Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Cuong Manh Le ee833ed72e sync: use atomic.Uint64 for WaitGroup state
So it's guaranteed to have 64-bit alignment, simplify the code without
losing any performance:

name                     old time/op    new time/op    delta
WaitGroupUncontended-8     3.84ns ± 2%    3.82ns ± 1%   ~     (p=0.159 n=10+10)
WaitGroupAddDone-8         33.2ns ± 3%    33.0ns ± 3%   ~     (p=0.564 n=9+10)
WaitGroupAddDoneWork-8     39.3ns ± 1%    39.3ns ± 1%   ~     (p=1.000 n=8+9)
WaitGroupWait-8            0.70ns ± 3%    0.70ns ± 2%   ~     (p=0.720 n=9+10)
WaitGroupWaitWork-8        7.93ns ± 1%    7.99ns ± 3%   ~     (p=0.271 n=10+10)
WaitGroupActuallyWait-8     135ns ± 2%     135ns ± 1%   ~     (p=0.897 n=10+10)

Change-Id: I446b53fa92873419aadd592f45e51398f8ad8652
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/424835
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
2022-08-19 01:34:22 +00:00
Russ Cox a71ca3dfbd runtime, sync, sync/atomic: document happens-before guarantees
A few of these are copied from the memory model doc.
Many are entirely new, following discussion on #47141.
See https://research.swtch.com/gomm for background.

The rule we are establishing is that each type that is meant
to help synchronize a Go program should document its
happens-before guarantees.

For #50859.

Change-Id: I947c40639b263abe67499fa74f68711a97873a39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381316
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
2022-06-06 20:48:03 +00:00
Carlo Alberto Ferraris ad7db1f90f sync: avoid a dynamic check in WaitGroup on 64-bit architectures
uint64 is guaranteed by the compiler to be aligned on 64-bit archs.
By using uint64+uint32 instead of [3]uint32 we can make use of the
guaranteed alignment to avoid the run-time alignment check.

On linux/amd64:

name                     old time/op    new time/op    delta
WaitGroupUncontended-4     8.84ns ± 3%    7.62ns ± 4%  -13.72%  (p=0.000 n=17+18)
WaitGroupAddDone-4         66.8ns ± 3%    45.9ns ± 2%  -31.31%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
WaitGroupAddDoneWork-4     79.2ns ± 1%    56.6ns ± 1%  -28.54%  (p=0.000 n=17+20)
WaitGroupWait-4            2.83ns ± 2%    2.58ns ± 2%   -9.05%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
WaitGroupWaitWork-4        16.8ns ± 6%    16.5ns ± 6%     ~     (p=0.072 n=20+18)
WaitGroupActuallyWait-4     263ns ± 2%     261ns ± 5%     ~     (p=0.063 n=18+20)

Change-Id: I314340f2ed8a47d8b9c15f8a3b07e41f252f4831
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/189837
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
2021-10-19 18:21:38 +00:00
Carlo Alberto Ferraris 4c3f26076b sync: allow inlining the Mutex.Unlock fast path
Make use of the newly-enabled limited midstack inlining.
Similar changes will be done in followup CLs.

name                    old time/op  new time/op  delta
MutexUncontended        19.3ns ± 1%  18.9ns ± 0%   -1.92%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
MutexUncontended-4      5.24ns ± 0%  4.75ns ± 1%   -9.25%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
MutexUncontended-16     2.10ns ± 0%  2.05ns ± 0%   -2.38%  (p=0.000 n=15+19)
Mutex                   19.6ns ± 0%  19.3ns ± 1%   -1.92%  (p=0.000 n=20+17)
Mutex-4                 54.6ns ± 5%  52.4ns ± 4%   -4.09%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Mutex-16                 133ns ± 5%   139ns ± 2%   +4.23%  (p=0.000 n=20+16)
MutexSlack              33.4ns ± 2%  18.9ns ± 1%  -43.56%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MutexSlack-4             206ns ± 5%   225ns ± 8%   +9.12%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
MutexSlack-16           89.4ns ± 1%  98.4ns ± 1%  +10.10%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
MutexWork               60.5ns ± 0%  58.2ns ± 3%   -3.75%  (p=0.000 n=12+20)
MutexWork-4              105ns ± 5%   103ns ± 7%   -1.68%  (p=0.007 n=20+20)
MutexWork-16             157ns ± 1%   163ns ± 2%   +3.90%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
MutexWorkSlack          70.2ns ± 5%  57.7ns ± 1%  -17.81%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
MutexWorkSlack-4         277ns ±13%   276ns ±13%     ~     (p=0.682 n=20+19)
MutexWorkSlack-16        156ns ± 0%   147ns ± 0%   -5.62%  (p=0.000 n=16+14)
MutexNoSpin              966ns ± 0%   968ns ± 0%   +0.11%  (p=0.029 n=15+20)
MutexNoSpin-4            269ns ± 4%   270ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.807 n=20+19)
MutexNoSpin-16           122ns ± 0%   120ns ± 4%   -1.63%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
MutexSpin               3.13µs ± 0%  3.13µs ± 1%   +0.16%  (p=0.004 n=18+20)
MutexSpin-4              826ns ± 1%   832ns ± 2%   +0.74%  (p=0.000 n=19+16)
MutexSpin-16             397ns ± 1%   395ns ± 0%   -0.50%  (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RWMutexUncontended      71.4ns ± 0%  69.5ns ± 0%   -2.72%  (p=0.000 n=16+20)
RWMutexUncontended-4    18.4ns ± 4%  17.5ns ± 0%   -4.92%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RWMutexUncontended-16   8.01ns ± 0%  7.92ns ± 0%   -1.15%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
RWMutexWrite100         24.9ns ± 0%  24.9ns ± 1%     ~     (p=0.099 n=19+20)
RWMutexWrite100-4       46.5ns ± 3%  46.2ns ± 4%     ~     (p=0.253 n=17+19)
RWMutexWrite100-16      68.9ns ± 3%  69.9ns ± 5%   +1.46%  (p=0.012 n=18+20)
RWMutexWrite10          27.1ns ± 0%  27.0ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.128 n=17+20)
RWMutexWrite10-4        34.8ns ± 1%  34.7ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.180 n=20+18)
RWMutexWrite10-16       37.5ns ± 2%  37.2ns ± 4%   -0.89%  (p=0.023 n=20+20)
RWMutexWorkWrite100      164ns ± 0%   164ns ± 0%     ~     (p=0.106 n=12+20)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-4    186ns ± 3%   193ns ± 3%   +3.46%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-16   204ns ± 2%   210ns ± 3%   +2.96%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
RWMutexWorkWrite10       153ns ± 0%   153ns ± 0%   -0.20%  (p=0.017 n=20+19)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-4     179ns ± 1%   178ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.215 n=19+20)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-16    191ns ± 1%   192ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.166 n=15+19)

linux/amd64 bin/go 14630572 (previous commit 14605947, +24625/+0.17%)

Change-Id: I3f9d1765801fe0b8deb1bc2728b8bba8a7508e23
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/148958
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2019-03-05 14:59:31 +00:00
Diogo Pinela 9ff7df003d sync: make WaitGroup more space-efficient
The struct stores its 64-bit state field in a 12-byte array to
ensure that it can be 64-bit-aligned. This leaves 4 spare bytes,
which we can reuse to store the sema field.

(32-bit alignment is still guaranteed because the array type was
changed to [3]uint32.)

Fixes #19149.

Change-Id: I9bc20e69e45e0e07fbf496080f3650e8be0d6e8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/100515
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2018-03-15 09:56:25 +00:00
Daniel Martí fbc8973a6b all: join some chained ifs to unindent code
Found with mvdan.cc/unindent. It skipped the cases where parentheses
would need to be added, where comments would have to be moved elsewhere,
or where actions and simple logic would mix.

One of them was of the form "err != nil && err == io.EOF", so the first
part was removed.

Change-Id: Ie504c2b03a2c87d10ecbca1b9270069be1171b91
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/57690
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
2017-08-29 20:57:41 +00:00
Alberto Donizetti 4b4bb53bf3 sync: make clear that WaitGroup.Done decrements by one
Change-Id: Ief076151739147378f8ca35cd09aabb59c3c9a52
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46350
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2017-06-21 15:49:18 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov 0556e26273 sync: make Mutex more fair
Add new starvation mode for Mutex.
In starvation mode ownership is directly handed off from
unlocking goroutine to the next waiter. New arriving goroutines
don't compete for ownership.
Unfair wait time is now limited to 1ms.
Also fix a long standing bug that goroutines were requeued
at the tail of the wait queue. That lead to even more unfair
acquisition times with multiple waiters.

Performance of normal mode is not considerably affected.

Fixes #13086

On the provided in the issue lockskew program:

done in 1.207853ms
done in 1.177451ms
done in 1.184168ms
done in 1.198633ms
done in 1.185797ms
done in 1.182502ms
done in 1.316485ms
done in 1.211611ms
done in 1.182418ms

name                    old time/op  new time/op   delta
MutexUncontended-48     0.65ns ± 0%   0.65ns ± 1%     ~           (p=0.087 n=10+10)
Mutex-48                 112ns ± 1%    114ns ± 1%   +1.69%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexSlack-48            113ns ± 0%     87ns ± 1%  -22.65%         (p=0.000 n=8+10)
MutexWork-48             149ns ± 0%    145ns ± 0%   -2.48%         (p=0.000 n=9+10)
MutexWorkSlack-48        149ns ± 0%    122ns ± 3%  -18.26%         (p=0.000 n=6+10)
MutexNoSpin-48           103ns ± 4%    105ns ± 3%     ~           (p=0.089 n=10+10)
MutexSpin-48             490ns ± 4%    515ns ± 6%   +5.08%        (p=0.006 n=10+10)
Cond32-48               13.4µs ± 6%   13.1µs ± 5%   -2.75%        (p=0.023 n=10+10)
RWMutexWrite100-48      53.2ns ± 3%   41.2ns ± 3%  -22.57%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RWMutexWrite10-48       45.9ns ± 2%   43.9ns ± 2%   -4.38%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-48   122ns ± 2%    134ns ± 1%   +9.92%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-48    206ns ± 1%    188ns ± 1%   -8.52%         (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Cond32-24               12.1µs ± 3%   12.4µs ± 3%   +1.98%         (p=0.043 n=10+9)
MutexUncontended-24     0.74ns ± 1%   0.75ns ± 1%     ~           (p=0.650 n=10+10)
Mutex-24                 122ns ± 2%    124ns ± 1%   +1.31%        (p=0.007 n=10+10)
MutexSlack-24           96.9ns ± 2%  102.8ns ± 2%   +6.11%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexWork-24             146ns ± 1%    135ns ± 2%   -7.70%         (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MutexWorkSlack-24        135ns ± 1%    128ns ± 2%   -5.01%         (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MutexNoSpin-24           114ns ± 3%    110ns ± 4%   -3.84%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexSpin-24             482ns ± 4%    475ns ± 8%     ~           (p=0.286 n=10+10)
RWMutexWrite100-24      43.0ns ± 3%   43.1ns ± 2%     ~           (p=0.956 n=10+10)
RWMutexWrite10-24       43.4ns ± 1%   43.2ns ± 1%     ~            (p=0.085 n=10+9)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-24   130ns ± 3%    131ns ± 3%     ~           (p=0.747 n=10+10)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-24    191ns ± 1%    192ns ± 1%     ~           (p=0.210 n=10+10)
Cond32-12               11.5µs ± 2%   11.7µs ± 2%   +1.98%        (p=0.002 n=10+10)
MutexUncontended-12     1.48ns ± 0%   1.50ns ± 1%   +1.08%        (p=0.004 n=10+10)
Mutex-12                 141ns ± 1%    143ns ± 1%   +1.63%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexSlack-12            121ns ± 0%    119ns ± 0%   -1.65%          (p=0.001 n=8+9)
MutexWork-12             141ns ± 2%    150ns ± 3%   +6.36%         (p=0.000 n=9+10)
MutexWorkSlack-12        131ns ± 0%    138ns ± 0%   +5.73%         (p=0.000 n=9+10)
MutexNoSpin-12          87.0ns ± 1%   83.7ns ± 1%   -3.80%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexSpin-12             364ns ± 1%    377ns ± 1%   +3.77%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RWMutexWrite100-12      42.8ns ± 1%   43.9ns ± 1%   +2.41%         (p=0.000 n=8+10)
RWMutexWrite10-12       39.8ns ± 4%   39.3ns ± 1%     ~            (p=0.433 n=10+9)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-12   131ns ± 1%    131ns ± 0%     ~            (p=0.591 n=10+9)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-12    173ns ± 1%    174ns ± 0%     ~            (p=0.059 n=10+8)
Cond32-6                10.9µs ± 2%   10.9µs ± 2%     ~           (p=0.739 n=10+10)
MutexUncontended-6      2.97ns ± 0%   2.97ns ± 0%     ~     (all samples are equal)
Mutex-6                  122ns ± 6%    122ns ± 2%     ~           (p=0.668 n=10+10)
MutexSlack-6             149ns ± 3%    142ns ± 3%   -4.63%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexWork-6              136ns ± 3%    140ns ± 5%     ~           (p=0.077 n=10+10)
MutexWorkSlack-6         152ns ± 0%    138ns ± 2%   -9.21%         (p=0.000 n=6+10)
MutexNoSpin-6            150ns ± 1%    152ns ± 0%   +1.50%         (p=0.000 n=8+10)
MutexSpin-6              726ns ± 0%    730ns ± 1%     ~           (p=0.069 n=10+10)
RWMutexWrite100-6       40.6ns ± 1%   40.9ns ± 1%   +0.91%         (p=0.001 n=8+10)
RWMutexWrite10-6        37.1ns ± 0%   37.0ns ± 1%     ~            (p=0.386 n=9+10)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-6    133ns ± 1%    134ns ± 1%   +1.01%         (p=0.005 n=9+10)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-6     152ns ± 0%    152ns ± 0%     ~     (all samples are equal)
Cond32-2                7.86µs ± 2%   7.95µs ± 2%   +1.10%        (p=0.023 n=10+10)
MutexUncontended-2      8.10ns ± 0%   9.11ns ± 4%  +12.44%         (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Mutex-2                 32.9ns ± 9%   38.4ns ± 6%  +16.58%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexSlack-2            93.4ns ± 1%   98.5ns ± 2%   +5.39%         (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MutexWork-2             40.8ns ± 3%   43.8ns ± 7%   +7.38%         (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MutexWorkSlack-2        98.6ns ± 5%  108.2ns ± 2%   +9.80%         (p=0.000 n=10+8)
MutexNoSpin-2            399ns ± 1%    398ns ± 2%     ~             (p=0.463 n=8+9)
MutexSpin-2             1.99µs ± 3%   1.97µs ± 1%   -0.81%          (p=0.003 n=9+8)
RWMutexWrite100-2       37.6ns ± 5%   46.0ns ± 4%  +22.17%         (p=0.000 n=10+8)
RWMutexWrite10-2        50.1ns ± 6%   36.8ns ±12%  -26.46%         (p=0.000 n=9+10)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-2    136ns ± 0%    134ns ± 2%   -1.80%          (p=0.001 n=7+9)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-2     140ns ± 1%    138ns ± 1%   -1.50%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Cond32                  5.93µs ± 1%   5.91µs ± 0%     ~            (p=0.411 n=9+10)
MutexUncontended        15.9ns ± 0%   15.8ns ± 0%   -0.63%          (p=0.000 n=8+8)
Mutex                   15.9ns ± 0%   15.8ns ± 0%   -0.44%        (p=0.003 n=10+10)
MutexSlack              26.9ns ± 3%   26.7ns ± 2%     ~           (p=0.084 n=10+10)
MutexWork               47.8ns ± 0%   47.9ns ± 0%   +0.21%          (p=0.014 n=9+8)
MutexWorkSlack          54.9ns ± 3%   54.5ns ± 3%     ~           (p=0.254 n=10+10)
MutexNoSpin              786ns ± 2%    765ns ± 1%   -2.66%        (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MutexSpin               3.87µs ± 1%   3.83µs ± 0%   -0.85%          (p=0.005 n=9+8)
RWMutexWrite100         21.2ns ± 2%   21.0ns ± 1%   -0.88%         (p=0.018 n=10+9)
RWMutexWrite10          22.6ns ± 1%   22.6ns ± 0%     ~             (p=0.471 n=9+9)
RWMutexWorkWrite100      132ns ± 0%    132ns ± 0%     ~     (all samples are equal)
RWMutexWorkWrite10       124ns ± 0%    123ns ± 0%     ~           (p=0.656 n=10+10)

Change-Id: I66412a3a0980df1233ad7a5a0cd9723b4274528b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34310
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2017-02-17 17:24:59 +00:00
Aliaksandr Valialkin c81a3532fe cmd/vet: check sync.* types' copying
Embed noLock struct into the following types, so `go vet -copylocks` catches
their copying additionally to types containing sync.Mutex:
  - sync.Cond
  - sync.WaitGroup
  - sync.Pool
  - atomic.Value

Fixes #14582

Change-Id: Icb543ef5ad10524ad239a15eec8a9b334b0e0660
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22015
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-05-06 16:43:51 +00:00
Brad Fitzpatrick 5fea2ccc77 all: single space after period.
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.

This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:

$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.)  +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.)  +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update

Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-03-02 00:13:47 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov 7b767f4e52 internal/race: add package
Factor out duplicated race thunks from sync, syscall net
and fmt packages into a separate package and use it.

Fixes #8593

Change-Id: I156869c50946277809f6b509463752e7f7d28cdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14870
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2015-11-26 16:50:31 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov 03a48ebe1c sync: simplify WaitGroup
A comment in waitgroup.go describes the following scenario
as the reason to have dynamically created semaphores:

// G1: Add(1)
// G1: go G2()
// G1: Wait() // Context switch after Unlock() and before Semacquire().
// G2: Done() // Release semaphore: sema == 1, waiters == 0. G1 doesn't run yet.
// G3: Wait() // Finds counter == 0, waiters == 0, doesn't block.
// G3: Add(1) // Makes counter == 1, waiters == 0.
// G3: go G4()
// G3: Wait() // G1 still hasn't run, G3 finds sema == 1, unblocked! Bug.

However, the scenario is incorrect:
G3: Add(1) happens concurrently with G1: Wait(),
and so there is no reasonable behavior of the program
(G1: Wait() may or may not wait for G3: Add(1) which
can't be the intended behavior).

With this conclusion we can:
1. Remove dynamic allocation of semaphores.
2. Remove the mutex entirely and instead pack counter and waiters
   into single uint64.

This makes the logic significantly simpler, both Add and Wait
do only a single atomic RMW to update the state.

benchmark                            old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkWaitGroupUncontended        30.6          32.7          +6.86%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait       722           595           -17.59%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait-2     396           319           -19.44%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait-4     224           183           -18.30%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait-8     134           106           -20.90%

benchmark                          old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait     2              1              -50.00%

benchmark                          old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait     48            16            -66.67%

Change-Id: I28911f3243aa16544e99ac8f1f5af31944c7ea3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4117
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-06-26 18:48:29 +00:00
Russ Cox c007ce824d build: move package sources from src/pkg to src
Preparation was in CL 134570043.
This CL contains only the effect of 'hg mv src/pkg/* src'.
For more about the move, see golang.org/s/go14nopkg.
2014-09-08 00:08:51 -04:00