Mostly a rollback of CL 217541. No changes in the actual tests.
Change-Id: I910551d4750822bd2d8c5039d1cf194e42d01500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/256363
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change standardizes the folder structure for testdata that are used for testing the lsp. In particular, it uses the following format:
- dir
- primarymod
- .go files
- packages
- go.mod (optional)
- modules
- repoa
- mod1
- .go files
- packages
- go.mod (optional)
As we can see, any folder inside of testdata should be of this format, where the primary test files with the markers are all located inside the primarymod folder. The modules folder is used to hold any potential dependencies that are used for testing.
A consequence of this change is that we can have one directory separated by folders, where each folder is it's own module, this allows us to use internal/lsp/tests with go.mod files. Now, tests.Load() will return an array of Data objects, where each object corresponds to one of the directories structured above.
Updates golang/go#36091
Change-Id: I437cc2a2a9fc1bac93779845737aa74383fbf9c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217541
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Fix type inference to expect a type name for the first "make()"
parameter and an integer for later parameters. For example:
// Previously we expected "[]int{}", now we expect "[]int".
var _ []int = make(<>)
Note that we don't currently support actually completing to unnamed
type names like "[]int", but this improvement at least eliminates
nonsensical completion suggestions.
// Previously we had no expectation, now we expect an int.
var _ []int = make([]int, <>)
Change-Id: Ifd349767662ab6902d3a3ea9e52de7df70cb37c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217310
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Oeser <nightlyone@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now that we understand object "kind" for builtin generic functions, we
can apply it to a couple more places as well:
// prefer rangeable object kinds
for i := range <> {
}
// prefer channels
<- <>
Change-Id: If9cfba3a06b3abde073a9d397000bb3f3b0e9853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/214678
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We now understand what "kind" of type is expected when using various
builtins. For example, when completing "close(<>)" we prefer channels,
and when completing "delete(<>)" we prefer maps.
I also added some code to infer the expected type for the second
argument to "delete()" and for the args to "copy()":
delete(map[someType]int{}, <>) // expect "someType"
copy([]int{}, <>) // expect "[]int"
copy(<>, []int{}) // expect "[]int"
And I marked "new()" as expected a type name, and it infers the type
name properly:
var _ *int = new(<>) // expected type at "<>" is "int"
Fixesgolang/go#36326.
Change-Id: I4295c8753f8341d47010a0553fd2d0c2586f2efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/212957
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Heschi Kreinick
Rohan Challa
Muir Manders