This includes the patch for systems that build PIE executables by
defaul
Updates #20276.
Change-Id: Iecf8dfcf11bc18d397b8075559c37e3610f825cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44470
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44491
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
It was removed in CL 27325.
Fixes#20431
Change-Id: I6842851444186e19029d040f61fdf4f87a3103a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43771
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit deebd8fe273df2de2d590ee41ae1155c521219e9)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43772
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
This change removes the punitive language and anonymous reporting mechanism
from the Code of Conduct document. Read on for the rationale.
More than a year has passed since the Go Code of Conduct was introduced.
In that time, there have been a small number (<30) of reports to the Working Group.
Some reports we handled well, with positive outcomes for all involved.
A few reports we handled badly, resulting in hurt feelings and a bad
experience for all involved.
On reflection, the reports that had positive outcomes were ones where the
Working Group took the role of advisor/facilitator, listening to complaints and
providing suggestions and advice to the parties involved.
The reports that had negative outcomes were ones where the subject of the
report felt threatened by the Working Group and Code of Conduct.
After some discussion among the Working Group, we saw that we are most
effective as facilitators, rather than disciplinarians. The various Go spaces
already have moderators; this change to the CoC acknowledges their authority
and places the group in a purely advisory role. If an incident is
reported to the group we may provide information to or make a
suggestion the moderators, but the Working Group need not (and should not) have
any authority to take disciplinary action.
In short, we want it to be clear that the Working Group are here to help
resolve conflict, period.
The second change made here is the removal of the anonymous reporting mechanism.
To date, the quality of anonymous reports has been low, and with no way to
reach out to the reporter for more information there is often very little we
can do in response. Removing this one-way reporting mechanism strengthens the
message that the Working Group are here to facilitate a constructive dialogue.
Change-Id: Iee52aff5446accd0dae0c937bb3aa89709ad5fb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37014
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37040
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
Update docs on correspondence between Go releases and GCC releases.
Update C type that corresponds to Go type `int`.
Drop out of date comments about Ubuntu and RTEMS.
Change-Id: Ic1b5ce9f242789af23ec3b7e7a64c9d257d6913e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35631
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
You have to actually run make.bash (or make.bat).
Update #18771.
Change-Id: Ie6672a4e4abde0150c1ae57cabb1222de2c78716
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35632
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Change-Id: Iac713ae1f322f893c92b3fc47fe9b5719052f9eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35240
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Also fix a couple of other errors.
Fixes#6877
Change-Id: I94c81c5847cc7b0adab19418e71687bc2ee7fe94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34960
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We are seeing a bad stack map in #18190. In a copystack, it is
mistaking a slot for a pointer.
Presumably this is caused either by our fledgling dynlink support on
darwin, or a consequence of having two copies of the runtime in the
process. But I have been unable to work out which in the 1.8 window,
so pushing darwin support to 1.9 or later.
Change-Id: I7fa4d2dede75033d9a428f24c1837a4613bd2639
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34391
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Made many minor changes so that the document is consistent with itself.
Some more noticeable changes:
* CL/34141: Revert "testing: add T.Context method"
* CL/33630: net/http: document restrictions on ETag as expected by ServeContent
Change-Id: I39ae5e55c56e374895c115e6852998c940beae35
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34243
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
There is nothing notable to mention as far as users are concerned.
Fixes#17929 (another bug tracks the remaining TODO item)
Change-Id: Id39f787581ed9d2ecd493126bb7ca27836816d4b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34145
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
This rolls back https://golang.org/cl/27117 partly, softening it so it
only retries POST/PUT/DELETE etc requests where there's no Body (nil
or NoBody). This is a little useless, since most idempotent requests
have a body (except maybe DELETE), but it's late in the Go 1.8 release
cycle and I want to do the proper fix.
The proper fix will look like what we did for http2 and only retrying
the request if Request.GetBody is defined, and then creating a new request
for the next attempt. See https://golang.org/cl/33971 for the http2 fix.
Updates #15723Fixes#18239
Updates #18241
Change-Id: I6ebaa1fd9b19b5ccb23c8d9e7b3b236e71cf57f3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34134
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Bergan <tombergan@google.com>
Mention that the best-effort race detector on maps
was upgraded to detect write/iterate races.
Fixes#18137
Change-Id: Ib6e0adde47e965126771ea712386031a2a55eba3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33768
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>