A //go:debug line mentioning an unknown or retired setting
should be diagnosed as making the program invalid. Do that.
We agreed on this in the proposal but I forgot to implement it.
Change-Id: Ie69072a1682d4eeb6866c02adbbb426f608567c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/476280
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The parsed forms of MIME headers and multipart forms can consume
substantially more memory than the size of the input data.
A malicious input containing a very large number of headers or
form parts can cause excessively large memory allocations.
Set limits on the size of MIME data:
Reader.NextPart and Reader.NextRawPart limit the the number
of headers in a part to 10000.
Reader.ReadForm limits the total number of headers in all
FileHeaders to 10000.
Both of these limits may be set with with
GODEBUG=multipartmaxheaders=<values>.
Reader.ReadForm limits the number of parts in a form to 1000.
This limit may be set with GODEBUG=multipartmaxparts=<value>.
Thanks for Jakob Ackermann (@das7pad) for reporting this issue.
For CVE-2023-24536
For #59153
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1802455
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
Change-Id: I08dd297bd75724aade4b0bd6a7d19aeca5bbf99f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/482077
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For requests containing large numbers of small parts,
memory consumption of a parsed form could be about 250%
over the estimated size.
When considering the size of parsed forms, account for the size of
FileHeader structs and increase the estimate of memory consumed by
map entries.
Thanks to Jakob Ackermann (@das7pad) for reporting this issue.
For CVE-2023-24536
For #59153
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1802454
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
Change-Id: I9620758495ed77c09ca6dc5db4b723c29f3baad8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/482076
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When copying form data to disk with io.Copy,
allocate only one copy buffer and reuse it rather than
creating two buffers per file (one from io.multiReader.WriteTo,
and a second one from os.File.ReadFrom).
Thanks to Jakob Ackermann (@das7pad) for reporting this issue.
For CVE-2023-24536
For #59153
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1802453
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Change-Id: I732bd2e1e7467918cac8ab9d65d089272ba4656f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/482075
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Because "CopyN" will read one more byte, which will cause us
to overflow when calling "Reader.ReadForm(math.MaxInt64)".
So we should check if the parameter exceeds "math.MaxInt64"
to avoid returning no data.
Fixes#58384.
Change-Id: I30088ce6468176b21e4a9a0b8b6080f2986dda23
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/467557
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: hopehook <hopehook@golangcn.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reader.ReadForm is documented as storing "up to maxMemory bytes + 10MB"
in memory. Parsed forms can consume substantially more memory than
this limit, since ReadForm does not account for map entry overhead
and MIME headers.
In addition, while the amount of disk memory consumed by ReadForm can
be constrained by limiting the size of the parsed input, ReadForm will
create one temporary file per form part stored on disk, potentially
consuming a large number of inodes.
Update ReadForm's memory accounting to include part names,
MIME headers, and map entry overhead.
Update ReadForm to store all on-disk file parts in a single
temporary file.
Files returned by FileHeader.Open are documented as having a concrete
type of *os.File when a file is stored on disk. The change to use a
single temporary file for all parts means that this is no longer the
case when a form contains more than a single file part stored on disk.
The previous behavior of storing each file part in a separate disk
file may be reenabled with GODEBUG=multipartfiles=distinct.
Update Reader.NextPart and Reader.NextRawPart to set a 10MiB cap
on the size of MIME headers.
Thanks to Jakob Ackermann (@das7pad) for reporting this issue.
Fixes#58006
Fixes CVE-2022-41725
Change-Id: Ibd780a6c4c83ac8bcfd3cbe344f042e9940f2eab
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1714276
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Security TryBots <security-trybots@go-security-trybots.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468124
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
As part of #42026, these helpers from io/ioutil were moved to os.
(ioutil.TempFile and TempDir became os.CreateTemp and MkdirTemp.)
Update the Go tree to use the preferred names.
As usual, code compiled with the Go 1.4 bootstrap toolchain
and code vendored from other sources is excluded.
ReadDir changes are in a separate CL, because they are not a
simple search and replace.
For #42026.
Change-Id: If318df0216d57e95ea0c4093b89f65e5b0ababb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266365
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Returning an error about integer overflow is needlessly pedantic.
The meaning of ReadForm(MaxInt64) is easily understood
(accept a lot of data) and can be implemented.
Fixes#40430.
Change-Id: I8a522033dd9a2f9ad31dd2ad82cf08d553736ab9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/275112
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Updates Reader.ReadForm to check for overflow errors that may
result from a leeway addition of 10MiB to the input argument
maxMemory.
Fixes#40430
Change-Id: I510b8966c95c51d04695ba9d08fcfe005fd11a5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/247477
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Revert the code changes of CL 96975 and CL 70931, but keep the tests,
appropriately modified for the code changes. This restores the 1.9
handling of form-data entries with missing or empty file names.
Changing the handling of this simply confused existing programs for no
useful benefit. Go back to the old behavior.
Updates #19183Fixes#24041
Change-Id: I4ebc32433911e6360b9fd79d8f63a6d884822e0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121055
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Allow the memory limit passed into ReadForm to be used as the
memory limit for processing non-file form data as well as file
form data, rather than the existing behaviour of the memory limit
only applying to the file parts and the non-file parts being
arbitrarily limited to 10MB.
This ensures backwards compatibility while still providing the
user with control over the amount of non-file data that can be
processed instead of enforcing an arbitrary 10MB limit.
Change-Id: I53c09eae00147d3ff2d6bdfd4e50949267932c3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38195
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change makes it possible to retrieve the size of a file part
without having to Seek to determine file-size.
Resolves#19501
Change-Id: I7b9994c4cf41c9b06a046eb7046f8952ae1f15e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39223
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Always close the file regardless of whether the copy succeeds or fails.
Pass along the close error if the copy succeeds
Fixes#16296
Change-Id: Ib394655b91d25750f029f17b3846d985f673fb50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30410
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Named returned values should only be used on public funcs and methods
when it contributes to the documentation.
Named return values should not be used if they're only saving the
programmer a few lines of code inside the body of the function,
especially if that means there's stutter in the documentation or it
was only there so the programmer could use a naked return
statement. (Naked returns should not be used except in very small
functions)
This change is a manual audit & cleanup of public func signatures.
Signatures were not changed if:
* the func was private (wouldn't be in public godoc)
* the documentation referenced it
* the named return value was an interesting name. (i.e. it wasn't
simply stutter, repeating the name of the type)
There should be no changes in behavior. (At least: none intended)
Change-Id: I3472ef49619678fe786e5e0994bdf2d9de76d109
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20024
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>