made it
easier to right a test for this issue, but also uncovered an issue
with untyped completion logic. I fixed it to do the untyped constant
check if _either_ the expected or candidate type is
untyped (previously it required the candidate type to be untyped).

Fixes golang/go#35625.

Change-Id: I9a837d6a781669cb7a2f1d6d3d7f360c85be49eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/207518
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-11-18 05:14:29 +00:00
Rebecca Stambler 889af361d2 internal/lsp/testdata: change test case to work around CL 202581
go/parser has switched from reporting no position for the end of a
broken file to reporting an invalid position. This broke on of our tests
that contains broken code. Change the test case as a result.

Change-Id: I4feb7790539994e593c56d5ae84929364c1eec1c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/204202
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
2019-10-30 21:10:04 +00:00
Muir Manders e96d959c47 internal/lsp: downrank untyped completion candidates
In cases like:

type myInt int
const (
  a       = 1
  b myInt = 2
)
var foo myInt = <>

We now prefer "b" over "a" since b's type matches the expected type
exactly.

Change-Id: I675934761cc17f6b303b63b4715b31dd1af7cea1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/202737
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-10-25 17:43:33 +00:00
Sebastian Chlopecki 25e800de08 internal/lsp: add some keyword completions
For *ast.Ident completion requests, this checks the parent node to
see if the token begins a statement and then based on the path adds
possible keyword completion candidates. The test lists some cases where
this approach cannot provide completion candidates.

The biggest thing missing is keywords for file level declarations

Updates golang/go#34009

Change-Id: I9d9c0c1eb88e362613feca66d0eea6b88705b9b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196664
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
2019-10-22 20:49:18 +00:00
Muir Manders 9d59f9e855 internal/lsp: improve completion support for untyped constants
Add some extra smarts when evaluating untyped constants as completion
candidates. Previously we called types.Default() on the expected type
and candidate type, but this loses the untypedness of an untyped
constant which prevents it from being assignable to any type or named
type other than the untyped constant's default type.

Note that the added logic does not take into account the untyped
constant's value, so you will still get some false positive
completions (e.g. suggesting an untyped negative integer constant when
only a uint would do). Unfortunately go/types doesn't provide a way of
answering the question "is this *types.Const assignable to this
types.Type" since types.AssignableTo only considers a constant's type,
not its value.

Change-Id: If7075642e928f712b127256ae7706a5190e2f42c
GitHub-Last-Rev: 124d2f05b0aec09c9d7004d9da0d900524185b92
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#128
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/184477
Reviewed-by: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
2019-07-03 16:30:32 +00:00
Muir Manders 30f1cf78d7 internal/lsp: improve completion support for type conversions
Now when completing in code like:

foo := int64(<>)

we prefer candidates whose type is convertible to int64.

Change-Id: Iadc6cdc7de097ac30d8807d6f5aa21d83f89d756
GitHub-Last-Rev: a86dd72496ba752a1f20877c0594ec6a0ed8160e
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#127
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/183941
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-07-01 17:57:14 +00:00
Muir Manders e5f21acdc3 internal/lsp: handle more expected type cases
Calculate expected type in the following cases:

- switch case statements
- index expressions (e.g. []int{}[<>] or map[string]int{}[<>])
- slice expressions (e.g. []int{}[1:<>])
- channel send statements
- channel receive expression

We now also prefer type names in type switch clauses and type asserts.

Change-Id: Iff8c317a9116868b36701d931c802d9147f962d8
GitHub-Last-Rev: e039a45aebe1c6aa9b2011cad67ddaa5e4ed4d77
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/176941
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
2019-05-16 16:26:11 +00:00
Rebecca Stambler 6e267b5cc7 internal/lsp: add additional tests for completion
New tests include cases for anonymous structs, composite literals,
ranking of results in binary expressions, and import cycles.

Change-Id: Ic02e84e09101bb9873fc1705bba2594d655bb45b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153443
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
2018-12-19 22:27:14 +00:00