As noted in the TODO comment, the sticky bit is only used
when the rounding bit is zero or the rounding mode is
ToNearestEven. This change makes that check explicit and
will eliminate half the sticky bit calculations on average
when rounding mode is not ToNearestEven.
Change-Id: Ia4709f08f46e682bf97dabe5eb2a10e8e3d7af43
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/54111
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Manual hyphenation doesn't work well when text gets reflown,
for example by godoc.
There are a few other manual hyphenations in the tree,
but they are in local comments or comments for unexported functions.
Change-Id: I17c9b1fee1def650da48903b3aae2fa1e1119a65
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/53510
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Starting in go1.9, the minimum processor requirement for ppc64 is POWER8. So it
may now use the same divWW implementation as ppc64le.
Updates #19074
Change-Id: If1a85f175cda89eee06a1024ccd468da6124c844
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39010
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Verified that BenchmarkBitLen time went down from 2.25 ns/op to 0.65 ns/op
an a 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7, before removing that benchmark (now covered by
math/bits benchmarks).
Change-Id: I3890bb7d1889e95b9a94bd68f0bdf06f1885adeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38464
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
A -0 constant is the same as 0. Use explicit negative zero
for float64 -0.0. Also, fix two test cases that were wrong.
Fixes#19673.
Change-Id: Ic09775f29d9bc2ee7814172e59c4a693441ea730
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38463
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
nat.setUint64 is nicely generic.
By assuming 32- or 64-bit words, however,
we can write simpler code,
and eliminate some shifts
in dead code that vet complains about.
Generated code for 64 bit systems is unaltered.
Generated code for 32 bit systems is much better.
For 386, the routine length drops from 325
bytes of code to 271 bytes of code, with fewer loops.
Change-Id: I1bc14c06272dee37a7fcb48d33dd1e621eba945d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38070
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Change-Id: I6343c162e27e2e492547c96f1fc504909b1c03c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37793
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change adds math/bits as a new dependency of math/big.
- use bits.LeadingZeroes instead of local implementation
(they are identical, so there's no performance loss here)
- leave other functionality local (ntz, bitLen) since there's
faster implementations in math/big at the moment
Change-Id: I1218aa8a1df0cc9783583b090a4bb5a8a145c4a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37141
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
For compatibility with math/bits uint operations.
When math/big was written originally, the Go compiler used 32bit
int/uint values even on a 64bit machine. uintptr was the type that
represented the machine register size. Now, the int/uint types are
sized to the native machine register size, so they are the natural
machine Word type.
On most machines, the size of int/uint correspond to the size of
uintptr. On platforms where uint and uintptr have different sizes,
this change may lead to performance differences (e.g., amd64p32).
Change-Id: Ief249c160b707b6441848f20041e32e9e9d8d8ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37372
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Change-Id: I280c53be455f2fe0474ad577c0f7b7908a4eccb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36993
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The tests failed to compile when using the math_big_pure_go tag on
s390x.
Change-Id: I2a09f53ff6562ab9bc9b886cffc0f6205bbfcfbb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36956
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
After x.ProbablyPrime(n) passes the n Miller-Rabin rounds,
add a Baillie-PSW test before declaring x probably prime.
Although the provable error bounds are unchanged, the empirical
error bounds drop dramatically: there are no known inputs
for which Baillie-PSW gives the wrong answer. For example,
before this CL, big.NewInt(443*1327).ProbablyPrime(1) == true.
Now it is (correctly) false.
The new Baillie-PSW test is two pieces: an added Miller-Rabin
round with base 2, and a so-called extra strong Lucas test.
(See the references listed in prime.go for more details.)
The Lucas test takes about 3.5x as long as the Miller-Rabin round,
which is close to theoretical expectations.
name time/op
ProbablyPrime/Lucas 2.91ms ± 2%
ProbablyPrime/MillerRabinBase2 850µs ± 1%
ProbablyPrime/n=0 3.75ms ± 3%
The speed of prime testing for a prime input does get slower:
name old time/op new time/op delta
ProbablyPrime/n=1 849µs ± 1% 4521µs ± 1% +432.31% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
ProbablyPrime/n=5 4.31ms ± 3% 7.87ms ± 1% +82.70% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
ProbablyPrime/n=10 8.52ms ± 3% 12.28ms ± 1% +44.11% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
ProbablyPrime/n=20 16.9ms ± 2% 21.4ms ± 2% +26.35% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
However, because the Baillie-PSW test is only added when the old
ProbablyPrime(n) would return true, testing composites runs at
the same speed as before, except in the case where the result
would have been incorrect and is now correct.
In particular, the most important use of this code is for
generating random primes in crypto/rand. That use spends
essentially all its time testing composites, so it is not
slowed down by the new Baillie-PSW check:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Prime 104ms ±22% 111ms ±16% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10)
Thanks to Serhat Şevki Dinçer for CL 20170, which this CL builds on.
Fixes#13229.
Change-Id: Id26dde9b012c7637c85f2e96355d029b6382812a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30770
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The tree is inconsistent about single l vs double l in those
words in documentation, test messages, and one error value text.
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshall(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
42
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshal(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
1694
Make it consistently a single l, per earlier decisions. This means
contributors won't be confused by misleading precedence, and it helps
consistency.
Change the spelling in one error value text in newRawAttributes of
crypto/x509 package to be consistent.
This change was generated with:
perl -i -npe 's,([Mm]arshal)l(|s|er|ers|ed|ing),$1$2,' $(git grep -l -E '[Mm]arshall' | grep -v AUTHORS | grep -v CONTRIBUTORS)
Updates #12431.
Follows https://golang.org/cl/14150.
Change-Id: I85d28a2d7692862ccb02d6a09f5d18538b6049a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33017
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Implements Float.Scan which satisfies fmt.Scanner interface.
Also enforces docs' interface implementation claims with compile time
type assertions, that is:
+ Float always implements fmt.Formatter and fmt.Scanner
+ Int always implements fmt.Formatter and fmt.Scanner
+ Rat always implements fmt.Formatter
which will ensure that the API claims are strictly matched.
Also note that Float.Scan doesn't handle ±Inf.
Fixes#17391
Change-Id: I3d3dfbe7f602066975c7a7794fe25b4c645440ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30723
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
In addition to the DecimalConversion benchmark, that exercises the
String method of the internal decimal type on a range of small shifts,
add a few benchmarks for the big.Float String method. They can be used
to obtain more realistic data on the real-world performance of
big.Float printing.
Change-Id: I7ada324e7603cb1ce7492ccaf3382db0096223ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31275
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is needed for some of the more complex primality tests
(to filter out exact squares), and while the code is simple the
boundary conditions are not obvious, so it seems worth having
in the library.
Change-Id: Ica994a6b6c1e412a6f6d9c3cf823f9b653c6bcbd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30706
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Inspired by Alberto Donizetti's observations in
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/30099/.
name old time/op new time/op delta
DecimalConversion-8 138µs ± 1% 136µs ± 2% -1.85% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
10 runs each, measured on a Mac Mini, 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7.
Performance improvements varied between -1.25% to -4.4%; -1.85% is
about in the middle of the observed improvement. The generated code
is slightly shorter in the inner loops of the conversion code.
Change-Id: I10fb3b2843da527691c39ad5e5e5bd37ed63e2fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31250
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
1. Define behavior for Unmarshal of JSON null into Unmarshaler and
TextUnmarshaler. Specifically, an Unmarshaler will be given the
literal null and can decide what to do (because otherwise
json.RawMessage is impossible to implement), and a TextUnmarshaler
will be skipped over (because there is no text to unmarshal), like
most other inappropriate types. Document this in Unmarshal, with a
reminder in UnmarshalJSON about handling null.
2. Test all this.
3. Fix the TextUnmarshaler case, which was returning an unmarshalling
error, to match the definition.
4. Fix the error that had been used for the TextUnmarshaler, since it
was claiming that there was a JSON string when in fact the problem was
NOT having a string.
5. Adjust time.Time and big.Int's UnmarshalJSON to ignore null, as is
conventional.
Fixes#9037.
Change-Id: If78350414eb8dda712867dc8f4ca35a9db041b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30944
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
A later CL will be adding more code here.
It will help to keep it separate from the other code.
Change-Id: I971ba53de819cd10991b51fdec665984939a5f9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30709
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The Montgomery multiply code is applicable to this case
but was being bypassed. Don't do that.
The old test len(x) > 1 was really just a bad approximation to x > 1.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Exp-8 5.56ms ± 4% 5.73ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.095 n=5+5)
Exp2-8 7.59ms ± 1% 5.66ms ± 1% -25.40% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
This comes up especially when doing Fermat (Miller-Rabin)
primality tests with base 2.
Change-Id: I4cc02978db6dfa93f7f3c8f32718e25eedb4f5ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30708
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This way you can still run 'go test' or 'go bench -run Foo'
without wondering why it is taking so very long.
Change-Id: Icfa097a6deb1d6682acb7be9f34729215c29eabb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30707
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
- Add new BenchmarkQuoRem.
- Eliminate allocation in divLarge nat pool
- Unroll mulAddVWW body 4x
- Remove some redundant slice loads in divLarge
name old time/op new time/op delta
QuoRem-8 2.18µs ± 1% 1.93µs ± 1% -11.38% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
The starting point in the comparison here is Cherry's
pending CL to turn mulWW and divWW into intrinsics.
The optimizations in divLarge work best because all
the function calls are gone. The effect of this CL is not
as large if you don't assume Cherry's CL.
Change-Id: Ia6138907489c5b9168497912e43705634e163b35
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30613
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Also adds the 'find leftmost one' instruction (FLOGR) and replaces the
WORD-encoded use of FLOGR in math/big with it.
Change-Id: I18e7cd19e75b8501a6ae8bd925471f7e37ded206
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29372
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
No need to test so many sizes in race mode, especially for a package
which doesn't use goroutines.
Reduces test time from 2.5 minutes to 25 seconds.
Updates #17104
Change-Id: I7065b39273f82edece385c0d67b3f2d83d4934b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29163
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
The new SSA backend for s390x can use R0 as a general purpose register.
This change modifies assembly code to either avoid using R0 entirely
or explicitly set R0 to 0.
R0 can still be safely used as 0 in address calculations.
Change-Id: I3efa723e9ef322a91a408bd8c31768d7858526c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28976
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing implementation used a pure go implementation, leading to slow
cryptographic performance.
Implemented mulWW, subVV, mulAddVWW, addMulVVW, and bitLen for
ppc64{le}.
Implemented divWW for ppc64le only, as the DIVDEU instruction is only
available on Power8 or newer.
benchcmp output:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkSignP384 28934360 10877330 -62.41%
BenchmarkRSA2048Decrypt 41261033 5139930 -87.54%
BenchmarkRSA2048Sign 45231300 7610985 -83.17%
Benchmark3PrimeRSA2048Decrypt 20487300 2481408 -87.89%
Fixes#16621
Change-Id: If8b68963bb49909bde832f2bda08a3791c4f5b7a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/26951
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
Previously, a 0 mantissa was special-cased during big.Float
parsing, but not during big.Rat parsing. This meant that a value
like 0e9999999999 would parse successfully in big.Float.SetString,
but would hang in big.Rat.SetString. This discrepancy became an
issue in https://golang.org/src/go/constant/value.go?#L250,
where the big.Float would report an exponent of 0, so
big.Rat.SetString would be used and would subsequently hang.
A Go Playground example of this is https://play.golang.org/p/3fy28eUJuF
The solution is to special-case a zero mantissa during big.Rat
parsing as well, so that neither big.Rat nor big.Float will hang when
parsing a value with 0 mantissa but a large exponent.
This was discovered using go-fuzz on CockroachDB:
https://github.com/cockroachdb/go-fuzz/blob/master/examples/parser/main.goFixes#16176
Change-Id: I775558a8682adbeba1cc9d20ba10f8ed26259c56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24430
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
shortens code and gives an example of the use of Run.
Change-Id: I75ffaf762218a589274b4b62e19022e31e805d1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23424
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Carlos Eduardo Seo
Brian Kessler
Josh Bleecher Snyder
Alberto Donizetti
Eric Lagergren
Robert Griesemer
Eitan Adler
Daniel Martí
Michael Munday
Russ Cox
Dmitri Shuralyov
Vladimir Stefanovic
Cherry Zhang
Bill O'Farrell
Mohit Agarwal
Emmanuel Odeke
Michal Bohuslávek
Brad Fitzpatrick
Ethan Miller
Nathan VanBenschoten
Marcel van Lohuizen