CL 622236 forgot to check the mask was also a 32 bit rotate mask. Add
a modified version of isPPC64WordRotateMask which valids the mask is
contiguous and fits inside a uint32.
I don't this is possible when merging SRDconst, the first check should
always reject such combines. But, be extra careful and do it there
too.
Fixes#74098
Change-Id: Ie95f74ec5e7d89dc761511126db814f886a7a435
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/679775
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jayanth Krishnamurthy <jayanth.krishnamurthy@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/680835
On these platforms, we set up a frame pointer record below
the current stack pointer, so when we're in duffcopy or duffzero,
we get a reasonable traceback. See #73753.
But because this frame pointer record is below SP, it is vulnerable.
Anything that adds a new stack frame to the stack might clobber it.
Which actually happens in #73748 on amd64. I have not yet come across
a repro on arm64, but might as well be safe here.
The only real situation this could happen is when duffzero or duffcopy
is passed a nil pointer. So we can just avoid the problem by doing the
nil check outside duffzero/duffcopy. That way we never add a frame
below duffzero/duffcopy. (Most other ways to get a new frame below the
current one, like async preempt or debugger-generated calls, don't
apply to duffzero/duffcopy because they are runtime functions; we're
not allowed to preempt there.)
Longer term, we should stop putting stuff below SP. #73753 will
include that as part of its remit. But that's not for 1.25, so we'll
do the simple thing for 1.25 for this issue.
Fixes#73908
Change-Id: I913c49ee46dcaee8fb439415a4531f7b59d0f612
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/676916
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit dbaa2d3e65)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/677095
this does result in a little bit more inlining,
cmd/compile text is 0.5% larger,
bent-benchmark text geomeans grow by only 0.02%.
some of our tests make assumptions about inlining.
Fixes: #73440.
Change-Id: I999d1798aca5dc64a1928bd434258a61e702951a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655157
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/666555
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Currently, if the user stops the timer in a B.Loop benchmark loop, the
benchmark will run until it hits the timeout and fails.
Fix this by detecting that the timer is stopped and failing the
benchmark right away. We avoid making the fast path more expensive for
this check by "poisoning" the B.Loop iteration counter when the timer
is stopped so that it falls back to the slow path, which can check the
timer.
This causes b to escape from B.Loop, which is totally harmless because
it was already definitely heap-allocated. But it causes the
test/inline_testingbloop.go errorcheck test to fail. I don't think the
escape messages actually mattered to that test, they just had to be
matched. To fix this, we drop the debug level to -m=1, since -m=2
prints a lot of extra information for escaping parameters that we
don't want to deal with, and change one error check to allow b to
escape.
Fixes#72974.
Change-Id: I7d4abbb1ec1e096685514536f91ba0d581cca6b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/659657
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/660558
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Look at the inlining stack of positions for a call site,
if the line/col/file of the call site appears in that
stack, do not inline. This subsumes all the other
recently-added recursive inlining checks, but they are
left in to make this easier+safer to backport.
Fixes#72822
Change-Id: I0f487bb0d4c514015907c649312672b7be464abd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/655155
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit cad4dca518)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/657075
CL 629195 strongly favor closure inlining, allowing closures to be
inlined more aggressively.
However, if the closure body contains a call to a function, which itself
is one of the call arguments, it causes the infinite inlining.
Fixing this by prevent this kind of functions from being inlinable.
Fixes#72067
Change-Id: I5fb5723a819b1e2c5aadb57c1023ec84ca9fa53c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/654195
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/654517
Commit-Queue: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorropo <jorropo.pgm@gmail.com>
This could lead to manufacturing a pointer that points outside
its original allocation.
Bug was introduced in CL 629858.
Fixes#71938
Change-Id: Ia86ab0b65ce5f80a8e0f4f4c81babd07c5904f8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652078
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8b8bff7bb2)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652855
Before this CL, we could use the same register for both a temporary
register and for moving a value in the output register out of the way.
Fixes#71904
Change-Id: Iefbfd9d4139136174570d8aadf8a0fb391791ea9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651221
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit cc16fb52e6)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/652178
The existing code for recover from deferrangefunc was broken in
several ways.
1. the code following a deferrangefunc call did not check the return
value for an out-of-band value indicating "return now" (i.e., recover
was called)
2. the returned value was delivered using a bespoke ABI that happened
to match on register-ABI platforms, but not on older stack-based
ABI.
3. the returned value was the wrong width (1 word versus 2) and
type/value(integer 1, not a pointer to anything) for deferrangefunc's
any-typed return value (in practice, the OOB value check could catch
this, but still, it's sketchy).
This -- using the deferreturn lookup method already in place for
open-coded defers -- turned out to be a much-less-ugly way of
obtaining the desired transfer of control for recover().
TODO: we also could do this for regular defer, and delete some code.
Fixes#71840
Change-Id: If7d7ea789ad4320821aab3b443759a7d71647ff0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/650476
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/651497
CL 630696 changes budget for once-called closures, making them more
inlinable. However, when recursive inlining involve both the closure and
its parent, the inliner goes into an infinite loop:
parent (a closure) -> closure -> parent -> ...
The problem here dues to the closure name mangling, causing the inlined
checking condition failed, since the closure name affects how the
linker symbol generated.
To fix this, just prevent the closure from inlining its parent into
itself, avoid the infinite inlining loop.
Fixes#71829
Change-Id: Ib27626d70f95e5f1c24a3eb1c8e6c3443b7d90c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/649656
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/650555
Prevent conversions between Pointer types,
like we do for sync/atomic.Pointer.
Fixes#71583
Change-Id: I20e83106d8a27996f221e6cd9d52637b0442cea4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/647195
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8163ea1458)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/647435
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
TryBot-Bypass: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
mapiterinit allows external linkname. These users must allocate their
own iter struct for initialization by mapiterinit. Since the type is
unexported, they also must define the struct themselves. As a result,
they of course define the struct matching the old hiter definition (in
map_noswiss.go).
The old definition is smaller on 32-bit platforms. On those platforms,
mapiternext will clobber memory outside of the caller's allocation.
On all platforms, the pointer layout between the old hiter and new
maps.Iter does not match. Thus the GC may miss pointers and free
reachable objects early, or it may see non-pointers that look like heap
pointers and throw due to invalid references to free objects.
To avoid these issues, we must keep mapiterinit and mapiternext with the
old hiter definition. The most straightforward way to do this is to use
mapiterinit and mapiternext as a compatibility layer between the old and
new iter types.
The first step to that is to move normal map use off of these functions,
which is what this CL does.
Introduce new mapIterStart and mapIterNext functions that replace the
former functions everywhere in the toolchain. These have the same
behavior as the old functions.
This CL temporarily makes the old functions throw to ensure we don't
have hidden dependencies on them. We cannot remove them entirely because
GOEXPERIMENT=noswissmap still uses the old names, and internal/goobj
requires all builtins to exist regardless of GOEXPERIMENT. The next CL
will introduce the compatibility layer.
I want to avoid using linkname between runtime and reflect, as that
would also allow external linknames. So mapIterStart and mapIterNext are
duplicated in reflect, which can be done trivially, as it imports
internal/runtime/maps.
For #71408.
Change-Id: I6a6a636c6d4bd1392618c67ca648d3f061afe669
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/643898
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Re-enable tests for stack-allocated maps and fast map accessors.
Those are implemented now.
Update #54766
Change-Id: I8c019702bd9fb077b2fe3f7c78e8e9e10d2263a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/642376
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We can't coalesce a non-WB store with a subsequent Move, as the
result of the store might be the source of the move.
There's a simple codegen test. Not sure how we might do a real test,
as all the repro's I've come up with are very expensive and unreliable.
Fixes#71228
Change-Id: If18bf181a266b9b90964e2591cd2e61a7168371c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/642197
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
OpenBSD is bumping up against the nosplit limit, and openbsd/ppc64
is over it. Increase StackGuardMultiplier on OpenBSD, matching AIX.
Change-Id: I61e17c99ce77e1fd3f368159dc4615aeae99e913
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/632996
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Theses tests were forgot because when CL 462298 was originally written
And & Or atomics were not available in go.
Git were smart enough to rebase over And's & Or's addition.
After most reviews and before merging it were pointed I should
make theses new intrinsics noescape.
When doing this last minute addition I forgot to add tests.
Change-Id: I457f98315c0aee91d5743058ab76f256856cb782
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/633416
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This should make it much more likely that rangefunc
iterators become "plain inline code".
Change-Id: I8026603afdc5249f60cc663c4bc15cb1d26d1c83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/630696
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Remove the OpLocalAddrs that are unnecessary in the CSE pass, so the
following passes like DSE and memcombine can do its work better.
Fixes#70300
Change-Id: I600025d49eeadb3ca4f092d614428399750f69bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/628075
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This came up in some swissmap code.
Change-Id: I3c6705a5cafec8cb4953dfa9535cf0b45255cc83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/629516
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
x - (y - c) == (x - y) + c, not (x - y) - c. Oops.
Fixes#70481
Change-Id: I0e54d8e65dd9843c6b92c543ac69d69ee21f617c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/630397
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Ciolek <jakub@ciolek.dev>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
testing.B.Loop now does its own loop scheduling without interaction with b.N.
b.N will be updated to the actual iterations b.Loop controls when b.Loop returns false.
This CL also added tests for fixed iteration count (benchtime=100x case).
This CL also ensured that b.Loop() is inlined.
For #61515
Change-Id: Ia15f4462f4830ef4ec51327520ff59910eb4bb58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/627755
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This intentionally gives up on the property of not computing the public
key until requested. It was nice, but it was making the code too
complex. The average use case is to call PublicKey immediately after
GenerateKey anyway.
Added support in the module for P-224, just in case we'd ever want to
support it in crypto/ecdh.
Tried various ways to fix test/fixedbugs/issue52193.go to be meaningful,
but crypto/ecdh is pretty complex and all the solutions would end up
locking in crypto/ecdh structure rather than compiler behavior. The rest
of that test is good enough on its own anyway. If we do the work in the
future of making crypto/ecdh zero-allocations using the affordances of
the compiler, we can add a more robust TestAllocations on our side.
For #69536
Change-Id: I68ac3955180cb31f6f96a0ef57604aaed88ab311
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/628315
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This tweaks the inlining cost knob for closures
specifically, they receive a doubled budget. The
rationale for this is that closures have a lot of
"crud" in their IR that will disappear after inlining,
so the standard budget penalizes them unnecessarily.
This is also the cause of these bugs -- looking at the
code involved, these closures "should" be inlineable,
therefore tweak the parameters until behavior matches
expectations. It's not costly in binary size, because
the only-called-from-one-site case is common (especially
for rangefunc iterators).
I can imagine better fixes and I am going to try to
get that done, but this one is small and makes things
better.
Fixes#69411, #69539.
Change-Id: I8a892c40323173a723799e0ddad69dcc2724a8f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/629195
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Following CLs will refactor Mutex and change the internals of Map. This
ends up breaking tests in x/tools for the copylock vet check, because
the error message changes. Let's insulate ourselves from such things
permanently by adding an explicit noCopy field. We'll update the vet
check to accept that as the problem, rather than depend on less explicit
internals.
We capture Once here too to clean up the error message as well.
Change-Id: Iead985fc8ec9ef3ea5ff615f26dde17bb03aeadb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/627777
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
This is a two-pronged approach. First, try to keep large objects
off the stack frame. Second, if they do manage to appear anyway,
use straight bitmasks instead of gc programs.
Generally probably a good idea to keep large objects out of stack frames.
But particularly keeping gc programs off the stack simplifies
runtime code a bit.
This CL sets the limit of most stack objects to 131072 bytes (on 64-bit archs).
There can still be large objects if allocated by a late pass, like order, or
they are required to be on the stack, like function arguments.
But the size for the bitmasks for these objects isn't a huge deal,
as we have already have (probably several) bitmasks for the frame
liveness map itself.
Change-Id: I6d2bed0e9aa9ac7499955562c6154f9264061359
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/542815
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Fixes#16241
I made 64 bits op on 32 bits arches still leak since it was kinda promised.
The promised leaks were wider than this but I don't belive it's effect can
be observed in an breaking maner without using unsafe the way it's currently
setup.
Change-Id: I66d8df47bfe49bce3efa64ac668a2a55f70733a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/462298
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Prefix keywords (type, default, case, etc.) with "keyword" in error
messages to make them less ambiguous.
Fixes#68589.
Change-Id: I1eb92d1382f621b934167b3a4c335045da26be9f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/623819
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
Fold constant int16 addends for usages of math/bits.Add64(x,const,0)
on PPC64. This usage shows up in a few crypto implementations;
notably the go wrapper for CL 626176.
Change-Id: I6963163330487d04e0479b4fdac235f97bb96889
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/625899
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For the loop body guarded by testing.B.Loop, we disable function inlining and devirtualization inside. The only legal form to be matched is `for b.Loop() {...}`.
For #61515
Change-Id: I2e226f08cb4614667cbded498a7821dffe3f72d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/612043
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Junyang Shao <shaojunyang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
As proposed on #66984, this CL allows more types to be used as
wasmimport/wasmexport function parameters and results.
Specifically, bool, string, and uintptr are now allowed, and also
pointer types that point to allowed element types. Allowed element
types includes sized integer and floating point types (including
small integer types like uint8 which are not directly allowed as
a parameter type), bool, array whose element type is allowed, and
struct whose fields are allowed element type and also include a
struct.HostLayout field.
For #66984.
Change-Id: Ie5452a1eda21c089780dfb4d4246de6008655c84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/626615
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
For the SubFromLen64 codegen test case to work as intended, we need
to fold c-(-(x-d)) into x+(c-d).
Still, some instances of LeadingZeros are not optimized into single
CLZ instructions right now (actually, the LeadingZeros micro-benchmarks
are currently still compiled with redundant adds/subs of 64, due to
interference of loop optimizations before lowering), but perf numbers
indicate it's not that bad after all.
Micro-benchmark results on Loongson 3A5000 and 3A6000:
goos: linux
goarch: loong64
pkg: math/bits
cpu: Loongson-3A5000 @ 2500.00MHz
| bench.old | bench.new |
| sec/op | sec/op vs base |
LeadingZeros 3.660n ± 0% 1.348n ± 0% -63.17% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros8 1.777n ± 0% 1.767n ± 0% -0.56% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros16 2.816n ± 0% 1.770n ± 0% -37.14% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros32 5.293n ± 1% 1.683n ± 0% -68.21% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros64 3.622n ± 0% 1.349n ± 0% -62.76% (p=0.000 n=20)
geomean 3.229n 1.571n -51.35%
goos: linux
goarch: loong64
pkg: math/bits
cpu: Loongson-3A6000 @ 2500.00MHz
| bench.old | bench.new |
| sec/op | sec/op vs base |
LeadingZeros 2.410n ± 0% 1.103n ± 1% -54.23% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros8 1.236n ± 0% 1.501n ± 0% +21.44% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros16 2.106n ± 0% 1.501n ± 0% -28.73% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros32 2.860n ± 0% 1.324n ± 0% -53.72% (p=0.000 n=20)
LeadingZeros64 2.6135n ± 0% 0.9509n ± 0% -63.62% (p=0.000 n=20)
geomean 2.159n 1.256n -41.81%
Updates #59120
This patch is a copy of CL 483356.
Co-authored-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name>
Change-Id: Iee81a17f7da06d77a427e73dfcc016f2b15ae556
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624575
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: abner chenc <chenguoqi@loongson.cn>
Fixes: #70156
Change-Id: I2e5dc2a39a8e54ec5f18c5f9d1644208cffb2e9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624695
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Fixes#70175
Change-Id: I13767d951455854b03ad6707ff9292cfe9097ee9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624377
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The compiler will stack allocate the Map struct and initial group if
possible.
Stack maps are initialized inline without calling into the runtime.
Small heap allocated maps use makemap_small.
These are the same heuristics as existing maps.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I6c371d1309716fd1c38a3212d417b3c76db5c9b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622042
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Add all the specialized variants that exist for the existing maps.
Like the existing maps, the fast variants do not support indirect
key/elem.
Note that as of this CL, the Get and Put methods on Map/table are
effectively dead. They are only reachable from the internal/runtime/maps
unit tests.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I95297750be6200f34ec483e4cfc897f048c26db7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616463
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
If there is a phi that is computing the minimum of its two inputs,
then we know the result of the phi is smaller than or equal to both
of its inputs. Similarly for maxiumum (although max seems less useful).
This pattern happens for the case
n := copy(a, b)
n is the minimum of len(a) and len(b), so with this optimization we
know both n <= len(a) and n <= len(b). That extra information is
helpful for subsequent slicing of a or b.
Fixes#16833
Change-Id: Ib4238fd1edae0f2940f62a5516a6b363bbe7928c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622240
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Test that a small Wasm program uses 8 MB of linear memory. This
reflects the current allocator. We test an exact value, but if the
allocator changes, we can update or relax this.
Updates #69018.
Change-Id: Ifc0bb420af008bd30cde4745b3efde3ce091b683
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622378
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
For #69635
Change-Id: Id5696dc9724c3b3afcd7b60a6994f98c5309eb0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/621755
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Change-Id: I03ba70076d6dd3c0b9624d14699b7dd91a3c0e9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/618476
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
CL 621357 introduced new generic lowering rules which caused
several shift related codegen test failures.
Add new rules to fix the test regressions, and cleanup tests
which are changed but not regressed. Some CLRLSLDI tests are
removed as they are no test CLRLSLDI rules.
Fixes#70003
Change-Id: I1ecc5a7e63ab709a4a0cebf11fa078d5cf164034
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622236
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>