Coupling workspace symbols to package checking means that they do not
function when the workspace is contracted, and also forces us to do
duplicate work traversing file declarations.
This CL changes the workspace symbol implementation to precompute
symbols based only on syntactic information, allowing them to function
in degraded workspace mode, improving their performance, and laying the
groundwork for more significant performance improvement later on.
There is some loss of precision where we can't determine the kind of a
symbol from syntactic information alone, but this is minor: we fall back
on 'Class' if we can't determine whether a type definition is a basic
type, struct, or interface.
Benchmark ("test" in x/tools): 56ms->40ms
Benchmark ("test" in kuberneted): 874ms->799ms
Change-Id: Ic48df29b387bf029dd374d7d09720746bc27ae5e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/338692
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Recent changes to the go/ast APIs for type parameters have broken the
internal/typeparams package when built with -tags=typeparams.
Fix this by adjusting the internal/typeparams API. Also update a few
tests accordingly.
Bump the build constraint used by the internal/typeparams package to
go1.18, as we are no longer compatible with the 1.17 typeparams API. It
is no long possible to opt in to type parameter specific functionality
1.17, which is fine as the dev.typeparams branch has moved to 1.18.
Even after these fixes, not all x/tools tests pass with go1.18. Some
completion tests are failing due to finding 'any' in types.Universe.
Change-Id: I5f92870aaf7853e531e3a154987f98520a52d70c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/339349
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, if the position was before the "." in a selector,
pathEnclosingObjNode would move the position to right after the
".". This created confusing behavior where editors would highlight
the identifier before the ".", but references and go to definition
would be applied on the identified after the selector. This change
removes the shifting of the position if found on a selector.
Fixesgolang/go#47408
Change-Id: If2504e7d5af2fae24b97c5c1e88b9cbe67aaaaf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/338789
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Currently the `SignatureHelp` function provides signature help even when the
requested range lies within a string literal. Let's suppress this behavior and
return an error when someone requests signature help from within a string
literal.
Fixesgolang/go#43397
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ib03e87258622f4294bf9385bf5f0a8effe0050ee
GitHub-Last-Rev: 0c9549ae68b0263a3cac274da133e9ab4b4c7bf5
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#332
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/337170
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
"Extract method" allows users to take a code fragment and move it
to a separate method. This is available if the enclosing function
is a method.
Change-Id: Ib824f6b79b13ca73532223283a050946c90a47e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/330070
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
There is insufficient type information to compute semantic tokens in
packages that don't compile. Particularly affected are test files
and files being actively edited in new packages.
Further, existing code could
panic on poorly formed imports; this has been fixed.
Computing semantic tokens for identifiers
having neither use or definition information has been improved.
(Each of the many cases in the new function unkIdent() occurs
in existing code or test files.)
Change-Id: Id1b5db0622b17076de1ed23a950a20cd03c3750a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/333869
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
*ast.AssignStmt doesn't have an associated comment group. So, we should
try to find and return a comment just before the identifier.
Fixesgolang/go#42134
Change-Id: Ie40717a4973ccfdbd99c3df891c2cfffbb21742d
GitHub-Last-Rev: da75fde2dbf3613f3325dbc5930dfc84ea813b90
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#323
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/327229
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts commit 5b540d349b.
Reason for revert: left in logging statements
Change-Id: I9ef5cd79e9ae8c94098fceca3a356fa3377c16e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/333711
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Error messages associated with bad parses and when working at the end
of the file are not useful to users, so they are no longer generated.
The logic around recognizing function calls has been improved, and
a panic sometimes caused by bad imports has been fixed.
The logic is imprecise/incorrect in some cases; there will be
another CL.
Change-Id: I72be3a0a003569fe06d458989e3dbbb46b7a22c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/332909
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
As an experiment, this CL introduces the first gopls feature that is
specific to generics: enriching function hover information with inferred
types. This is done with no additional gating on build constraints by
using the new internal/typeparams package.
The marker tests are updated to allow tests that rely on type parameters
being enabled.
Change-Id: Ic627d64b61a6211389196814edd0abe1484491eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/317452
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For array, slice, maps and chan candidates, we now support
transforming them to their element type in completions. For example:
var m map[string]int
var _ int = m<>
At <> we complete to "m[]" because we see that the map value type
matches our expected type.
Fixesgolang/go#46045.
Change-Id: Ibee088550193a53744f93217cc365f67f301ae90
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323451
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Now we search up to three levels for candidate modifiers. For example,
we can now complete "foo" to "foo()()" (double invocation).
Granted this is rarely useful, but it generalizes and simplifies the
searching we did for dereference modifiers.
Updates golang/go#46045.
Change-Id: Ibf0be8158e16a0a26a6344a346f34af8fe182bb0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323450
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
"type mod" refers to agglutinative expressions such as dereference
"*", invocation "()", and slicing "[:]". When considering an object as
a completion candidate, we check whether applying a type mod would
make it a better candidate.
Previously we tracked the type mods we wanted to apply to a candidate
by setting bool fields. Now instead we keep a slice of the type mods.
This has two main advantages:
- The mods are now ordered which will allow us to format candidates
properly when the same mods can appear in different order (e.g.
"<-*foo" or *<-foo").
- We can now record any mod multiple times allowing for "<-<-foo" or
"foo()()".
I changed the formatting code to always create a snippet object since
that made things simpler. I had to tweak a few snippet helper methods
to accept a snippet argument rather than creating a new snippet.
This commit's only functional change is that we no longer show any
type mods in candidate labels. For example, the user will now see
"foo" in the completion popup instead of "*foo". Showing the operators
adds noise to the candidate list, and we didn't display them
consistently.
Updates golang/go#46045.
Change-Id: I3ea7baa1ee2fee80a1f8cfe88cbae1093ae269ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323449
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
If new functions or variables need to be created during an extract
call, then we choose the new names. This change makes those names
more descriptive to make the generated names easier to read and
understand.
Before:
cond0, ret0 := fn0()
if cond0 {
return ret0
}
After
shouldReturn, returnValue := newFunction()
if shouldReturn {
return returnValue
}
Change-Id: I44795dc45185c75d5bf65e48378aa54d6c156212
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/326112
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When choosing variable names, extract makes sure that the chosen
name does not conflict with any existing variables. By avoiding these
conflicts, we may actually have a conflict with the other names we
are choosing. This change removes this conflict by sending the next
index to use as the suffix of the function name.
Change-Id: Icd81b67db29db2503e214d24ec19ca1065cda090
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/326111
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Block comments are a single comment that stretches across multiple
lines. The folding range code made assumptions that each comment
was a single line. This change fixes the folding range logic to check for multiline comments and adjust the folding range to start at
the end of the first line.
Fixesgolang/go#46253Fixesgolang/vscode-go#1511
Change-Id: I902f6cda7547cb1f8b4cd447152c3cf29a691d3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/325071
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Currently we don't consider function literals in outgoing call
hierarchy, because we only consider expressions of type
`ast.SelectorExpr` and `ast.Ident`. So function literals are skipped.
Fix this by ensuring we traverse through other types even if we
don't add the type itself as an outgoing call hierarchy.
Fixesgolang/go#43438
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I9eacbd5ec7a68224518bf0e405319adeb673c853
GitHub-Last-Rev: 3e7118a8fd090b339a3eacf32fa8d62e05a76b87
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#320
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323809
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
In cases like:
var foo func(...interface{})
var one int
var two func() (int, int)
foo(<>)
At <> we were preferring "two()" over "one" because we were really
excited that the multi return value function was usable. "one" was not
preferred because the expected value is interface{} (we default to
saying candidates _don't_ match interface{} to give non-type based
aspects of candidate inference a chance to shine).
Fix by applying the corresponding interface{} logic to the assignees
checking: ignore the case of completing into func(...interface{})
since all multi return value functions would match.
Fixesgolang/go#46378.
Change-Id: I355daa75e067e8b14508ca50b8d3b6b727df5fec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323509
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
For example:
type foo struct { i int }
type bar struct { i int }
var _ foo = <>
Previously at <> we would offer "bar{}" in addition to "foo{}" because
we knew "bar" was convertible to "foo". The "bar{}" completion wasn't
valid as inserted, however, because we didn't include the type
conversion. Anyway, it doesn't make sense to include convertible types
since the directly matching type should also be available. Fix by
tweaking the literal candidate code to skip candidates requiring
conversion.
Fixesgolang/go#46113.
Change-Id: Ica5e4af7f2f8bb2f7e2361efe39694f8bb738c97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/319509
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
This CL adds two new commands that let a client request a list of importable packages relative to a Go file and then select which import a programmer would like to add to said file.
Updates golang/go#43351
Change-Id: If12518874a92ed4167bdd711a92e03ee21c7b949
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/281412
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
- Use func.FullName() everywhere we can, since simply Printf or Errorf is often ambiguous.
- Give more specific error output when unsupported %w directive is used.
Change-Id: Ic2b423d87f9bedde459c79ce5aae622e9a4b5266
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/301949
Trust: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Trust: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
If A is a type, then in
type B {
A
} it is a type, but in
type C {
A int
}
it is a variable (and similarly in function types). The old code got this wrong.
Fixes: golang/go#46068
Change-Id: Ib7320914de81d2b7377214f53f99f4fea25e00fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/318749
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Support typeDefinition for functions/methods that have only one return value
of a named type. The total number of return values doesn't matter.
Examples:
* func foo() X
* func foo() (X, bool, int)
* func foo() (*float64, *X, error)
Fixesgolang/go#38589
Change-Id: I8840d667437300fd1250a13630e12a36601f0a60
GitHub-Last-Rev: 581d810af959f8b2c0bf62a22e5725f32947f5e4
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#311
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/313093
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
In cases like:
append([]string{}, foo<>)
we now prefer objects of type string at <>. Previously we had no
preference. In particular, we now try to infer the slice type from the
first append() arg instead of only from the outer context of the
append() call.
Fixesgolang/go#43240.
Change-Id: I59dfa3b18892c5c87fc5ff53109f51f50ee03d26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/316849
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Due to the limitations of comments in ast, it is difficult to move
comments. The extract function feature currently does not handle
comments at all. This change instead prints the comments that would
have been lost above the call to the function, so that the user can
easily recover them. Otherwise, it was possible for users to lose
comments and not notice.
Updates golang/go#37170
Change-Id: I1e2d865f5deddefbb0417732490decbdfcde5f3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/313211
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
If there is a return statement that is guaranteed to execute in
the selection to extract to function, then the result of calling
the extracted function can be directly returned.
Updates golang/go#37170
Change-Id: I6454e4107d670e4a1bc9048b2e1073fc80fc78ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/312469
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In cases like:
foo.<>
bar = 123
We weren't detecting that the selector preceding <> was a statement.
The above is parsed as "foo.<>bar = 123", so it looks like <> is
contained in an AssignStmt. This matters because we give different
postfix completions depending on whether it is valid to replace the
surrounding selector with a statement or not.
Updates golang/go#45718.
Change-Id: I8f74505b2c8c7060f1e94433904ff0a987d0cc57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/313269
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For example:
var b [4]byte
var s []byte = <>
At <> we now prefer "b" and insert as "b[:]".
Fixesgolang/go#40277.
Change-Id: I5fe9d153813dac7218edf31c7c33610130eef9bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/311169
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
With unsafe.Slice about to be added, we'll get varying completions at
'unsafe.S_' depending on the Go version. Change the completion position
to be 'unsafe.Si_'.
Change-Id: Ib537fefceda7864b7a256565a3a7286d18e845c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/312470
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Always use (*ast.TypeSpec).Type as a HoverInformation source.
Store a type name and an indication of whether it's a type alias
declaration as fields of HoverInformation.
Fixesgolang/go#45261
Change-Id: Ifbcdc15990379d0c73a419dd6cdf175d53dce925
GitHub-Last-Rev: 556dc94ab7d59fd251bbe0a537b19bc0fd7dd544
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#293
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/305189
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Go to Type Definition works for all composite types except maps because
it is not clear which type to return if both key and value are named types.
Fixesgolang/go#45029
Change-Id: Ie14f333c51af11033e2494aaaac367d35e7dc87b
GitHub-Last-Rev: 94a04812eafe8c157819f0155ed7be2779437867
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#292
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/304789
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
xyz and err in
type A func(xyz int) (err error), or
type B struct{xyz int}
were incorrectly marked as types, when they are not.
These are now marked as variables (although the choice is somewhat
arbitrary for A).
Fixesgolang/go#45233
Change-Id: I2df4eab7606c356f30bf3337c12d9190e74bc392
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/305209
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
There are 2 different anonymous struct declarations that require
different approaches:
1. var x struct{...}
2. x := struct{...}{}
For the first one we can use the existing solution with a minor update.
However, it returns the wrong docs for the fields of nested structs.
To fix this we need to visit all fields recursively.
The second one is not a generic declaration. So, the simplest solution
is to use the method Snapshot.PosToField.
Fixesgolang/go#43675
Change-Id: I46685e7985cbf2c1c5b1b74ef3cd3a70b920feba
GitHub-Last-Rev: 8a5704c2ecc3f8a007c00c7adcd637e56d99106c
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#284
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/300029
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The blank identifier is always a local variable. It can't be
a function parameter or a return value.
Fixesgolang/go#44813
Change-Id: Ieca9da35aaa9f5826ab89ded73702bed952e1226
GitHub-Last-Rev: bb7a2353ab64eed7f13bd5b9cb3b85d90b71c0ed
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#294
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/305429
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Postfix snippets are artificial methods that allow the user to compose
common operations in an "argument oriented" fashion. For example,
instead of "sort.Slice(someSlice, ...)" a user can expand
"someSlice.sort!". The snippet labels end in "!" to make it clearer
they do something potentially unexpected. The postfix snippets have
low scores so they should not interfere with normal completions.
The snippets are represented (almost) entirely as Go text/template
templates. This way the user can create custom snippets to match their
general preferences or to capture common patterns in their codebase.
There is currently no way for the user to create snippets, but it
could be accomplished with a configuration file, custom LSP command,
or similar.
I started by implementing a variety of snippets to help flesh out the
various facilities needed by the templates. The most interesting
template capabilities are:
- The ability to import packages as necessary (e.g. "sort" must be
imported to call sort.Slice()).
- The ability to generate unique variable names to avoid accidental
shadowing issues.
- The ability to weave LSP snippets into the template. Currently,
only {{.Cursor}} is exposed, which corresponds to the snippet's
final tab stop.
Briefly, these are the postfix snippets in this commit:
- foo.sort => sort.Slice(foo, func(...){}) (slices)
- foo.last => foo[len(foo)-1] (slices)
- foo.reverse (slices)
- foo.range => for i, v := range foo {} (slices/maps)
- foo.append
This snippet inserts a self-assignment append statement when
appropriate, otherwise just an append expression.
- foo.copy creates a copy of a slice
- foo.clear empties out a map
- foo.keys creates slice of keys
- foo().var assigns result value(s) to variables
- foo.print prints foo to stdout
Some of these are probably not very useful in practice, and I'm sure
there are lots of great ones I didn't think of.
Updates golang/go#39507.
Change-Id: I9ecc748aa79c0d47fa6ff72d4ea671e917a2d5d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/272586
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This CL updates addErrCheckAndReturn to return "if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) }"
if the conditions for such snippet completion are met.The CL allows for
the following condition:
The enclosing functions takes a type that implements testing.TB which allows
for tests, benchmarks and extensions to the testing object to be completed.
Also, this CL doesn't explicitly check for the Test/Benchmark function
signature so that test helpers can also get the same benefits.
The remaining conditions for the current "if err != nil" checks also apply.
In the future, more testing completions UX can be added.
Fixesgolang/go#43310
Change-Id: I45197ab25610e31fef629394c79cb3792b532e7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/279488
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
When parse errors occur, go's parse package cannot recover nicely.
gopls tried to compute folding ranges based on the partial info
in this case, but returning partial folding range info confuses
editors (vscode) and results in dropping previous folding range
info from the region after the parse error location.
This CL makes gopls not to return anything - so the editor can
tell the result is not believable and ignore it.
The ideal solution is to return a response explicitly surfacing
this case, but currently LSP (3.16, as of today) does not have
a way to describe this condition. See the discussion in
https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/1200.
We also tried to make gopls return an error. While it worked
nicely in VSCode, we are not sure about how other editors handle
errors from foldingRange. So, instead, we just let gopls return
an empty result - since foldingRange is already broken in this
case, we hope it doesn't add a lot of noise to existing users.
VSCode Go will check the response from the middleware. If the
response is empty but the file is not empty, VSCode Go will
ignore the response.
(https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vscode-go/+/299569)
Updates golang/vscode-go#1224
Updates golang/go#41281
Change-Id: I917d6667508aabbca1906137eb5e21a97a6cfdaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/291569
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The logic to extract the receiver identifier from a func decl was
incorrect, accepting only the common T and *T syntaxes, and panicking on
*(T).
Fix this by copying the logic from go/types.
Fixesgolang/go#44806
Change-Id: I1c87ab21ac04e484972bc4161180ca1112df3c73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/298852
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The current hover information for constant time.Duration is not very
useful because it displays nanoseconds. So, show formatted duration
as an inline comment.
Fixesgolang/go#44667
Change-Id: I6177455fb8932d1914d5cf623c0d9c4eff8f0b3f
GitHub-Last-Rev: e168968012741a1e614c66bc97fe60b196943ed3
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#281
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297310
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
For index expressions, optional "make" args, and composite literal
slice/array keys, we were inferring an expected type of int instead of
untyped int. This caused candidate rankings to not be quite right in
general, and in particular, after support for automatic type
conversions was added, the issue manifested as:
var foo []int
var bar int32
foo[ba<>] // completed to "int(bar)" instead of "bar"
Fixesgolang/go#43375.
Change-Id: I6daef7d23b767f296bdbbc8f47f5b2c972ad9b80
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289272
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
In cases like:
type foo struct { a int; b float64 }
foo{b<>}
We were completing to "foo{int(b: <float64>)}" (the problem being the
nonsensical int() conversion).
The expected type at "<>" is int to allow completions to match "a".
When we pass the *types.Var representing "b" through the candidate
matching machinery, we say "Oh, a float64! I can convert that to my
expected type of int!".
Fix by bailing out of candidate matching early if the candidate is a
composite literal struct field name. Field names aren't really objects
you can do anything to.
Fixesgolang/go#43789.
Change-Id: Ie4dab166973dfcdcb519f864532ead1f792d25a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289130
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
In cases like:
foo<> == 100
We weren't preferring floats at <>. Fix the basic type comparison
logic to know that an untyped int is always compatible with a float.
Fixesgolang/go#44066.
Change-Id: I9cf9bac1632178db100c0a5447351be208b4a2af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289129
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Field embedding links two objects (a TypeName and a Var) by name,
requiring special handling during renaming. In CL 282932, renaming of
types was made to propagate to uses of their embeddings. However, no
such propagation in the reverse direction was added, meaning that
renaming an embedded field would not rename the corresponding type, and
code could still be left in a non-compiling state.
It should be an invariant that renaming does not change program
behavior. To enforce with field embeddings this we'd need to also rename
the corresponding type, but this seems problematic. If I'm hovering over
the field selector x.T, and rename T, it is surprising that this would
end up renaming a type.
For lack of a better solution, make it an error to rename embedded
fields, but try to provide a helpful error message.
Also handle the blank identifier, for which renaming was giving a
message to "please file a bug".
Marker tests are added for the new errors in rename, but not for
prepareRename. The prepareRename tests were not set up for asserting on
errors -- perhaps that would be a good project for a later CL where we
clean up errors.
Fixesgolang/go#43616
Change-Id: I66c2dd5e531dd102431d1edd443d553687d9ca7e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/284312
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When renaming a type name, also rename indirect uses of the name as an
embedded field. This is conservatively isolated to just renames for now;
it's not clear to me that users would also want to see uses of embedded
fields as references.
Fixesgolang/go#43616
Change-Id: I41913d037fedb8c27a448cd922eeaf11a02d01f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/282932
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Outgoing callhierarchy didn't handle different functions defined as
field in a struct as separate functions since they were declared by the
same AST node.
This change adds the identifier name to the key, so that a function
must share both declaration node and name to be considered "the same".
Fixesgolang/go#43456
Change-Id: Ifbced98f2e8fc3a303834f7cefbae66829b68d27
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/280618
Trust: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When trying to get outgoing call hierarchy from an var func like:
func main() {
foo := func() {}
foo()
}
gopls crashed with a panic.
This change makes it return an empty call hierarchy instead.
It also adds support for testing outgoing calls where the expected
result is 0 items, to be able to test this change.
Fixesgolang/go#43376
Change-Id: Icd91bf54cb4fbd5203f5865f0ff9d81365c27d5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/279469
Trust: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Rob Findley
Suzy Mueller
Karthik Nayak
pjw
Shoshin Nikita
Muir Manders
Marwan Sulaiman
johnnyjacobs
Andrii Soluk
Hana
Pontus Leitzler