Fix#63983
parseIndVar, prove and maybe more are on the assumption that the loop header
is a single block. This can be wrong, ensure we don't match theses cases we
don't know how to handle.
In the future we could update them so that they know how to handle such cases
but theses cases seems rare so I don't think the value would be really high.
We could also run a loop canonicalization pass first which could handle this.
The repro case looks weird because I massaged it so it would crash with the
previous compiler.
Change-Id: I4aa8afae9e90a17fa1085832250fc1139c97faa6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539977
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8b4e1259d0)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539936
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jorropo <jorropo.pgm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
For aggregate-typed arguments passed to a call, expandCalls
decomposed them into parts in the same block where the value
was created. This is not necessarily the call block, and in
the case where stores are involved, can change the memory
leaving that block, and getting that right is problematic.
Instead, do all the expanding in the same block as the call,
which avoids the problems of (1) not being able to reorder
loads/stores across a block boundary to conform to memory
order and (2) (incorrectly, not) exposing the new memory to
consumers in other blocks. Putting it all in the same block
as the call allows reordering, and the call creates its own
new memory (which is already dealt with correctly).
Fixes#62056.
Updates #61992.
Change-Id: Icc7918f0d2dd3c480cc7f496cdcd78edeca7f297
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/519276
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit e72ecc6a6b)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/520059
types2 have already errored about any spec-required overflows, and
division by zero. CL 469595 unintentionally fixed typecheck not to error
about overflows, but zero division is still be checked during tcArith.
This causes unsafe operations with variable size failed to compile,
instead of raising runtime error.
This CL also making change to typecheck.EvalConst, to stop evaluating
literal shifts or binary operators where {over,under}flows can happen.
For go1.21, typecheck.EvalConst is removed entirely, but that change is
too large to backport.
See discussion in CL 501735 for more details.
Fixes#60675
Change-Id: I7bea2821099556835c920713397f7c5d8a4025ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/501735
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/503855
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Use the type of the store for the byteswap, not the type of the
store's value argument.
Normally when we're storing a 16-bit value, the value being stored is
also typed as 16 bits. But sometimes it is typed as something smaller,
usually because it is the result of an upcast from a smaller value,
and that upcast needs no instructions.
If the type of the store's arg is thinner than the type being stored,
and the byteswap'd value uses that thinner type, and the byteswap'd
value needs to be spilled & restored, that spill/restore happens using
the thinner type, which causes us to lose some of the top bits of the
value.
Fixes#59374
Change-Id: If6ce1e8a76f18bf8e9d79871b6caa438bc3cce4d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481395
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit b3bc8620f8)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/483176
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Range statement will mutate the key and value, so we should treat them as reassigned.
Fixes#59580
Change-Id: I9c6b67d938760a0c6a1d9739f2737c67af4a3a10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/483855
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 89567a35c1)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/484136
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Unified IR already records the correct type for them.
Fixes#59450
Change-Id: I275c45b48f67bde55c8e2079d60b5868d0acde7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481555
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/482655
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Casting to a *uintptr is not ok if there isn't at least 8 bytes of
data backing that pointer (on 64-bit archs).
So although we end up making a slice of 0 length with that pointer,
the cast itself doesn't know that.
Instead, bail early if the result is going to be 0 length.
Fixes#59336
Change-Id: Id3c0e09d341d838835c0382cccfb0f71dc3dc7e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/480575
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 297cf6dd31bd99fc4ccda320aa3d4faf290ab278)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481238
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
unsafe.SliceData can return pointers which are nil. That function gets
lowered to the SSA OpSlicePtr, which the compiler assumes is non-nil.
This used to be the case as OpSlicePtr was only used in situations
where the bounds check already passed. But with unsafe.SliceData that
is no longer the case.
There are situations where we know it is nil. Use Bounded() to
indicate that.
I looked through all the uses of OSPTR and added SetBounded where it
made sense. Most OSPTR results are passed directly to runtime calls
(e.g. memmove), so even if we know they are non-nil that info isn't
helpful.
Fixes#59296
Change-Id: I437a15330db48e0082acfb1f89caf8c56723fc51
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/479896
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit b899641ecea7d07c997282e985beb295c31d1097)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/479899
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The assertion here was to make sure the newly constructed and
typechecked expression selected the same receiver-qualified method,
but in the case of anonymous receiver types we can actually end up
with separate types.Field instances corresponding to each types.Type
instance. In that case, the assertion spuriously failed.
The fix here is to relax and assertion and just compare the method's
name and type (including receiver type).
Fixes#58776.
Change-Id: I67d51ddb020e6ed52671473c93fc08f283a40886
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/471676
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 37a2004b43)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/472620
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
For go/defer calls like "defer f(x, y)", the compiler rewrites it to:
x1, y1 := x, y
defer func() { f(x1, y1) }()
However, if "f" needs runtime type information, the "RType" field will
refer to the outer ".dict" param, causing wrong liveness analysis.
To fix this, if "f" refers to outer ".dict", the dict param will be
copied to an autotmp, and "f" will refer to this autotmp instead.
Fixes#58467
Change-Id: I238b6e75441442b5540d39bc818205398e80c94d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/466035
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/467935
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
There are a plenty of regression in 1.20 with this optimization. This CL
disable inline static init, so it's safer to backport to 1.20 branch.
The optimization will be enabled again during 1.21 cycle.
Fixes#58444
Change-Id: If5916008597b46146b4dc7108c6b389d53f35e95
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/467015
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/467035
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Blank node must be ignored when building arguments substitued tree.
Otherwise, it could be used to replace other blank node in left hand
side of an assignment, causing an invalid IR node.
Consider the following code:
type S1 struct {
s2 S2
}
type S2 struct{}
func (S2) Make() S2 {
return S2{}
}
func (S1) Make() S1 {
return S1{s2: S2{}.Make()}
}
var _ = S1{}.Make()
After staticAssignInlinedCall, the assignment becomes:
var _ = S1{s2: S2{}.Make()}
and the arg substitued tree is "map[*ir.Name]ir.Node{_: S1{}}". Now,
when doing static assignment, if there is any assignment to blank node,
for example:
_ := S2{}
That blank node will be replaced with "S1{}":
S1{} := S2{}
So constructing an invalid IR which causes the ICE.
Fixes#58335
Change-Id: I21b48357f669a7e02a7eb4325246aadc31f78fb9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/465098
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/466275
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Since go1.19, these errors are already reported by types2 for any user's
Go code. Compiler generated code, which looks like constant expression
should be evaluated as non-constant semantic, which allows overflows.
Fixes#58319
Change-Id: I6f0049a69bdb0a8d0d7a0db49c7badaa92598ea2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/466676
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Unified IR added several new IR fields for holding *runtime._type
expressions. To avoid throwing off any frontend semantics
(particularly inlining cost heuristics), they were marked as
`mknode:"-"` so that code wouldn't visit them.
Unfortunately, this has a bad interaction with the static init
inlining optimization, because the latter relies on ir.EditChildren to
substitute all parameters. This potentially includes dictionary
parameters, which can appear within the new RType fields.
This CL adds a new ir.EditChildrenWithHidden function that also edits
these fields, and switches staticinit to use it. Longer term, we
should unhide the RType fields so that ir.EditChildren visits them
normally, but that's scarier so late in the release cycle.
Updates #57778.
Updates #57854.
Change-Id: I98c1e8cf366156dc0c81a0cb79029cc5e59c476f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/461686
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9f2fbedf010d59c3ecaa8c25b07a5f68fcb2e3d5)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/462535
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
We need to avoid nospill registers at this point in regalloc.
Make sure that we don't restrict our register set to avoid registers
desired by other instructions, if the resulting set includes only
nospill registers.
Fixes#57846
Change-Id: I05478e4513c484755dc2e8621d73dac868e45a27
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/461685
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
As we have seen many times, the type checker must be careful to avoid
accessing named type information before the type is fully set up. We
need a more systematic solution to this problem, but for now avoid one
case that causes a crash: checking a selector expression on an
incomplete type when a type expression is expected.
For golang/go#57522
Change-Id: I7ed31b859cca263276e3a0647d1f1b49670023a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/461577
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
These typos were found by executing grep, aspell, sort, and uniq in
a pipe and searching the resulting list manually for possible typos.
grep -r --include '*.go' -E '^// .*$' . | aspell list | sort | uniq
Change-Id: I56281eda3b178968fbf104de1f71316c1feac64f
GitHub-Last-Rev: e91c7cee34
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#57669
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/460767
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Devirtualization can turn OCALLINTER into OCALLMETH, but then we want
to actually desugar into OCALLFUNC instead for later phases. Just
needs a missing call to typecheck.FixMethodCall.
Fixes#57309.
Change-Id: I331fbd40804e1a370134ef17fa6dd501c0920ed3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/457715
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
ARM64 maintains booleans in the low byte of registers. Upper parts
of that register are junk.
This rule is using all 32 bits of a boolean-containing register, which
is wrong. Change the rule to only look at the low bit.
Fixes#57184
Change-Id: Ibbef86b2be859df3d06d993db00e1231c481c428
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/456556
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
CL 450136 added handling for simple calls in staticinit. If there's any
derived types conversion in the body of generic function called, that
conversion will require runtime dictionary, thus the optimization could
not happen.
Fixes#56923
Change-Id: I498cee9f8ab4397812ef79a6c2ab6c55e0ee4aef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/453315
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Morency (Amgc63spaming) <morencyvincent8@gmail.com>
if q != nil {
p = &q.f
}
Which gets rewritten to a conditional move:
tmp := &q.f
p = Select q!=nil, tmp, p
Unfortunately, we can't compute &q.f before we've checked if q is nil,
because if it is nil, &q.f is an invalid pointer (if f's offset is
nonzero but small).
Normally this is not a problem because the tmp variable above
immediately dies, and is thus not live across any safepoint. However,
if later there is another &q.f computation, those two computations are
CSEd, causing tmp to be used at both use points. That will extend
tmp's lifetime, possibly across a call.
Fixes#56990
Change-Id: I3ea31be93feae04fbe3304cb11323194c5df3879
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/454155
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
This was disabled in CL 452676 out of an abundance of caution,
but further analysis has shown that the failures were not being
caused by this optimization. Instead the sequence of commits was:
CL 450136 cmd/compile: handle simple inlined calls in staticinit
...
CL 449937 archive/tar, archive/zip: return ErrInsecurePath for unsafe paths
...
CL 451555 cmd/compile: fix static init for inlined calls
The failures in question became compile failures in the first CL
and started building again after the last CL.
But in the interim the code had been broken by the middle CL.
CL 451555 was just the first time that the tests could run and fail.
For #30820.
Change-Id: I65064032355b56fdb43d9731be2f9f32ef6ee600
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/452817
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL adds -d=inlstaticinit to control whether static initialization
of inlined function calls (added in CL 450136) is allowed.
We've needed to fix it once already (CL 451555) and Google-internal
testing is hitting additional failure cases, so putting this
optimization behind a feature flag seems appropriate regardless.
Also, while we diagnose and fix the remaining cases, this CL also
disables the optimization to avoid miscompilations.
Updates #56894.
Change-Id: If52a358ad1e9d6aad1c74fac5a81ff9cfa5a3793
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/452676
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This CL changes cmd/compile to reject anonymous interface cycles like:
type I interface { m() interface { I } }
We don't anticipate any users to be affected by this change in
practice. Nonetheless, this CL also adds a `-d=interfacecycles`
compiler flag to suppress the error. And assuming no issue reports
from users, we'll move the check into go/types and types2 instead.
Updates #56103.
Change-Id: I1f1dce2d7aa19fb388312cc020e99cc354afddcb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/445598
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The previous rule may move the phi value into a wrong block.
This CL make it only rewrite the phi value not the If block,
so that the phi value will stay in old block.
Fixes#56777
Change-Id: I9479a5c7f28529786968413d35b82a16181bb1f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/451496
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For implementing interface to empty interface conversion, the compiler
generate code like:
var res *uint8
res = itab
if res != nil {
res = res.type
}
However, itab has type *uintptr, so the assignment is broken. The
problem is not shown up, until CL 450215, which call typecheck on this
broken assignment.
To fix this, just cast itab to *uint8 when doing the conversion.
Fixes#56768
Change-Id: Id42792d18e7f382578b40854d46eecd49673792c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/451256
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
CL 450136 made the compiler to be able to handle simple inlined calls in
staticinit. However, it's missed a condition when checking substituting
arg for param. If there's any non-trivial closures, it has captured one
of the param, so the substitution could not happen.
Fixes#56778
Change-Id: I427c9134e333e2f9af136c1a124da4d37d326f10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/451555
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
CL 440455 fixed missing walk pass for static initialization slice.
However, slicelit may produce un-typechecked node, thus we need to do
typecheck for sinit before calling walkStmtList.
Fixes#56727
Change-Id: I40730cebcd09f2be4389d71c5a90eb9a060e4ab7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/450215
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
If an imported, non-generic function F transitively calls a generic
function G[T], we may need to call CanInline on G[T].
While here, we can also take advantage of the fact that we know G[T]
was already seen and compiled in an imported package, so we don't need
to call InlineCalls or add it to typecheck.Target.Decls. This saves us
from wasting compile time re-creating DUPOK symbols that we know
already exist in the imported package's link objects.
Fixes#56280.
Change-Id: I3336786bee01616ee9f2b18908738e4ca41c8102
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/443535
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Prior to Go 1.18, ineffectual //go:linkname directives (i.e.,
directives referring to an undeclared name, or to a declared type or
constant) were treated as noops. In Go 1.18, we changed this into a
compiler error to mitigate accidental misuse.
However, the x/sys repo contained ineffectual //go:linkname directives
up until go.dev/cl/274573, which has caused a lot of user confusion.
It seems a bit late to worry about now, but to at least prevent
further user pain, this CL changes the error message to only apply to
modules using "go 1.18" or newer. (The x/sys repo declared "go 1.12"
at the time go.dev/cl/274573 was submitted.)
Fixes#55889.
Change-Id: Id762fff96fd13ba0f1e696929a9e276dfcba2620
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/447755
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Error messages currently print floats with %.6g, which means that if
you tried to convert something close to, but not quite, an integer, to
an integer, the error you get looks like "cannot convert 1 to type
int", when really you want "cannot convert 0.9999999 to type int".
Add more digits to floats when printing them, to make it clear that they
aren't quite integers. This helps for errors which are the result of not
being an integer. For other errors, it won't hurt much.
Fixes#56220
Change-Id: I7f5873af5993114a61460ef399d15316925a15a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/442935
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Using importcfg instead of depending on the existence of .a files for
standard library packages will enable us to remove the .a files in a
future cl.
Change-Id: I6108384224508bc37d82fd990fc4a8649222502c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440222
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
fakePC uses hash.Sum32, which returns an uint32. However, libfuzzer
trace/hook functions declare fakePC argument as int, causing overflow on
386 archs.
Fixing this by changing fakePC argument to uint to prevent the overflow.
Fixes#56141
Change-Id: I3994c461319983ab70065f90bf61539a363e0a2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/441996
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For #56109
Change-Id: I999763e463fac57732a92f5e396f8fa8c35bd2e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440297
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 403995 fixed static init of literal contains dynamic exprs, by
ensuring their init are ordered properly. However, we still need to walk
the generated init codes before appending to parent init. Otherwise,
codes that requires desugaring will be unhandled, causing the compiler
backend crashing.
Fixes#56105
Change-Id: Ic25fd4017473f5412c8e960a91467797a234edfd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/440455
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The linker needs FuncInfo metadata for all inlined functions. This is
typically handled by gc.enqueueFunc calling ir.InitLSym for all function
declarations in typecheck.Target.Decls (ir.UseClosure adds all closures
to Decls).
However, non-trivial closures in Decls are ignored, and are insteaded
enqueued when walk of the calling function discovers them.
This presents a problem for direct calls to closures. Inlining will
replace the entire closure definition with its body, which hides the
closure from walk and thus suppresses symbol creation.
Explicitly create a symbol early in this edge case to ensure we keep
this metadata.
InitLSym needs to move out of ssagen to avoid a circular dependency (it
doesn't have anything to do with ssa anyway). There isn't a great place
for it, so I placed it in ir, which seemed least objectionable.
The added test triggers one of these inlined direct non-trivial closure
calls, though the test needs CL 429637 to fail, which adds a FuncInfo
assertion to the linker. Note that the test must use "run" instead of
"compile" since the assertion is in the linker, and "compiler" doesn't
run the linker.
Fixes#54959.
Change-Id: I0bd1db4f3539a78da260934cd968372b7aa92546
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436240
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
If a cycle has length 1, don't enumerate the single cycle entry;
instead just mention "refers to itself". For instance, for an
invalid recursive type T we now report:
invalid recursive type: T refers to itself
instead of:
invalid recursive type T
T refers to
T
Adjust tests to check for the different error messages.
Change-Id: I5bd46f62fac0cf167f0d0c9a55f952981d294ff4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436295
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
This matches what go/types and types2 report and it also matches
the compiler errors reported for some related shift problems.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Iee40e8d988d5a7f9ff2c49f019884d02485c9fdf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436177
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This is close to what the compiler used to say, except now we say
"as T value" rather than "as type T" which is closer to the truth
(we cannot use a value as a type, after all). Also, place the primary
error and the explanation (cause) on a single line.
Make respective (single line) adjustment to the matching "cannot
convert" error.
Adjust various tests.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Ib646cf906b11f4129b7ed0c38cf16471f9266b88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/436176
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Compromise between old compiler error "T.m redeclared in this block"
(where the "in this block" is not particularly helpful) and the old
type-checker error "method m already declared for type T ...".
In the case where we have position information for the original
declaration, the error message is "method T.m already declared at
<position>". The new message is both shorter and more precise.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Id4a7f326fe631b11db9e8030eccb417c72d6c7db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/435016
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This is a compromise of the error reported by the compiler (quotes
around field name removed) and the error reported by the type checkers
(added mention of struct type).
For #55326.
Change-Id: Iac4fb5c717f17c6713e90d327d39e68d3be40074
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/434815
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
This matches longstanding compiler behavior.
Also, for unused packages, report:
`"pkg" imported and not used`
`"pkg" imported as X and not used`
This matches the other `X declared and not used` errors.
For #55326.
Change-Id: Ie71cf662fb5f4648449c64fc51bede298a1bdcbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/432557
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
For #55326
Change-Id: I3d0ff7f820f7b2009d1b226abf701b2337fe8cbc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/432635
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
The type of the source and destination of a memmove call isn't
always accurate. It will always be a pointer (or an unsafe.Pointer), but
the base type might not be accurate. This comes about because multiple
copies of a pointer with different base types are coalesced into a single value.
In the failing example, the IData selector of the input argument is a
*[32]byte in one branch of the type switch, and a *[]byte in the other branch.
During the expand_calls pass both IDatas become just copies of the input
register. Those copies are deduped and an arbitrary one wins (in this case,
*[]byte is the unfortunate winner).
Generally an op v can rely on v.Type during rewrite rules. But relying
on v.Args[i].Type is discouraged.
Fixes#55122
Change-Id: I348fd9accf2058a87cd191eec01d39cda612f120
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431496
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Now we have 8-byte alignment types on 32-bit system, so in some rare
case, e.g, generated wrapper for embedded interface, the function
argument may need more than 4 byte alignment. We could pad somehow, but
this is a rare case which makes it hard to ensure that we've got it right.
So relaxing the check for argument and return value region of the stack.
Fixes#54991
Change-Id: I34986e17a920254392a39439ad3dcb323da2ea8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/431098
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
The unified frontend ICEs when inlining a function that contains a
function literal, which captures both a type switch case variable and
another variable.
Updates #54912.
Change-Id: I0e16d371ed5df48a70823beb0bf12110a5a17266
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428917
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
It was fixed by CL 422196, and have been already worked in unified IR.
Fixes#54911
Change-Id: Ie69044a64b296f6961e667e7661d8c4d1a24d84e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428758
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>