Implement int reg <-> fp reg moves on amd64.
If we see a load to int reg followed by an int->fp move, then we can just
load to the fp reg instead. Same for stores.
math.Abs is now:
MOVQ "".x+8(SP), AX
SHLQ $1, AX
SHRQ $1, AX
MOVQ AX, "".~r1+16(SP)
math.Copysign is now:
MOVQ "".x+8(SP), AX
SHLQ $1, AX
SHRQ $1, AX
MOVQ "".y+16(SP), CX
SHRQ $63, CX
SHLQ $63, CX
ORQ CX, AX
MOVQ AX, "".~r2+24(SP)
math.Float64bits is now:
MOVSD "".x+8(SP), X0
MOVSD X0, "".~r1+16(SP)
(it would be nicer to use a non-SSE reg for this, nothing is perfect)
And due to the fix for #21440, the inlined version of these improve as well.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Abs 1.38ns ± 5% 0.89ns ±10% -35.54% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Copysign 1.56ns ± 7% 1.35ns ± 6% -13.77% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Fixes#13095
Change-Id: Ibd7f2792412a6668608780b0688a77062e1f1499
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/58732
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
This commit defines the inverse of error function (erfinv) in the
math package. The function is based on the rational approximation
of percentage points of normal distribution available at
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2347330.pdf.
Fixes#6359
Change-Id: Icfe4508f623e0574c7fffdbf7aa929540fd4c944
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46990
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Updates #13745
Recognize z.Mul(x, x) as squaring for Floats and use
the internal z.sqr(x) method for nat on the mantissa.
Change-Id: I0f792157bad93a13cae1aecc4c10bd20c6397693
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/56774
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
updates #13745
A squared rational is always positive and can not
be reduced since the numerator and denominator had
no previous common factors. The nat multiplication
can be performed using the internal sqr method.
Change-Id: I558f5b38e379bfd26ff163c9489006d7e5a9cfaa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/56776
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Found with mvdan.cc/unindent. Prioritized the ones with the biggest wins
for now.
Change-Id: I2b032e45cdd559fc9ed5b1ee4c4de42c4c92e07b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/56470
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing implementation is translated from C, which uses a
polynomial coefficient very close to 1/6. If the function uses
1/6 as this coeffient, the result of Exp(1) will be more accurate.
And this change doesn't introduce more error to Exp function.
Fixes#20319
Change-Id: I94c236a18cf95570ebb69f7fb99884b0d7cf5f6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49294
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
updates #13745
Multiprecision squaring can be done in a straightforward manner
with about half the multiplications of a basic multiplication
due to the symmetry of the operands. This change implements
basic squaring for nat types and uses it for Int multiplication
when the same variable is supplied to both arguments of
z.Mul(x, x). This has some overhead to allocate a temporary
variable to hold the cross products, shift them to double and
add them to the diagonal terms. There is a speed benefit in
the intermediate range when the overhead is neglible and the
asymptotic performance of karatsuba multiplication has not been
reached.
basicSqrThreshold = 20
karatsubaSqrThreshold = 400
Were set by running calibrate_test.go to measure timing differences
between the algorithms. Benchmarks for squaring:
name old time/op new time/op delta
IntSqr/1-4 51.5ns ±25% 25.1ns ± 7% -51.38% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/2-4 79.1ns ± 4% 72.4ns ± 2% -8.47% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/3-4 102ns ± 4% 97ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.056 n=5+5)
IntSqr/5-4 161ns ± 4% 163ns ± 7% ~ (p=0.952 n=5+5)
IntSqr/8-4 277ns ± 5% 267ns ± 6% ~ (p=0.087 n=5+5)
IntSqr/10-4 358ns ± 3% 360ns ± 4% ~ (p=0.730 n=5+5)
IntSqr/20-4 1.07µs ± 3% 1.01µs ± 6% ~ (p=0.056 n=5+5)
IntSqr/30-4 2.36µs ± 4% 1.72µs ± 2% -27.03% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/50-4 5.19µs ± 3% 3.88µs ± 4% -25.37% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/80-4 11.3µs ± 4% 8.6µs ± 3% -23.78% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/100-4 16.2µs ± 4% 12.8µs ± 3% -21.49% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/200-4 50.1µs ± 5% 44.7µs ± 3% -10.65% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/300-4 105µs ±11% 95µs ± 3% -9.50% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
IntSqr/500-4 231µs ± 5% 227µs ± 2% ~ (p=0.310 n=5+5)
IntSqr/800-4 496µs ± 9% 459µs ± 3% -7.40% (p=0.016 n=5+5)
IntSqr/1000-4 700µs ± 3% 710µs ± 5% ~ (p=0.841 n=5+5)
Show a speed up of 10-25% in the range where basicSqr is optimal,
improved single word squaring and no significant difference when
the fallback to standard multiplication is used.
Change-Id: Iae2c82ca91cf890823f91e5c83bbe9a2c534b72b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/53638
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The current implementation of the extended Euclidean GCD algorithm
calculates both cosequences x and y inside the division loop. This
is unneccessary since the second Bezout coefficient can be obtained
at the end of calculation via a multiplication, subtraction and a
division. In case only one coefficient is needed, e.g. ModInverse
this calculation can be skipped entirely. This is a standard
optimization, see e.g.
"Handbook of Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Curve Cryptography"
Cohen et al pp 191
Available at:
http://cs.ucsb.edu/~koc/ccs130h/2013/EllipticHyperelliptic-CohenFrey.pdf
Updates #15833
Change-Id: I1e0d2e63567cfed97fd955048fe6373d36f22757
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50530
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The current implementation uses a shift and add
loop to compute the product of x's exponent xe and
the integer part of y (yi) for yi up to 1<<63.
Since xe is an 11-bit exponent, this product can be
up to 74-bits and overflow both 32 and 64-bit int.
This change checks whether the accumulated exponent
will fit in the 11-bit float exponent of the output
and breaks out of the loop early if overflow is detected.
The current handling of yi >= 1<<63 uses Exp(y * Log(x))
which incorrectly returns Nan for x<0. In addition,
for y this large, Exp(y * Log(x)) can be enumerated
to only overflow except when x == -1 since the
boundary cases computed exactly:
Pow(NextAfter(1.0, Inf(1)), 1<<63) == 2.72332... * 10^889
Pow(NextAfter(1.0, Inf(-1)), 1<<63) == 1.91624... * 10^-445
exceed the range of float64. So, the call can be
replaced with a simple case statement analgous to
y == Inf that correctly handles x < 0 as well.
Fixes#7394
Change-Id: I6f50dc951f3693697f9669697599860604323102
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48290
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
As noted in the TODO comment, the sticky bit is only used
when the rounding bit is zero or the rounding mode is
ToNearestEven. This change makes that check explicit and
will eliminate half the sticky bit calculations on average
when rounding mode is not ToNearestEven.
Change-Id: Ia4709f08f46e682bf97dabe5eb2a10e8e3d7af43
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/54111
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Add test cases to verify behavior for Ldexp with exponents outside the
range of Minint32/Maxint32, for a gccgo bug.
Test for issue #21323.
Change-Id: Iea67bc6fcfafdfddf515cf7075bdac59360c277a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/54230
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The standard deviation of a uniform distribution is size / √12.
The size of the interval [0, 255] is 256, not 255.
While we're here, simplify the expression.
The tests previously passed only because the error margin was large enough.
Sample observed standard deviations while running tests:
73.7893634666819
73.9221651548294
73.8077961697150
73.9084236069471
73.8968446814785
73.8684209136244
73.9774618960282
73.9523483202549
255 / √12 == 73.6121593216772
256 / √12 == 73.9008344562721
Change-Id: I7bc6cdc11e5d098951f2f2133036f62489275979
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/51310
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Regular HTTP is insecure, oeis.org supports HTTPS and it is actually
used in some other places in the codebase. This changes these final urls
to use HTTPS.
Change-Id: Ia46410a9c7ce67238a10cb6bfffaceca46112f58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/52072
Reviewed-by: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Manual hyphenation doesn't work well when text gets reflown,
for example by godoc.
There are a few other manual hyphenations in the tree,
but they are in local comments or comments for unexported functions.
Change-Id: I17c9b1fee1def650da48903b3aae2fa1e1119a65
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/53510
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Erroneously called OnesCount instead of OnesCount64
Change-Id: Ie877e43f213253e45d31f64931c4a15915849586
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/53410
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
Go doesn't guarantee that the result of floating point operations will
be the same on different architectures. It was not stated in the
documentation, that can lead to confusion.
Fixes#18354
Change-Id: Idb1b4c256fb9a7158a74256136eca3b8ce44476f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34938
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Implements detection of x86 cpu features that
are used in the go standard library.
Changes all standard library packages to use the new cpu package
instead of using runtime internal variables to check x86 cpu features.
Updates: #15403
Change-Id: I2999a10cb4d9ec4863ffbed72f4e021a1dbc4bb9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41476
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This adds math/bits intrinsics for OnesCount, Len, TrailingZeros on
ppc64x.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkLeadingZeros-16 4.26 1.71 -59.86%
BenchmarkLeadingZeros16-16 3.04 1.83 -39.80%
BenchmarkLeadingZeros32-16 3.31 1.82 -45.02%
BenchmarkLeadingZeros64-16 3.69 1.71 -53.66%
BenchmarkTrailingZeros-16 2.55 1.62 -36.47%
BenchmarkTrailingZeros32-16 2.55 1.77 -30.59%
BenchmarkTrailingZeros64-16 2.78 1.62 -41.73%
BenchmarkOnesCount-16 3.19 0.93 -70.85%
BenchmarkOnesCount32-16 2.55 1.18 -53.73%
BenchmarkOnesCount64-16 3.22 0.93 -71.12%
Update #18616
I also made a change to bits_test.go because when debugging some failures
the output was not quite providing the right argument information.
Change-Id: Ia58d31d1777cf4582a4505f85b11a1202ca07d3e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41630
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
As necessary, math functions were structured to use stubs, so that they can
be accelerated with assembly on any platform.
Technique used was minimax polynomial approximation using tables of
polynomial coefficients, with argument range reduction.
Benchmark New Old Speedup
BenchmarkAcos 12.2 47.5 3.89
BenchmarkAcosh 18.5 56.2 3.04
BenchmarkAsin 13.1 40.6 3.10
BenchmarkAsinh 19.4 62.8 3.24
BenchmarkAtan 10.1 23 2.28
BenchmarkAtanh 19.1 53.2 2.79
BenchmarkAtan2 16.5 33.9 2.05
BenchmarkCbrt 14.8 58 3.92
BenchmarkErf 10.8 20.1 1.86
BenchmarkErfc 11.2 23.5 2.10
BenchmarkExp 8.77 53.8 6.13
BenchmarkExpm1 10.1 38.3 3.79
BenchmarkLog 13.1 40.1 3.06
BenchmarkLog1p 12.7 38.3 3.02
BenchmarkPowInt 31.7 40.5 1.28
BenchmarkPowFrac 33.1 141 4.26
BenchmarkTan 11.5 30 2.61
Accuracy was tested against a high precision
reference function to determine maximum error.
Note: ulperr is error in "units in the last place"
max
ulperr
Acos 1.15
Acosh 1.07
Asin 2.22
Asinh 1.72
Atan 1.41
Atanh 3.00
Atan2 1.45
Cbrt 1.18
Erf 1.29
Erfc 4.82
Exp 1.00
Expm1 2.26
Log 0.94
Log1p 2.39
Tan 3.14
Pow will have 99.99% correctly rounded results with reasonable inputs
producing numeric (non Inf or NaN) results
Change-Id: I850e8cf7b70426e8b54ec49d74acd4cddc8c6cb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38585
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We have dedicated asm implementation of sincos only on 386 and amd64,
on everything else we are just jumping to generic version.
However amd64 version is actually slower than generic one:
Sincos-6 34.4ns ± 0% 24.8ns ± 0% -27.79% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
So remove all sincos*.s and keep only generic and 386.
Updates #19819
Change-Id: I7eefab35743729578264f52f6d23ee2c227c92a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41200
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The instructions allow moves between floating point and general
purpose registers without any conversion taking place.
Change-Id: I82c6f3ad9c841a83783b5be80dcf5cd538ff49e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38777
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Starting in go1.9, the minimum processor requirement for ppc64 is POWER8. So it
may now use the same divWW implementation as ppc64le.
Updates #19074
Change-Id: If1a85f175cda89eee06a1024ccd468da6124c844
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39010
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
After https://golang.org/cl/31490 we break false
output dependency for CVTS.. in compiler generated code.
I've looked through asm code, which uses CVTS..
and added XOR to the only case where it affected performance.
Log-6 21.6ns ± 0% 19.9ns ± 0% -7.87% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I25d9b405e3041a3839b40f9f9a52e708034bb347
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38771
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Verified that BenchmarkBitLen time went down from 2.25 ns/op to 0.65 ns/op
an a 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7, before removing that benchmark (now covered by
math/bits benchmarks).
Change-Id: I3890bb7d1889e95b9a94bd68f0bdf06f1885adeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38464
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
A -0 constant is the same as 0. Use explicit negative zero
for float64 -0.0. Also, fix two test cases that were wrong.
Fixes#19673.
Change-Id: Ic09775f29d9bc2ee7814172e59c4a693441ea730
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38463
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
nat.setUint64 is nicely generic.
By assuming 32- or 64-bit words, however,
we can write simpler code,
and eliminate some shifts
in dead code that vet complains about.
Generated code for 64 bit systems is unaltered.
Generated code for 32 bit systems is much better.
For 386, the routine length drops from 325
bytes of code to 271 bytes of code, with fewer loops.
Change-Id: I1bc14c06272dee37a7fcb48d33dd1e621eba945d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38070
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Change-Id: I6343c162e27e2e492547c96f1fc504909b1c03c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37793
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Removes an extra function call for TrailingZeroes and thus may
increase chances for inlining.
Change-Id: Iefd8d4402dc89b64baf4e5c865eb3dadade623af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37613
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change adds math/bits as a new dependency of math/big.
- use bits.LeadingZeroes instead of local implementation
(they are identical, so there's no performance loss here)
- leave other functionality local (ntz, bitLen) since there's
faster implementations in math/big at the moment
Change-Id: I1218aa8a1df0cc9783583b090a4bb5a8a145c4a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37141
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Removes init function from the math package.
Allows stripping of arrays with pre-computed values
used for Pow10 from binaries if Pow10 is not used.
cmd/go shrinks by 128 bytes.
Fixed small values like 10**-323 being 0 instead of 1e-323.
Overall precision is increased but still not as good as
predefined constants for some inputs.
Samples:
Pow10(208)
before: 1.0000000000000006662e+208
after: 1.0000000000000000959e+208
Pow10(202)
before 1.0000000000000009895e+202
after 1.0000000000000001193e+202
Pow10(60)
before 1.0000000000000001278e+60
after 0.9999999999999999494e+60
Pow10(-100)
before 0.99999999999999938551e-100
after 0.99999999999999989309e-100
Pow10(-200)
before 0.9999999999999988218e-200
after 1.0000000000000001271e-200
name old time/op new time/op delta
Pow10Pos-4 44.6ns ± 2% 1.2ns ± 1% -97.39% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
Pow10Neg-4 50.8ns ± 1% 4.1ns ± 2% -92.02% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Change-Id: If094034286b8ac64be3a95fd9e8ffa3d4ad39b31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36331
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Test finite negative x with Y0(-1), Y1(-1), Yn(2,-1), Yn(-3,-1).
Also test the special case Yn(0,0).
Fixes#19130.
Change-Id: I95f05a72e1c455ed8ddf202c56f4266f03f370fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37310
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
For compatibility with math/bits uint operations.
When math/big was written originally, the Go compiler used 32bit
int/uint values even on a 64bit machine. uintptr was the type that
represented the machine register size. Now, the int/uint types are
sized to the native machine register size, so they are the natural
machine Word type.
On most machines, the size of int/uint correspond to the size of
uintptr. On platforms where uint and uintptr have different sizes,
this change may lead to performance differences (e.g., amd64p32).
Change-Id: Ief249c160b707b6441848f20041e32e9e9d8d8ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37372
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Add exported global variables and store the results of benchmarked
functions in them. This prevents the current compiler optimizations
from removing the instructions that are needed to compute the return
values of the benchmarked functions.
Change-Id: If8b08424e85f3796bb6dd73e761c653abbabcc5e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37195
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
- moved from: x&m>>k | x&^m<<k to: x&m>>k | x<<k&m
This permits use of the same constant m twice (*) which may be
better for machines that can't use large immediate constants
directly with an AND instruction and have to load them explicitly.
*) CPUs don't usually have a &^ instruction, so x&^m becomes x&(^m)
- simplified returns
This improves the generated code because the compiler recognizes
x>>k | x<<k as ROT when k is the bitsize of x.
The 8-bit versions of these instructions can be significantly faster
still if they are replaced with table lookups, as long as the table
is in cache. If the table is not in cache, table-lookup is probably
slower, hence the choice of an explicit register-only implementation
for now.
BenchmarkReverse-8 8.50 6.86 -19.29%
BenchmarkReverse8-8 2.17 1.74 -19.82%
BenchmarkReverse16-8 2.89 2.34 -19.03%
BenchmarkReverse32-8 3.55 2.95 -16.90%
BenchmarkReverse64-8 6.81 5.57 -18.21%
BenchmarkReverseBytes-8 3.49 2.48 -28.94%
BenchmarkReverseBytes16-8 0.93 0.62 -33.33%
BenchmarkReverseBytes32-8 1.55 1.13 -27.10%
BenchmarkReverseBytes64-8 2.47 2.47 +0.00%
Reverse-8 8.50ns ± 0% 6.86ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Reverse8-8 2.17ns ± 0% 1.74ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Reverse16-8 2.89ns ± 0% 2.34ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Reverse32-8 3.55ns ± 0% 2.95ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Reverse64-8 6.81ns ± 0% 5.57ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ReverseBytes-8 3.49ns ± 0% 2.48ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ReverseBytes16-8 0.93ns ± 0% 0.62ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ReverseBytes32-8 1.55ns ± 0% 1.13ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ReverseBytes64-8 2.47ns ± 0% 2.47ns ± 0% ~ (all samples are equal)
Change-Id: I0064de8c7e0e568ca7885d6f7064344bef91a06d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37215
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Change-Id: I280c53be455f2fe0474ad577c0f7b7908a4eccb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36993
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The tests failed to compile when using the math_big_pure_go tag on
s390x.
Change-Id: I2a09f53ff6562ab9bc9b886cffc0f6205bbfcfbb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36956
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The s390x port was based on the ppc64 port and, because of the way the
port was done, inherited some instructions from it. ppc64 supports
3-operand (4-operand for FMADD etc.) floating point instructions
but s390x doesn't (the destination register is always an input) and
so these were emulated.
There is a bug in the emulation of FMADD whereby if the destination
register is also a source for the multiplication it will be
clobbered. This doesn't break any assembly code in the std lib but
could affect future work.
To fix this I have gone through the floating point instructions and
removed all unnecessary 3-/4-operand emulation. The compiler doesn't
need it and assembly writers don't need it, it's just a source of
bugs.
I've also deleted the FNMADD family of emulated instructions. They
aren't used anywhere.
Change-Id: Ic07cedcf141a6a3b43a0c84895460f6cfbf56c04
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33350
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Unlike the pure go implementation used by every other architecture,
the amd64 asm implementation of Exp does not fail early if the
argument is known to overflow. Make it fail early.
Cost of the check is < 1ns (on an old Sandy Bridge machine):
name old time/op new time/op delta
Exp-4 18.3ns ± 1% 18.7ns ± 1% +2.08% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
Fixes#14932Fixes#18912
Change-Id: I04b3f9b4ee853822cbdc97feade726fbe2907289
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36271
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
There is some code value too: types intending to implement
Source64 can write a conversion confirming that.
For #4254 and the Go 1.8 release notes.
Change-Id: I7fc350a84f3a963e4dab317ad228fa340dda5c66
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33456
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
After x.ProbablyPrime(n) passes the n Miller-Rabin rounds,
add a Baillie-PSW test before declaring x probably prime.
Although the provable error bounds are unchanged, the empirical
error bounds drop dramatically: there are no known inputs
for which Baillie-PSW gives the wrong answer. For example,
before this CL, big.NewInt(443*1327).ProbablyPrime(1) == true.
Now it is (correctly) false.
The new Baillie-PSW test is two pieces: an added Miller-Rabin
round with base 2, and a so-called extra strong Lucas test.
(See the references listed in prime.go for more details.)
The Lucas test takes about 3.5x as long as the Miller-Rabin round,
which is close to theoretical expectations.
name time/op
ProbablyPrime/Lucas 2.91ms ± 2%
ProbablyPrime/MillerRabinBase2 850µs ± 1%
ProbablyPrime/n=0 3.75ms ± 3%
The speed of prime testing for a prime input does get slower:
name old time/op new time/op delta
ProbablyPrime/n=1 849µs ± 1% 4521µs ± 1% +432.31% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
ProbablyPrime/n=5 4.31ms ± 3% 7.87ms ± 1% +82.70% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
ProbablyPrime/n=10 8.52ms ± 3% 12.28ms ± 1% +44.11% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
ProbablyPrime/n=20 16.9ms ± 2% 21.4ms ± 2% +26.35% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
However, because the Baillie-PSW test is only added when the old
ProbablyPrime(n) would return true, testing composites runs at
the same speed as before, except in the case where the result
would have been incorrect and is now correct.
In particular, the most important use of this code is for
generating random primes in crypto/rand. That use spends
essentially all its time testing composites, so it is not
slowed down by the new Baillie-PSW check:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Prime 104ms ±22% 111ms ±16% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10)
Thanks to Serhat Şevki Dinçer for CL 20170, which this CL builds on.
Fixes#13229.
Change-Id: Id26dde9b012c7637c85f2e96355d029b6382812a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30770
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The tree is inconsistent about single l vs double l in those
words in documentation, test messages, and one error value text.
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshall(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
42
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshal(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
1694
Make it consistently a single l, per earlier decisions. This means
contributors won't be confused by misleading precedence, and it helps
consistency.
Change the spelling in one error value text in newRawAttributes of
crypto/x509 package to be consistent.
This change was generated with:
perl -i -npe 's,([Mm]arshal)l(|s|er|ers|ed|ing),$1$2,' $(git grep -l -E '[Mm]arshall' | grep -v AUTHORS | grep -v CONTRIBUTORS)
Updates #12431.
Follows https://golang.org/cl/14150.
Change-Id: I85d28a2d7692862ccb02d6a09f5d18538b6049a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33017
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Note, most math functions are structured to use stubs, so that they can
be accelerated with assembly on any platform.
Sinh, cosh, and tanh were not structued with stubs, so this CL does
that. This set of routines was chosen as likely to produce good speedups
with assembly on any platform.
Technique used was minimax polynomial approximation using tables of
polynomial coefficients, with argument range reduction.
A table of scaling factors was also used for cosh and log10.
before after speedup
BenchmarkCos 22.1 ns/op 6.79 ns/op 3.25x
BenchmarkCosh 125 ns/op 11.7 ns/op 10.68x
BenchmarkLog10 48.4 ns/op 12.5 ns/op 3.87x
BenchmarkSin 22.2 ns/op 6.55 ns/op 3.39x
BenchmarkSinh 125 ns/op 14.2 ns/op 8.80x
BenchmarkTanh 65.0 ns/op 15.1 ns/op 4.30x
Accuracy was tested against a high precision
reference function to determine maximum error.
Approximately 4,000,000 points were tested for each function,
producing the following result.
Note: ulperr is error in "units in the last place"
max
ulperr
sin 1.43 (returns NaN beyond +-2^50)
cos 1.79 (returns NaN beyond +-2^50)
cosh 1.05
sinh 3.02
tanh 3.69
log10 1.75
Also includes a set of tests to test non-vector functions even
when SIMD is enabled
Change-Id: Icb45f14d00864ee19ed973d209c3af21e4df4edc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32352
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
The condition to determine if any further iterations are needed is
evaluated to false in case it encounters a NaN. Instead, flip the
condition to keep looping until the factor is greater than the machine
roundoff error.
Updates #17577
Change-Id: I058abe73fcd49d3ae4e2f7b33020437cc8f290c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31952
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Implements Float.Scan which satisfies fmt.Scanner interface.
Also enforces docs' interface implementation claims with compile time
type assertions, that is:
+ Float always implements fmt.Formatter and fmt.Scanner
+ Int always implements fmt.Formatter and fmt.Scanner
+ Rat always implements fmt.Formatter
which will ensure that the API claims are strictly matched.
Also note that Float.Scan doesn't handle ±Inf.
Fixes#17391
Change-Id: I3d3dfbe7f602066975c7a7794fe25b4c645440ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30723
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Add special case for Gamma(+∞) which speeds it up:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkGamma-4 14.5 7.44 -48.69%
The documentation for math.Gamma already specifies it as a special
case:
Gamma(+Inf) = +Inf
The original C code that has been used as the reference implementation
(as mentioned in the comments in gamma.go) also treats Gamma(+∞) as a
special case:
if( x == INFINITY )
return(x);
Change-Id: Idac36e19192b440475aec0796faa2d2c7f8abe0b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31370
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
In addition to the DecimalConversion benchmark, that exercises the
String method of the internal decimal type on a range of small shifts,
add a few benchmarks for the big.Float String method. They can be used
to obtain more realistic data on the real-world performance of
big.Float printing.
Change-Id: I7ada324e7603cb1ce7492ccaf3382db0096223ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31275
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is needed for some of the more complex primality tests
(to filter out exact squares), and while the code is simple the
boundary conditions are not obvious, so it seems worth having
in the library.
Change-Id: Ica994a6b6c1e412a6f6d9c3cf823f9b653c6bcbd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30706
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Inspired by Alberto Donizetti's observations in
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/30099/.
name old time/op new time/op delta
DecimalConversion-8 138µs ± 1% 136µs ± 2% -1.85% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
10 runs each, measured on a Mac Mini, 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7.
Performance improvements varied between -1.25% to -4.4%; -1.85% is
about in the middle of the observed improvement. The generated code
is slightly shorter in the inner loops of the conversion code.
Change-Id: I10fb3b2843da527691c39ad5e5e5bd37ed63e2fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31250
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
1. Define behavior for Unmarshal of JSON null into Unmarshaler and
TextUnmarshaler. Specifically, an Unmarshaler will be given the
literal null and can decide what to do (because otherwise
json.RawMessage is impossible to implement), and a TextUnmarshaler
will be skipped over (because there is no text to unmarshal), like
most other inappropriate types. Document this in Unmarshal, with a
reminder in UnmarshalJSON about handling null.
2. Test all this.
3. Fix the TextUnmarshaler case, which was returning an unmarshalling
error, to match the definition.
4. Fix the error that had been used for the TextUnmarshaler, since it
was claiming that there was a JSON string when in fact the problem was
NOT having a string.
5. Adjust time.Time and big.Int's UnmarshalJSON to ignore null, as is
conventional.
Fixes#9037.
Change-Id: If78350414eb8dda712867dc8f4ca35a9db041b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30944
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
A later CL will be adding more code here.
It will help to keep it separate from the other code.
Change-Id: I971ba53de819cd10991b51fdec665984939a5f9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30709
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The Montgomery multiply code is applicable to this case
but was being bypassed. Don't do that.
The old test len(x) > 1 was really just a bad approximation to x > 1.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Exp-8 5.56ms ± 4% 5.73ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.095 n=5+5)
Exp2-8 7.59ms ± 1% 5.66ms ± 1% -25.40% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
This comes up especially when doing Fermat (Miller-Rabin)
primality tests with base 2.
Change-Id: I4cc02978db6dfa93f7f3c8f32718e25eedb4f5ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30708
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This way you can still run 'go test' or 'go bench -run Foo'
without wondering why it is taking so very long.
Change-Id: Icfa097a6deb1d6682acb7be9f34729215c29eabb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30707
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
- Add new BenchmarkQuoRem.
- Eliminate allocation in divLarge nat pool
- Unroll mulAddVWW body 4x
- Remove some redundant slice loads in divLarge
name old time/op new time/op delta
QuoRem-8 2.18µs ± 1% 1.93µs ± 1% -11.38% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
The starting point in the comparison here is Cherry's
pending CL to turn mulWW and divWW into intrinsics.
The optimizations in divLarge work best because all
the function calls are gone. The effect of this CL is not
as large if you don't assume Cherry's CL.
Change-Id: Ia6138907489c5b9168497912e43705634e163b35
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30613
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Using 387 mode was computing it without underflow to zero,
apparently due to an 80-bit intermediate. Avoid underflow even
with 64-bit floats.
This eliminates the TODOs in the test suite.
Fixes linux-386-387 build and fixes#11441.
Change-Id: I8abaa63bfdf040438a95625d1cb61042f0302473
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30540
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The 387 implementation is less accurate and slower.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Exp-8 29.7ns ± 2% 24.0ns ± 2% -19.08% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
This makes Gamma more accurate too.
Change-Id: Iad33b9cce0b087ccbce3e08ba7a6d285c4999d02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30230
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This adds Uint64 methods to Rand and rngSource.
Rand.Uint64 uses Source.Uint64 directly if it is present.
rngSource.Uint64 provides access to all 64 bits generated by the
underlying ALFG. To ensure high seed quality a 64th bit has been added
to all elements of the array of "cooked" random numbers that are used
for seeding. gen_cooked.go generates both the 63 bit and 64 bit array.
Fixes#4254
Change-Id: I22855618ac69abae3d2799b3e7e59996d4c5a4b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27253
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This makes function fit in 16 bytes, saving 16 bytes.
Change-Id: Iac5d2add42f6dae985b2a5cbe19ad4bd4bcc92ec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29151
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This adds the instructions frim, frip, and friz to the ppc64x
assembler for use in implementing the math.Floor, math.Ceil, and
math.Trunc functions to improve performance.
Fixes#17185
BenchmarkCeil-128 21.4 6.99 -67.34%
BenchmarkFloor-128 13.9 6.37 -54.17%
BenchmarkTrunc-128 12.7 6.33 -50.16%
Change-Id: I96131bd4e8c9c8dbafb25bfeb544cf9d2dbb4282
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29654
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
Also adds the 'find leftmost one' instruction (FLOGR) and replaces the
WORD-encoded use of FLOGR in math/big with it.
Change-Id: I18e7cd19e75b8501a6ae8bd925471f7e37ded206
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29372
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
No need to test so many sizes in race mode, especially for a package
which doesn't use goroutines.
Reduces test time from 2.5 minutes to 25 seconds.
Updates #17104
Change-Id: I7065b39273f82edece385c0d67b3f2d83d4934b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29163
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
The new SSA backend for s390x can use R0 as a general purpose register.
This change modifies assembly code to either avoid using R0 entirely
or explicitly set R0 to 0.
R0 can still be safely used as 0 in address calculations.
Change-Id: I3efa723e9ef322a91a408bd8c31768d7858526c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28976
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
1.7 introduced a significant regression compared to 1.6:
SqrtIndirect-4 2.32ns ± 0% 7.86ns ± 0% +238.79% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
This is caused by sqrtsd preserving upper part of destination register.
Which introduces dependency on previous value of X0.
In 1.6 benchmark loop didn't use X0 immediately after call:
callq *%rbx
movsd 0x8(%rsp),%xmm2
movsd 0x20(%rsp),%xmm1
addsd %xmm2,%xmm1
mov 0x18(%rsp),%rax
inc %rax
jmp loop
In 1.7 however xmm0 is used just after call:
callq *%rbx
mov 0x10(%rsp),%rcx
lea 0x1(%rcx),%rax
movsd 0x8(%rsp),%xmm0
movsd 0x18(%rsp),%xmm1
I've verified that this is caused by dependency, by inserting
XORPS X0,X0 in the beginning of math.Sqrt, which puts performance back on 1.6 level.
Splitting SQRTSD mem,reg into:
MOVSD mem,reg
SQRTSD reg,reg
Removes dependency, because MOVSD (load version)
doesn't need to preserve upper part of a register.
And reg,reg operation is solved by renamer in CPU.
As a result of this change regression is gone:
SqrtIndirect-4 7.86ns ± 0% 2.33ns ± 0% -70.36% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
This also removes old Sqrt benchmarks, in favor of benchmarks measuring latency.
Only SqrtIndirect is kept, to show impact of this patch.
Change-Id: Ic7eebe8866445adff5bc38192fa8d64c9a6b8872
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/28392
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
While it was previously explicitly documented that "the default Source"
is safe for concurrent use, a careless reader can interpret that as
meaning "the implementation of the Source interface created by functions
in this package" rather than "the default shared Source used by
top-level functions". Be explicit that the Source returned by NewSource
is not safe for use by multiple goroutines.
Fixes#3611.
Change-Id: Iae4bc04c3887ad6e2491e36e38feda40324022c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/25501
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing implementation used a pure go implementation, leading to slow
cryptographic performance.
Implemented mulWW, subVV, mulAddVWW, addMulVVW, and bitLen for
ppc64{le}.
Implemented divWW for ppc64le only, as the DIVDEU instruction is only
available on Power8 or newer.
benchcmp output:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkSignP384 28934360 10877330 -62.41%
BenchmarkRSA2048Decrypt 41261033 5139930 -87.54%
BenchmarkRSA2048Sign 45231300 7610985 -83.17%
Benchmark3PrimeRSA2048Decrypt 20487300 2481408 -87.89%
Fixes#16621
Change-Id: If8b68963bb49909bde832f2bda08a3791c4f5b7a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/26951
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
Add missing function prototypes.
Fix function prototypes.
Use FP references instead of SP references.
Fix variable names.
Update comments.
Clean up whitespace. (Not for vet.)
All fairly minor fixes to make vet happy.
Updates #11041
Change-Id: Ifab2cdf235ff61cdc226ab1d84b8467b5ac9446c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27713
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The Source provided by math/rand relies on an array of cooked
pseudo-random 63bit integers for seeding. The origin of these
numbers is undocumented.
Add a standalone program in math/rand folder that generates
the 63bit integer array as well as a 64bit version supporting
extension of the Source to 64bit pseudo-random number
generation while maintaining the current sequence in the
lower 63bit.
The code is largely based on the initial implementation of the
random number generator in the go repository by Ken Thompson
(revision 399).
Change-Id: Ib4192aea8127595027116a0f5a7be53f11dc110b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22230
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
There are no synchronization points protecting the readVal and readPos
variables. This leads to a race when Read is called concurrently.
Fix this by adding methods to lockedSource, which is the case where
a race matters.
Fixes#16308.
Change-Id: Ic028909955700906b2d71e5c37c02da21b0f4ad9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24852
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Do not throw away the rest of Int63 value used for
generation random bytes. Save it in Rand struct and
re-use during the next Read call.
Fixes#16124
Change-Id: Ic70bd80c3c3a6590e60ac615e8b3c2324589bea3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24251
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#15788
Change-Id: I5a1fd1e5992f1c16cf8d8437d742bf02e1653b9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23461
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, a 0 mantissa was special-cased during big.Float
parsing, but not during big.Rat parsing. This meant that a value
like 0e9999999999 would parse successfully in big.Float.SetString,
but would hang in big.Rat.SetString. This discrepancy became an
issue in https://golang.org/src/go/constant/value.go?#L250,
where the big.Float would report an exponent of 0, so
big.Rat.SetString would be used and would subsequently hang.
A Go Playground example of this is https://play.golang.org/p/3fy28eUJuF
The solution is to special-case a zero mantissa during big.Rat
parsing as well, so that neither big.Rat nor big.Float will hang when
parsing a value with 0 mantissa but a large exponent.
This was discovered using go-fuzz on CockroachDB:
https://github.com/cockroachdb/go-fuzz/blob/master/examples/parser/main.goFixes#16176
Change-Id: I775558a8682adbeba1cc9d20ba10f8ed26259c56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24430
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
shortens code and gives an example of the use of Run.
Change-Id: I75ffaf762218a589274b4b62e19022e31e805d1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23424
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Document the fact that the default Source uses only
the bottom 31 bits of the given seed.
Fixes#15788
Change-Id: If20d1ec44a55c793a4a0a388f84b9392c2102bd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23352
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Follow-up to https://golang.org/cl/21755.
This turned out to be a bit more than just a few nits
as originally expected in that CL.
1) The actual mantissa may be shorter than required for the
given precision (because of trailing 0's): no need to
allocate space for it (and transmit 0's). This can save
a lot of space when the precision is high: E.g., for
prec == 1000, 16 words or 128 bytes are required at the
most, but if the actual number is short, it may be much
less (for the test cases present, it's significantly less).
2) The actual mantissa may be longer than the number of
words required for the given precision: make sure to
not overflow when encoding in bytes.
3) Add more documentation.
4) Add more tests.
Change-Id: I9f40c408cfdd9183a8e81076d2f7d6c75e7a00e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22324
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Added GobEncode/Decode and a test for them.
Fixes#14593
Change-Id: Ic8d3efd24d0313a1a66f01da293c4c1fd39764a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21755
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
cmd and runtime were handled separately, and I'm intentionally skipped
syscall. This is the rest of the standard library.
CL generated mechanically with github.com/mdempsky/unconvert.
Change-Id: I9e0eff886974dedc37adb93f602064b83e469122
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22104
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Converting a big.Float value x to a float32/64 value did not correctly
round x up to the smallest denormal float32/64 if x was smaller than the
smallest denormal float32/64, but larger than 0.5 of a smallest denormal
float32/64.
Handle this case explicitly and simplify some code in the turn.
For #14651.
Change-Id: I025e24bf8f0e671581a7de0abf7c1cd7e6403a6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20816
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
'b' is a standard verb for floating point values. The runes like '+'
and '#' are called "flags" by package fmt's documentation. The flag
'-' controls left/right justification, not anything related to signs.
Change-Id: Ia9cf81b002df373f274ce635fe09b5bd0066aa1c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20930
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing implementation uses code written in Go to
implement Sqrt; this adds the assembler to use the sqrt
instruction for Power and makes the necessary changes to
allow it to be inlined.
The following tests showed this relative improvement:
benchmark delta
BenchmarkSqrt -97.91%
BenchmarkSqrtIndirect -96.65%
BenchmarkSqrtGo -35.93%
BenchmarkSqrtPrime -96.94%
Fixes#14349
Change-Id: I8074f4dc63486e756587564ceb320aca300bf5fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19515
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Adds a type of output to Examples that allows tests to have unordered
output. This is intended to help clarify when the output of a command
will produce a fixed return, but that return might not be in an constant
order.
Examples where this is useful would be documenting the rand.Perm()
call, or perhaps the (os.File).Readdir(), both of which can not guarantee
order, but can guarantee the elements of the output.
Fixes#10149
Change-Id: Iaf0cf1580b686afebd79718ed67ea744f5ed9fc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19280
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
When a big.Float is converted to a denormal float32/64, the rounding
precision depends on the size of the denormal. Rounding may round up
and thus change the size (exponent) of the denormal. Recompute the
correct precision again for correct placement of the mantissa.
Fixes#14553.
Change-Id: Iedab5810a2d2a405cc5da28c6de7be34cb035b86
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20198
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
It appears to be a trivial dreg. Unreferenced. Gone.
Change-Id: I4a5ceed48e84254bc8a07fdb04487a18a0edf965
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20122
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.
This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:
$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.) +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.) +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update
Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a subset of https://golang.org/cl/20022 with only the copyright
header lines, so the next CL will be smaller and more reviewable.
Go policy has been single space after periods in comments for some time.
The copyright header template at:
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#copyright
also uses a single space.
Make them all consistent.
Change-Id: Icc26c6b8495c3820da6b171ca96a74701b4a01b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20111
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Takes 3% off my all.bash run time.
For #10571.
Change-Id: I8f00f523d6919e87182d35722a669b0b96b8218b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18087
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also fix bug reported in CL 17510.
Found during fix of #13515 in CL 17672, but separate from the fix.
Change-Id: I4b1024569a98f5cfd2ebb442ec3d64356164d284
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17673
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Replaced code that substituted 0 for rounded-up 1 with
code to try again. This has minimal effect on the existing
stream of random numbers, but restores uniformity.
Fixes#12290.
Change-Id: Ib68f0b0a4a173339bcd0274cc16509f7b0977de8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17670
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
ˆ (U+02C6) is a circumflex accent, not an exponentiation operator.
In the rest of the source code for this package, exponentation is
written as **, so do the same here.
Change-Id: I107b85be242ab79d152eb8a6fcf3ca2b197d7658
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17671
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Found by github user asukakenji.
Change-Id: I4c76316b69e8a243fb6bf280283f3722e728d853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17641
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Noticed by cmd/vet.
Expected values array produced by Python instead of Keisan because:
1) Keisan's website calculator is painfully difficult to copy/paste
values into and out of, and
2) after tediously computing e^(vf[i] * 10) - 1 via Keisan I
discovered that Keisan computing vf[i]*10 in a higher precision was
giving substantially different output values.
Also, testing uses "close" instead of "veryclose" because 386's
assembly implementation produces values for some of the test cases
that fail "veryclose". Curiously, Expm1(vf[i]*10) is identical to
Exp(vf[i]*10)-1 on 386, whereas with the portable implementation
they're only "veryclose".
Investigating these questions is left to someone else. I just wanted
to fix the cmd/vet warning.
Fixes#13101.
Change-Id: Ica8f6c267d01aa4cc31f53593e95812746942fbc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16505
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Post <klauspost@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The bug number was a typo, and I forgot to switch the implementation
back to if statements after the change from Float64bits in the first
patchset back to branching.
if statements can currently be inlined, but switch cannot (#13071)
Change-Id: I81d0cf64bda69186c3d747a07047f6a694f8fa70
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16446
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The compiler can do a fine job, and can also inline it.
From Jeremy Jackins's observation and rsc's recommendation in thread:
"Pure Go math.Abs outperforms assembly version"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-dev/nP5mWvwAXZo
Updates #13095
Change-Id: I3066f8eaa327bb403173b29791cc8661d7c0532c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16444
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Copy math package CL 12230 to cmplx package.
Change-Id: I3345b782b84b5b98e2b6a60d8774c7e7cede2891
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15500
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
As akalin points out in the bug, the comment previously claimed that the
probability that the input is prime given that the function returned
true is 1 - ¼ⁿ. But that's wrong: the correct statement is that the
probability of the function returning false given a composite input is
1 - ¼ⁿ.
This is not nearly as helpful, but at least it's truthful. A number of
other (correct) expressions are suggested on the bug, but I think that
the simplier one is preferable.
This change also notes that the function is not suitable for
adversarial inputs since it's deterministic.
Fixes#12274.
Change-Id: I6a0871d103b126ee5a5a922a8c6993055cb7b1ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14052
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Good enough for now.
Fixes#11241.
Change-Id: Ieb50809f104d20bcbe14daecac503f72486bec92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15111
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- more uniform naming
- test sign more deliberately
- remove superfluous test (JSON encoder always uses the JSON marshaler if present)
Change-Id: I37b1e367c01fc8bae1e06adbdb72dd366c08d5ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15110
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- moved existing package documentation from nat.go to doc.go
- expanded on it
For #11241.
Change-Id: Ie75a2b0178a8904a4154307a1f5080d7efc5489a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15042
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Like int/rat/float conversions, move this functionality into separate
implementation and test files.
No implementation changes besides the move.
Change-Id: If19c45f5a72a57b95cbce2329724693ae5a4807d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14997
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- renamed (nat) itoa to utoa (since that's what it is)
- added (nat) itoa that takes a sign parameter; this helps removing a few string copies
- used buffers instead of string+ in Rat conversions
Change-Id: I6b37a6b39557ae311cafdfe5c4a26e9246bde1a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14995
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This makes the Int conversion routines match the respective strconv
and big.Float conversion routines.
Change-Id: I5cfcda1632ee52fe87c5bb75892bdda76cc3af15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14994
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Current result of DecimalConversion benchmark (for future reference):
BenchmarkDecimalConversion-8 10000 204770 ns/op
Measured on Mac Mini (late 2012) running OS X 10.10.5,
2.3 GHz Intel Core i7, 8 GB 1333 MHz DDR3.
Also: Removed comment suggesting to implement decimal by representing
digits as numbers 0..9 rather than ASCII chars '0'..'9' to avoid
repeated +/-'0' operations. Tried and it appears (per above benchmark)
that the +/-'0' operations are neglibile but the addition conversion
passes around it are not and that it makes things significantly slower.
Change-Id: I6ee033b1172043248093cc5d02abff5fc54c2e7a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14857
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Enabled all but a handful of disabled Float formatting test cases.
Fixes#10991.
Change-Id: Id18e160e857be2743429a377000e996978015a1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14850
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Instead of computing the final adjustment factor as a power of 10,
it's more efficient to split 10**e into 2**e * 5**e . Powers of 2
are trivially added to the Float exponent, and powers of 5 are
smaller and thus faster to compute.
Also, use a table of uint64 values rather than float64 values for
initial power value. uint64 values appear to be faster to convert
to Floats (useful for small exponents).
Added two small benchmarks to confirm that there's no regresssion.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkParseFloatSmallExp-8 17543 16220 -7.54%
BenchmarkParseFloatLargeExp-8 60865 59996 -1.43%
Change-Id: I3efd7556b023316f86f334137a67fe0c6d52f8ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14782
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Add a Read function to Rand which reads random bytes into a buffer.
Fixes#8330
Change-Id: I85b90277b8be9287c6697def8dbefe0029b6ee06
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14522
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Block comments appear after a block in the HTML documentation generated by
godoc. Words like "following" should be avoided.
Change-Id: Iedfad67f4b8b9c84f128b98b9b06fa76919af388
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14357
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
For primes which are 3 mod 4, using Tonelli-Shanks is slower
and more complicated than using the identity
a**((p+1)/4) mod p == sqrt(a)
For 2^450-2^225-1 and 2^10860-2^5430-1, which are 3 mod 4:
BenchmarkModSqrt225_TonelliTri 1000 1135375 ns/op
BenchmarkModSqrt225_3Mod4 10000 156009 ns/op
BenchmarkModSqrt5430_Tonelli 1 3448851386 ns/op
BenchmarkModSqrt5430_3Mod4 2 914616710 ns/op
~2.6x to 7x faster.
Fixes#11437 (which is a prime choice of issues to fix)
Change-Id: I813fb29454160483ec29825469e0370d517850c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11522
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Even though the umul/uquo functions expect two valid, finite big.Floats
arguments, SetString was calling them with possibly Inf values, which
resulted in bogus return values.
Replace umul and udiv calls with Mul and Quo calls to fix this. Also,
fix two wrong tests.
See relevant issue on issue tracker for a detailed explanation.
Fixes#11341
Change-Id: Ie35222763a57a2d712a5f5f7baec75cab8189a53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13778
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This is not a functional change.
Also:
- minor cleanups, better comments
- uniform spelling of noun "zeros" (per OED)
Fixes#11277.
Change-Id: I1726f358ce15907bd2410f646b02cf8b11b919cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11267
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Urge users of math/rand to consider using crypto/rand when doing
security-sensitive work.
Related to issue #11871. While we haven't reached consensus on how
to make the package inherently safer, everyone agrees that the docs
for math/rand can be improved.
Change-Id: I576a312e51b2a3445691da6b277c7b4717173197
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12900
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
- Make Log2 exact for powers of two.
- Fix error tolerance function to make tolerance
a function of the correct (expected) value.
Fixes#9066.
Change-Id: I0320a93ce4130deed1c7b7685627d51acb7bc56d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12230
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The previous commit (git 2ae77376) just did golang.org. This one
includes golang.org subdomains like blog, play, and build.
Change-Id: I4469f7b307ae2a12ea89323422044e604c5133ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12071
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The one in misc/makerelease/makerelease.go is particularly bad and
probably warrants rotating our keys.
I didn't update old weekly notes, and reverted some changes involving
test code for now, since we're late in the Go 1.5 freeze. Otherwise,
the rest are all auto-generated changes, and all manually reviewed.
Change-Id: Ia2753576ab5d64826a167d259f48a2f50508792d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12048
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
All of the architectures except ppc64 have only "RET" for the return
mnemonic. ppc64 used to have only "RETURN", but commit cf06ea6
introduced RET as a synonym for RETURN to make ppc64 consistent with
the other architectures. However, that commit was never followed up to
make the code itself consistent by eliminating uses of RETURN.
This commit replaces all uses of RETURN in the ppc64 assembly with
RET.
This was done with
sed -i 's/\<RETURN\>/RET/' **/*_ppc64x.s
plus one manual change to syscall/asm.s.
Change-Id: I3f6c8d2be157df8841d48de988ee43f3e3087995
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10672
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
- (*Float).Scan conflicted with fmt.Scanner.Scan; it was also only used
internally. Removed it, as well as the companion ScanFloat function.
- (*Float).Parse (and thus ParseFloat) can now also parse infinities.
As a result, more code could be simplified.
- Fixed a bug in rounding (round may implicitly be called for infinite
values). Found via existing test cases, after simplifying some code.
- Added more test cases.
Fixes issue #10938.
Change-Id: I1df97821654f034965ba8b82b272e52e6dc427f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10498
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This paves the way for a fmt-compatible (*Float).Format method.
A better name then Text is still desirable (suggestions welcome).
This is partly fixing issue #10938.
Change-Id: I59c20a8cee11f5dba059fe0f38b414fe75f2ab13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10493
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
A decimal represented 0.0 with a 0-length mantissa and undefined
exponent, but the formatting code assumes a valid zero exponent
if the float value is 0.0. The code worked because we allocate a
new decimal value each time and because there's no rounding that
lead to 0.0.
Change-Id: Ifd771d7709de83b87fdbf141786286b4c3e13d4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10448
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- factor out handling of sign
- rename bstring, pstring to fmtB, fmtP consistent with fmtE, fmtF
- move all float-to-string conversion functions into ftoa.go
- no functional changes
Change-Id: I5970ecb874dc9c387630b59147d90bda16a5d8e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10387
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Float.Format supports the 'b' and 'p' format, both of which print
a binary ('p') exponent. The 'b' format always printed a sign ('+'
or '-') for the exponent; the 'p' format only printed a negative
sign for the exponent. This change makes the two consistent. It
also makes the 'p' format easier to read if the exponent is >= 0.
Also:
- Comments added elsewhere.
Change-Id: Ifd2e01bdafb3043345972ca22a90248d055bd29b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10359
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- This change uses the same code as for Float32 and fixes the case
of a number that gets rounded up to the smallest denormal.
- Enabled correspoding test case.
Change-Id: I8aac874a566cd727863a82717854f603fbdc26c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10352
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- structure the Float64 conversion tests the same way as for Float32
- add additional test cases, including one that exposes a current issue
(currently disabled, same issue as was fixed for Float32)
The Float64 fix will be in a subsequent change for easier reviewing.
Change-Id: I95dc9e8d1f6b6073a98c7bc2289e6d3248fc3420
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10351
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
The existing code was incorrect for numbers that after rounding would
become the smallest denormal float32 (instead the result was 0). This
caused all.bash to fail if Float32() were used in the compiler for
constant arithmetic (there's currently a work-around - see also issue
10321.
This change fixes the implementation of Float.Float32 and adds
corresponding test cases. Float32 and Float64 diverge at this point.
For ease of review, this change only fixes Float32. Float64 will be
made to match in a subsequent change.
Fixes#10321.
Change-Id: Iccafe37c1593a4946bc552e4ad2045f69be62d80
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10350
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
On Haswell I measure anywhere between 2X to 3.5X speedup for RSA.
I believe other architectures will also greatly improve.
In the future may be upgraded by dedicated assembly routine.
Built-in benchmarks i5-4278U turbo off:
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkRSA2048Decrypt 6696649 3073769 -54.10%
Benchmark3PrimeRSA2048Decrypt 4472340 1669080 -62.68%
Change-Id: I17df84f85e34208f990665f9f90ea671695b2add
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9253
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Krasnov <vlad@cloudflare.com>
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
This change adds Int.ModSqrt to compute modular square-roots via the
standard Tonelli-Shanks algorithm, and the Jacobi function that this and
many other modular-arithmetic algorithms depend on.
This is needed by change 1883 (https://golang.org/cl/1883), to add
support for ANSI-standard compressed encoding of elliptic curve points.
Change-Id: Icc4805001bba0b3cb7200e0b0a7f87b14a9e9439
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1886
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
There was no way to get to the error message before.
Change-Id: I4aa9d3d9f468c33f9996295bafcbed097de0389f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8660
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Fixed bug that caused Exp(x, y, m) ( i.e. x**y (mod m) ) to return x
instead of x (mod m) when y == 1. See issue page on github for more
details.
Added test case
Fixes#9826
Change-Id: Ibabb58275a20c4231c9474199b7f1c10e54241ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8409
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
I first prototyped this change in Sept 2011, and I discarded it
because it made no difference in the obvious benchmark loop.
It still makes no difference in the obvious benchmark loop,
but in a less obvious one, doing some extra computation
around the calls to Sqrt, not making the call does have a
significant effect.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkSqrt 4.56 4.57 +0.22%
BenchmarkSqrtIndirect 4.56 4.56 +0.00%
BenchmarkSqrtGo 69.4 69.4 +0.00%
BenchmarkSqrtPrime 4417 3647 -17.43%
This is a warmup for using hardware expansions for some
calls to 1-line assembly routines in the runtime (for example getg).
Change-Id: Ie66be23f8c09d0f7dc4ddd7ca8a93cfce28f55a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8356
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
NaNs make the API more complicated for no real good reasons.
There are few operations that produce NaNs with IEEE arithmetic,
there's no need to copy the behavior. It's easy to test for these
scenarios and avoid them (on the other hand, it's not easy to test
for overflow or underflow, so we want to keep +/-Inf).
Also:
- renamed IsNeg -> Signbit (clearer, especially for x == -0)
- removed IsZero (Sign() == 0 is sufficient and efficient)
- removed IsFinite (now same as !IsInf)
Change-Id: I3f3b4445c325d9bbb1bf46ce2e298a6aeb498e07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8280
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- fix bounds checks for exponent range of denormalized numbers
- use correct rounding precision for denormalized numbers
- added extra tests
Change-Id: I6be56399afd0d9a603300a2e44b5539e08d6f592
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8096
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
To use a pure Go implementation of the low-level arithmetic
functions (when no platform-specific assembly implementations
are available), set the build tag math_big_pure_go.
This will make it easy to vendor the math/big package where no
assembly is available (for instance for use with gc which relies
on 1.4 functionality for now).
Change-Id: I91e17c0fdc568a20ec1512d7c64621241dc60c17
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7856
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Float.Cmp used to return a value < 0, 0, or > 0 depending on how
arguments x, y compared against each other. With the possibility
of NaNs, the result was changed into an Accuracy (to include Undef).
Consequently, Float.Cmp results could still be compared for (in-)
equality with 0, but comparing if < 0 or > 0 would provide the
wrong answer w/o any obvious notice by the compiler.
This change wraps Float.Cmp results into a struct and accessors
are used to access the desired result. This prevents incorrect
use.
Change-Id: I34e6a6c1859251ec99b5cf953e82542025ace56f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7526
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Also:
- Implemented NewFloat convenience factory function (analogous to
NewInt and NewRat).
- Implemented convenience accessors for Accuracy values returned
from Float.Cmp.
- Added test and example.
Change-Id: I985bb4f86e6def222d4b2505417250d29a39c60e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6970
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This is a fairly significant _internal_ representation change. Instead
of encoding 0, finite, infinite, and NaN values with special mantissa
and exponent values, a new (1 byte) 'form' field is used (without making
the Float struct bigger). The form field permits simpler and faster
case distinctions. As a side benefit, for zero and non-finite floats,
fewer fields need to be set. Also, the exponent range is not the full
int32 range (in the old format, infExp and nanExp were used to represent
Inf and NaN values and tests for those values sometimes didn't test
for the empty mantissa, so the range was reduced by 2 values).
The correspondence between the old and new fields is as follows.
Old representation:
x neg mant exp
---------------------------------------------------------------
+/-0 sign empty 0
0 < |x| < +Inf sign mantissa exponent
+/-Inf sign empty infExp
NaN false empty nanExp
New representation (- stands for ignored fields):
x neg mant exp form
---------------------------------------------------------------
+/-0 sign - - zero
0 < |x| < +Inf sign mantissa exponent finite
+/-Inf sign - - inf
NaN - - - nan
Client should not be affected by this change.
Change-Id: I7e355894d602ceb23f9ec01da755fe6e0386b101
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6870
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This is a pure code move without any semantic change.
Change-Id: I2c18efc858955d07949b1241e793232f2cf1deb9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6821
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Shifts are trivially implemented by combining
Float.MantExp and Float.SetMantExp.
Change-Id: Ia2fb49297d8ea7aa7d64c8b1318dc3dc7c8af2f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6671
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This change represents Accuracy as a bit pattern rather than
an ordered value; with a new value Undef which is both Below
and Above.
Change-Id: Ibb96294c1417fb3cf2c3cf2374c993b0a4e106b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6650
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This change introduces NaNs (for situations like Inf-Inf, etc.).
The implementation is incomplete (the four basic operations produce
a NaN if any of the operands is an Inf or a NaN); and some operations
produce incorrect accuracy for NaN arguments. These are known bugs
which are documented.
Change-Id: Ia88841209e47930681cef19f113e178f92ceeb33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6540
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
MinPrec returns the minimum precision required to represent a Float
without loss of precision. Added test.
Change-Id: I466c8e492dcdd59fae854fc4e71ef9b1add7d817
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6010
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Some rounding modes are affected by the sign of the value to
be rounded. Make sure the sign is set before round is called.
Added tests (that failed before the fix).
Change-Id: Idd09b8fcbab89894fede0b9bc922cda5ddc87930
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4876
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Also: remove NewFloat - not needed anymore. Work-around for places
where has been used so far:
NewFloat(x, prec, mode) === new(Float).SetMode(mode).SetPrec(prec).SetFloat64(x)
However, if mode == ToNearestEven, SetMode is not needed. SetPrec
is needed if the default precision (53 after SetFloat64) is not
adequate.
TBR adonovan
Change-Id: Ifda12c479ba157f2dea306c32b47c7afbf31e759
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4842
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Also:
- make representation more flexible (no need to store trailing 0 digits to match precision)
- simplify rounding as a consequence
- minor related fixes
TBR adonovan
Change-Id: Ie91075990688b506d28371ec3b633b8267397ebb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4841
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This avoids surprises.
Change-Id: Iaae67da2d12e29c4e797ad6313e0895f7ce80cb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4480
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- Frexp, Ldexp are equivalents to the corresponding math functions.
- Set now has the same prec behavior as the other functions
- Copy is a true assignment (replaces old version of Set)
- Cmp now handles infinities
- more tests
Change-Id: I0d33980c08be3095b25d7b3d16bcad1aa7abbd0f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4292
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- better and more consistent documentation
- more functions implemented
- more tests
Change-Id: If4c591e7af4ec5434fbb411a48dd0f8add993720
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4140
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
- clarified representation of +/-Inf
- only 0 and Inf values can have 0 precision
- a zero precision value used as result value takes the max precision
of the arguments (to be fine-tuned for setters)
- the zero precision approach makes Float zero values possible
(they represent +0)
- more tests
Missing: Filling in the blanks. More tests.
Change-Id: Ibb4f97e12e1f356c3085ce80f3464e97b82ac130
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4000
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Only documentation / comment changes. Update references to
point to golang.org permalinks or go.googlesource.com/go.
References in historical release notes under doc are left as is.
Change-Id: Icfc14e4998723e2c2d48f9877a91c5abef6794ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4060
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Keith Randall
Agniva De Sarker
Lakshay Garg
Brian Kessler
Daniel Martí
crvv
Carlos Eduardo Seo
romanyx
Wembley G. Leach, Jr
Than McIntosh
Josh Bleecher Snyder
Jelte Fennema
Francesc Campoy Flores
Francesc Campoy
Dylan Waits
Aditya Mukerjee
Martynas Budriūnas
Ian Lance Taylor
gulyasm
Alberto Donizetti
Martin Möhrmann
Lynn Boger
Bill O'Farrell
Ilya Tocar
Michael Munday
Robert Griesemer
Eric Lagergren
Eitan Adler
Alexander Döring
Shenghou Ma
Russ Cox
Brad Fitzpatrick
Dmitri Shuralyov
Vladimir Stefanovic
Cherry Zhang
Mohit Agarwal
Emmanuel Odeke
Florian Uekermann
Michal Bohuslávek
David Glasser
Ethan Miller
Dmitri Popov
Konstantin Shaposhnikov
Nathan VanBenschoten
Marcel van Lohuizen
Jeff R. Allen
OneOfOne
Matthew Dempsky
Aliaksandr Valialkin
Dominik Honnef
Brady Catherman
Rob Pike
Martin Möhrmann
David Chase
Jingguo Yao
Yao Zhang
Caleb Spare
David Crawshaw
Charlie Dorian
Damian Gryski
Adam Langley
Spencer Nelson
David Leon Gil
Tarmigan Casebolt
Andrey Petrov
Andrew Gerrand
Austin Clements
Dave Cheney
Vlad Krasnov
Bryan Ford
Igor Dolzhikov
Jeremy Schlatter
Aram Hăvărneanu
Ivan Ukhov
Péter Surányi