The type of the source and destination of a memmove call isn't
always accurate. It will always be a pointer (or an unsafe.Pointer), but
the base type might not be accurate. This comes about because multiple
copies of a pointer with different base types are coalesced into a single value.
In the failing example, the IData selector of the input argument is a
*[32]byte in one branch of the type switch, and a *[]byte in the other branch.
During the expand_calls pass both IDatas become just copies of the input
register. Those copies are deduped and an arbitrary one wins (in this case,
*[]byte is the unfortunate winner).
Generally an op v can rely on v.Type during rewrite rules. But relying
on v.Args[i].Type is discouraged.
Fixes#55124
Change-Id: I348fd9accf2058a87cd191eec01d39cda612f120
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431496
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit e283473ebb)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431917
ir.ClosureExpr implements ir.InitNode, so ir.InitExpr can prepend init
statements to it. However, CalleeEffects wasn't aware of this and
could cause the init statements to get dropped when inlining a call to
a closure.
This isn't an issue today, because we don't create closures with init
statements. But I ran into this within unified IR.
Easy and robust solution: just take advantage that ir.TakeInit can
handle any node.
Fixes#54917.
Change-Id: Ica05fbf6a8c5be4b11927daf84491a1140da5431
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422196
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/429896
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
In typebits.Set we check that the offset is a multiple of the
alignment, which makes perfect sense. But for values like
atomic.Int64, which has 8-byte alignment even on 32-bit platforms
(i.e. the alignment is larger than PtrSize), if it is on stack it
may be under-aligned, as the stack frame is only PtrSize aligned.
Normally we would prevent such values on stack, as the escape
analysis force values with higher alignment to heap. But for a
composite literal assignment like x = AlignedType{...}, the
compiler creates an autotmp for the RHS then copies it to the LHS.
The autotmp is on stack and may be under-aligned. Currently this
may cause an ICE in the typebits.Set check.
This CL makes it align the _offset_ of the autotmp to 8 bytes,
which satisfies the check. Note that this is actually lying: the
actual address at run time may not necessarily be 8-byte
aligned as we only align SP to 4 bytes.
The under-alignment is probably okay. The only purpose for the
autotmp is to copy the value to the LHS, and the copying code we
generate (at least currently) doesn't care the alignment beyond
stack alignment.
Updates #54638.
Fixes#54697.
Change-Id: I13c16afde2eea017479ff11dfc24092bcb8aba6a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/425256
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1211a62bdc)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/425935
CL 327871 changes methodWrapper to always perform inlining after global
escape analysis. However, inlining the method may reveal closures, which
require walking all function bodies to decide whether to capture free
variables by value or by ref.
To fix it, just not doing inline if the method contains any closures.
Fixes#54726
Change-Id: I4b0255b86257cc6fe7e5fafbc545cc5cff9113e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/426334
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/426160
Normally, when moving Go values of type T from one location to another,
we don't need to worry about partial overlaps. The two Ts must either be
in disjoint (nonoverlapping) memory or in exactly the same location.
There are 2 cases where this isn't true:
1) Using unsafe you can arrange partial overlaps.
2) Since Go 1.17, you can use a cast from a slice to a ptr-to-array.
https://go.dev/ref/spec#Conversions_from_slice_to_array_pointer
This feature can be used to construct partial overlaps of array types.
var a [3]int
p := (*[2]int)(a[:])
q := (*[2]int)(a[1:])
*p = *q
We don't care about solving 1. Or at least, we haven't historically
and no one has complained.
For 2, we need to ensure that if there might be partial overlap,
then we can't use OpMove; we must use memmove instead.
(memmove handles partial overlap by copying in the correct
direction. OpMove does not.)
Note that we have to be careful here not to introduce a call when
we're marshaling arguments to a call or unmarshaling results from a call.
Fixes#54629
Change-Id: I1ca6aba8041576849c1d85f1fa33ae61b80a373d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/425076
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 332a5981d0)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/425234
Same as CL 417555, but for cmd/compile.
Fixes#54235
Change-Id: I4cc6deaf0a87c952f636888b4ab73f81a44bfebd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/420975
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422034
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
For selector expression "x.M" where "M" is a promoted method, irgen is using
the type of receiver "x" for determining the typeparams for instantiation.
However, because M is a promoted method, so its associated receiver is
not "x", but "x.T" where "T" is the embedded field of "x". That casues a
mismatch when converting non-shape types arguments.
Fixing it by using the actual receiver which has the method, instead of
using the base receiver.
Fixes#54243
Change-Id: I1836fc422d734df14e9e6664d4bd014503960bfc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/419294
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/423114
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
When checkEnabled is forced true, the 52278 test fails. Be a bit
more careful about processing blank labels.
Update #52278
Change-Id: I48aa89e2c9e3715d8efe599bc4363b5b5879d8a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/419318
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Induction variable detection is still not quite right. I've added
another failing test.
Redo the overflow/underflow detector so it is more obviously correct.
Update #53600Fixes#53653Fixes#53663
Change-Id: Id95228e282fdbf6bd80b26e1c41d62e935ba08ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/415874
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The new gofrontend message matches other gofrontend error messages,
so adjust the test to accept it.
For #27938
For #51237
Change-Id: I29b536f83a0cf22b1dbdae9abc2f5f6cf21d522d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/416014
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
When the terminating condition is <= X, we need to make sure that
X+step doesn't overflow.
Fixes#53600
Change-Id: I36e5384d05b4d7168e48db6094200fcae409bfe5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/415219
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Works with cmd/compile, but fails with gccgo currently.
Updates #53619.
Change-Id: I787faa9584cc33bd851c9cc8f146c91f4eb36fc9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/415238
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For #51475
Change-Id: Ie1b27304687225194a323dc8305e5d62578fff4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414755
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
For #52871
Change-Id: Id6102222a8b1ec8a84b716425bed0e349c65dbc4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414336
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
The gofrontend crashed importing a complex 0 constant.
For #52862
Change-Id: Ia87d8eadb9c5ddf51e1cd65c1a626f05f0d068d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/413980
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
For #52856
Change-Id: Iab3e8352f64d774058391f0422cd01c53c3e711d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414235
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#50788.
Change-Id: Id1ed7d9c0687e3005e28598373fd5634178c78ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/413895
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
For #52846
Change-Id: I763f81def97b53277396c123c524f7b8193ea35e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/413694
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
We sometimes use 16-byte load+store to move values around in memory.
In rare circumstances, the loaded value must be spilled because the
store can't happen yet.
In that case, we need to be able to spill the 16-byte value.
Fixes#53454
Change-Id: I09fd08e11a63c6ba3ef781d3f5ede237e9b0132e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/413294
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
For #52870
Change-Id: Ic0791af4283c9e426f7cbfab0514517ff84cfa80
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/412535
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Matches examples in spec section on string conversions.
For #23814.
Change-Id: I08099c27bfdb98735868266f5a42901321b97b56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/412095
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
For type assertions, if either src or dst type has shape, we must
convert them to dynamic type assertions.
Fixes#53309
Change-Id: Ia3362fa67c011febcbdb5b26f856d081b5c366de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/411617
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For instantiated generic functions, all implicit dot operations are
resolved. Thus unsafe.Offsetof may calculating the offset against the
wrong base selector.
To fix it, we must remove any implicit dot operations to find the first
non-implicit one, which is the right base selector for calculating the
offset.
Fixes#53137
Change-Id: I38504067ce0f274615b306edc8f7d7933bdb631a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/409355
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The divisor must be non-zero for the rule to be triggered.
Fixes#53018
Change-Id: Id56b8d986945bbb66e13131d11264ee438de5cb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/407655
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: xiaodong liu <teaofmoli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name>
A composite literal assignment
x = T{field: v}
may be compiled to
x = T{}
x.field = v
We already do not use this form is RHS uses LHS. If LHS is
address-taken, RHS may uses LHS implicitly, e.g.
v = &x.field
x = T{field: *v}
The lowering above would change the value of RHS (*v).
Fixes#52953.
Change-Id: I3f798e00598aaa550b8c17182c7472fef440d483
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/407014
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Change-Id: I63eb42f3ce5ca452279120a5b33518f4ce16be45
GitHub-Last-Rev: a88f2f72be
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#52951
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406843
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #51291
Change-Id: If47e4cbf899853ade5050852c3870b9500da4c63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406916
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
CL 395854 made inline pass to not inlining function with shape params,
but pass no shape arguments. This is intended to be the reverse case of
CL 361260.
However, CL 361260 is using wider condition than necessary. Though it
only needs to check against function parameters, it checks whether the
function type has no shape. It does not cause any issue, because
!fn.Type().HasShape() implies !fn.Type().Params().HasShape().
But for the reverse case, it's not true. Function may have shape type,
but has no shape arguments. Thus, we must tighten the condition to
explicitly check against the function parameters only.
Fixes#52907
Change-Id: Ib87e87ff767c31d99d5b36aa4a6c1d8baf32746d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406475
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This test is currently overly sensitive to compiler optimizations,
because inlining can affect the order in which cmd/link emits field
references. The order doesn't actually matter though, so this CL just
tweaks the test to sort the tracked fields before printing them.
Updates #51734.
Change-Id: I3b65ca265856b2e1102f40406d5ce34610c70d40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406674
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Since CL 391014, cmd/compile now requires the -p flag to be set the
build system. This CL changes it to initialize LocalPkg.Path to the
provided path, rather than relying on writing out `"".` into object
files and expecting cmd/link to substitute them.
However, this actually involved a rather long tail of fixes. Many have
already been submitted, but a few notable ones that have to land
simultaneously with changing LocalPkg:
1. When compiling package runtime, there are really two "runtime"
packages: types.LocalPkg (the source package itself) and
ir.Pkgs.Runtime (the compiler's internal representation, for synthetic
references). Previously, these ended up creating separate link
symbols (`"".xxx` and `runtime.xxx`, respectively), but now they both
end up as `runtime.xxx`, which causes lsym collisions (notably
inittask and funcsyms).
2. test/codegen tests need to be updated to expect symbols to be named
`command-line-arguments.xxx` rather than `"".foo`.
3. The issue20014 test case is sensitive to the sort order of field
tracking symbols. In particular, the local package now sorts to its
natural place in the list, rather than to the front.
Thanks to David Chase for helping track down all of the fixes needed
for this CL.
Updates #51734.
Change-Id: Iba3041cf7ad967d18c6e17922fa06ba11798b565
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/393715
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
CL 395854 made inline pass to not inlining function with shape params,
but pass no shape arguments. But it does not consider the case where
function has shape params, but passing zero arguments. In this case, the
un-safe interface conversion that may be applied to a shape argument can
not happen, so it's safe to inline the function.
Fixes#52907
Change-Id: Ifa7b23709bb47b97e27dc1bf32343d92683ef783
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/406176
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For #52841
Change-Id: If4723a70fba0dbedb5d1e70dab58f0b4612bf8b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/405759
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
The compiler use to compile f()(g()) as:
t1, t2 := g()
f()(t1, t2)
That violates the Go spec, since when "..., all function calls, ... are
evaluated in lexical left-to-right order"
This PR fixes the bug by compiling f()(g()) as:
t0 := f()
t1, t2 := g()
t0(t1, t2)
to make "f()" to be evaluated before "g()".
Fixes#50672
Change-Id: I6a766f3dfc7347d10f8fa3a151f6a5ea79bcf818
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/392834
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
When a fully instantiated generic method is exported, be sure to also
export the types in its signature.
Fixes#52279.
Change-Id: Icc6bca05b01f914cf67faaf1bf184eaa5484f521
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/405118
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Following CL 405114, the extension rule is also wrong. It is safe
to drop the extension if the value is from a boolean-generating
instruction, but not a boolean-typed Value in general (e.g. a Phi
or a in-register parameter). Fix it.
Updates #52788.
Change-Id: Icf3028fe8e90806f9f57fbe2b38d47da27a97e2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/405115
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
On ARM64, an If block is lowered to (NZ cond yes no). This is
incorrect because cond is a boolean value and therefore only the
last byte is meaningful (same as AMD64, see ARM64Ops.go). But here
we are comparing a full register width with 0. Correct it by
comparing only the last bit.
Fixes#52788.
Change-Id: I2cacf9f3d2f45e149c361a290f511b2d4ed845c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/405114
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
An invalid program may produce invalid types. If the program
calls unsafe.Sizeof on such a type, which is a compile-time
computation, the size-computation must be able to handle it.
Add the invalid type to the list of permissible basic types
and give it a size of 1 (word).
Fixes#52748.
Change-Id: I6c409628f9b77044758caf71cdcb199f9e77adea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/404894
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For #52535
Change-Id: I6798a8379163497ebebcdadf836b8569735c282b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/404496
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
In walkCompare, any ir.OCONVNOP was removed from both operands. So when
constructing assignments for them to preserve any side-effects, using
temporary variables can cause type mismatched with original type.
Instead, using blank assignments will prevent that issue and still make
sure that the operands will be evaluated.
Fixes#52701
Change-Id: I229046acb154890bb36fe441d258563687fdce37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/403997
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
We need to use the same marker everywhere. My CL to rename the
marker (CL 241661) and the CL to add more uses of the marker
under the old name (CL 241678) weren't coordinated with each other.
Fixes#52612
Change-Id: I97023c0769e518491924ef457fe03bf64a2cefa6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/403094
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Accept ~x as ordinary unary expression in the parser but recognize
such expressions as invalid in the type checker.
This change opens the door to recognizing complex type constraint
literals such as `*E|~int` in `[P *E|~int]` and parse them correctly
instead of reporting a parse error because `P*E|~int` syntactically
looks like an incorrect array length expression (binary expression
where the RHS of | is an invalid unary expression ~int).
As a result, the parser is more forgiving with expressions but the
type checker will reject invalid uses as before.
We could pass extra information into the binary/unary expression
parse functions to prevent the use of ~ in invalid situations but
it doesn't seem worth the trouble. In fact it may be advantageous
to allow a more liberal expression syntax especially in the presence
of errors (better parser synchronization after an error).
Preparation for fixing #49482.
Change-Id: I119e8bd9445dfa6460fcd7e0658e3554a34b2769
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/402255
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Fixes#52438.
Change-Id: I5cbf8c448dba037e9e0c5fe8f209401d6bf7d43f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/401134
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
After CL 398014 fixed a compiler deadlock on syntax errors,
this CL adds a test case and more details for that.
How it was fixed:
CL 57751 introduced a channel "sem" to limit the number of
simultaneously open files.
Unfortunately, when the number of syntax processing goroutines
exceeds this limit, will easily trigger deadlock.
In the original implementation, "sem" only limited the number
of open files, not the number of concurrent goroutines, which
will cause extra goroutines to block on "sem". When the p.err
of the following iteration happens to be held by the blocking
goroutine, it will fall into a circular wait, which is a deadlock.
CL 398014 fixed the above deadlock, also see issue #52127.
First, move "sem <- struct{}{}" to the outside of the syntax
processing goroutine, so that the number of concurrent goroutines
does not exceed the number of open files, to ensure that all
goroutines in execution can eventually write to p.err.
Second, move the entire syntax processing logic into a separate
goroutine to avoid blocking on the producer side.
Change-Id: I1bb89bfee3d2703784f0c0d4ded82baab2ae867a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399054
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Fixes#52278
Change-Id: Ibf67c7b019feec277d316e04d93b458efea133fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399574
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For syntax errors in various (syntactic) lists, instead of reporting
a set of "expected" tokens (which may be incomplete), provide context
and mention "possibly missing" tokens. The result is a friendlier and
more accurate error message.
Fixes#49205.
Change-Id: I38ae7bf62febfe790075e62deb33ec8c17d64476
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/396914
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When parsing method declarations in an interface, the parser has
for historic reasons gracefully handled a list of method names with
a single (common) signature, and then reported an error. For example
interface {
m1, m2, m3 (x int)
}
This code originally came from the very first parser for Go which
initially permitted such declarations (or at least assumed that
people would write such declarations). Nobody is doing this at this
point, so there's no need for being extra careful here. Remove the
respective code and adjust the corresponding test.
Change-Id: If6f9b398bbc9e425dcd4328a80d8bf77c37fe8b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/396654
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 367755 added soleComponent for handling 1-byte type interface conversion.
This implementation must be kept in sync with Type.SoleComponent, but it
does not. When seeing a blank field in struct, we must continue looking
at the field type to find sole component, if any. The current code just
terminate immediately, which causes wrong sole component type returned.
Fixes#52020
Change-Id: I4f506fe094fa7c5532de23467a4f9139476bb0a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/396614
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Keith Randall
Matthew Dempsky
Cherry Mui
Cuong Manh Le
Ian Lance Taylor
Robert Griesemer
John Bampton
David Chase
hopehook
nimelehin