Go to Type Definition works for all composite types except maps because
it is not clear which type to return if both key and value are named types.
Fixesgolang/go#45029
Change-Id: Ie14f333c51af11033e2494aaaac367d35e7dc87b
GitHub-Last-Rev: 94a04812eafe8c157819f0155ed7be2779437867
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#292
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/304789
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
There are 2 different anonymous struct declarations that require
different approaches:
1. var x struct{...}
2. x := struct{...}{}
For the first one we can use the existing solution with a minor update.
However, it returns the wrong docs for the fields of nested structs.
To fix this we need to visit all fields recursively.
The second one is not a generic declaration. So, the simplest solution
is to use the method Snapshot.PosToField.
Fixesgolang/go#43675
Change-Id: I46685e7985cbf2c1c5b1b74ef3cd3a70b920feba
GitHub-Last-Rev: 8a5704c2ecc3f8a007c00c7adcd637e56d99106c
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#284
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/300029
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The blank identifier is always a local variable. It can't be
a function parameter or a return value.
Fixesgolang/go#44813
Change-Id: Ieca9da35aaa9f5826ab89ded73702bed952e1226
GitHub-Last-Rev: bb7a2353ab64eed7f13bd5b9cb3b85d90b71c0ed
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#294
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/305429
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Move postfix completion functionality behind an experimental option
flag. For now users can enable it by setting
"experimentalPostfixCompletions" or "allExperiments".
I added a RunnerOption so regtest tests can tweak *source.Options. I
didn't refactor the "Experimental" mode to use the new RunnerOption
because I didn't fully understand its purpose.
Change-Id: I75ed748710cae7fa99f4ea6ea117ce245a4e9749
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/296109
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Postfix snippets are artificial methods that allow the user to compose
common operations in an "argument oriented" fashion. For example,
instead of "sort.Slice(someSlice, ...)" a user can expand
"someSlice.sort!". The snippet labels end in "!" to make it clearer
they do something potentially unexpected. The postfix snippets have
low scores so they should not interfere with normal completions.
The snippets are represented (almost) entirely as Go text/template
templates. This way the user can create custom snippets to match their
general preferences or to capture common patterns in their codebase.
There is currently no way for the user to create snippets, but it
could be accomplished with a configuration file, custom LSP command,
or similar.
I started by implementing a variety of snippets to help flesh out the
various facilities needed by the templates. The most interesting
template capabilities are:
- The ability to import packages as necessary (e.g. "sort" must be
imported to call sort.Slice()).
- The ability to generate unique variable names to avoid accidental
shadowing issues.
- The ability to weave LSP snippets into the template. Currently,
only {{.Cursor}} is exposed, which corresponds to the snippet's
final tab stop.
Briefly, these are the postfix snippets in this commit:
- foo.sort => sort.Slice(foo, func(...){}) (slices)
- foo.last => foo[len(foo)-1] (slices)
- foo.reverse (slices)
- foo.range => for i, v := range foo {} (slices/maps)
- foo.append
This snippet inserts a self-assignment append statement when
appropriate, otherwise just an append expression.
- foo.copy creates a copy of a slice
- foo.clear empties out a map
- foo.keys creates slice of keys
- foo().var assigns result value(s) to variables
- foo.print prints foo to stdout
Some of these are probably not very useful in practice, and I'm sure
there are lots of great ones I didn't think of.
Updates golang/go#39507.
Change-Id: I9ecc748aa79c0d47fa6ff72d4ea671e917a2d5d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/272586
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Some of the refactoring changed the way that we label code action kinds,
and we need to add quickfix and fixall kinds for each diagnostic type.
Support a per-kind suggested fix, and fix a small issue in setting the
analyzer for a fixall code action.
Fixesgolang/go#45111
Change-Id: I6bb32c9aa7427b690f42910672d3139579e84478
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/303209
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Locating the workspace module by convention has multiple problems:
+ gopls's view of $TMPDIR might be different from the client
+ there might be multiple views
+ there might be multiple gopls sessions per pid
Instead, assign a temp workspace directory for each workspace folder,
and provide a command to access this information.
Cleaning up all these temp directories was overcomplicated. Instead,
create a temp directory for the gopls server to nest them under, that
can be removed up on server shutdown.
Also fix a bug where the snapshot was not acquired before copying its
workspace.
Updates golang/go#42252
Change-Id: I0641cebe09cd376dfa27373cac30397711c64a8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/300409
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This CL updates addErrCheckAndReturn to return "if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) }"
if the conditions for such snippet completion are met.The CL allows for
the following condition:
The enclosing functions takes a type that implements testing.TB which allows
for tests, benchmarks and extensions to the testing object to be completed.
Also, this CL doesn't explicitly check for the Test/Benchmark function
signature so that test helpers can also get the same benefits.
The remaining conditions for the current "if err != nil" checks also apply.
In the future, more testing completions UX can be added.
Fixesgolang/go#43310
Change-Id: I45197ab25610e31fef629394c79cb3792b532e7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/279488
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
As much as possible, try to unify the codeAction code paths. We always
run analysis now. And rather than assuming certain categories of
analyzers will generate certain kinds of code actions, mark them
explicitly and use that information to filter the actions afterward.
Change-Id: I8154cd67aa8b59b2a6c8aa9c3ea811de2e190db4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/300170
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When parse errors occur, go's parse package cannot recover nicely.
gopls tried to compute folding ranges based on the partial info
in this case, but returning partial folding range info confuses
editors (vscode) and results in dropping previous folding range
info from the region after the parse error location.
This CL makes gopls not to return anything - so the editor can
tell the result is not believable and ignore it.
The ideal solution is to return a response explicitly surfacing
this case, but currently LSP (3.16, as of today) does not have
a way to describe this condition. See the discussion in
https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/1200.
We also tried to make gopls return an error. While it worked
nicely in VSCode, we are not sure about how other editors handle
errors from foldingRange. So, instead, we just let gopls return
an empty result - since foldingRange is already broken in this
case, we hope it doesn't add a lot of noise to existing users.
VSCode Go will check the response from the middleware. If the
response is empty but the file is not empty, VSCode Go will
ignore the response.
(https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vscode-go/+/299569)
Updates golang/vscode-go#1224
Updates golang/go#41281
Change-Id: I917d6667508aabbca1906137eb5e21a97a6cfdaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/291569
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The logic to extract the receiver identifier from a func decl was
incorrect, accepting only the common T and *T syntaxes, and panicking on
*(T).
Fix this by copying the logic from go/types.
Fixesgolang/go#44806
Change-Id: I1c87ab21ac04e484972bc4161180ca1112df3c73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/298852
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now that we're generating quick fixes at analysis time, we can use those
in code action requests and delete a fair amount of redundancy. The
codeAction function is a little cluttered, but I want to get it all in
one place before I decide how to split it up.
Change-Id: Icd91e2547542cce0a05c18c02a088833f71232a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297532
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Type error analyzers can be viewed as enhancing type errors, rather
than analyzers in their own right. Create a source.DiagnosePackage
function that combines the list/parse/typecheck diagnostics with type
error analyzers. This allows us to remove some special cases from the
analysis path, and is a first step in removing all the special
handling for analysis quick fixes.
Along the way:
Pass pointers to source.Analyzer after I spent half an hour chasing a
loop capture bug. Spend a further 2-3 hours chasing slowdown in the
command tests as a result.
Move Unnecessary tag generation into diagnostic creation rather than
as a mutating post-processing step that required cloning diagnostics.
Change-Id: Id246667a9dcf484dc79516f92d5524261c435794
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297879
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Most callers of source.Package.GetDiagnostics do it via
GetTypeCheckDiagnostics. Push its logic up or down as appropriate and
delete it.
Rather than requiring fully populated maps of diagnostics, which was
rather subtle, call storeDiagnostics for every Go file in the package.
Change-Id: If43b0cc922af1013e80f969362246538df14985b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297878
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
The current hover information for constant time.Duration is not very
useful because it displays nanoseconds. So, show formatted duration
as an inline comment.
Fixesgolang/go#44667
Change-Id: I6177455fb8932d1914d5cf623c0d9c4eff8f0b3f
GitHub-Last-Rev: e168968012741a1e614c66bc97fe60b196943ed3
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#281
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297310
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
In CL 295413 we fixed the handling of related type checker diagnostics
to correctly identify the primary and secondary errors at a position.
However, on clients that don't support diagnostic related information,
this can lead to confusing primary diagnostics.
Add handling for clients that don't support related information, to
embed the secondary error in the primary error.
Fixesgolang/go#44735
Change-Id: I3d2470d2a4044661e6ed31ac9ffd2f9ff27f7d4b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297875
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Rather than using the directory of the package, store the package ID and
calculate the directory in GCOptimizationDetails. I think this is
slightly more readable/cleaner.
Change-Id: I13cac8a7552b73b2bd5d25ff582b5d4936a74827
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297877
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Hopefully improve some of the details around parsing that have always
confused me.
- parser.ParseFile will never return an error other than
scanner.ErrorList. Encode that in ParsedGoFile.
- parser.ParseFile will never return a nil file. Eliminate the code
path that handled that.
- Explain why we might fail to find a token.File.
- Trying to fix errors appears quite expensive even if there aren't any
to fix. Don't waste the time.
Change-Id: I87e082ed52c98a438bc7fd3b29e1a486f32fb347
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/297069
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
In typeCheckDiagnostics, we have logic to suppress go list and type
checking errors based on the presence of other errors. Nobody seems to
know why the logic is exactly what it is, and suppressing list errors
means that bad //go:embed patterns don't show up.
Intuitively, it makes sense to me that we don't want to type check if
listing or parsing fails: list errors mean that whole files may be
missing, and parsing errors may wipe out arbitrary chunks of files.
There's little point reporting errors from type checking that. However,
list errors and parse errors should be mostly orthogonal: go list
parses very little of the file and in practice only reports errors
parsing the package statement. So, at least for now, we report both
parse and list errors, and stop there if there are any.
Finally, move the suppression logic to the actual typeCheck function
that generates the diagnostics. typeCheckDiagnostics is the primary
consumer, but I think it's better to do the suppression at the source.
Because we are now showing list errors, and they are prone to getting
stuck due to bad overlay support, a couple of tests now require 1.16.
Change-Id: I7801e44c4d3da30bda61e0c1710a2f52de6215f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/295414
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The comparable interface is introduced on the dev.typeparams branch.
Filter it out from gopls completion results so that it doesn't break
tests on the dev.typeparams branch.
Change-Id: Iba22c0980c09e99b454ce9e22813cc3a1f94a90c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/293931
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
We haven't been able to reproduce this scenario, but it may be possible
when the user is in a broken state. Avoid panicking by gating every
use of obj.Pkg() with nil checks.
Fixesgolang/go#44300
Change-Id: Ia0c56a7fd5d6b89795dded1efdf05838f3de8209
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/292671
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
It makes more sense to handle the import shortcut behavior at a higher
level anyway, so pull it out of findIdentifier and add a test for the
configuration.
Fixesgolang/go#44189
Change-Id: I96f08c7def154f6761efa727d693fdfb2fb722ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/290789
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
We currently write directly to go.mod/sum via the go command, expecting
that editors will pick up the changes. While that's true for VS Code,
vim doesn't necessarily reload unchanged buffers. Change to send
explicit edits instead, but only if the file is open. Behavior when
using Go versions that don't support -modfile is unchanged.
Fixesgolang/go#44035.
Change-Id: Ie4e5cf60673b860f5dfcbdb726bee0efe6aae405
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/290189
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Add the ListKnownPackages and AddImport methods to command.Interface and
regenerate bindings. Add empty implementations to lsp.commandHandler.
These are our first commands returning results. I'll update our docgen
to support result in a subsequent CL.
Change-Id: Ic3b7c0d9383ac8f3e1cb546a71e9c496a92a7840
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/291129
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
When go.sum updates are needed in experimental workspace module mode, we
don't necessarily know which module needs the correction. As a fix,
apply all of these fixes to each module in the multi-module workspace.
The "add dependency" quick fix also seems to be broken, but I'll fix
that in a separate CL.
Fixesgolang/go#44097
Change-Id: Id4a6013f2aceb6b902dff3118b027f6cb99eb3c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289772
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Update our docgen to include documentation for commands. This is done in
an ad-hoc manner. We'll probably need to iterate on this as we go.
For golang/go#40438
Change-Id: I0a6922aa2f5e7dc4c8a43e0f843ddb54971cbe44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/290190
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Fully switch to the new generated command API, and remove the old
dynamic command configuration.
This involved several steps:
+ Switch the command dispatch in internal/lsp/command.go to go through
the command package. This means that all commands must now use the new
signature.
+ Update commandHandler to use the new command signatures.
+ Fix some errors discovered in the command interface now that we're
actually using it.
+ Regenerate bindings.
+ Update all code lens and suggested fixes to new the new command
constructors.
+ Generate values in the command package to hold command names and the
full set of commands, so that they may be referenced by name.
+ Update any references to command names to use the command package.
+ Delete command metadata from the source package. Rename command.go to
fix.go.
+ Update lsp tests to execute commands directly rather than use an
internal API. This involved a bit of hackery to collect the edits.
+ Update document generation to use command metadata. Documenting the
arguments is left to a later CL.
+ Various small fixes related to the above.
This change is intended to be invisible to users. We have changed the
command signatures, but have not (previously) committed to backwards
compatibility for commands. Notably, the gopls.test and gopls.gc_details
signatures are preserved, as these are the two cases where we are aware
of LSP clients calling them directly, not from a code lens or
diagnostic.
For golang/go#40438
Change-Id: Ie1b92c95d6ce7e2fc25fc029d1f85b942f40e851
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/290111
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
appliesFn and suggestedFixFn were blocking eliminating the
source.Command dynamic configuration. Remove them, and along the way
refactor command dispatch to align better with the new
internal/lsp/command package.
This involved refactoring the internal/lsp/command.go as follows:
- create a new commandHandler type, which will eventually implement
command.Interface.
- create a commandDeps struct to hold command dependencies.
- move command functionality into methods on commandHandler.
Of these, there are likely to be at least a couple points of controvery:
I decided to store the ctx on the commandHandler, because I preferred it
to threading a context through command.Interface when it isn't needed.
We should revisit this in a later CL.
I opted for a sparse commandDeps struct, rather than either explicit
resolution of dependencies where necessary, or something more abstract
like a proper dependency resolution pattern. It saved enough boilerplate
that I deemed it worthwhile, but didn't want to commit to something more
sophisticated.
Actually switching to the internal/lsp/command package will happen in a
later CL.
Change-Id: I71502fc68f51f1b296bc529ee2885f7547145e92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289970
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
For stability and to ease navigation, sort commands alphabetically.
This will simplify the diff in later CLs, where command discovery is
refactored.
Change-Id: I346cbc2162b1b4dbac16572a653c4169b93cc0f3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/290390
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For index expressions, optional "make" args, and composite literal
slice/array keys, we were inferring an expected type of int instead of
untyped int. This caused candidate rankings to not be quite right in
general, and in particular, after support for automatic type
conversions was added, the issue manifested as:
var foo []int
var bar int32
foo[ba<>] // completed to "int(bar)" instead of "bar"
Fixesgolang/go#43375.
Change-Id: I6daef7d23b767f296bdbbc8f47f5b2c972ad9b80
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289272
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
In cases like:
type foo struct { a int; b float64 }
foo{b<>}
We were completing to "foo{int(b: <float64>)}" (the problem being the
nonsensical int() conversion).
The expected type at "<>" is int to allow completions to match "a".
When we pass the *types.Var representing "b" through the candidate
matching machinery, we say "Oh, a float64! I can convert that to my
expected type of int!".
Fix by bailing out of candidate matching early if the candidate is a
composite literal struct field name. Field names aren't really objects
you can do anything to.
Fixesgolang/go#43789.
Change-Id: Ie4dab166973dfcdcb519f864532ead1f792d25a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289130
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
In cases like:
foo<> == 100
We weren't preferring floats at <>. Fix the basic type comparison
logic to know that an untyped int is always compatible with a float.
Fixesgolang/go#44066.
Change-Id: I9cf9bac1632178db100c0a5447351be208b4a2af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/289129
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Collapse Diagnostic.Kind, Source, and Category into just Source. Remove
code that converted from Diagnostic to Diagnostic. Notes on the changes
I had to make along the way:
- We used to use Kind to determine Severity. Set Severity when the
Diagnostic is created instead.
- Use constants for Source as much as possible -- we still need to use
Analyzer.Name for analysis diagnostics. It would be nice to break that
dependency so that Source was totally opaque, but that's a separate
issue.
- Introduce a new Source for gc_details, "optimizer details". It was "go
compiler" previously.
- Some of the assignments are a little arbitrary. Is inconsistent
vendoring really a "go list" error?
- GetTypeCheckDiagnostics had code to cope with diagnostics that had no
URI associated with them. We now spread such diagnostics to all files
when they are generated.
- Analyze modifies Diagnostics by adding a Tag to them. That means it
has to own them, so I had it clone them. I would like to push that logic
down to the diagnostics, per the TODO, but that's another CL.
And some observations:
- It's obviously tempting to combine DiagnosticSource and
diagnosticSource, but they mean very different things. I'm open to a
better name for one or the other.
Change-Id: If2e861d6fe16bfd2e5ba216cf7e29cf338d0fd25
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/288215
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
source.Error and source.Diagnostic are almost identical types, used
arbitrarily in different parts of the code. This CL is the first step in
cleaning up that redundancy: it deletes the source.Error type.
To do that, I added the fields from source.Error to source.Diagnostic,
and made absolutely no other semantic code changes -- I just renamed
things that were named Error to Diagnostic. With only aesthetic concerns
in play, I hope this CL will be easy to review. The next CL will clean
up all the stupid-looking code that converts a Diagnostic to a
Diagnostic, etc.
Change-Id: I1298cc8144c686b8a37fc2cc106930105e511353
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/288214
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The Typescript source is still at version 3.16, but there are new
requests, more detailed client capabilities, and an attempt to be
more specific about ranges of number in the Typescript code.
Vscode defines types integer and uinteger (32-bit signed and unsigned),
so the Go code now uses int32 and uint32.
They've changed the use of TextDocument, so version information is sometimes
missing. cache/session.go:625 was changed correspondingly.
This CL also make CodeAction.Disabled into a pointer.
New requests or notifications:
DidCreateFiles, DidRenameFiles, DidDeleteFiles (notifications)
ShowDocument, WillCreateFiles,WillRenameFiles, WillDeleteFiles (request)
It's a lot of code; I've probably missed something.
Change-Id: I8449ad8473ac00947d0344c5f6133f9bd73b9e10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/286192
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Using structured errors in gopls has proven to be difficult to manage:
it's hard to know whether a given error return is expected to be
structured without any type information. We have mostly eliminated
them; finish the job.
I don't intend any semantic changes here.
I considered eliminating CriticalError altogether, but it does seem
useful to have a convenient bundle for return values. So I left it
alone for now.
Change-Id: I4b5f85a8de9712babffbc1383088151b596bd815
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/287792
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now that workspace module mode generates a combined go.sum there are
relatively few blockers to enabling -mod=readonly. Fix them and do it.
This CL is a bit of a grab bag, but the fixes are relatively separate. I
can split it into multiple CLs if desired.
- If module A depends on module B at v1.0.0, the go command will want to
upgrade the workspace module from v0.0.0-goplsworkspace to v1.0.0. To
prevent that, use vN.999999.0 as the base pseudoversion, adjusting v0 to
v1 where appropriate. A few test cases needed updating as a result.
- For old Go versions, sort the generated workspace module and
synthesize a go statement from the maximum go version declared in the
workspace.
- Some regtests need go.sum files created.
- matchErrorToModule created incorrect quick fixes: it would try to
download the top-level module mentioned in the error message, not the
one that actually caused the problem. Now it issues quick fixes for the
lowest-level module.
- TestMultiModuleModDiagnostics accidentally included the same module
in the workspace twice. Fix it, and make that an error.
Fixesgolang/go#43346.
Change-Id: I605f762a4d23bedd914241525e64c1b3ecc42150
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/287032
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In CL 271297, I disabled the constantly-running upgrade check, which
removed the upgrade commands for individual dependencies. This seems to
have been a relatively popular feature. Re-introduce it, but requiring
explicit user interaction.
We now run an upgrade check when the user clicks "Check for upgrades".
Those results are stored on the View and used to show diagnostics on
any requires they apply to. Right now we only check the go.mod the user
has open; in multi-module workspaces it might make sense to check all of
them, but I'm not sure.
Fixesgolang/go#42969.
Change-Id: I65205dc99a4fa9daafdb83145b0294b6f3be5336
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/286474
Trust: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Field embedding links two objects (a TypeName and a Var) by name,
requiring special handling during renaming. In CL 282932, renaming of
types was made to propagate to uses of their embeddings. However, no
such propagation in the reverse direction was added, meaning that
renaming an embedded field would not rename the corresponding type, and
code could still be left in a non-compiling state.
It should be an invariant that renaming does not change program
behavior. To enforce with field embeddings this we'd need to also rename
the corresponding type, but this seems problematic. If I'm hovering over
the field selector x.T, and rename T, it is surprising that this would
end up renaming a type.
For lack of a better solution, make it an error to rename embedded
fields, but try to provide a helpful error message.
Also handle the blank identifier, for which renaming was giving a
message to "please file a bug".
Marker tests are added for the new errors in rename, but not for
prepareRename. The prepareRename tests were not set up for asserting on
errors -- perhaps that would be a good project for a later CL where we
clean up errors.
Fixesgolang/go#43616
Change-Id: I66c2dd5e531dd102431d1edd443d553687d9ca7e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/284312
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When renaming a type name, also rename indirect uses of the name as an
embedded field. This is conservatively isolated to just renames for now;
it's not clear to me that users would also want to see uses of embedded
fields as references.
Fixesgolang/go#43616
Change-Id: I41913d037fedb8c27a448cd922eeaf11a02d01f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/282932
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Shoshin Nikita
Muir Manders
Rebecca Stambler
Rob Findley
Marwan Sulaiman
Heschi Kreinick
Matheus Alcantara
Ainar Garipov
Hana
pjw