cmd/cover has always assumed that package x/y/z can be
found in $GOPATH/src/x/y/z (roughly; by using go/build).
That won't be true for too much longer. Instead, run the
go command to find out where packages are.
This will make 'go tool cover' safe for use with Go modules
when they are in use in Go 1.11, and it continues to work
with the existing Go toolchains too.
An alternative would be to modify the cover profile format
to record file names directly, but that would require also
updating golang.org/x/tools/cover/profile and any tools
that use it, which seems not worth the trouble.
(That fork of the code does not contain any code to resolve
package names to directory locations, so it's unaffected.)
No new test here: cmd/go's TestCoverageFunc tests this code.
Fixes#25318 (when people use Go 1.11 instead of vgo).
Change-Id: I8769b15107aecf25f7aaf8692b724cf7d0f073d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122478
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
It's non-portable, and the test isn't hard to write without diff.
It still produces helpful output in case of trouble:
--- FAIL: TestCoverHTML (0.75s)
cover_test.go:325: line 4 differs: got:
case <-ch:<span class="cov0" title="0"></span>
want:
case <-ch:<span class="cov0" xitle="0"></span>
This makes the test operating-system independent.
Change-Id: Iff35f00cb76ba89bc1b93db01c6f994e74341f4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/118795
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 116975 added TestCoverHTML. However, this test is failing
on Plan 9, because the GNU diff tool is called "ape/diff"
instead of "diff" on Plan 9.
This change replaces the "diff" command by the "ape/diff"
command on Plan 9.
Fixes#25795.
Change-Id: I15b49868cd09f3f977aa13fffdfc430c882bf757
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/117415
Run-TryBot: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a refinement of CL 114855, which fixed the empty clause case,
but broke some other cases where segment boundaries can coincide
for other reasons.
Fixes#25767.
Change-Id: I2a387c83f9d651c8358f3e11b03f6167af0eb8bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/116976
Run-TryBot: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This adds a case for what was fixed in 4fe688c to prevent regression;
a follow-on change will address #25767.
Change-Id: Iced8cc10e2993ef7caf7e9c59ffbc7147d78ddd7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/116975
Run-TryBot: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If a span of coverable code is empty (e.g. an empty select clause)
then there will be two Boundary values with the same offset. In that
case, the starting Boundary needs to come first so that the generated
HTML output will open the <span> tag before it tries to close it.
Change-Id: Ib44a8b7c36ae57757c18b6cceb7a88ffa4e95394
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/114855
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
I grepped for "bytes.Buffer" and "buf.String" and mostly ignored test
files. I skipped a few on purpose and probably missed a few others,
but otherwise I think this should be most of them.
Updates #18990
Change-Id: I5a6ae4296b87b416d8da02d7bfaf981d8cc14774
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102479
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Without the change to cover.go, the new test fails with
panic: overlapping edits: [4946,4950)->"", [4947,4947)->"thisNameMustBeVeryLongToCauseOverflowOfCounterIncrementStatementOntoNextLineForTest.Count[112]++;"
The original code inserts "else{", deletes "else", and then positions
a new block just after the "}" that must come before the "else".
That works on gofmt'ed code, but fails if the code looks like "}else".
When there is no space between the "{" and the "else", the new block
is inserted into a location that we are deleting, leading to the
"overlapping edits" mentioned above.
This CL fixes this case by not deleting the "else" but just using the
one that is already there. That requires adjust the block offset to
come after the "{" that we insert.
Fixes#23927
Change-Id: I40ef592490878765bbce6550ddb439e43ac525b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98935
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
cover -func mode was reporting a coverage for function
declarations without bodies - assembly functions.
Since we are not annotating their code, we have no data
for those functions and should not report them at all.
Fixes#6880.
Change-Id: I4b8cd90805accf61f54e3ee167f54f4dc10c7c59
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77152
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Now that cover does not modify the formatting of the original file
or add any newline characters, we can make it print a //line comment
pointing back at the original, and compiler errors and panics will
report accurate line numbers.
Fixes#6329.
Fixes#15757.
Change-Id: I7b0e386112c69beafe69e0d47c5f9e9abc87c0f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77151
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
cmd/cover rewrites Go source code to add coverage annotations.
The approach to date has been to parse the code to AST, analyze it,
rewrite the AST, and print it back out. This approach fails to preserve
line numbers in the original code and has a very difficult time with
comments, because go/printer does as well.
This CL changes cmd/cover to decide what to modify based on the
AST but to apply the modifications as purely textual substitutions.
In this way, cmd/cover can be sure it never adds or removes a newline
character, nor a comment, so all line numbers and comments are
preserved.
This also allows us to emit a single //line comment at the beginning
of the translated file and have the compiler report errors with
correct line numbers in the original file.
Fixes#6329.
Fixes#15757.
Change-Id: Ia95f6f894bb498e80d1f91fde56cd4a8009d7f9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77150
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixed an error that occurred in atomic mode. cover adds a global
variable declaration that forces sync/atomic to be used. fixDirectives
was confused by this declaration since it has an invalid
position. These declarations are now skipped.
Fixes#22309
Change-Id: I84f5fec13ef847fca35ad49f7704fb93b60503e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71351
Run-TryBot: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, cover printed directives (//go: comments) near the top of
the file unless they were in doc comments. However, directives
frequently apply to specific definitions, and they are not written in
doc comments to prevent godoc from printing them. Moving all
directives to the top of the file affected semantics of tests.
With this change, directives are kept together with the following
top-level declarations. Only directives that occur after all top-level
declarations are moved.
Fixes#22022
Change-Id: Ic5c61c4d3969996e4ed5abccba0989163789254c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69630
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Also add -V=full to print a unique identifier of the specific tool being invoked.
This will be used for content-based staleness.
Also sort and clean up a few of the flag doc comments.
Change-Id: I786fe50be0b8e5f77af809d8d2dab721185c2abd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68590
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Defaulting total to 1 for each function, adds up to the
counting error. testing/cover.go already does this once.
Fixes#20515
Change-Id: I0e3f524c2ccb628eb9a8f0a1f81c22365c24cf9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44337
Run-TryBot: Dhananjay Nakrani <dhananjayn@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Parser doesn't attach some compiler directives to anything in the tree.
We have to explicitely retain them in the generated code. This change,
makes cover explicitely print out any compiler directive that wasn't
handled in the ast.Visitor.
Fixes#18285.
Change-Id: Ib60f253815e92d7fc85051a7f663a61116e40a91
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34563
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
So we can merge cover profiles from multiple runs.
Change-Id: I1bf921e2b02063a2a62b35d21a6823062d10e5d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23831
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Failing to create the output file would give confusing errors such as:
cover: invalid argument
Also do out.Close() even if Execute() errored.
Fixes#17951.
Change-Id: I897e1d31f7996871c54fde7cb09614cafbf6c3fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33278
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Consider a switch like
switch x {
case foo:
f()
g()
}
Before, the coverage annotation for the block calling f and g included
in its position span the text for 'case foo:'. This looks nice in the coverage
report, but it breaks the invariant that coverage blocks are disjoint if
you have a more complex expression like:
switch x {
case func() int { return foo }():
f()
g()
}
Then the coverage analysis wants to annotate the func literal body,
which overlaps with the case body, because the case body is considered
to begin at the case token.
Change the annotation for a case body to start just after the colon of
the case clause, avoiding any potential conflict with complex case
expressions. Could have started at the colon instead, but it seemed
less weird to start just after it.
Fixes#16540.
Change-Id: I1fec4bc2a53c7092e649dc0d4be1680a697cb79b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32612
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
If a labeled statement is the target of a goto, we must treat it as the
boundary of a new basic block, but only if it is not already the boundary
of a basic block such as a labeled for loop.
Fixes#16624
Now reports 100% coverage for the test in the issue.
Change-Id: If118bb6ff53a96c738e169d92c03cb3ce97bad0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30977
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Currently, it separates comments from rest of the AST. This causes problems when
long counter increment statements are added before compiler directives.
See Issue #17315.
This change moves comments handling into AST Visitor so that when printer prints
code from AST, position of compiler directives relative to the associated function
is preserved.
Tested with https://gist.github.com/dhananjay92/837df6bc1f171b1350f85d7a7d59ca1e
and unit test.
Fixes#17315
Change-Id: I61a80332fc1923de6fc59ff63b953671598071fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30161
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
cmd/cover, cmd/trace, and cmd/pprof all open browsers.
'go bug' will soon also open a browser.
It is time to unify the browser-handling code.
Change-Id: Iee6b443e21e938aeaaac366a1aefb1afbc7d9b2c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29160
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change makes sure that tests are run with the correct
version of the go tool. The correct version is the one that
we invoked with "go test", not the one that is first in our path.
Fixes#16577
Change-Id: If22c8f8c3ec9e7c35d094362873819f2fbb8559b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28089
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.
This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:
$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.) +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.) +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update
Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a subset of https://golang.org/cl/20022 with only the copyright
header lines, so the next CL will be smaller and more reviewable.
Go policy has been single space after periods in comments for some time.
The copyright header template at:
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#copyright
also uses a single space.
Make them all consistent.
Change-Id: Icc26c6b8495c3820da6b171ca96a74701b4a01b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20111
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When visiting the AST to add counters, there are special cases in which
the code calls cuts the walking short by returning nil. In some cases
certain nodes are ignored, e.g. Init and Cond inside IfStmt.
The fix is to explicitly walk all the children nodes (not only
Body and Else) when cutting the current walk. Similar approach
was taken with SwitchStmt and TypeSwitchStmt.
While the existing test code doesn't handle different counters in the
same line, the generated HTML report does it correctly (because it takes
column into account).
The previous behavior caused lines in function literals to not be
tracked when those literals were inside Init or Cond of an IfStmt for
example.
Fixes#14039.
Change-Id: Iad591363330843ad833bd79a0388d709c8d0c8aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19775
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Usually, you are primarily interested to see the coverage of a particular
file (e.g. when you're changing tests that affects a given source file),
it is very valuable if you can just refresh the page and immediately see
changes to the part you're already looking at (without selecting from the
selector again.)
Change-Id: I615207c9be6713f436e444771134fceaf4600ff3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17238
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Fix the various builds which don't have a real filesystem or don't support forking.
Change-Id: I3075c662fe6191ecbe70ba359b73d9a88bb06f35
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9528
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Forgot to update the references to the old cover package. No excuse.
Change-Id: If17b7521f0bf70bc0c8da9c5adf246d90f644637
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9564
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This required dealing with the ill-advised split of the profile code
into a separate package. I just copied it over unchanged. The package
does not deserve to be in the standard repository. We can cope
with the duplication.
Also update the go command to know about the new location.
Fixes#10528.
Change-Id: I05170ef3663326d57b9c18888d01163acd9256b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9560
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>