"type mod" refers to agglutinative expressions such as dereference
"*", invocation "()", and slicing "[:]". When considering an object as
a completion candidate, we check whether applying a type mod would
make it a better candidate.
Previously we tracked the type mods we wanted to apply to a candidate
by setting bool fields. Now instead we keep a slice of the type mods.
This has two main advantages:
- The mods are now ordered which will allow us to format candidates
properly when the same mods can appear in different order (e.g.
"<-*foo" or *<-foo").
- We can now record any mod multiple times allowing for "<-<-foo" or
"foo()()".
I changed the formatting code to always create a snippet object since
that made things simpler. I had to tweak a few snippet helper methods
to accept a snippet argument rather than creating a new snippet.
This commit's only functional change is that we no longer show any
type mods in candidate labels. For example, the user will now see
"foo" in the completion popup instead of "*foo". Showing the operators
adds noise to the candidate list, and we didn't display them
consistently.
Updates golang/go#46045.
Change-Id: I3ea7baa1ee2fee80a1f8cfe88cbae1093ae269ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323449
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In cases like:
foo<> == 100
We weren't preferring floats at <>. Fix the basic type comparison
logic to know that an untyped int is always compatible with a float.
Fixesgolang/go#44066.
Change-Id: I9cf9bac1632178db100c0a5447351be208b4a2af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289129
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
For example:
func wantsInt64(int64) {}
func wantsDuration(time.Duration) {}
func _() {
for i := range []string{} {
// inserts "i" as "int64(i)"
wantsInt64(i<>)
// inserts "i" as "time.Duration(i)"
wantsDuration(i<>)
}
}
Type converted candidates have a significant score penalty so they
should never outrank a directly assignable candidate, other factors
being equal.
To minimize false positive completions, we don't offer converted
candidates if either:
- The candidate is a deep completion into another package. This avoids
random "float64(somepkg.SomeVar)" popping up when completing a
float64.
- Don't offer to convert ints to strings since that's not normally
what the user wants.
After going back and forth I decided not to include the type
conversion in the candidate label. This means you will just see the
candidate "i" in the completion popup instead of "float64(i)". Type
names add a lot of noise to the candidate list.
I also tweaked the untyped constant penalty to interplay better with
the new type conversion penalty. I wanted untyped constants to be
ranked above type conversion candidates since they are directly
assignable, so I reduced untyped constants' penalty. However, to
continue suppressing untyped constants from random other packages, I
applied a similar heuristic to above where we give a bigger penalty if
the untyped constant is a deep completion from another package.
Fixesgolang/go#42764.
Updates golang/go#39207 (untyped constant penalty tweak may improve
this situation).
Change-Id: I565114b3a1c9628285d07200b9dfc45c61e5d898
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/272286
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Mostly a rollback of CL 217541. No changes in the actual tests.
Change-Id: I910551d4750822bd2d8c5039d1cf194e42d01500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/256363
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change standardizes the folder structure for testdata that are used for testing the lsp. In particular, it uses the following format:
- dir
- primarymod
- .go files
- packages
- go.mod (optional)
- modules
- repoa
- mod1
- .go files
- packages
- go.mod (optional)
As we can see, any folder inside of testdata should be of this format, where the primary test files with the markers are all located inside the primarymod folder. The modules folder is used to hold any potential dependencies that are used for testing.
A consequence of this change is that we can have one directory separated by folders, where each folder is it's own module, this allows us to use internal/lsp/tests with go.mod files. Now, tests.Load() will return an array of Data objects, where each object corresponds to one of the directories structured above.
Updates golang/go#36091
Change-Id: I437cc2a2a9fc1bac93779845737aa74383fbf9c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217541
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Filter keywords out of completion results in tests similar to
builtins. You don't care about keyword completions unless you are
explicitly testing keyword completion.
Change-Id: I0caaaef8b0f5b08c4b15ba3ada1a963f35a14028
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217499
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In cases like:
var foo []io.Writer
var buf *bytes.Buffer
foo = append(foo, <>)
we weren't giving "buf" a good score. When comparing the candidate
type *bytes.Buffer to the (variadic) expected type []io.Writer we were
turning the candidate type into []*bytes.Buffer. However, of course,
[]*bytes.Buffer is not assignable to []io.Writer, so the types didn't
match. Now we instead turn the expected type []io.Writer into
io.Writer and compare to *bytes.Buffer.
I fixed the @rank test note to check that the candidates' scores are
strictly decreasing. Previously it would allow candidates with the
same score if they happened to be in the right order. This made it
easier to right a test for this issue, but also uncovered an issue
with untyped completion logic. I fixed it to do the untyped constant
check if _either_ the expected or candidate type is
untyped (previously it required the candidate type to be untyped).
Fixesgolang/go#35625.
Change-Id: I9a837d6a781669cb7a2f1d6d3d7f360c85be49eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/207518
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
go/parser has switched from reporting no position for the end of a
broken file to reporting an invalid position. This broke on of our tests
that contains broken code. Change the test case as a result.
Change-Id: I4feb7790539994e593c56d5ae84929364c1eec1c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/204202
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
In cases like:
type myInt int
const (
a = 1
b myInt = 2
)
var foo myInt = <>
We now prefer "b" over "a" since b's type matches the expected type
exactly.
Change-Id: I675934761cc17f6b303b63b4715b31dd1af7cea1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/202737
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For *ast.Ident completion requests, this checks the parent node to
see if the token begins a statement and then based on the path adds
possible keyword completion candidates. The test lists some cases where
this approach cannot provide completion candidates.
The biggest thing missing is keywords for file level declarations
Updates golang/go#34009
Change-Id: I9d9c0c1eb88e362613feca66d0eea6b88705b9b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196664
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Add some extra smarts when evaluating untyped constants as completion
candidates. Previously we called types.Default() on the expected type
and candidate type, but this loses the untypedness of an untyped
constant which prevents it from being assignable to any type or named
type other than the untyped constant's default type.
Note that the added logic does not take into account the untyped
constant's value, so you will still get some false positive
completions (e.g. suggesting an untyped negative integer constant when
only a uint would do). Unfortunately go/types doesn't provide a way of
answering the question "is this *types.Const assignable to this
types.Type" since types.AssignableTo only considers a constant's type,
not its value.
Change-Id: If7075642e928f712b127256ae7706a5190e2f42c
GitHub-Last-Rev: 124d2f05b0aec09c9d7004d9da0d900524185b92
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#128
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/184477
Reviewed-by: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Calculate expected type in the following cases:
- switch case statements
- index expressions (e.g. []int{}[<>] or map[string]int{}[<>])
- slice expressions (e.g. []int{}[1:<>])
- channel send statements
- channel receive expression
We now also prefer type names in type switch clauses and type asserts.
Change-Id: Iff8c317a9116868b36701d931c802d9147f962d8
GitHub-Last-Rev: e039a45aebe1c6aa9b2011cad67ddaa5e4ed4d77
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/176941
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
New tests include cases for anonymous structs, composite literals,
ranking of results in binary expressions, and import cycles.
Change-Id: Ic02e84e09101bb9873fc1705bba2594d655bb45b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153443
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Muir Manders
Rebecca Stambler
Heschi Kreinick
Rohan Challa
Sebastian Chlopecki