The vulnerability that allowed this panic is
CVE-2020-28362 and has been fixed in a security
release, per #42552.
Change-Id: I774bcda2cc83cdd5a273d21c8d9f4b53fa17c88f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/277959
Run-TryBot: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
As part of #42026, these helpers from io/ioutil were moved to os.
(ioutil.TempFile and TempDir became os.CreateTemp and MkdirTemp.)
Update the Go tree to use the preferred names.
As usual, code compiled with the Go 1.4 bootstrap toolchain
and code vendored from other sources is excluded.
ReadDir changes are in a separate CL, because they are not a
simple search and replace.
For #42026.
Change-Id: If318df0216d57e95ea0c4093b89f65e5b0ababb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266365
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The s390x assembly for shlVU does a forward copy when the shift amount s
is 0. This causes corruption of the result z when z is aliased to the
input x.
This fix removes the s390x assembly for both shlVU and shrVU so the pure
go implementations will be used.
Test cases have been added to the existing TestShiftOverlap test to
cover shift values of 0, 1 and (_W - 1).
Fixes#42838
Change-Id: I75ca0e98f3acfaa6366a26355dcd9dd82499a48b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274442
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The previous s value could cause a crash
for certain inputs.
Will check in tests and documentation improvements later.
Thanks to the Go Ethereum team and the OSS-Fuzz project for reporting this.
Thanks to Rémy Oudompheng and Robert Griesemer for their help
developing and validating the fix.
Fixes CVE-2020-28362
Change-Id: Ibbf455c4436bcdb07c84a34fa6551fb3422356d3
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/899974
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <valsorda@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/269657
Trust: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Trust: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Append operations in the decimal String function may cause several allocations.
Use make to pre allocate slices in String that have enough capacity to avoid additional allocations in append operations.
name old time/op new time/op delta
DecimalConversion-8 139µs ± 7% 109µs ± 2% -21.06% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: Id0284d204918a179a0421c51c35d86a3408e1bd9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233980
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Trust: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Use the const variable Ln2 in math/const.go for function acosh.
Change-Id: I5381d03dd3142c227ae5773ece9be6c8f377615e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232517
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
While reading the source code of the math/big package, I found the SetString function example of float type missing.
Change-Id: Id8c16a58e2e24f9463e8ff38adbc98f8c418ab26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232804
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Simplifying some code without compromising performance.
My CPU is Intel Xeon Gold 6161, 2.20GHz, 64-bit operating system.
The memory is 8GB. This is my test environment, I hope to help you judge.
Benchmark:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Log1p-4 21.8ns ± 5% 21.8ns ± 4% ~ (p=0.973 n=20+20)
Change-Id: Icd8f96f1325b00007602d114300b92d4c57de409
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233940
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Replaced almost every use of Bytes with FillBytes.
Note that the approved proposal was for
func (*Int) FillBytes(buf []byte)
while this implements
func (*Int) FillBytes(buf []byte) []byte
because the latter was far nicer to use in all callsites.
Fixes#35833
Change-Id: Ia912df123e5d79b763845312ea3d9a8051343c0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230397
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Implement special case handling and testing to ensure
conformance with the C99 standard annex G.6 Complex arithmetic.
Fixes#29320
Change-Id: Id72eb4c5a35d5a54b4b8690d2f7176ab11028f1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220689
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When I browsed the source code, I saw that there is no corresponding example of this function. I am not sure if there is a need for an increase, this is my first time to submit CL.
Change-Id: Idbf4e1e1ed2995176a76959d561e152263a2fd26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230741
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Originally, we use an assembly function that returns a boolean result to
tell whether the machine has vector facility or not. It is now no longer
needed when we can directly use cpu.S390X.HasVX variable.
Change-Id: Ic1dae851982532bcfd9a9453416c112347f21d87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230318
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Originally, we use an assembly function that returns a boolean result to
tell whether the machine has vector facility or not. It is now no longer
needed when we can directly use cpu.S390X.HasVX variable.
Change-Id: Ic3ffeb9e63238ef41406d97cdc42502145ddb454
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230319
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL optimizes code that uses a carry from a function such as
bits.Add64 as the condition in an if statement. For example:
x, c := bits.Add64(a, b, 0)
if c != 0 {
panic("overflow")
}
Rather than converting the carry into a 0 or a 1 value and using
that as an input to a comparison instruction the carry flag is now
used as the input to a conditional branch directly. This typically
removes an ADD LOGICAL WITH CARRY instruction when user code is
doing overflow detection and is closer to the code that a user
would expect to generate.
Change-Id: I950431270955ab72f1b5c6db873b6abe769be0da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/219757
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL looks big but it only does formatting changes to arith_s390x.s.
The file was formatted using asmfmt(https://github.com/klauspost/asmfmt)
, so there should not be any functional impact. I verified that the
generated assembly of big.test file is identical.
Change-Id: I8b4035ef082a4d0357881869327e25253f2d8be1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229302
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The Float.Sqrt method switches (for performance reasons) between
direct (uses Quo) and inverse (doesn't) computation, depending on the
precision, with threshold 128.
Unfortunately the implementation of recursive division in CL 172018
made Quo slightly slower exactly in the range around and below the
threshold Sqrt is using, so this strategy is no longer profitable.
The new division algorithm allocates more, and this has increased the
amount of allocations performed by Sqrt when using the direct method;
on low precisions the computation is fast, so additional allocations
have an negative impact on performance.
Interestingly, only using the inverse method doesn't just reverse the
effects of the Quo algorithm change, but it seems to make performances
better overall for small precisions:
name old time/op new time/op delta
FloatSqrt/64-4 643ns ± 1% 635ns ± 1% -1.24% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/128-4 1.44µs ± 1% 1.02µs ± 1% -29.25% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/256-4 1.49µs ± 1% 1.49µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.752 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/1000-4 3.71µs ± 1% 3.74µs ± 1% +0.87% (p=0.001 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/10000-4 35.3µs ± 1% 35.6µs ± 1% +0.82% (p=0.002 n=10+9)
FloatSqrt/100000-4 844µs ± 1% 844µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.549 n=10+9)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4 69.5ms ± 0% 69.6ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.222 n=9+9)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
FloatSqrt/64-4 280B ± 0% 200B ± 0% -28.57% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/128-4 504B ± 0% 248B ± 0% -50.79% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/256-4 344B ± 0% 344B ± 0% ~ (all equal)
FloatSqrt/1000-4 1.30kB ± 0% 1.30kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
FloatSqrt/10000-4 13.5kB ± 0% 13.5kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.237 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/100000-4 123kB ± 0% 123kB ± 0% ~ (p=0.247 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4 1.83MB ± 1% 1.83MB ± 3% ~ (p=0.779 n=8+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
FloatSqrt/64-4 8.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% -37.50% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/128-4 11.0 ± 0% 5.0 ± 0% -54.55% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FloatSqrt/256-4 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
FloatSqrt/1000-4 6.00 ± 0% 6.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
FloatSqrt/10000-4 6.00 ± 0% 6.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
FloatSqrt/100000-4 6.00 ± 0% 6.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4 10.3 ±13% 10.3 ±13% ~ (p=1.000 n=10+10)
For example, 1.02µs for FloatSqrt/128 is actually better than what I
was getting on the same machine before the Quo changes.
The .8% slowdown on /1000 and /10000 appears to be real and it is
quite baffling (that codepath was not touched at all); it may be
caused by code alignment changes.
Change-Id: Ib03761cdc1055674bc7526d4f3a23d7a25094029
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/228062
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fixes#38304
Also change `If m > 0, y < 0, ...` to `If m != 0, y < 0, ...` since `Exp` will return `nil`
whatever `m`'s sign is.
Change-Id: I17d7337ccd1404318cea5d42a8de904ad185fd00
GitHub-Last-Rev: 2399510300
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#38390
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/228000
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The divBasic function computes the quotient of big nats u/v word by word.
It estimates each word qhat by performing a long division (top 2 words of u
divided by top word of v), looks at the next word to correct the estimate,
then perform a full multiplication (qhat*v) to catch any inaccuracy in the
estimate.
In the latter case, "negative" values appear temporarily and carries
must be carefully managed, and the recursive division refactoring
introduced a case where qhat*v has the same length as v, triggering an
out-of-bounds write in the case it happens when computing the top word
of the quotient.
Fixes#37499
Change-Id: I15089da4a4027beda43af497bf6de261eb792f94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221980
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The s390x assembly implementation was previously only handling this
case correctly for x = -Pi. Update the special case handling for
any y.
Fixes#35446
Change-Id: I355575e9ec8c7ce8bd9db10d74f42a22f39a2f38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/223420
Run-TryBot: Brian Kessler <brian.m.kessler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Document that the Float.Sqrt method does not set the receiver's
Accuracy field.
Updates #37915
Change-Id: Ief1dcac07eacc0ef02f86bfac9044501477bca1c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/224497
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
s390x has inaccurate range reduction for the assembly routines
in math so these tests are diabled until these are corrected.
Updates #37854
Change-Id: I1e26acd6d09ae3e592a3dd90aec73a6844f5c6fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/223457
Run-TryBot: Brian Kessler <brian.m.kessler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Tan has poles along the real axis. In order to accurately calculate
the value near these poles, a range reduction by Pi is performed and
the result calculated via a Taylor series. The prior implementation
of range reduction used Cody-Waite range reduction in three parts.
This fails when x is too large to accurately calculate the partial
products in the summation accurately. Above this threshold, Payne-Hanek
range reduction using a multiple precision value of 1/Pi is required.
Additionally, the threshold used in math/trig_reduce.go for Payne-Hanek
range reduction was not set conservatively enough. The prior threshold
ensured that catastrophic failure did not occur where the argument x
would not actually be reduced below Pi/4. However, errors in reduction
begin to occur at values much lower when z = ((x - y*PI4A) - y*PI4B) - y*PI4C
is not exact because y*PI4A cannot be exactly represented as a float64.
reduceThreshold is lowered to the proper value.
Fixes#31566
Change-Id: I0f39a4171a5be44f64305f18dc57f6c29f19dba7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172838
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Provide an assembly implementation of mulWW - for now all others run the
Go code.
Change-Id: Icb594c31048255f131bdea8d64f56784fc9db4d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220919
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
It was removed in CL 217302 but was intentionally added in CL 217104.
Change-Id: I1a478d80ad1ec4f0a0184bfebf8f1a5e352cfe8c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217941
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
We don't usually document past behavior (like "As of Go 1.14 ...") and
in isolation the current docs made it sound like a and b could only be
negative or zero.
Change-Id: I0d3c2b8579a9c01159ce528a3128b1478e99042a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217302
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The bounds in the last carry branch were wrong as there
is no reason for len(u) >= n+n/2 to always hold true.
We also adjust test to avoid using a remainder of 1
(in which case, the last step of the algorithm computes
(qhatv+1) - qhatv which rarely produces a carry).
Change-Id: I69fbab9c5e19d0db1c087fbfcd5b89352c2d26fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206839
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
There is a (theoretical, but possible) chance that the
random number values a, b used for TestDiv are 0 or 1,
in which case the test would fail.
This CL makes sure that a >= 1 and b >= 2 at all times.
Fixes#35523.
Change-Id: I6451feb94241249516a821cd0066e95a0c65b0ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206818
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The current division algorithm produces one word of result at a time,
using 2-word division to compute the top word and mulAddVWW to compute
the remainder. The top word may need to be adjusted by 1 or 2 units.
The recursive version, based on Burnikel, Ziegler, "Fast Recursive Division",
uses the same principles, but in a multi-word setting, so that
multiplication benefits from the Karatsuba algorithm (and possibly later
improvements).
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkDiv/20/10-4 38.2 38.3 +0.26%
BenchmarkDiv/40/20-4 38.7 38.5 -0.52%
BenchmarkDiv/100/50-4 62.5 62.6 +0.16%
BenchmarkDiv/200/100-4 238 259 +8.82%
BenchmarkDiv/400/200-4 311 338 +8.68%
BenchmarkDiv/1000/500-4 604 649 +7.45%
BenchmarkDiv/2000/1000-4 1214 1278 +5.27%
BenchmarkDiv/20000/10000-4 38279 36510 -4.62%
BenchmarkDiv/200000/100000-4 3022057 1359615 -55.01%
BenchmarkDiv/2000000/1000000-4 310827664 54012939 -82.62%
BenchmarkDiv/20000000/10000000-4 33272829421 1965401359 -94.09%
BenchmarkString/10/Base10-4 158 156 -1.27%
BenchmarkString/100/Base10-4 797 792 -0.63%
BenchmarkString/1000/Base10-4 3677 3814 +3.73%
BenchmarkString/10000/Base10-4 16633 17116 +2.90%
BenchmarkString/100000/Base10-4 5779029 1793808 -68.96%
BenchmarkString/1000000/Base10-4 889840820 85524031 -90.39%
BenchmarkString/10000000/Base10-4 134338236860 4935657026 -96.33%
Fixes#21960
Updates #30943
Change-Id: I134c6f81a47870c688ca95b6081eb9211def15a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172018
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts CL 169501.
Reason for revert: The new tests fail at least on s390x and MIPS. This is likely a minor bug in the compiler or runtime. But this point in the release cycle is not the time to debug these details, which are unlikely to be new. Let's try again for 1.15.
Updates #29320Fixes#35443
Change-Id: I2218b2083f8974b57d528e3742524393fc72b355
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206037
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Implement special case handling and testing to ensure
conformance with the C99 standard annex G.6 Complex arithmetic.
Fixes#29320
Change-Id: Ieb0527191dd7fdea5b1aecb42b9e23aae3f74260
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169501
Run-TryBot: Brian Kessler <brian.m.kessler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Toasa
Katie Hockman
Russ Cox
Jonathan Albrecht
surechen
SparrowLii
Xiangdong Ji
zhouzhongyuan
Lynn Boger
kakulisen
Alberto Donizetti
Bryan C. Mills
Filippo Valsorda
Joel Sing
Brian Kessler
Ruixin(Peter) Bao
Tyson Andre
Michael Munday
Brad Fitzpatrick
Hanjun Kim
Rémy Oudompheng
Robert Griesemer
Ville Skyttä
Ian Lance Taylor