Use the following (suboptimal) script to obtain a list of possible
typos:
#!/usr/bin/env sh
set -x
git ls-files |\
grep -e '\.\(c\|cc\|go\)$' |\
xargs -n 1\
awk\
'/\/\// { gsub(/.*\/\//, ""); print; } /\/\*/, /\*\// { gsub(/.*\/\*/, ""); gsub(/\*\/.*/, ""); }' |\
hunspell -d en_US -l |\
grep '^[[:upper:]]\{0,1\}[[:lower:]]\{1,\}$' |\
grep -v -e '^.\{1,4\}$' -e '^.\{16,\}$' |\
sort -f |\
uniq -c |\
awk '$1 == 1 { print $2; }'
Then, go through the results manually and fix the most obvious typos in
the non-vendored code.
Change-Id: I3cb5830a176850e1a0584b8a40b47bde7b260eae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/193848
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
math/big.Int Cmp method does not have a fast path for the case if x and y are the same.
Fixes#30856
Change-Id: Ia9a5b5f72db9d73af1b13ed6ac39ecff87d10393
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/178957
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The old code only normalized decimal integer imaginary number
literals. But with the generalized imaginary number syntax,
the number value may be decimal, binary, octal, or hexadecimal,
integer or floating-point.
The new code only looks at the number pattern. Only for decimal
integer imaginary literals do we need to strip leading zeroes.
The remaining normalization code simply ignore the 'i' suffix.
As a result, the new code is both simpler and shorter.
Fixes#32718.
Change-Id: If43fc962a48ed62002e65d5c81fddbb9bd283984
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183378
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Shorten some of the longest tests that run during all.bash.
Removes 7r 50u 21s from all.bash.
After this change, all.bash is under 5 minutes again on my laptop.
For #26473.
Change-Id: Ie0460aa935808d65460408feaed210fbaa1d5d79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/177559
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
For the case where the addresses of parameter z and x of the function
shlVU overlap and the address of z is greater than x, x (input value)
can be polluted during the calculation when the high words of x are
overlapped with the low words of z (output value).
Fixes#31084
Change-Id: I9bb0266a1d7856b8faa9a9b1975d6f57dece0479
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169780
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Int.String had no documentation and the documentation for Int.Text
did not mention the handling of the nil pointer case.
Change-Id: I9f21921e431c948545b7cabc7829e4b4e574bbe9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/175118
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Where assembly functions are just jumps to the Go implementation
put them into a stubs_<arch>.s file. This reduces the number of
files considerably and makes it easier to see what is really
implemented in assembly.
I've also run the stubs files through asmfmt to format them in
a more consistent way.
Eventually we should replace these 'stub' assembly files with
a pure Go implementation now that we have mid-stack inlining
(see #31362).
Change-Id: If5b2022dcc23e1299f1b7ba79884f1b1263d0f7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173398
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Though there is variation in the spelling of canceled,
cancellation is always spelled with a double l.
Reference: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/canceled-vs-cancelled/
Change-Id: I240f1a297776c8e27e74f3eca566d2bc4c856f2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170060
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Mnemonics for these instructions were added to the assembler in
CL 159357.
Change-Id: Ie11c45ecc9cead9a8850fcc929b0211cfd980fe5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/160157
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Rearranged code slightly to make lifetime of underlying array of
pow5 more explicit in code.
Fixes#31184.
Change-Id: I063081f0e54097c499988d268a23813746592654
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170641
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
If x does not have an inverse modulo m, and a negative exponent is used,
return nil just like ModInverse does now.
Change-Id: I8fa72f7a851e8cf77c5fab529ede88408740626f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170757
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When building as part of the bootstrap process, avoid
use of "go:linkname" applied to variables, since this
feature is ill-defined/unsupported for gccgo.
Updates #30771.
Change-Id: Id44d01b5c98d292702e5075674117518cb59e2d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170737
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This addresses the failures we have seen in #31084. The correct
fix is to find the actual bug in the assembly code.
Updates #31084.
Change-Id: I437780c53d0c4423d742e2e3b650b899ce845372
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169721
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Implemented via the underlying Int.SetUint64.
Added tests for Rat.SetInt64 and Rat.SetUint64.
Fixes#29579
Change-Id: I03faaffc93e36873b202b58ae72b139dea5c40f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/160682
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This fixes an old oversight. Rat.SetString already permitted
fractions a/b where both a and b could independently specify
a base prefix. With this CL, it now also accepts non-decimal
floating-point numbers.
Fixes#29799.
Change-Id: I9cc65666a5cebb00f0202da2e4fc5654a02e3234
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168237
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
This CL instrinsifies Add64 with arm64 instruction sequence ADDS, ADCS
and ADC, and optimzes the case of carry chains.The CL also changes the
test code so that the intrinsic implementation can be tested.
Benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 2.090000ns +- 4% -16.40% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Add32-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 2.500000ns +- 0% ~ (all equal)
Add64-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 1.577778ns +- 2% -36.89% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Add64multiple-224 6.000000ns +- 0% 2.000000ns +- 0% -66.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I6ee91c9a85c16cc72ade5fd94868c579f16c7615
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/159017
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Modify the |x| == |y| case to return -0 when x < 0.
Fixes#30814.
Change-Id: Ic4cd48001e0e894a12b5b813c6a1ddc3a055610b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167479
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The primary change is in nat.scan which now accepts underscores for base 0.
While at it, streamlined error handling in that function as well.
Also, improved the corresponding test significantly by checking the
expected result values also in case of scan errors.
The second major change is in scanExponent which now accepts underscores when
the new sepOk argument is set. While at it, essentially rewrote that
function to match error and underscore handling of nat.scan more closely.
Added a new test for scanExponent which until now was only tested
indirectly.
Finally, updated the documentation for several functions and added many
new test cases to clients of nat.scan.
A major portion of this CL is due to much better test coverage.
Updates #28493.
Change-Id: I7f17b361b633fbe6c798619d891bd5e0a045b5c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/166157
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
In the normal case, only a few words have to be updated when adding a word to a vector.
When that happens, we can simply copy the rest of the words, which is much faster.
However, the overhead of that makes it prohibitive for small vectors,
so we check the size at the beginning.
The implementation is a bit weird to allow addVW to continued to be inlined; see #30548.
The AddVW benchmarks are surprising, but fully repeatable.
The SubVW benchmarks are more or less as expected.
I expect that removing the indirect function call will
help both and make them a bit more normal.
name old time/op new time/op delta
AddVW/1-8 4.27ns ± 2% 3.81ns ± 3% -10.83% (p=0.000 n=89+90)
AddVW/2-8 4.91ns ± 2% 4.34ns ± 1% -11.60% (p=0.000 n=83+90)
AddVW/3-8 5.77ns ± 4% 5.76ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.365 n=91+87)
AddVW/4-8 6.03ns ± 1% 6.03ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.392 n=80+76)
AddVW/5-8 6.48ns ± 2% 6.63ns ± 1% +2.27% (p=0.000 n=76+74)
AddVW/10-8 9.56ns ± 2% 9.56ns ± 1% -0.02% (p=0.002 n=69+76)
AddVW/100-8 90.6ns ± 0% 18.1ns ± 4% -79.99% (p=0.000 n=72+94)
AddVW/1000-8 865ns ± 0% 85ns ± 6% -90.14% (p=0.000 n=66+96)
AddVW/10000-8 8.57µs ± 2% 1.82µs ± 3% -78.73% (p=0.000 n=99+94)
AddVW/100000-8 84.4µs ± 2% 31.8µs ± 4% -62.29% (p=0.000 n=93+98)
name old time/op new time/op delta
SubVW/1-8 3.90ns ± 2% 4.13ns ± 4% +6.02% (p=0.000 n=92+95)
SubVW/2-8 4.15ns ± 1% 5.20ns ± 1% +25.22% (p=0.000 n=83+85)
SubVW/3-8 5.50ns ± 2% 6.22ns ± 6% +13.21% (p=0.000 n=91+97)
SubVW/4-8 5.99ns ± 1% 6.63ns ± 1% +10.63% (p=0.000 n=79+61)
SubVW/5-8 6.75ns ± 4% 6.88ns ± 2% +1.82% (p=0.000 n=98+73)
SubVW/10-8 9.57ns ± 1% 9.56ns ± 1% -0.13% (p=0.000 n=77+64)
SubVW/100-8 90.3ns ± 1% 18.1ns ± 2% -80.00% (p=0.000 n=75+94)
SubVW/1000-8 860ns ± 4% 85ns ± 7% -90.14% (p=0.000 n=97+99)
SubVW/10000-8 8.51µs ± 3% 1.77µs ± 6% -79.21% (p=0.000 n=100+97)
SubVW/100000-8 84.4µs ± 3% 31.5µs ± 3% -62.66% (p=0.000 n=92+92)
Change-Id: I721d7031d40f245b4a284f5bdd93e7bb85e7e937
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/164968
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This CL extends the various SetString and Parse methods for
Ints, Rats, and Floats to accept the new octal prefixes.
The main change is in natconv.go, all other changes are
documentation and test updates.
Finally, this CL also fixes TestRatSetString which silently
dropped certain failures.
Updates #12711.
Change-Id: I5ee5879e25013ba1e6eda93ff280915f25ab5d55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/165898
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
The proposed change introduces a better initial guess which is closer to the final value and therefore converges in fewer steps. Consider for example sqrt(8): previously the guess was 8, whereas now it is 4 (and the result is 2). All this change does is it computes the division by two more accurately while it keeps the guess ≥ √x.
Change-Id: I917248d734a7b0488d14a647a063f674e56c4e30
GitHub-Last-Rev: c06d9d4876
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#28981
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163866
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
If the variables passed in to the cofactor arguments of GCD (x, y)
aliased the input arguments (a, b), the previous implementation would
result in incorrect results for y. This change reorganizes the calculation
so that the only case that need to be handled is when y aliases b, which
can be handled with a simple check.
Tests were added for all of the alias cases for input arguments and and
and irrelevant test case for a previous binary GCD calculation was dropped.
Fixes#30217
Change-Id: Ibe6137f09b3e1ae3c29e3c97aba85b67f33dc169
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/162517
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Matching fmt, %#b now prints an 0b prefix,
and %O prints octal with an 0o prefix.
See golang.org/design/19308-number-literals for background.
For #19308.
For #12711.
Change-Id: I139c5a9a1dfae15415621601edfa13c6a5f19cfc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160250
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
big.Float already had %p for printing hex format,
but that format normalizes differently from fmt's %x
and ignores precision entirely.
This CL adds %x to big.Float, matching fmt's behavior:
the verb is spelled 'x' not 'p', the mantissa is normalized
to [1, 2), and precision is respected.
See golang.org/design/19308-number-literals for background.
For #29008.
Change-Id: I9c1b9612107094856797e5b0b584c556c1914895
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160249
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Use ReverseBytes32 and ReverseBytes64 to speed up these functions.
The byte reversal functions are intrinsics on most platforms and
generally compile to a single instruction.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Reverse32 2.41ns ± 1% 1.94ns ± 3% -19.60% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
Reverse64 3.85ns ± 1% 2.56ns ± 1% -33.32% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Change-Id: I160bf59a0c7bd5db94114803ec5a59fae448f096
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/159358
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This applies the new gofmt literal normalizations to the library.
Change-Id: I8c1e8ef62eb556fc568872c9f77a31ef236348e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/162539
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This CL updates FormatFloat to format
standard hexadecimal floating-point constants,
using the 'x' and 'X' verbs.
See golang.org/design/19308-number-literals for background.
For #29008.
Change-Id: I540b8f71d492cfdb7c58af533d357a564591f28b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160242
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The current implementation accepted binary exponents but restricted
them to 'p'. This change permits both 'p' and 'P'.
R=Go1.13
Updates #29008.
Change-Id: I7a89ccb86af4438f17b0422be7cb630ffcf43272
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/159297
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
The original port of Log1p incorrectly translated a ternary statement
so that a correction was only applied to one of the branches.
Fixes#29488
Change-Id: I035b2fc741f76fe7c0154c63da6e298b575e08a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/156120
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fix comment as w&1 is the parity of 'x', not of 'n'.
Change-Id: Ia0e448f7e5896412ff9b164459ce15561ab624cc
GitHub-Last-Rev: 54ba08ab10
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#29419
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/155743
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The previous comment mis-stated the number of bits in mPi4.
The correct value is 19*64 + 1 == 1217 bits.
Change-Id: Ife971ff6936ce2d5b81ce663ce48044749d592a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/154017
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change implements Payne-Hanek range reduction by Pi/4
to properly calculate trigonometric functions of huge arguments.
The implementation is based on:
"ARGUMENT REDUCTION FOR HUGE ARGUMENTS: Good to the Last Bit"
K. C. Ng et al, March 24, 1992
The major difference with the reference is that the simulated
multi-precision calculation of x*B is implemented using 64-bit
integer arithmetic rather than floating point to ease extraction
of the relevant bits of 4/Pi.
The assembly implementations for 386 were removed since the trigonometric
instructions only use a 66-bit representation of Pi internally for
reduction. It is not possible to use these instructions and maintain
accuracy without a prior accurate reduction in software as recommended
by Intel.
Fixes#6794
Change-Id: I31bf1369e0578891d738c5473447fe9b10560196
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153059
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
TrailingZeros16 is the only one of the TrailingZeros functions with a
named return value in the signature. This creates a sligthly
unpleasant effect in the godoc listing:
func TrailingZeros(x uint) int
func TrailingZeros16(x uint16) (n int)
func TrailingZeros32(x uint32) int
func TrailingZeros64(x uint64) int
func TrailingZeros8(x uint8) int
Since the named return value is not even used, remove it.
Change-Id: I15c5aedb6157003911b6e0685c357ce56e466c0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153340
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Div panics when y<=hi because either the quotient overflows
the size of the output or division by zero occurs when y==0.
This provides a uniform behavior for all implementations.
Fixes#28316
Change-Id: If23aeb10e0709ee1a60b7d614afc9103d674a980
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149517
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Explicitly check for divide-by-zero/overflow and panic with the appropriate
runtime error. The additional checks have basically no effect on performance
since the branch is easily predicted.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Div-4 53.9ns ± 1% 53.0ns ± 1% -1.59% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
Div32-4 17.9ns ± 0% 18.4ns ± 0% +2.56% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Div64-4 53.5ns ± 0% 53.3ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.095 n=5+5)
Updates #28316
Change-Id: I36297ee9946cbbc57fefb44d1730283b049ecf57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144377
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Go documentation style for boolean funcs is to say:
// Foo reports whether ...
func Foo() bool
(rather than "returns true if")
This CL also replaces 4 uses of "iff" with the same "reports whether"
wording, which doesn't lose any meaning, and will prevent people from
sending typo fixes when they don't realize it's "if and only if". In
the past I think we've had the typo CLs updated to just say "reports
whether". So do them all at once.
(Inspired by the addition of another "returns true if" in CL 146938
in fd_plan9.go)
Created with:
$ perl -i -npe 's/returns true if/reports whether/' $(git grep -l "returns true iff" | grep -v vendor)
$ perl -i -npe 's/returns true if/reports whether/' $(git grep -l "returns true if" | grep -v vendor)
Change-Id: Ided502237f5ab0d25cb625dbab12529c361a8b9f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147037
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The function documentation was wrong, it was using a wrong parameter. This change
replaces it with the right parameter.
The wrong formula was: q = (u1<<_W + u0 - r)/y
The function has got a parameter "v" (of type Word), not a parameter "y".
So, the right formula is: q = (u1<<_W + u0 - r)/v
Fixes#28444
Change-Id: I82e57ba014735a9fdb6262874ddf498754d30d33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145280
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: math
name old time/op new time/op delta
Mod 64.7ns ± 2% 63.7ns ± 2% -1.52% (p=0.003 n=8+10)
Change-Id: I851bec0fd6c223dab73e4a680b7393d49e81a0e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/85095
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Don't worry, this patch just remove trailing whitespace from
assembly files, and does not touch any logical changes.
Change-Id: Ia724ac0b1abf8bc1e41454bdc79289ef317c165d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/113595
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Port math/big pure go versions of add-with-carry, subtract-with-borrow,
full-width multiply, and full-width divide.
Updates #24813
Change-Id: Ifae5d2f6ee4237137c9dcba931f69c91b80a4b1c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/123157
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Change-Id: Ibef5f96ea588d17eac1c96ee3992e01943ba0fef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131496
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The divLarge code contained "todo"s about avoiding alias
and clear calls in the initialization of variables. By
rearranging the order of initialization and always using
an auxiliary variable for the shifted divisor, all of these
calls can be safely avoided. On average, normalizing
the divisor (shift>0) is required 31/32 or 63/64 of the
time. If one always performs the shift into an auxiliary
variable first, this avoids the need to check for aliasing of
vIn in the output variables u and z. The remainder u is
initialized via a left shift of uIn and thus needs no
alias check against uIn. Since uIn and vIn were both used,
z needs no alias checks except against u which is used for
storage of the remainder. This change has a minimal impact
on performance (see below), but cleans up the initialization
code and eliminates the "todo"s.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Div/20/10-4 86.7ns ± 6% 85.7ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.841 n=5+5)
Div/200/100-4 523ns ± 5% 502ns ± 3% -4.13% (p=0.024 n=5+5)
Div/2000/1000-4 2.55µs ± 3% 2.59µs ± 5% ~ (p=0.548 n=5+5)
Div/20000/10000-4 80.4µs ± 4% 80.0µs ± 2% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
Div/200000/100000-4 6.43ms ± 6% 6.35ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.548 n=5+5)
Fixes#22928
Change-Id: I30d8498ef1cf8b69b0f827165c517bc25a5c32d7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130775
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Ceil and Trunc of -0.2 return -0, not +0, but we didn't test that.
Updates #23647
Change-Id: Idbd4699376abfb4ca93f16c73c114d610d86a9f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/91335
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
TMLL, LGDR and LDGR have all been added to the Go assembler
previously, so we don't need to encode them using WORD and BYTE
directives anymore. This is purely a cosmetic change, it does not
change the contents of any object files.
Change-Id: I93f815b91be310858297d8a0dc9e6d8e3f09dd65
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/129895
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Test large but not infinite arguments.
This CL adds a test which breaks s390x. Don't submit until
a fix for that is figured out.
Update #26477
Change-Id: Ic86739fe3554e87d7f8e15482875c198fcf1d59c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125641
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing implementation produces correct results with a wide range of inputs,
but invalid results asymptotically. With this change we ensure correct asymptotic results
on s390x
Fixes#26477
Change-Id: I760c1f8177f7cab2d7622ab9a926dfb1f8113b49
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/127119
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For modular exponentiation, negative exponents can be handled using
the following relation.
for y < 0: x**y mod m == (x**(-1))**|y| mod m
First compute ModInverse(x, m) and then compute the exponentiation
with the absolute value of the exponent. Non-modular exponentiation
with a negative exponent still returns 1.
Fixes#25865
Change-Id: I2a35986a24794b48e549c8de935ac662d217d8a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/118562
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Handling of sign bit as defined by IEEE 754-2008, section 6.3:
When the sum of two operands with opposite signs (or the difference of
two operands with like signs) is exactly zero, the sign of that sum (or
difference) shall be +0 in all rounding-direction attributes except
roundTowardNegative; under that attribute, the sign of an exact zero
sum (or difference) shall be −0. However, x+x = x−(−x) retains the same
sign as x even when x is zero.
This change handles the special case of Add/Sub resulting in exactly zero
when the rounding mode is ToNegativeInf setting the sign bit accordingly.
Fixes#25798
Change-Id: I4d0715fa3c3e4a3d8a4d7861dc1d6423c8b1c68c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/117495
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
For primes congruent to 5 mod 8 there is a simple deterministic
method for calculating the modular square root due to Atkin,
using one exponentiation and 4 multiplications.
A. Atkin. Probabilistic primality testing, summary by F. Morain.
Research Report 1779, INRIA, pages 159–163, 1992.
This increases the speed of modular square roots for these primes
considerably.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ModSqrt231_5Mod8-4 1.03ms ± 2% 0.36ms ± 5% -65.06% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Change-Id: I024f6e514bbca8d634218983117db2afffe615fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/99615
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This commit adds the wasm architecture to the math package.
Updates #18892
Change-Id: I5cc38552a31b193d35fb81ae87600a76b8b9e9b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/106996
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This makes math/bits not have any explicit imports even
when compiling tests and thereby avoids import cycles when
dependencies of testing want to import math/bits.
Change-Id: I95eccae2f5c4310e9b18124abfa85212dfbd9daa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110479
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently, there is no check for a negative modulus in ModInverse.
Negative moduli are passed internally to GCD, which returns 0 for
negative arguments. Mod is symmetric with respect to negative moduli,
so the calculation can be done by just negating the modulus before
passing the arguments to GCD.
Fixes#24949
Change-Id: Ifd1e64c9b2343f0489c04ab65504e73a623378c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108115
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Currently, the behavior of z.ModInverse(g, n) is undefined
when g and n are not relatively prime. In that case, no
ModInverse exists which can be easily checked during the
computation of the ModInverse. Because the ModInverse does
not indicate whether the inverse exists, there are reimplementations
of a "checked" ModInverse in crypto/rsa. This change removes the
undefined behavior. If the ModInverse does not exist, the receiver z
is unchanged and the return value is nil. This matches the behavior of
ModSqrt for the case where the square root does not exist.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ModInverse-4 2.40µs ± 4% 2.22µs ± 0% -7.74% (p=0.016 n=5+4)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ModInverse-4 1.36kB ± 0% 1.17kB ± 0% -14.12% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ModInverse-4 10.0 ± 0% 9.0 ± 0% -10.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Fixes#24922
Change-Id: If7f9d491858450bdb00f1e317152f02493c9c8a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108996
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
One might try to implement the Mod or Remainder function with the expression
x - TRUNC(x/y + 0.5)*y, but in fact this method is wrong, because the rounding
of (x/y + 0.5) to initialize the argument of TRUNC may lose too much precision.
However, the current test cases can not detect this error. This CL adds two
test cases to prevent people from continuing to do such attempts.
Change-Id: I6690f5cffb21bf8ae06a314b7a45cafff8bcee13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84275
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Made constant names more idiomatic,
moved some constants to function seedrand,
and found better name for _M.
Change-Id: I192172f398378bef486a5bbceb6ba86af48ebcc9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107135
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Updates #22830
Due to not checking if the output slices alias in divLarge,
calls of the form z.div(z, x, y) caused the slice z
to attempt to be used to store both the quotient and the
remainder of the division. CL 78995 applies an alias
check to correct that error. This CL cleans up the
additional div calls that attempt to supply the same slice
to hold both the quotient and remainder.
Note that the call in expNN was responsible for the reported
error in r.Exp(x, 1, m) when r was initialized to a non-zero value.
The second instance in expNNMontgomery did not result in an error
due to the size of the arguments.
// RR = 2**(2*_W*len(m)) mod m
RR := nat(nil).setWord(1)
zz := nat(nil).shl(RR, uint(2*numWords*_W))
_, RR = RR.div(RR, zz, m)
Specifically,
cap(RR) == 5 after setWord(1) due to const e = 4 in z.make(1)
len(zz) == 2*len(m) + 1 after shifting left, numWords = len(m)
Reusing the backing array for z and z2 in div was only triggered if
cap(RR) >= len(zz) + 1 and len(m) > 1 so that divLarge was called.
But, 5 < 2*len(m) + 2 if len(m) > 1, so new arrays were allocated
and the error was never triggered in this case.
Change-Id: Iedac80dbbde13216c94659e84d28f6f4be3aaf24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81055
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The go/printer (and thus gofmt) uses a heuristic to determine
whether to break alignment between elements of an expression
list which is spread across multiple lines. The heuristic only
kicked in if the entry sizes (character length) was above a
certain threshold (20) and the ratio between the previous and
current entry size was above a certain value (4).
This heuristic worked reasonably most of the time, but also
led to unfortunate breaks in many cases where a single entry
was suddenly much smaller (or larger) then the previous one.
The behavior of gofmt was sufficiently mysterious in some of
these situations that many issues were filed against it.
The simplest solution to address this problem is to remove
the heuristic altogether and have a programmer introduce
empty lines to force different alignments if it improves
readability. The problem with that approach is that the
places where it really matters, very long tables with many
(hundreds, or more) entries, may be machine-generated and
not "post-processed" by a human (e.g., unicode/utf8/tables.go).
If a single one of those entries is overlong, the result
would be that the alignment would force all comments or
values in key:value pairs to be adjusted to that overlong
value, making the table hard to read (e.g., that entry may
not even be visible on screen and all other entries seem
spaced out too wide).
Instead, we opted for a slightly improved heuristic that
behaves much better for "normal", human-written code.
1) The threshold is increased from 20 to 40. This disables
the heuristic for many common cases yet even if the alignment
is not "ideal", 40 is not that many characters per line with
todays screens, making it very likely that the entire line
remains "visible" in an editor.
2) Changed the heuristic to not simply look at the size ratio
between current and previous line, but instead considering the
geometric mean of the sizes of the previous (aligned) lines.
This emphasizes the "overall picture" of the previous lines,
rather than a single one (which might be an outlier).
3) Changed the ratio from 4 to 2.5. Now that we ignore sizes
below 40, a ratio of 4 would mean that a new entry would have
to be 4 times bigger (160) or smaller (10) before alignment
would be broken. A ratio of 2.5 seems more sensible.
Applied updated gofmt to all of src and misc. Also tested
against several former issues that complained about this
and verified that the output for the given examples is
satisfactory (added respective test cases).
Some of the files changed because they were not gofmt-ed
in the first place.
For #644.
For #7335.
For #10392.
(and probably more related issues)
Fixes#22852.
Change-Id: I5e48b3d3b157a5cf2d649833b7297b33f43a6f6e